\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effect of Triple Antibiotic Paste and Calcium Hydroxide using Different Vehicles against},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{1970-01-01 (revised: 01 January 1970)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{1970-01-01}
\title{Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effect of Triple Antibiotic Paste and Calcium Hydroxide using Different Vehicles against}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Khushboo  Kansal}

             \author[2]{Jaspreet  Singh}

             \author[3]{Gagandeep  Singla}

             \author[4]{Snigdha  Sharma}

             \author[5]{Nitika  Gupta}

             \author[6]{Vanshika  Saggar}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 1 January 1970 Accepted: 1 January 1970 Published: 1 January 1970}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)?] and triple antibiotic paste, combined with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) solution and normal saline.Materials and Method: Agar diffusion test was done to test the antimicrobial activity of intracanal medicaments and zone of inhibition was measured after 7 days of incubation. Furthermore, the data was analyzed using SPSS v16.0 software with one-way ANOVA and posthoc test.Results: In the agar diffusion test, largest inhibition zone was observed for triple antibiotic paste combined with 2% chlorhexidine and smallest for calcium hydroxide combined with normal saline.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\begin{textblock*}{10cm}(1.05cm,3cm)
{{\textit{CrossRef DOI of original article:}} \underline{}}
\end{textblock*}\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
naerobic bacteria dominate the root canal microbiota and these are largely responsible for initiating and sustaining periapical diseases. \hyperref[b0]{1,}\hyperref[b1]{2} Among these, few microorganisms are treatment resistant and are more prevalent in refractory cases. E.Faecalis is most commonly found facultative anaerobein the endodontic failure teeth due to its inherent ability of tolerance to starvation, extremes of pH, salt concentration, biofilm formation, dentin tubular invasion, and emergence of antibiotic resistant strains which has made their eradication challenging during endodontic treatment. \hyperref[b2]{3} The presence of complex and inaccessible areas like lateral canals, ramifications, apical deltas etc. render mechanical instrumentation and irrigation insufficient to achieve complete disinfection and asepsis of root canal. \hyperref[b3]{4} Thus arises the need of intracanal medicaments between successive treatment sessions to disinfect the root canal system. Calcium hydroxide has been considered as a gold standard among intracanal medicaments due to its high alkaline pH and antibacterial action. However, recent studies have questioned the efficacy of calcium hydroxide in reducing microbial numbers even after prolonged contact with the root canal specifically against E.Faecalis 5,6 and Candidia albicans. \hyperref[b6]{7} Therefore, the search for alternative medicaments that can target such microorganisms led to the discoveries of newer antimicrobial agents. Recently, triple antibiotic paste (a mixture of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and minocycline) has been introduced as an intracanal medicament for disinfecting the root canal system.\par
Various studies in the literature are available emphasizing the role of vehicle for intracanal medicament as they may have the ability to facilitate the better diffusion of medicament through dentinal tubules and anatomical aberrations and may reduce the bacterial loads in infected root canal. Although saline was most commonly used but it has no antibacterial efficiency. So Chlorhexidine has been added by many researchers due to its substantive antibacterial activity as a medicament vehicle and has antibacterial efficacy comparable to that of sodium hypochlorite. \hyperref[b7]{8,}\hyperref[b8]{9} So the purpose of this investigation was to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of triple antibiotic paste and calcium hydroxide using different types of vehicles i.e saline and chlorhexidine against E.faecalis. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Methodology}]{Methodology}\par
The microbial species used in this study was E.Faecalis (ATCC29212) which was grown overnight in BHI agar plate. The microbial strain was tested against the two medicaments: Calcium hydroxide (Group-I) and Triple antibiotic paste (Group-II). The medicaments were tested at concentrations of 1000mg, 100mg, 10mg, 1mg, 0.1mg and 0.01mg/ml using both normal saline and 2\% chlorhexidine as vehicles. 
\section[{A}]{A}\par
From the BHI agar plates, the microorganisms were inoculated into tube containing 5ml of 0.9\% sterile saline solution. A suspension of E.Faecalis was adjusted to 1.5×10 8 CFU/mL turbidity using McFarland tube as standard. Sterile swabs were dipped into suspension and were used to flood the tested organism into the Muller hinton agar plate. Round wells were punctured in each agar plate for each group. Wells were then filled with the medicament, followed by aerobic incubation at 37°C for 24hrs in an incubator. Growth inhibition zones were formed around all the wells whose diameters were subsequently recorded by measuring the shortest distance between the outer margin of the well and initial microbial growth (Fig. \hyperref[fig_0]{1}).\par
Each experiment was performed in triplicate for each tested material. The mean and standard deviation of the inhibitory zones were calculated. The data was statistically analyzed using Oneway Anova and Bonferroni Post hoc Test. 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Results}]{Results}\par
The mean and standard deviation of diameters of the growth inhibition zones for each concentration of the preparations are presented in Graph 1. At 0.1mg/ml and 0.01mg/ml concentrations, TAP with chlorhexidine was found to be significantly better than TAP with saline and calcium hydroxide with saline but had comparatively equal efficacy to that of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine group.\par
No statistical significant difference was found in TAP group at all other concentrations above 0.1mg/ml after mixing with either saline or 2\% chlorhexidine. However, calcium hydroxide group showed a larger zone of inhibition when mixed with 2\% chlorhexidine as compared to saline, difference being statistically significant at concentrations 0.01mg/ml, 0.1mg/ml, 1mg/ml and 10mg/ml.   
\section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par
During of the Complete elimination of the microorganisms from the root canals cannot be achieved uniformly by chemomechanical preparation alone due to the varying vulnerabilities of the involved species and the anatomical complexities of root canals. Among all the facultative anaerobes, Enterococcus faecalis may be regarded as one of the most resistant species in the oral cavity and a possible cause of failure of root canal treatment. E. faecalis was thus selected for testing antimicrobial efficacy of medicaments in this study. Various researchers have successfully used it to evaluate the efficacy of antibacterial agents as it represents an organism, most commonly isolated from previously treated root canals. Moreover, E. Faecalis is relatively easy to culture and is resistant to commonly used medicaments especially calcium hydroxide. \hyperref[b9]{10,}\hyperref[b10]{11} In our study, agar diffusion test was used to evaluate and compare the invitro antimicrobial activities of medicaments. Agar diffusion test has frequently been used for the evaluation of antibacterial effects of various endodontic materials in numerous studies also. \hyperref[b11]{[12]}\hyperref[b12]{[13]}\hyperref[b13]{[14]} It also offers many advantages over other methods: simplicity, low cost, the ability to test enormous numbers of microorganisms and antimicrobial agents, and the ease to interpret results provided.\par
Calcium hydroxide has been the most commonly used intracanal medicament due to its high pH which alters the biological properties of bacterial cell wall lipopolysaccharides of gram -ve species thereby inactivating membrane transport mechanism. However, more recently, concern has been growing about the inadequate antimicrobial efficacy of calcium hydroxide against E. Faecalis as buffering action of dentin neutralizes its action at deeper layers of dentinal tubules resulting in survival of micro-organisms, \hyperref[b14]{15,}\hyperref[b15]{16} emphasizing the need of change of vehicle. Numerous studies have been reported proving the increase in efficiency of calcium hydroxide when chlorhexidine was used as a vehicle as it has broad spectrum antimicrobial activity and has very low toxicity even at the higher concentrations. Its substantive antimicrobial activity is due to its cationic properties which leads to its adsorption onto hydroxyapatite in the dentin and released subsequently beyond the actual medication period. \hyperref[b16]{17} The results of the study by Turk et al. showed calcium hydroxide mixed with other vehicles was less effective than calcium hydroxide mixed with 2\% chlorhexidine digluconate against E. faecalis. \hyperref[b17]{18} Therefore 2\% chlorhexidine was used as one of the vehicles in this study. In our study, the bactericidal effect of calcium hydroxide with saline against E. Faecalis was lower at low concentrations whereas calcium hydroxide with chlorhexidine was found to be effective at even lower concentrations which may be due to the presence of chlorhexidine in it. Same results were found by Gomes et al proving the inefficiency of calcium hydroxide at lower concentrations. Whereas the concentrated mixture of calcium hydroxide i.e 1000mg/ml has similar efficacy in both the vehicles i.e saline and chlorhexidine.\par
At higher concentrations, TAP shows its equal efficacy when mixed with either of two vehicles. So the efficacy of TAP may be attributed to its mixed antibiotic contents not the vehicle. But according to various studies, at higher concentrations, TAP was found to cause dentin demineralization and also its minocycline component causes the discoloration of tooth. \hyperref[b18]{19} However at recommended concentration for TAP by AEE i.e 0.1mg/ml, TAP mixed with chlorhexidine was found to be more effective than that of saline vehicle. This finding thus indicated that alteration of vehicle was found to be beneficial as it increases the efficacy of triple antibiotic paste as an intracanal medicament. So, 2\% chlorhexidine gluconate can be substituted for saline as the vehicle in triple antibiotic paste to increase the antimicrobial efficacy of the mixture.\par
More in vivo and invitro studies are required to illustrate the efficacy of CHX as an intracanal medicament and to assess whether its substantivity property can actually inhibit microbial colonization in filled canals after treatment. Even then also the results of our study justify its use as an intracanal medicament vehicle in endodontics.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}Fig. 1 :}\end{figure}
 		 		\backmatter  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Jeansonne and White ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘A comparison of 2.0\% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25\% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants’.  		 			M J Jeansonne 		,  		 			R R White 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Endod}  		1994. 20 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ohara et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Antibacterial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected anaerobic bacteria’.  		 			P Ohara 		,  		 			M Torabinejad 		,  		 			J D Kettering 		.  	 	 		\textit{Endod Dent Traumatol}  		1993. 9 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Razmi et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Antimicrobial effects of AH26 sealer/antibiotic combinations against Enterococcus faecalis’.  		 			H Razmi 		,  		 			Ashofteh Yazdi 		,  		 			K Jabalameli 		,  		 			F Parvizi 		,  		 			S 		.  	 	 		\textit{Iranian Endodontic J}  		2008. 3  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Lenet et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘Antimicrobial substantivity of bovine root dentin exposed to different chlorhexidine delivery vehicles’.  		 			B J Lenet 		,  		 			R Komorowski 		,  		 			X Y Wu 		,  		 			J Huang 		,  		 			H Grad 		,  		 			H P Lawrence 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Endod}  		2000. 26 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Komorowski et al. ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Antimicrobial substantivity of chlorhexidine-treated bovine root dentin’.  		 			R Komorowski 		,  		 			H Grad 		,  		 			X Y Wu 		,  		 			S Friedman 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Endod}  		2000. 26 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dolan and Costerton ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Biofilms: survival mechanism of clinically relevant microorganisms’.  		 			R M Dolan 		,  		 			J W Costerton 		.  	 	 		\textit{Clin Microbiol Rev}  		2002. 15 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Cwikla et al. ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Dentinal tubule disinfection using three calcium hydroxide formulations’.  		 			S J Cwikla 		,  		 			M Blenger 		,  		 			S Giguere 		,  		 			A P Fox 		,  		 			F J Vertucci 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Endod}  		2005. 31 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Williams et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Detection and quantitation of Enterococcus faecalis by real-time PCR (qPCR), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and cultivation during endodontic treatment’.  		 			J M Williams 		,  		 			M Trope 		,  		 			D J Caplan 		,  		 			C D Shugars 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Endod}  		2006. 32 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ørstavik and Haapasalo ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules’.  		 			D Ørstavik 		,  		 			M Haapasalo 		.  	 	 		\textit{Endod Dent Traumatol}  		1990. 6 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Asgary et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Evaluation of antimicrobial effect of MTA, calcium hydroxide, and CEM cement’.  		 			S Asgary 		,  		 			Akbari Kamrani 		,  		 			F Taheri 		,  		 			S 		.  	 	 		\textit{Iranian Endodontic J}  		2007. 2  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Pinheiro et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Evaluation of root canal microorganisms isolated from teeth with endodontic failure and their antimicrobial susceptibility’.  		 			E T Pinheiro 		,  		 			Bpfa Gomes 		,  		 			Ccr Ferraz 		,  		 			F B Teixeira 		,  		 			A A Zaia 		,  		 			F J Souza-Filho 		.  	 	 		\textit{Oral Microbiol Immunol}  		2003. 18 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ashari et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Evaluation of the antimicrobial effects of MTAD, NaOCl against selected endodontic pathogens’.  		 			Asna Ashari 		,  		 			M Fayaz 		,  		 			F 		,  		 			Moezzi Ghadim 		,  		 			N 		,  		 			Alim Marvesti 		,  		 			L Mehrabi 		,  		 			Y 		.  	 	 		\textit{Iranian Endodontic J}  		2009. 4  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Turk et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		\textit{In vitro antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide mixed with different vehicles against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod},  		 			B T Turk 		,  		 			B H Sen 		,  		 			T Ozturk 		.  		2009. 108 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Waltimo et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘In vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans to four disinfectants and their combinations’.  		 			T Waltimo 		,  		 			D Ørstavik 		,  		 			E Siren 		,  		 			M Haapasalo 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int Endod J}  		1999. 32 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Haapasalo et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		‘Inactivation of local root canal medicaments by dentin: an in vitro study’.  		 			H K Haapasalo 		,  		 			E K Siren 		,  		 			Tmt Waltimo 		,  		 			D Ostravik 		,  		 			Mpp Haapasalo 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int Endod J}  		2000. 33 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Abbott ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Medicaments: aids to success in endodontics. Part 1. A review of the literature’.  		 			P V Abbott 		.  	 	 		\textit{Aust Dent J}  		1990. 35  (5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Heling et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Microbiological evaluation of efficacy of chlorhexidine in sustained-release device for dentine sterilization’.  		 			I Heling 		,  		 			M Sommer 		,  		 			D Steinberg 		,  		 			M Friedman 		,  		 			M N Sela 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int Endod J}  		1992. 25 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rolla et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Retention of chlorhexidine in the human oral cavity’.  		 			G Rolla 		,  		 			H Lo¨e 		,  		 			C R Schiott 		.  	 	 		\textit{Arch Oral Biol}  		1971. 16 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Kim et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Tooth discoloration of immature permanent incisor associated with triple antibiotic therapy: a case report’.  		 			J H Kim 		,  		 			Y Kim 		,  		 			S J Shin 		,  		 			J W Park 		,  		 			I Y Jung 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Endod}  		2010. 36 p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}