# I. Introduction

am a scientist and theorist. More than 25 years I have been studying the problem of AIDS. I published two scientific books: [1], [2] and published the article [3] in the scientific journal «World Journal of AIDS». Later was published also Russian version of this article [4].

I want to say that the English version of the article [3] is being downloaded by the specialists very actively: during one and half years it was already downloaded 720 times and viewed 1230 times. At this article is convincingly written how to act to end AIDS around the globe. It would seem, is not this the dream of mankind? It turns out that this is not so! On the endless searching the remedy against AIDS many scientists planned and built all their lifes. To date, humanity has spent against AIDS about $ 500 billion, and this amount is growing every day.

Specialists are downloading and downloading my article. But what they think about this article? I do not know it: nobody shared with me his opinion about my article, and in their writings yet no one wrote about my article. I began to analyze the situation and came to the conclusion that many of the statements of my article are so revolutionary, that they simply can not be adopted by the minds of many people. Even well-known opponents of the official theory of AIDS («rethinkers»), many of which are already acquainted with my theory, not have their opinion about it, although it seemed to me, that my theory is "grist for their mill."

Let's imagine that at the long bridge over the river are standing hand in hand several hundreds of people. These people formed a live chain. The first member of the chain got some information, for example, the word "Hello." He must pass this information down the chain. As a result, the last person in this chain will receive the message: "Hello." And what is interesting in it? Of course, nothing special, but I want to accent your attention at the analysis of "what has moved" from one riverbank to the other as a result of this experiment. Nothing material was not moved, was moved only information. What's the sense in it? If it is just hello, it is possible, sense and no. And suddenly this word is the key to open some important safe? Then the person on the other side of the river, having received this information, could easily open his safe and get from it something very important.

Another example: we make on some surface the pathway of gunpowder. Then we set fire to one end of the gunpowder. Naturally, the fire will move along this track and he will reaches the other end. Question: what was physically moved from one end of the gunpowder pathway to the other end of it? Transfer of a material object was not. From one end to the other one was moved only light and heat signal which is not material object. However, such movement of signal can have very tangible consequences. If we, for example, doused some house by gasoline and built toward this house a track from our gunpowder, and burned it at the other end... Such manner we remotely would have made a serious fire.

A third example. We set the dominoes vertically on the table. The distance between the dominos we do little -it is necessary to ensure that falling of one domino will cause the fall of the neighboring one. Such manner we can build very long way of dominoes. Having finished construction, we push the first domino by our finger... It is not difficult to guess that will take place further: along our track of dominoes will run some chain reaction: every previous domino will push the next one, etc. The same question arises: what moves along our track of dominoes? Transfer something tangible has not happened, but something, after all, was moved. The "strength pulse" was moved. However, even its movement could, in principle, lead to significant consequences.

Notice the title of this article. You, as I understand it, guessed why I mention these three examples of chain reactions. I affirm that AIDS -it is not an infectious disease, as is commonly believed. AIDS is an example of a completely new type of disease. It represents some parasitic chain reaction in human blood. The essence of this chain reaction is that it force the protective T-helpers, which are continuously produced by the thymus gland, to become pairwise interconnected. Then such interconnected T-helpers are simply excreted in the form of diarrhea. Since in real life T-helper cells are designed for catching in the blood of particles of various harmful infections followed by removing them from the body, then it is clear that tied each other T-helpers simply excluded from the process of fighting with any external infections. As a result, people often die from any accidental infection.

Earlier I wrote that HIV has no material carrier. I mean by this is that the reason of AIDS is not tangible. All AIDS-dissidents in unison claim that HIV does not cause AIDS. I thought: virologists, apparently so accustomed to the fact that the virus must be only alive and tangible, that they just can not understand which sense I put into the sentence: "HIV has no material carrier." To them, it sounds like this: "A loaf of bread has no material carrier." But a loaf of bread is namely a loaf of bread. It can exist only as a material object. It or exists or not, no middle ground. Let's leave HIV alone. The essence is the fact that the cause of AIDS is not tangible. The cause of AIDS is a parasitic chain reaction, which walks inside the human's organism. This chain reaction from one person to another is transmitted along the path of living blood. If you've had with someone a sexual relationship, but "the walkway of living blood" was not, then you do not have to worry about anything: even if the partner has AIDS, it will not be transmitted to you.

Luc Montagnier in 2008 received the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the virus, which in our time is called HIV. The official scientific world now believes that AIDS is an infectious disease that is transmitted from one person to another by contact with the help of HIV.

It seems to be: from the times of Louis Pasteur's clear to everyone that is a virus. If HIV was isolated in pure form, the appearance of drug against him is not far off. However, decades pass, and a cure for AIDS is still not found. What is the reason? The reason is that the source of AIDS has no material carrier -you will not see it in any microscope. But virologists can not fight against what is not visible in the microscope. So their fight against AIDS can be continued indefinitely.

I will not repeat: all the technology to overcome AIDS, I have already described in the previous articlesee. [3], [4]. You can follow specified by me path or you can continue to spend billions of dollars for the purchase of condoms and for "further searching for a cure for AIDS." But really humanity no longer knows where to spend his money? I accent your attention on the main my results:

1. The reason of AIDS has no material carrier. AIDS develops in the body due to dissemination of parasitic chain reaction in it. This chain reaction can not be seen through a microscope. In the emergence and spread of AIDS no virus does not participate.

2. Mentioned above chain reaction moves from one organism into another one through the walkway of living blood. 3. The chain reaction, which spreads in the human's body, obliges of T-helpers to become pairwise interconnected with each other. As a result, they become turned off from the process of combating external infections and removed from the body in the form of diarrhea. 4. If the rate of production of T-helper cells of the thymus gland is small, the body is exposed to external infections, possibly fatal. The question is: can a person to fight against the enemy, whom he can not see? James Clerk Maxwell was once developed the theory of the electromagnetic field. Has anyone seen this field? No one saw! However, the mankind has long been actively using the electromagnetic field, in particular, for far communications. In doing so, such communication is actively used even in the vacuum of space. If we need defence from the electromagnetic field in a certain amount of space, we simply surround the volume, what we need, with solid metal housing. It turned out, that the shield from electromagnetic fields can be made also from the metal grid with little cells.

Robert Kirchhoff once wrote: "There is nothing more practical than a good theory." And it's true. If you have a really good theory, you can actively use it in practice, even in those cases, where the object of your theory is not seen for you in any microscope.

We can not see the parasitic reaction of AIDS. But this reaction is working. It causes that the T-helper become pairwise connected to each other and then they will be removed from the body. What follows from this? It follows that for the diagnosis of AIDS, we need to take the blood sample of the patient and carefully look at it under a microscope. If we see many single T-helpers, we can be confident: for this patient the diagnosis of "AIDS" is not confirmed. If we see many interconnected with each other T-helpers, then there is no doubt that we face -AIDS patient... The term "the disease of chain reaction type" was introduced into the theory of medicine by me personally. If you are interested in more details, read them, please, in my monograph [1], chapter ?6 Thank you for your attention!
![Journals Inc. (US) AIDS is the Disease of «Chain Reaction» Type Year 2 015](image-2.png "")
		
		
			

				


* 
	
		«Puzzle with the name
		
			SergeyMakarov
		
	
	
		AIDS"» (in English)
		
			ISBN
			
			2012
			LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing
		
	




* 
	
		«Puzzle with the name
		
			SergeyMakarov
		
	
	
		AIDS"» (in Russian)
		
			ISBN
			
			2012
			LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing
		
	




* 
	
		«The Problem of AIDS May Have Already Solved
		
			SergeyMakarov
		
		
	
	
		World Journal of AIDS
		
			2014
		
	
	in English




* 
	
		Agency of technical and scientific information
		
			SergeyMakarov
		
		
		
			2015
		
	
	«The Problem of AIDS May Have Already Solved