DNA Normality Following in Vitro Sperm Preparation with Pentoxifylline and L-Carnitine for Asthenozoospermic Infertile Men

Table of contents

1. Introduction

nfertility is the inability of a sexually active noncontraception couple to achieve pregnancy in one year (WHO ,2010) . A male factor is solely responsible in about 20% of infertile couples and contributory in another 30-40%, if a male infertility factor is present, it is almost always defined by the finding of an abnormal semen analysis for the assessment of male fertility (Agarwal et al.,2003). Problems with the production and maturation of sperm are the most common causes of male infertility. Sperm may be immature, abnormally shaped, or unable to move properly. But, normal sperm may be produced in abnormally low numbers (oligozoospermia) or seemingly not at all (azoospermia) (Diemer et al., 2000).

Asthenozoospermia is one of the major causes of infertility or reduced fertility in men (4). Motility is the prime functional parameter that determines the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa, the cause underlying loss of sperm motility may be either hormonal, biochemical, immunological or infection (Henkel and Schill, 2003;Twigg et al., 1998).

Semen preparation techniques for assisted reproduction were developed to concentrate progressively motile, functional and morphologically normal spermatozoa, and to remove defective and non vital sperms as well as cells e.g. spermatogenic cells and leukocytes.

Leucocytes, bacteria and dead spermatozoa produce oxygen radicals that negatively influence the ability to fertilize the egg (Aviad and Dettelbache, 1984). Layering technique is used for normospermic and asthenospermic semen, which allow self-selection of motile sperm.Two factors protect the sperm DNA from oxidative insult: the characteristic tight packaging of the DNA; and the antioxidants present in seminal plasma (Stanic et al, 2002).

On the other hand, pentoxifylline is dimethylexanthine derivative designated chemically as 1-(5oxohexyl)-3, 7-dimethylexanthine (Okada,1997).The PX prevents cAMP breakdown by inhibiting the activity of the cAMP phosphodiesterase and presumably, stimulates sperm motion (Steiber et al.,2004). Moreover, PX has a protective effect on sperm membranes (i.e.it would preserve functional membrane integrity of sperm tail) as it scavenges ROS and then reduces lipid peroxidation (Muller et al 2002).

Moreover, L-carnitine is a quaternary ammonium compound biosynthesize from the amino acids lysine and methionine (Claudette and Lawrence, 1996). In human body, the primary L-carnitine function is to carry fatty acids into the mitochondria where they can be broken down with the ultimate production of energy (Oosterhuis et al., 2000). In the epididymis, the sperm use fatty acids as a source of metabolic energy and scientists believe that one of the functions of LC in sperm is to carry fatty acids into the sperm mitochondria, thereby assisting in the production of energy. Secondly, the conversion of some of the LC to ALC in the mature sperm facilitates the continuation of energy production within the sperm and the newly formed ALC serves as a readily available source of acetyl groups, i.e. energy, for the sperm (Sills, 2004).

A number of studies have investigated the relationship between human sperm DNA damage and semen parameters, such as concentration, motility and morphology (Gil-Guzman et al, 2001 ;Sikka, 2001). Oxidative stress (OS) may develop as a result of an imbalance between ROS generation and antioxidant scavenging activities (Cocuzza et al., 2007). Sperm preparation techniques can be used to decrease ROS damage production to enhance and maintain sperm quality after ejaculation (WHO, 1999). Therefore the aim of the present study was to use PX and LC for stimulate certain sperm functions and protect the male germ cell from the influence of free radicals.

2. II.

3. Material and Methods

Semen samples were obtained from 100 infertile men during their attendance to the IVF High Institute, Al-Nahrain University through the period from November 2011 to October 2012. The samples of seminal fluid were collected after 3 to 5 days of abstinence directly into a clean, dry and sterile disposable Petri-dishes by masturbation in a room near the laboratory. After liquefaction time, macroscopic and microscopic analysis of semen samples was don using standardization of WHO (1999) to determine certain sperm function parameters namely; sperm concentration (million/ml), percentage of sperm motility and morphologically normal sperm (MNS) percentage. The DNA denaturation was examined by using acridine orange test according to Tejada, et al. (1984).

4. a) Preparation of Pentoxifylline Stock Solution

This solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg from PX powder (sigma, USA) in 10 ml of PBS (0.1%) then stirring until dissolve. These concentrations prepared daily under sterile condition using UV light and Millipore filter (0.45?M).

5. b) Preparation of L-Carnitine Stock Solution

This solution was prepared by adding 0.5mg of LC powder (Natrol,USA) to 10 ml of phosphate buffer solution in plastic test tube . Then it was filtered by using Millipore 0.45 µM and have been fixed at pH 7.4-7.8 at 25?C.

6. c) In vitro activation technique

After liquefaction of human semen, layering activation technique was used according to Hall, et al. (1995), each semen sample was divided into four portions, one portion was considered as a control group by using Hams F-12 medium (Sigma, Germany) and the other three portions of semen is considered as treated groups by adding the following substances: Pentoxifylline (PX) 1mg/ml, L-Carnitine (LC) 0.5 mg/ml and both equally added PX + LC. Certain sperm function parameters were examined following in vitro activation according to WHO (1999) too.

Statistical analysis: Data from treated and control media groups were expressed as mean ± SEM and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the differences between the four prepared media. When F values reach the significant level at 5%, least significant difference (LSD) test was used (Sorlie, 1995).

III.

7. Results

Tables 1,2,3 and 4 shows that no significant (P< 0.05) difference in the mean of sperm concentration between control and treated media groups after activation in most infertile patients (asthenozoospermic men,table-1,oligoasthenozoospermic men, table-2, astheno-teratozoospermic men ,table-3 and oligoasthenoteratozoospermic men ,table-4). The activation of human sperm in vitro with both control (Hams F-12) and treated (PX and/or LC) media caused a significant (P<0.05) and a highly significant (P<0.001) increase in the percentage of progressive sperm motility grade (A,B,A+B) compared to before activation by layering activation technique in all treated infertile groups(Tables 1,2,3,4). There was a highly significant (P<0.001) increment in the mean of sperm concentration, percentage of progressive sperm motility grade (A), grade (B) and grade (A+B) with the percentage MNS after using mixing PX+LC medium in comparison with using PX and LC alone and with control medium in the asthenozoospermic patients (Table-1) and other mild male factors infertility (Tables 2, 3, 4). Activation of human sperm caused a highly significant (P<0.001) improvement in the MNS in both control and treated group when compared to before activation and between treated semen samples when compared to control semen samples in asthenoteratozoospermic patients(Table-1) and oligoasthenoteratozoospermic (Table-4) patients following layering technique. There was a significant (P<0.05) and a highly significant (P<0.001) decrease in the round cells in both control and treated groups when compared to before activation of all infertile men. Also the results show a highly significant (P<0.001) improvement in the percentage of normal DNA sperms after activation with PX and/or LC by layering technique in most infertile patients. Values are expressed as Mean±SEM. Different small letters mean significant difference at P<0.05. Different capital letters mean significant difference at P<0.001.

IV.

8. Discussion

In this study, there was a highly significant increase in the sperm motility grade (A) and grade (A+B), while there was a significant increase in sperm motility grade (B) in treated group. This finding is in agreement with studies that revealed a significant improvement in grade (A), hyperactivation and the acrosome reaction following activation by PX (Abid, 2005 andAl-Dujaily et al., 2007). PX has been demonstrated to increase testicular sperm motility when it added to culture media (Sato and Ishikawa, 2004). It inhibits the breakdown of cAMP and it is known that intracellular cAMP concentration plays a central role in cell energy which in turn sustain sperm motility. The increase of cAMP lead to increase progressive sperm motility. The cAMP plays an important role in the glycolytic path way of the sperm and, through its effect on glycolysis. It can influence the energy generation required for sperm motion (Steiber et al., 2004). The highly significant increase in most sperm parameters after adding LC to sperm activated medium which showed a highly elevation in active sperm motility was in agreement with other studies that reported a significant increase in the sperm motility when LC was added to ejaculated human spermatozoa (Al-Dujaily et al.,2012). The other positive effect of LC addition to the medium in current study may be its function to carry fatty acids into the sperm mitochondria to assisting the production of energy. (Agarwal and Said 2004).

This study believed that the medium contains both LC and PX gave excellent improvement in progressive sperm motility grade (A) and grade (A+B). stated that in vitro administration of LC and PX to extracted testicular sperm samples led to increased sperm motility. Whereas giving a highly improvement results in the percent of MNS may be resulting from the important effect of both PX and/or LC that works as antioxidant ROS scavengers to reduce sperm DNA damage after activation (Menezo et al.,2007).

Further significant improvement in the percentage of MNS was recorded after activation. This finding may be related to the fast movement of normal spermatozoa from seminal plasma into upper layer of culture medium, and consequently elicited from impact of some seminal plasma components like leukocytes, round cell and others leading to kept the sperm out of stress factor and ROS production that responsible for DNA damage (Sharma et al., 2004). Thus, layering activation technique remove the immotile and dead cells from the sample. The same observation was noticed by other studies using culture for separation and activation of sperm in vitro (Al-Dujaily and Malik, 2013 and Al- Dujaily et al., 2006).

The results of the present study has found a highly significant reduction in abnormal (DNA damaged) sperms in the infertile semen after activation by all activation media compared with results before activation.This may be caused by the of antioxidants (including LC and PX every one alone or both of them )which added to the medium (HamsF12), PX has been oxygen-free radical scavenging capacities by reducing the superoxide release from human spermatozoa (McKinney et al.,1996).The PX has been shown to decrease ROS production. Moreover, the antioxidant property of LC may also have an influence on sperm motility. L-carnitine, as anti-oxidant (Solarska et al., 2010) may protect sperm plasma membrane with high level of unsaturated fatty acid content (Aitken and Clarkson, 1987). Free radicals can also decrease mitochondrial energy availability and impaired sperm motility (De-Lamirande and Gagnon, 1992). It has been emphasized that acridine orange staining of semen smears improve the information obtained by semen analysis with respect to sperm fertilizing capacity (Kosower et al.,1992). The cause of infertility in the infertile men with normal semen parameters could be related to abnormal sperm DNA (Menezo et al., 2007). Therefore, the present work depends on the evaluation of sperm DNA integrity to improve the positive effects of the activation technique and the motility stimulants and to add further information on the quality of spermatozoa that will be used in future on reproductive outcomes (Schulte et al.,2010).

It was concluded that LC and PX can be added for the medium as activator substances to stimulate certain sperm function parameters in vitro of asthenozoospermic patients with or without other male infertility factors to reduce DNA damage in sperms. This results can be utilized for in vitro activation medium used in the ART centers.

Figure 1. Table 1 :
1
Certain sperm function parameters Before activation hams F12 hams F12 +PX LC PX + LC
Sperm Concentration (Million/ml) 53.96±3.77 a 50.52±3.23 a 56.29±5.34 a 58.13±5.49 a 59.78±4.62 a
Grade A 4.62±0.89 A 19.13±2.21 B 30.86±4.62 B 29.13±4.2 B 32.83±3.3 B
Active sperm motility (%) Grade B Grade A+B 34.35±1.17 A 38.96±1 A 39.43±1.85 A 58.57±3.39 B 42.86±3.34 b 73.71±5.98 Ba 42.4±2.4 b 71.53±4.88 Ba 77.35±4.13 B 44.52±2.5 B
Morphologically Normal sperm (%) 35.92±0.81 A 39.13±1.3 a 45.57±2.31 b 46.2±2.42 B 51.35±2.34 B
Round cells (cell/HPF) 7.31±1.2 a 5±0.94 ab 3.21±1.28 b 3.67±1.2 b 3.96±0.99 b
Green sperm % 50.14±6.51 a 68.87±6.06 b 77.74±7.1 b 66.47±6.99 ab 73.12±6.46 b
Orange sperm % 49.86±6.51 a 31.12±6.06 b 22.25±7.09 b 33.77±6.92 ab 26.87±6.46 b
Values are expressed as Mean± SEM.
Different small letters mean significant difference at P<0.05.
Different capital letters mean significant difference at P<0.001.
Figure 2. Table 2 :
2
Certain sperm function parameters Before activation hams F12 hams F12 +PX LC PX + LC
Sperm Concentration (Million/ml) 10.81±1.22 a 16.92±3.83 a 22.70±2.30 Ab 26.15±2.96 Ab 32.94±4.16 B
Values are expressed as Mean±SEM.
Different small letters mean significant difference at P<0.05.
Different capital letters mean significant difference at P<0.001.
Figure 3. Table 3 :
3
Certain sperm function parameters Before activation hams F12 hams F12 +PX LC PX + LC
Sperm Concentration (Million/ml) 31.15±2.85 a 40.96±3.89 a 36.50±5.82 a 37.33±5.52 a 59.87±4.59 B
Grade A 6.58±1.33 A 18.39±2.10 B 21.71±3.06 B 21.47±3.03 B 32.78±2.92 B
Active sperm motility (%) Grade B Grade A+B 24.31±1.98 A 30.88±2.48 A 37.61±2.63 B 36.14±4.62 Ba 36.60±3.13 Ba 56.00±4.20 B 57.86±7.04 B 58.07±5.66 Ba 46.65±1.94 B 79.43±3.49 B
Morphologically Normal sperm (%) 19.96±1.29 Aa 31.26±2.23 b 33.36±4.06 B 36.87±2.97 B 52.22±2.56 B
Round cells(cell/HPF) 7.46±1.44 a 5.74±1.30 a 3.07±1.03 b 6.07±1.76 a 4.52±1.09 a
Green sperm (%) 62.92±6.44 a 63.77±6.42 a 80.88±6.51 b 76.73±6.72 a 71.22±6.72 ab
Orange sperm (%) 37.12±6.43 a 36.24±6.42 a 19.12±6.51 b 25.26±6.72 a 28.77±6.72 ab
Values are expressed as Mean±SEM .
Different small letters mean significant difference at P<0.05.
Different capital letters mean significant difference at P<0.001.
Figure 4. Table 4 :
4
Certain parameters sperm function Before activation hams F12 hams +PX F12 LC PX + LC
Sperm Concentration (Million/ml) 12.75±0.76 a 18.24±2.59 ab 20.38±2.33 bB 21.86±1.78 b 28.44±3.10 b
Grade A 2.60±0.97 A 15.59±1.55 B 23.50±2.63 B 14.93±1.78 b 27.89±3.09 B
Active sperm motility (%) Grade B Grade A+B 19.55±1.46 A 35.18±2.13 B 22.15±1.94 A 50.76±2.99 B 37.31±2.80 B 60.81±5.03 B 31.57±2.20 Bb 43.33±2.26 B 46.50±3.37 B 71.22±4.77 B
Morphologically Normal sperm (%) 21.90±1.17 A 33.47±1.15 B 34.38±2.11 B 33.79±2.18 B 41.78±2.74 Ba
Round cells(cell/HPF) 6.65±0.66 A 2.41±0.49 B 2.38±0.93 B 2.21±0.70 B 2.94±0.92 B
Green sperm (%) 21.02±4.65 A 51.82±6.52 B 62.43±6.56 B 68.91±4.27 B 74.71±5.55 B
Orange sperm (%) 78.97±4.65 A 48.17±6.52 B 37.56±6.56 Ba 31.08±4.27 B 25.29±5.55 B
1

Appendix A

Appendix A.1

Appendix B

  1. Carnitine and male infertiity. A Agarwal , T M Said . Reprod. Biomed 2004. 8 p. .
  2. Carnitine: a nutritional, biosynthetic, and functional perspective. A Steiber , J Kerner , C Hoppelm . Mol Aspects Med 2004. 25 (5-6) p. .
  3. Examination and Board Review. D E Sorlie . Medical Biostatistics and Epidemiology 1995. p. . Appleton and Lang Norwalk Connecticut (1st ed.)
  4. Pharmacology of Pentoxifylline a heamorheologic agent for the treatment of intermittent claudication. D M Aviad , H R Dettelbache . Angiol 1984. 35 p. .
  5. Effects of oral l-carnitine supplementation on in vivo long-chain fatty acid oxidation in healthy adults. D M Muller , H Seim , W Kiess , H Loster , T Richter . Univ. Leipzig, Children's Hospital, Germany. Metabolism 2002. 51 (11) p. .
  6. Effects of l-carnitine and pentoxifylline on the activity of lactate dehydrogenase C4 isozyme and motility of testicular spermatozoa in mice. E Aliabadi , F Karimi , M Rasti , M Akmali , T Esmaeilpour . J Reprod Infertil 2013. 14 (2) p. .
  7. Reactive oxygen species and human spermatozoa. ll depletion of adenosine triphosphate plays an important role in the inhibition of sperm motility. E De-Lamirande , C Gagnon . J. Androl 1992. 13 p. .
  8. Differential production of reactive oxygen species by subsets of human spermatozoa at different stages of maturation. E Gil-Guzman , M Ollero , M C Lopez . Hum.Reprod 2001. 16 p. .
  9. Chromatin fluorescence characteristics and standard semen analysis parameters correlations observed in andrology testing among 136 males referred for infertility evaluation. E S Sills , J T Fryman , M Perloe , K B Michels , M J Tucker . J. Obstet. Gynaecol 2004. 24 p. .
  10. Antisperm immunity in assisted reproduction. F Lambardo , L Gandini , A Lenzi , F Dondero . J Reprod Immunol 2004. 62 p. .
  11. Measuring apoptosis in human spermatozoa a biological assay for semen quality. G J Oosterhuis , A B Mulder , E Kalsbeek-Batenburg , C B Lambalk , J Schoemaker , I Vermes . Fertil.Steril 2000. 74 p. .
  12. Guide line on male infertility. G R Dohle , A Jungwirth , G Colpi , T Diemer . Eur Associat Urol 2007. 11 p. .
  13. Formation of reaction oxygen species by spermatozoa from asthenospermic patients: response to treatment with pentoxifylline. H Okada , N Tatsumi , M Kanzaki . J Urology 1997. 157 p. .
  14. Efficacy and safety of semen in patient with oligospermia: an open clinical study. H S Agarwal , K S Kulkarni . Indian J. Clin. Practice 2003. 14 (2) p. .
  15. Role of free l-carnitine and acetyl-l-carnitine in post-gonadal maturation of mammalian spermatozoa. J Claudette , M L Lawrence . Human Reprod 1996. 2 (2) p. .
  16. Nuture vs nature: how can we optimize sperm quality?. J G Alvarez . J.Androl 2003. 24 p. .
  17. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus high insemination concentration in vitro fertilization in cases of very severe teratozoospermia. J Hall , S Fishel , S Green , S Fleming , A Hunter , N Stoddert , K Dowell , S Thornton . Hum Reprod 1995. 10 p. .
  18. Iatrogenic DNA damage induced in human spermatozoa during sperm preparation: protective significance of seminal plasma. J Twigg , D S Irvine , P Houston , N Fulton , L Michael , R J Aitken . Mol Hum Reprod 1998. 4 p. .
  19. The effect of pentoxifylline on the generation of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation in human spermatozoa. K A Mckinney , S E M Lewis , W Thompson . Andrologia. J 1996. 28 p. .
  20. The antioxidant properties of carnitine in vitro. K Solarska , A Lewinska , A Karowicz-Bilinska , G Bartosz . Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett 2010. 15 p. .
  21. Laboratory Manual for the examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. UK.: 4-59. 40. Laboratory Manual for Examination and Processing of Human Semen, World Health Organization, ( Who) (ed.) (New York; Switzerland
    ) 1999. 2010. Press. p. 37. (4th ed. 5th ed)
  22. Clinical relevance of oxidative stress and sperm chromatin damage in male infertility: an evidence based analysis. M Cocuzza , S C Sikka , K S Athayde . Int.braz J.urol 2007. 33 (5) p. .
  23. Men's health. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) 2010. UMMC) Press. p. . Maryland University of Maryland Medical Center
  24. Room temperature storage of mouse epididymal spermatozoa: exploration of factors affecting sperm survival. M Sato , A Ishikawa . Theriogenology 2004. 61 (7-8) p. .
  25. Thiol-disulfide status and acridine orange fluorescence of mammalian sperm nuclei. N S Kosower , H Katayose , R J N Yanagimachi . J. Androl 1992. 13 p. .
  26. Effect of pentoxifylline on motility and membrane integrity of cryopreservation human spermatozoa. P Stanic , Z Sonicki , E Suchanek . International J Androl 2002. 25 p. .
  27. Sperm preparation for ART. R Henkel , W Schill . Reprod Biol And Endocr 2003. 1 p. .
  28. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. R I Tejada , J C Mitchell , A Norman , J J Marik , S Friedman . Fertil.Steril 1984. 42 p. .
  29. Cellular basis of defective sperm function and its association with the genesis of reactive oxygen species by human spermatozoa. R J Aitken , J S Clarkson . J. Reprod.Fertil 1987. 18 p. .
  30. Sperm DNA damage and its clinical relevance in assessing reproductive outcome. R K Sharma , T Said , A Agarwal . Asian. J. Androl 2004. 6 p. .
  31. Effect of pentoxifylline (Trental®) on human sperm in vitro activation of asthenospermic infertile patients, R S Abid . 2005. High diploma thesis Institute of Embryo Research on Infertility Treatment/ Al-Nahrian University
  32. Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes. R T Schulte , D A Ohl , M Sigman , G D Smith . J. Assist. Reprod. Genet 2010. 27 p. .
  33. Relative impact of oxidative stress on male reproductive function. S C Sikka . Curr. Med. Chem 2001. 8 p. .
  34. Effect of Glycyrrhiza extract on in vitro sperm activation of asthenospermic patients. S S Al-Dujaily , A S Al-Janabi , M Nori . J Babylon University 2006. 11 p. .
  35. Effect of pentoxifylline on the outcome of artificial inseminations. Iraqi post graduate. S S Al-Dujaily , A R Al-Nakash , S A Al-Biaty . Med J 2007. 5 p. .
  36. Effect of L-carnitine on in vitro sperm activation of infertile men. S S Al-Dujaily , N Al-Shahiri , A Abbas . I J Embryo inter Res 2012. 2 (3) p. .
  37. In vitro sperm activation for asthenospermic semen by using progesterone, pentoxifylline and Glycyrrhiza glabra extraction.Globel. S S Al-Dujaily , K Malik . J Med Res 2013. 3 (1) p. .
  38. Influence of urogenital infection on sperm function. T Diemer , M Ludwig , P Huwe , D B Hales . Curr. Opin. Urol 2000. 10 p. .
  39. Antioxidants to reduce sperm DNA fragmentation: an unexpected adverse effect. Y J Menezo , A Hazout , G Panteix , F Robert , J Rollet , P Cohen-Bacrie . Reprod Biomed Online 2007. 14 p. .
Notes
1
© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US) © 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)
Date: 2013-01-15