Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Stove Knob and Water Faucet by using ATP Inspection

Table of contents

1. Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Stove

Knob and Water Faucet by using ATP Inspection Naomi Katayama ? , Shoko Kondo ? , Akemi Ito ? , Mayumi Hirabayashi ? , Yui Nakayama ¥ , Ayari Naka § , Natuki Sasaki ? , Moe Inuzuka ? & Takashi Tamura ? Abstract-In Japan, many food poisoning cases occur every year form the rainy season to summer. After all, restaurants account for about 50% of all food poisoning cases. Still they also occur at school meals (6.4%) and hospitals (0.6%), where hygiene management should strictly controlled in the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare announced (2019). Therefore, from the viewpoint of food poisoning prevention, this study focused on the stove knob and water faucet, which are often touched by the cook's fingers in the kitchen and may cause secondary contamination. The effect of hygiene education investigated by measuring invisible microbial load as visible ATP value using ATP wiping test. The 12 stove knob and 11 water faucet inspected before and after hygiene education by using the ATP wiping test. Before hygiene education, the average value of the ATP values measured after washing before and after washing. To the surprise, after washing, the ATP value did not drop below 1000 for Stove knob and Water faucet. Almost the same ATP value as before cleaning. It turned out that the number of microorganisms did not decrease even if the cooks cleaned themselves. Then, the inspector wash the stove knob and water faucet firmly with detergent and sponge, wipe clean with a clean cloth three times or more. The inspector taught the cooks to repeat this process twice. The cook tries to do it as same as the inspector is doing. Then, the cook tries to do it next cooking. After hygiene education, the average value of the ATP values was significant low. Unfortunately, after washing, the ATP value did not drop below 100 for the Stove knob and Water faucet. Even after the hygiene education, the ATP value did not fall below 100, an indication that more rigorous hygiene education is necessary.

Keywords: gender; ATP wiping test, stove knob, water faucet, Hygiene education, double wash.

2. I. Introduction

utbreaks of food poisoning often involve cooking and providing food together, for example, school lunches, employee cafeterias, and inns with meals. Therefore, to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, it is necessary to strictly management of hygiene. HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) is a base method of the hygiene management. NASA used this system to prevent Hazards related to food handling in advance. This HACCP has 12 items, and the 9 th measurement method (monitoring) setting 1) . Currently, the ATP wipe test used to control microorganisms in hospitals and food companies 2,3,4) . Food poisoning in elderly facilities is likely to cause death; this is a reason why hygiene education for the staff is essential 5) . Since microorganisms are invisible, it is possible to count the number of bacteria as the number of ATP by using the ATP wiping test. This test is very useful for health education. The cook's fingers touch many places in the kitchen. And, depending on the place, there are places where the fingers of multiple cooks touched many times. For example the place, a stove knob or a water faucet. Therefore, it is necessary to repeat the hygiene education of the cooks and give a careful explanation about the places where the cook's fingers touch. The purpose of this study, the effect of hygiene education for cooks by conducting an ATP wiping test on the stove knob and water faucet installed in the kitchen.

3. II. Materials and Methods

4. a) Stove knob and Water faucet

The 12 stoves knob and 11 water faucet, prepared in the kitchen were wiped clean before the start of cooking. The stove knob ignites as it releases gas when pressed. So, every time the stove lit, the cook's finger will touch the stove knob. Similarly, the water faucet is the place where the cook's finger touches each time to uses water. Five cooktops have two stove knob and two water faucet, and one cooktop has two stove knob and one water faucet.

5. b) ATP inspection procedure

Twelve cooks worked in groups of two to cook on six cooktops. Before the education of hygiene, the work start time depends on the working conditions of the cooks, but the inspector always performed an ATP inspection before using the 12 stove knob and 11 water faucet. Then, each cook finished the work, washed the 12 stove knob and 11 water faucet by himself, and they inspected the ATP inspection by inspector again. The value of ATP recorded. In the same way, after the education of hygiene, the work start time depends on the working conditions of the cooks. Still the inspector always performed an ATP inspection before using the 12 stove knob and 11 water faucet. Then, each cook finished the work, washed the 12 stove knob and 11 water faucet by himself, and they inspected the ATP inspection by inspector again. The value of ATP recorded.

6. III. Hygiene Education Procedure a) Cleaning instruction

While showing the ATP result before the hygiene education to the cook, ATP inspector the stove knob and the water faucet firmly with detergent and sponge, wipe clean with a clean cloth three times or more. Then, the inspector washes again the stove knob and water faucet carefully with detergent and sponge, wipe clean with a clean cloth three times or more. The cook tries to do it as same as the inspector is doing. Then, the cook tries to do it next cooking. After the educational, results of ATP recorded.

7. b) Statistical processing

The results obtained compared using statistical methods. The data to be compared was subjected to an F test to determine whether to use a parametric test or nonparametric test. When there is no difference in the F test, the presence or absence of a significant difference was confirmed using the student-t-test with or without a correspondence. If there was a difference in the F test, the presence or absence of a significant difference was confirmed using the Wilcoxon test with a pair or the Mann-Whitney test without correlation.

8. IV. Results

9. a) Before hygiene education: Stove knob and Water faucet

The results of ATP wiping tests on the stove knob and the water faucet before hygiene education shown in Table 1 and Table 2. It can see that the average value of the ATP values measured after washing before and after washing and washing little bit lowers the ATP value. To the surprise, after cleaning, the ATP value did not drop below 1000 for Stove knob and Water faucet. Almost the same ATP value as before cleaning.

10. b) After hygiene education: Stove knob and Water faucet

The results of ATP wiping tests on the stove knob and the water faucet after hygiene education shown in Table 3

11. Comparison of ATP test values of Stove knob and

Water faucet: before and after education Before and after hygiene education, the results of the ATP wiping test on the stove knob and the water faucet statistically compared. The results shown in Tables 5 and 6. The ATP wiping test values after hygiene education for the stove knobs and the water faucet were statistically significant difference. Although there was a statistically significant difference even before hygiene education, the ATP wiping test values for both were not less than 100, so it can say that hygiene is still insufficient.

12. V. Discussion

The ATP test is a quick test because it can show the number of microorganisms by the ATP amount within one minute 6,7) . Many hospitals have adopted this method to help maintain a hygienic environment 8) . In this study, the ATP wiping test used to inspect the stove knob and water faucet in the kitchen. The ATP wiping test used to show the number of microorganisms to the cooks, and the hygiene education conducted. The ATP value after washing the stove knob and water faucet before hygiene education showed almost the same ATP value as before cooking. The ATP value did not drop below 1000 for Stove knob and Water faucet. It is not change as ATP value as before cleaning. The microorganisms could not be removed by the cook's washing. However, after the hygiene education by the demonstration of the washing method by the inspector, hygienic cleaning with a statistically significant difference was achieved. Although there was a statistically significant difference even before hygiene education, the ATP wiping test values for both were not less than 100, so it can say that hygiene is still insufficient. It found that cooks need to regularly clean stove knobs and water faucet that is touched by multiple cooks even during cooking, and wipe with a clean cloth three or more times.

Although it has said that food poisoning is unlikely to occur during the cold season, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare had revealed that noroviruses often occur in winter. Also, according to the announcement from the National Institute of Infectious, there are food poisoning s caused by dysentery, cholera, typhoid, salmonella, and pathogenic Escherichia coli as import infectious diseases brought in from overseas. Food poisoning occurs when various factors such as foodstuffs, cooking utensils, fingers of cooks, and temperature and humidity of food storage overlap. To prevent this, such a cook needs to be highly aware of the hygiene management. Also, it is necessary to maintain hygiene management awareness by regularly measuring the ATP value using the AYP wiping test so that invisible microorganisms can see.

13. VI. Conclusions

To prevent food poisoning, which may cause fatal accidents in some cases, we examined ways to improve instruction of hygiene education. The effect of hygiene education investigated by measuring invisible microbial load as visible ATP value using ATP wiping test. The 12 stove knob and 11 water faucet inspected before and after hygiene education by using the ATP wiping test. Before hygiene education, the average value of the ATP values measured after washing before and after washing. To the surprise, after washing, the ATP value did not drop below 1000 for Stove knob and Water faucet. There was no statistically significant difference between the ATP values measured at the start of cooking and after washing after completion. The ATP value is almost the same as before cleaning. It turned out that the number of microorganisms did not decrease even if the cooks cleaned themselves. Then, the inspector washes the stove knob and water faucet firmly with detergent and sponge, wipe clean with a clean cloth three times or more. The inspector taught the cooks to repeat this process twice. The cook tries to do it as same as the inspector is doing. Then, the cook tries to do it next cooking. After hygiene education, the average value of the ATP values was significant lowers. Unfortunately, after washing, the ATP value did not drop below 100 for the Stove knob and Water faucet. However, the ATP value was statistically significant. Even after the hygiene education, the ATP value did not fall below 100, an indication that more rigorous hygiene education is necessary.

Figure 1. Table 1 :
1
before cleaning before cleaning
instruction instruction
Place before after Place before after
stove? 2730 285 water supply ? 574 428
stove? 1178 356 water supply 2 8848 531
stoveï¼?" 21 409 water supply ï¼?" 877 554
stoveï¼?" 1593 432 water supply ï¼?" 6122 709
stove? 6279 478 water supply ? 2495 1639
stove? 1254 493 water supply ? 1850 3758
stove? 388 906 water supply ? 54 4227
stove? 634 1013 water supply ? 2795 4442
stove? 496 1131 water supply ? 908 4922
stove?? 1672 1644 water supply ?? 5499 6306
stove?? 8837 3677 water supply ?? 28180 19893
stove?? 774 4204 Average 5291.09 4309.91
Average 2154.67 1252.33 Standard deviation 8071.87 5577.43
Standard deviation Median Maximum 2679.07 1322.4 1216 699.5 8837 4204 Median Maximum Minimum 2495 28180 54 3758 19893 428
Minimum 21 285
Figure 2. Table 2 :
2
after cleaning after cleaning
instruction instruction
Place before after Place before after
stove? 102 25 water supply ? 153 1
stove? 137 26 water supply 2 187 9
stoveï¼?" 344 31 water supply ï¼?" 1596 15
stoveï¼?" 630 32 water supply ï¼?" 91 15
stove? 902 36 water supply ? 619 25
stove? 5643 59 water supply ? 183 110
stove? 2157 139 water supply ? 116 114
stove? 293 167 water supply ? 3802 126
stove? 39 172 water supply ? 54131 200
stove?? 949 203 water supply ?? 712 315
stove?? 448 232 water supply ?? 794 338
stove?? 875 245 Average 5671.27 115.273
Average 1043.25 113.917 Standard deviation 16109 122.242
Standard deviation 1559.37 87.4855 Median 619 110
Median 539 99 Maximum 54131 338
Maximum 5643 245 Minimum 91 1
Minimum 39 25
before cleaning instrucion after cleaning instruction
before cooking after cooking before cooking after cooking
Average 2154.7 1252.3 1043.3 113.9
Standard deviation 2679.1 1322.4 1559.4 87.5
F test ?= 0.011* p=0.0001**
Student-t test
Wilcoxon test p=0.239 p=0.006**
* P<0.05, ** P<0.01
before cleaning instrucion after cleaning instruction
before cooking after cooking before cooking after cooking
Average 5291.1 4309.9 5671.3 115.3
Standard deviation 8071.9 5577.4 16109.0 122.2
F test ?= 0.118 p=0.0001**
Student-t test p=0.481
Wilcoxon test p=0.003**
* P<0.05, ** P<0.01
Figure 3. Table 3 :
3
Figure 4. Table 4 :
4
Figure 5. Table 5 :
5
Figure 6. Table 6 :
6
Year 2020
37
Note: c) Statistical processing resultsi.

Appendix A

Appendix A.1 Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the cooks who participated in this experiment. Also, we would like to thank the inspectors who also performed the ATP inspection.

Appendix B

  1. Bioluminescence ATP monitoring for the routine assessment of food contact surface cleanliness in a university canteen. A Osimani , C Garofalo , F Clementi , S Tavoletti , L Aquilanti . Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014. 17 (10) p. .
  2. An evaluation of hospital cleaning refimes and standards. C J Griffith , R A Coooper , J Gilmore , C Davies , M Lweis . J Hosp Infect 2000. 45 (1) p. .
  3. Rapid microbiology: application s of bioluminescence in the food industry-a review. C J Stannard , P A Gibbs . J Biolumin Chemilumin 1986. 1 (1) p. .
  4. Use of ATP bioluminescence for assessing h eclealiness of hospital surfaces: a review of the published literature. E Amodio , C Dubi . J infect Public Health 1990-2012. 2014. 7 (2) p. .
  5. Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional ygiene swabbing methods for the deteminaton of surface cleanliness at a hospital kitchen. H Aycieck , U Oquz , K Karci . Int J Hyg Environ Health 2006. 209 (2) p. .
  6. An investigation of Factors that influence Hygiene Practices at a small Day Care Center. J H Lee . J Food Prot 2018. 2018. 81 (1) p. .
  7. Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review. N Nante , E Ceriale , G Messina , D Lenzi , P Manzi . J Prev. Med. Hyg 2017. 58 (2) p. .
  8. A review of bioluminescent STP techniques in papid microbiology. P E Stanley . J Biolumin Chemilumin 1989. 4 (1) p. .
Date: 2020-01-15