ince Japan is a super-aged society, various problems are occurring for the elderly. There are many older asults on the waiting list to get into the welfare facilities, and many households forced to provide home care. The nutritional problems of the elderly are complex, and measures currently took to solve it by focusing on malnutrition-related items such as flail, sarcopenia, and locomotive syndrome. One of the causes of under nutrition is the phenomenon of nutrient intake due to the difficulty of understanding the taste, loss of appetite, and reduction of the total diet. Flavors, that is, matching both taste and smell, are need in a diet, and low thresholds for typical five tastes (sweetness, saltiness, sourness, bitterness, and umami) affect health. Therefore, in this study, we focused on the sourness, which can identify the spoilage of food and can expect to reduce salt.
The participants were community dwellers who voluntarily participated in the Yakumo Study and had managed their everyday life themselves. The Yakumo Study conducted since 1981 as a joint project between the town of Yakumo in Hokkaido and the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine. Professionals in the fields of epidemiology, internal medicine, orthopedics, neuropsychology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and urology joined the Yakumo Study. The analyzed data were based on the database to2019 from the neuropsychology and otolaryngology teams.
problems are occurring for the elderly. The nutritional problems of the elderly are complex, and measures currently took to solve the one by focusing on malnutrition-related items. Therefore, in this study, we focused on the sourness, which can identify the spoilage of food and could be expected to reduce salt. For 16 years, we have conducted research on taste and olfaction in Yakumo town in Hokkaido, Japan, Where the population does not move much. In this report, we report on the results of the taste test using TASTDISC (Sourness) in 2019 at Yakumo Town Resident Examination, which has been ongoing since 2007. From the database, 298 participants (169 females and 129 males) were selected form data in August2019. The sourness test performed using the sourness test paper with liquid TASTEDISC (Sanwa Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd) which include five different densities of Tartaric acid on a liquid with test paper namely:, 1(0.02%), 2(0.2%),3(2.0%), 4(4.0%), 5(8.0%). As a result, 17 males out of 129male participants (13.2%) and tenfemales of 169 female participants (5.9%) had abnormal values in sour taste test (Tastedisc) results. The tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) of sourness, blood pressure (systole, diastole), and body composition (BMI, body fat percentage, abdominal circumference) compared with other values. As a result, there was no statistically significant difference in the sourness threshold between the normal range of blood pressure, BMI, and others. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the result of sourness between the normal range of body fat percentage and the other one. And also, in female Naomi Katayama ? , Mayumi Hirabayashi ? , Akemi Ito ? , Shoko Kondo ? , Yui Nakayama ¥ , Takafumi Nakada § , Seiya Goto ? , Satofumi Sugimoto ? , Tadao Yoshida ? , Masaaki Teranisi ? , Michihiko Sone £ , Yasushi Fujimoto ? , Hironao Otake ? , Hirokazu Suzuki ?, Naoki, Saji ? , Seiichi Nakata ? , Tsutomu Nakashima ? , Kenji Kondo ? & Takaki Miwa ?
The participants had been engaged in a variety of jobs, not only white-collar but also in agriculture, fishery, and forestry. Therefore, this town can regard as representative of today's Japanese society. From the database, 297participants (168 females and 129 males) were selected form data in August 2019 (Table 1).
The sourness test performed using test paper with liquid TASTEDISC (Sanwa Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd) which include five different densities of Tartaric acid on a liquid with test paper namely:, 1(0.02%), 2(0.2%),3(2.0%), 4(4.0%), 5(8.0%).
The inspection method is as follows. 1) Show participants the taste choice paper: Sweet, Salty, Sour, Bitter. Taste something, but I don't know, No taste. 2) Hold the filter paper with tweezers. The sweetening solution is dropped on the disc and moistened. 3) The moistened disc gently placed on the canaliculus chordae tympani innervation area of the participant's tongue. The canaliculus chordae tympani innervation area is located 2 cm left and right from the tip of it. 4) Instruct the user to answer one of the taste choice paper in 2~3 seconds with the mouth open. 5) The examiner then removes the disc from the participant's tongue with tweezers. 6) If a correct answer is not obtained, the test is continued using a solution having a higher concentration in order. 7) After garglling with water to prevent residual teste, perform the next taste test at intervals of 1 minute or more. This method was in accordance with the test method of the teste test kit (TASTEDISC: Sanwa Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd ).
This study conducted with the approval of the Ethical Review Board (Nagoya women's university Ethics Committee: 'hitowo mochiita kennkyuuni kansuru iinnkai'). The approval number is 30-14.
The test results were confirmed to be normal distribution by F-test. Data that were the tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) distributed were compared with Student-t without correlation of parametric test. The data that is not normally distributed was compared without correlated Mann-Whitney one of the non-parametric test.
Data on body composition and blood pressure of participants showed by age. The males showed in Table 2. And the females are shown in Table 3. All data showed as averages by age. For both males and females, the mean values of blood pressure for each one were in the normal range. Body fat percentage was higher in females than in males, and BMI and body fat were almost tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) for both males and females.
The sour test result was statistically processed. Table 5 and Table 6 show the results of the comparison of the Sourness test results using TASTDISC with the tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) systolic and diastolic blood pressure values and others. The results did not show a statistically significant difference in either case. Table 8 shows the results of the comparison of the sourness test results using TASTDISC with the tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) Body fat and other. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the normal Body fat range and the other. Participants with a high body fat percentage were able to feel sourness at lower concentrations than those with right body fat percentage. Table 9 and Table 10 shows the results of the comparison of the sourness test results using TASTDISC with normal Waist circumference range and the other. In Japan, the tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) waist circumference of the male is less than 85 cm (Table 9), and female is less than 90 Cm (Table10). The results did not show a statistically significant difference in the male cases. But, in female cases, participants with a long waist circumference had a statistically significant lower sourness threshold than those with short waist circumference.
There are many reports in the past that the taste deteriorates with increasing age1). Also, the perceived concentration of taste changes with temperature 2, 3). In this research, we focused on sourness, but there are five basic tastes (sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami) 4, 5, 6). Also, there are various teste inspection methods7). But this time, we used TASTDISC to get a taste of sourness. The cognitive threshold of sourness examined for 298 participants (129 males and 169 females) in Yakumo-town, Hokkaido, Japan, where population migration is low. As a result, 17 males out of 129male participants (13.2%) and ten females of 169 female participants (5.9%) had abnormal values in sour taste test (Tastedisc) results. The tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) of sourness, blood pressure (systole, diastole), and body composition (BMI, body fat percentage, abdominal circumference) compared with other values. As a result, there was no statistically significant difference in the sourness threshold between the normal range of blood pressure, BMI, and others. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the one of sourness between the normal range of body fat percentage and the other one. And also, in female cases, participants with a long waist circumference had a statistically significant lower sourness threshold than those with short waist circumference. Sourness thresholds were righter in participants with high body fat than in participants with low body fat. Our past sweet taste data show that participants with heavy body fat have high sweetness perception thersholds8). The sweetness data was statistically significantly different from the sourness data this time. Although the result was similar, in our past cognitive threshold of salty taste, there was no statistically significant item in the contents examined for sourness this time9).In the future, we would like to inspect the bitterness and umami. And, we would like to understand the actual taste sensation of the elderly by clarifying the differences between the five taste tests and blood pressure, body composition, and eating habits. We would like to obtain underlying data for preparing a diet suitable for the elderly to prevent malnutrition by grasping the taste of the elderly.
V.
We obtained sour test results, TASTDISC, at the time of health check-up in Yakumo Town, Hokkaido, where population migration is low. From the database, 298 participants (169 females and 129 males) were selected form data in August 2019. The sourness test performed using the sourness test paper with liquid TASTEDISC (Sanwa Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd) which include five different densities of Tartaric acid on a liquid with test paper namely:, 1(0.02%), 2(0.2%), 3(2.0%), 4(4.0%), 5(8.0%). As a result, 17 males out of 129male participants (13.2%) and ten females of 169 female participants (5.9%) had abnormal values in sour taste test (Tastedisc) results. The tolerance range (in this study, it called the normal range) of sourness, blood pressure (systole, diastole), and body composition (BMI, body fat percentage, abdominal circumference) compared with other values. As a result, there was no statistically significant difference in the sourness threshold between the normal range of blood pressure, BMI, and others. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the one of sourness between the normal range of body fat percentage and the other range. And also, in female cases, participants with a thick waist circumference had a statistically significant lower sourness threshold than those with a short waist circumference. Sourness thresholds were lower in participants with high body fat than in participants with low body fat. It is necessary to increase the number of participants and analyze the one in the future.
| Participants | 40's | 50's | 60's | 70's | 80's |
| Male (129) | 10 | 24 | 49 | 39 | 6 |
| Female (168) | 23 | 40 | 65 | 38 | 3 |
| Total (297) | 33 | 64 | 114 | 77 | 9 |
| Number | Age | Height | Weight | Waist | BMI | Body fat | Systolic blood | Dyastolic blood | |
| rate | pressure | pressure | |||||||
| cm | g | cm | kg/m/m | % | mmHg | mmHg | |||
| Average of 40's Male | 10 | 45.5 | 170.1 | 74.2 | 84.8 | 25.7 | 23.7 | 136.8 | 80.9 |
| Average of 50's Male | 24 | 54.8 | 168.0 | 71.3 | 86.7 | 25.4 | 24.4 | 131.0 | 81.3 |
| Average of 60's Male | 49 | 64.8 | 167.3 | 68.9 | 86.5 | 24.6 | 24.7 | 138.3 | 83.1 |
| Average of 70's Male | 40 | 73.0 | 164.7 | 66.2 | 84.6 | 24.4 | 23.7 | 145.5 | 79.7 |
| Average of 80's Male | 6 | 84.8 | 159.1 | 63.5 | 87.4 | 25.1 | 24.3 | 134.7 | 66.2 |
| Total average of Male | 129 | 64.9 | 166.4 | 68.7 | 85.8 | 24.8 | 24.2 | 138.9 | 80.8 |
| Number | Age | Height | Weight | Waist | BMI | Body fat | Systolic blood | Dyastolic blood | |
| rate | pressure | pressure | |||||||
| cm | g | cm | kg/m/m | % | mmHg | mmHg | |||
| Average of 40's Female | 23 | 45.2 | 158.0 | 57.2 | 76.7 | 22.8 | 33.2 | 122.3 | 70.1 |
| Average of 50's Female | 40 | 54.3 | 155.5 | 56.4 | 76.8 | 23.3 | 33.4 | 131.6 | 77.4 |
| Average of 60's Female | 66 | 64.5 | 153.8 | 55.7 | 77.7 | 23.5 | 33.9 | 137.1 | 77.0 |
| Average of 70's Female | 37 | 72.8 | 150.6 | 52.8 | 76.2 | 23.3 | 33.1 | 140.1 | 74.7 |
| Average of 80's Female | 3 | 82.0 | 147.4 | 49.6 | 78.1 | 22.9 | 31.1 | 149.0 | 77.0 |
| Total average of Female | 169 | 61.6 | 154.0 | 55.3 | 77.0 | 23.3 | 33.4 | 134.7 | 75.7 |
| (n=298) | Normal 0.02%, 0.20% | Observation 2.0%, 4.0% | Consultation 8.0% ormore |
| Male 40's (n=10) | 6 | 4 | 0 |
| Male 50's (n=24) | 10 | 10 | 4 |
| Male 60's (n=49) | 24 | 17 | 8 |
| Male 70's (n=40) | 16 | 21 | 3 |
| Male 80's (n=6) | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Male total (n=129) | 57 | 55 | 17 |
| Female 40's (n=23) | 16 | 6 | 1 |
| Female 50's (n=40) | 20 | 19 | 1 |
| Female 60's (n=66) | 26 | 34 | 6 |
| Systolic biood pressure (mmHg) | Tastedisc test result (Normal=1, Ovservation = 2, Consultation =3) | |||
| Less than 120 | 120 or more | Systolic blood pressure? Less than 120 | Systolic blood pressure 120 or more | |
| Average±Standard deviaton | 108.934±19.003 | 144.616±16.889 | 1.622±0.542 | 1.637±0.670 |
| ? test | P=0.0001** | P=0.010* | ||
| Unpaired student-ï½?" test | ||||
| Mann-Whaitny test | P=0.0001** | P=0.821 | ||
| * P<0.05 , ** P<0.01 | ||||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Tastedisc test result (Normal=1, Ovservation = 2, Consultation =3) | |||
| Less than 90 | 90 or more | Diastolic blood pressure Less than 90 | Diastolic blood pressure 90 or more | |
| Average±Standard deviaton | 73.984±8.903 | 97.180±8.329 | 1.640±0.628 | 1.646±0.668 |
| ? test | P=0.291 | P=0.173 | ||
| Unpaired student-ï½?" test | P=0.0001** | P=0.919 | ||
| Mann-Whaitny test | ||||
| * P<0.05 , ** P<0.01 | ||||
| BMI(kg/m/m/) | Saltness test result (Normal=1, Ovservation = 2, Consultation =3) | |||
| Less than 25.0 | 2.50 or more | BMI Less than 25.0 | BMI 2.50 or more | |
| Average±Standard deviaton | 27.548±2.143 | 32.993±2.439 | 1.681±0.637 | 1.557±0.638 |
| ? test | P=0.0001** | P=0.501 | ||
| Unpaired student-ï½?" test | ||||
| Mann-Whaitny test | P=0.0001** | P=0.101 | ||
| * P<0.05 , ** P<0.01 | ||||
| Waist (cm) | Saltness test result (Normal=1, Ovservation = 2, Consultation =3) | |||
| Less than 85.0 | 85.0 or more | Waist Less than 85.0 | Waist 85.0 or more | |
| Average±Standard deviaton | 78.327±4.478 | 91.603±4.721 | 1.661±0.668 | 1.712±0.716 |
| ? test | P=0.334 | P=0.286 | ||
| Unpaired student-ï½?" test | P=0.0001** | P=0.677 | ||
| Mann-Whaitny test | ||||
| * P<0.05 , ** P<0.01 | ||||
| Waist (cm) | Salttness test result (Normal=1, Ovservation = 2, Consultation =3) | |||
| Less than 90.0 | 90.0 or more | Waist Less than 90.0 | Waist 90.0 or more | |
| Average±Standard deviaton | 75.729±7.477 | 93.733±4.338 | 1.165±0.595 | 1.250±0.452 |
| ? test | P=0.0019** | P=0.142 | ||
| Unpaired student-ï½?" test | P=0.039* | |||
| Mann-Whaitny test | P=0.0001** | |||
| * P<0.05 , ** P<0.01 | ||||
This study was supported by the research aid of Choju-iryo-kenkyu-kaihatsuhi 30-14 and the Japanese Society of Taste Technology, 2019.
The Effect of Temperture on Umami Taste. Chem Sense 2016. 41 (6) p. .
Umami as an Alimentary Taste. A New Perspective on Taste Classification. Nutrients 2019. 11 (1) p. 182.
Methods of Taste Sensitivity Examination. Wiad Lek 2008. 61 (7-9) p. .
Taste Loss in the Elderly: Possible Implications ofr Dietary Habits. Clit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2017. 57 (17) p. .
Stimulus-Dependent Effects of Temperature on Bitter Taste In Humans. Chem Sense 2017. 42 (2) p. .
Taste Receptors in Multiple Organs. Clin Calcium 2018. 28 (7) p. .
Comparison between threshold of sweetness perception and blood pressure for resident health examination in Yakumo Town (2020) Adv. Nutr Food Sci 182 (03) p. .
Comparison between threshold of saltiness perception and blood pressure for resident health examination in Yakumo Town (2020) Adv. Nutr Food Sci 181 (02) p. .
Taste Transductions in Taste Receptor Cells: Basic Tastes and Moreover. Curr Pharm Des 2014. 20 (16) p. .