# Introduction utism, a neurodevelopmental disorder, significantly influences an individual's daily life, impeding their ability to engage in typical activities, particularly in the realms of social interaction and communication. It manifests in restrictive behaviours, often characterized by repetitive actions, which encompass stereotypy, ritualistic behaviour, perseveration (Ringdahl, 2011), and compulsions. (American Psychatric Association, 2013) According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), autism is a spectrum disorder with varying degrees of severity and presentation. The core symptoms of autism are evident early in childhood and persist throughout the individual's lifespan. One can observe repetitive behaviours and fixation on particular interests and, or specific activities. The authors of this paper maintain the belief that it is possible for children on the autism spectrum to receive education alongside their same-age peers in mainstream schools. Specific adaptations will be needed. Lindsay (2007) pointsout that inclusion is a crucial education plan designed to increase the educational opportunities of students with particular needs. Research such as that carried out by Crosland and Dunlap (2012) and Sanahuja and Qinyi (2012) has shown that students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) benefit from attending mainstream, although additional support is required. This paper reviews individualized and systemic interventions, specifically cooperative learning strategies, used with autistic children. These strategies are believed to help create an inclusive learning environment. Therefore, in this paper, we discuss strategies for the successful inclusion of children with autism, which can be used by educators in mainstream environments. # II. # Method a) Search Procedures The studies in this research were obtained by searching research papers in the HyDi database, which discuss cooperative and collaborative strategies. HyDi is an extensive database with access rights to many databases such as Education Database, Web of Science, ProQuest Central, Social Science Database, Springer, and EBSCOhost. The terms "cooperative," "collaborative," and "learning strategies" were employed in conjunction with "autism," "Asperger," and "inclusion.". The returned papers were sorted by relevance, and the abstracts of all articles containing "autism" or "Asperger" in the title were manually screened. Publications that did not pertain to the research question of the current study, meaning they contained the search terms in a different context, were excluded. The search also included papers that were cited in the articles which were selected for inclusion. Studies published between 2010 and the spring of 2023 were included in this literature review. The literature searches were conducted in the winter of 2022 and again in the spring of 2023. The Web of Science allowed us to refine our search results by choosing pertinent research areas. We utilized this function by selecting "education-educational research." Within this database, the search yielded 102 papers, of which 8 met the inclusion criteria. EBSCO Host provided the option to search several databases. This search returned 113 papers, with six qualifying for inclusion. ProQuest Central provided the option to narrow down the search result by title; we selected autism or Asperger's. This search returned 82 papers, of which eight qualified for review. Social Science Database produced 22 papers, four qualifying for A inclusion. Springer returned 18 papers, and one qualified for review. Education Database produced 49 papers, two qualifying for inclusion. All abstracts were read, and 29 articles were selected for review. # b) Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria For inclusion in this extensive review, each article underwent evaluation based on several criteria. Initially, the article needed to detail the application of an evidence-based intervention for at least one participant with ASD. Secondly, the articles were required to incorporate a minimum of one cooperative learning strategy. Thirdly, the research was mandated to have been conducted within an inclusive setting. Lastly, the reviewed articles were expected to have been published in the year 2010 or later. # III. # Results # a) Review of Strategy 1: Cooperative group teaching Cooperative learning is one of the methods that enable students with disabilities to reveal their strengths and weaknesses together with their typically developing peers (Corbett et al., 2013). Studies on cooperative learning have shown that it positively affects the social acceptance of students with disabilities in general education classes (Gilles, 2007). Supporters of the cooperative learning model believe that learning consists of various components. Cooperative learning is a very beneficial model for children with autism. Corbett et al., (2013) emphasized that Student Team Learning (STL) has three bases. These are team rewards, individual responsibility, and equal opportunities for success. Using STL techniques, teams earn certificates or other team rewards if they exceed a designated criterion. Personal accountability implies that the team's overall success relies on the individual learning efforts of all team members. This redirects the team members' actions towards elucidating concepts to their peers and ensuring that everyone in the team is adequately prepared for quizzes or assessments, which they must undertake independently, without reliance on their teammates. Equal opportunities for success mean that students contribute to their teams by improving over their past performances. This ensures that high, average, and low achievers are equally challenged to do their best and that the contributions of all team members will be valued. Cooperative learning is a method that can foster success for future generations. The SENSE Theatre project, a peer-mediated initiative immersed in play and focused on performance, is introduced by Corbett et al. (2013). Through the programme, actors of a similar age who are ordinarily developing are paired with individuals who have Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) to serve as co-actors and peer models in a play. The severity of each participant's symptom profile and their prior interaction with the ASD community are taken into consideration during the matching process. Ten main goals are the emphasis of the SENSE Theatre approach. These goals are communicated, exemplified, and integrated through direct instruction, bolstered by a variety of case studies and ongoing, supervised experience. These ten main goals are clearly explained to peers and are intended to improve different facets of autism symptomology. The primary goals and desired behaviours include: (1) giving social support to establish trust and lower stress levels; (2) making an enjoyable environment to promote social play; (3) modeling warm social interaction to encourage reciprocal engagement with peers; (4) increasing motivation to boost social initiation; (5) using directed communication to improve verbal back-and-forth conversation; (6) using nonverbal communication to enhance gestures, eye contact, and facial expressions; (7) playing imaginatively to cultivate creativity; (8) using empathic responding to foster empathy; 9) supporting active learning to promote novelty and participation; and (10) advancing individual learning by combining social learning with behaviour. Studies on this subject are summarized in Table 1. The results showed that using the CVLE-social interaction system had significant positive effects on participants' performance, both within the CVLE-social interaction system and in terms of reciprocal social interaction learning. All the studies reviewed here were designed with a single-subject experimental model. A total of 15 students, 13 of whom were ASD students (n = 13 ASD), were included in the studies. Participants were between the ages of 4 and 11. These studies were carried out in inclusive environments, in preschool, primary, and secondary schools. A variety of behaviours were targeted for intervention. In one study (Cheng & Ye, 2010), the focus was on enhancing social competence in a collaborative virtual environment. Another study (Scott, 2019) delved into the hidden aspects of group work's curriculum, while Lee et al. (2021) concentrated on physical activities. Cheng and Ye (2010) focus on using a virtual learning environment to help the deficiencies of social competence for people with ASDs and to increase their social interaction. In particular, it provides a basic exploration of social competence within collaborative virtual learning environment (CVLE) systems and behavioural performance in social and cognitive interactions. Thus, this CVLE-social interaction system involves a 3D expressive avatar, an animated social situation, with verbal and text communication. The results showed that using the CVLE-social interaction system had significant positive effects on participants' performance, both within the CVLE-social interaction system and in terms of reciprocal social interaction learning. Lee et al., (2021) evaluated the effects of cooperative physical activities on the social interactions of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in China. Cooperative physical activities include procedures such as peer selection, peer practice, group task completion, and an interdependent group contingency. The intervention took place during inclusive physical education (PE) classes. The generalization of interactions with peers was evaluated during free play. Although the frequency of inappropriate interactions increased after the intervention in both settings, the proportion of inappropriate interactions relative to appropriate interactions decreased for two children in the PE setting and all three children in the free-play setting. Scott (2019) used Video-recorded observations. The observations were transcribed and coded according to the nature of each conversational attempt, which included prompted reciprocal communication, unprompted reciprocal communication, self-centric conversations, directives, clarification questions/ statements, and off-topic remarks. Results from this study indicate that when the four participants with ASD used a structured protocol that guided communication attempts (through explicit tasks) during cooperative academic group works, their interaction attempts increased, as did their (prompted and unprompted) reciprocal exchanges. # b) Review of Strategy 2: Peer Tutoring and Peer Influences Peer-mediated instruction is implemented by pairing a child on the spectrum with another child without disabilities (Berman, 2019). Thus, rather than involving just a teacher or therapist through this strategy, one or more peers will take on a role in the teaching/learning process. This intervention can be used in small groups and classroom-wide intervention programs (Zhang et Classroom-Wide Tutoring consists of dividing the class into diverse small learning groups. Teams should include at least one high-performing student, an average student, and an underperforming student with a disability (Lundblom & Woods, 2012). Thus, while there is heterogeneity within groups, groups are similar across the class, allowing the educator to capitalize on the groups' complementary knowledge and achieve higherlevel, collaborative objectives. The teacher conveys to students that every team collectively bears the responsibility of aiding all its members in comprehending the material taught earlier. Teammates should have the chance to collaborate in problemsolving or grasping the content, with each potentially taking on the role of the designated "tutor" within the group (Lundblom & Woods, 2012). Peer Support Arrangements involve equipping one or more general education students in an inclusive classroom to provide academic and social support to students with disabilities (Corbett et al., 2013). Broad descriptions of individualized educational objectives, participation objectives, and social interaction objectives for the student with a disability are shared with the peers. Educators with expertise in special education or paraprofessionals offer comprehensive support to facilitate the peer counseling process and assist students in achieving their established objectives (Corbett et al., 2013). Lunch Bunches relates a student with a disability to a group of students without similar disabilities or students without disabilities to join them for lunch, focusing on social interaction during that lunchtime (Fan et al., 2021) A total of 241 autistic persons participated in these investigations, according to an overall analysis of the trials. Examining the participants' gender characteristics reveals that 47 of them are male and 15 are female. Furthermore, the gender of 179 people with autism was not identified. There are 15 boys and 15 girls among children with typical development. The 134 students' genders were not identified. This group, along with their peers, constituted the 375 participants in the study. The age range spans from 4 to 18. When the methods of the studies are examined, it is noticeable that most of them are carried out with a single-subject design. Seven of them used multiple baselines (Banda., et al., 2010;Ganz., et (Parsons., et al., 2019). The other one study used qualitative methods (Fan et al., 2021), and yet another used clinical trials (Zhang et al., 2022). When we examine the type of intervention the studies used one would see that most used social skills and social instruction (Banda., et # c) Review of Strategy 3: Social Skills Training Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have recently received a lot of attention both within and outside the PBS (Positive Behaviour Support) community (Vincent et al., 2022). Because social interaction is a common problem for people on the spectrum, many social skills interventions have been designed to try to improve the social aspects of their lives (Corbett., et al.,2013). Although there is increasing evidence supporting the use of social skills training to improve social performance, there is little evidence that this enhanced performance improves the quality of social life of people with ASD (McMahon, et al., 2012). This discrepancy is, at least in part, due to how the dependent variable was defined. Researchers commonly evaluate the efficacy of interventions by examining observable changes in behaviour, focusing on the behaviour's outward appearance. Examples of these dependent variables encompass aspects like social initiation, social response, conversational skills, and peer imitation (Sabey et al., 2020). As a majority of studies within this category revolve around peer interactions, they were primarily assessed under the former title. Upon evaluating the studies, it becomes evident that a total of 140 individuals with autism were involved in the research. Regarding the gender composition of the participants, five were male, two were female, and the gender of 133 individuals with autism was not specified. The age range of the participants varied from 6 to 12 years. If the methods of the studies are examined, one can notice that different designs were used. For instance, Kasari et All the interventions evaluated used social skills intervention, but they used different programs such as peer social connection (Kasari, et al., 2012), vocalizations (McMahon, et al., 2012), social behaviour (Sabey, et al., 2020), physical activity (Sansi, et al., 2021), and cooperative play (Vincent et al., 2022). # Social Skills Intervention The students on the autism spectrum showed increases in the percentage of time engaged in cooperative play with peers during the intervention. # d) Review of Strategy 4: Collaborative Teaching Schools are communal organizations, and for teachers, collaborative competence is an essential component of their expertise. Similarly, Collaboration is an essential aspect of teacher education, helping students learn how to teach effectively and develop their team teaching (Huskens, et al, 2014 # Collaborative teaching Based on these preliminary results, co-teaching appears to be an effective mode of instruction for meeting the needs of pupils with, and without, SEN in mainstream settings. Upon review of the studies, it is evident that a cumulative total of 496 individuals with autism were participants in these research endeavours. When the gender characteristics of the participants are examined, it is seen that 6 of them are boys, and the gender of 490 individuals with autism was not specified. The age ranges vary between 5 and 13 years old. Different types of designs were used in these studies. Becevic et al. (2021) employed a crosssectional post-virtual clinic survey design, Huskens, et al. (2014) utilized a multiple baseline design, and Lehane and Senior, (2019) incorporated a mixedmethods approach. Upon evaluation of the interventions, it is apparent that all of them were based on collaborative learning and teaching methods. All the interventions evaluated used different programs such as virtual collaboration (Becevic, et al., 2021), robot-mediated intervention (Huskens, et al., 2014), and collaborative teaching (Lehane & Senior, 2020). IV. # Conclusion This review has shown that cooperative learning strategies enable students with disabilities to share their skills and weaknesses with their peers who are typically developing (Corbett et al., 2013). According to studies on cooperative learning, it helps general education students with impairments feel more accepted by their peers. (Gilles, 2007). Cooperative and collaborative learning proponents, as shown in the reviewed studies, hold that cooperative learning is a particularly useful strategy for children with autism. Collaborative work among students, aimed at achieving a common goal, often leads to increased success and productivity compared to individual efforts. Creating learning environments that foster positive interdependence is generally more favorable than those emphasizing independence. It's widely recognized that student cooperation within groups can be challenging, and it's important to establish groups in a way that makes the five essential elements of successful collaboration clear. These elements include promoting productive interactions among group members, ensuring individual accountability, explicitly teaching necessary social skills, and encouraging groups to reflect on both task management and interpersonal interactions. When these key components are integrated into group work, students are more likely to feel motivated to work together to attain both their individual and the group's objectives. They become more inclined to take personal responsibility for their contributions to the group and their interactions with fellow group members. They also tend to show greater respect for the contributions of others and are committed to resolving disagreements democratically. Moreover, they actively contribute to effective task management and the maintenance of positive working relationships. 1Year 202346 toappropriateinteractionsdecreased for two children in thePE setting and for all threechildren in the free-play settingScott, 20193 boy, 1 girl10-11 yABAHiddenResults from this study indicatewith 5 fifth-Curriculum ofthat when the four participantsgradegroup workwith ASD used a structuredpeersprotocolthatguidedcommunication attempts (throughexplicit tasks) during cooperativeacademic group work their overallinteraction attempts increased, as did their (prompted and unprompted) reciprocal exchanges.Year 202347Volume XXIII Issue III Version ID D D D ) A(Medical Researchal.2022). Research has indicated that peer-mediated instruction and interventions are effective because they create more chances for individuals to practice proper social and communication skills during natural interactions with others (Schmidt &Global Journal ofStichter, 2012). If properly designed and implemented,peer support strategies can be a valuable method forproviding academic and social support to students withdisabilities (Bell & Carter, 2013). Peer support strategiesrefer to a wide variety of intervention approaches. Themain three approaches are (a) classroom-wide peertutoring, (b) peer support arrangements, and (c) lunchbunches.© 2023 Global Journ als 2Author(s), yearSampleAgeDesignInterventionFindingsBanda., and2 girls with ASD8 yMultiple baselinePeer-to-peerResultsindicatedHart., 2010designs acrosssocial skillsincreasedsocialparticipantsthrough directinitiationsinbothinstructionparticipants and sharingbehaviours in one of theparticipants,butnoincreases in responses inboth participants.Berman.,2 boys with ASD4 yABAB modelGroup AffectionThe findings agree with2019and 5 peers ofActivities (GAA) onthosereportedbythe same agessocial interactionpreviouslyconductedstudies, however, themaintenanceandgeneralizationofimprovedinteractionskills remain to be ofgreat concern. It issuggested that in order toaddress this importantissue, an interventionprogramcombiningGroup Affection Activitieswith peer training shouldbesystematicallyintegrated into the earlychildhood curriculum andimplemented for all tobenefit.Collet-3 boys, 1 girl12-13 y Pre-test Post-testPower-PALS (PeerPower Pals had aKlingenberg.,with ASD, andAssisting,Leading,significant impact onNeitzel., and18 peersSupporting)school experiences andLaBerge.,Implementing asocial interactions for2012peer-mediatedboth learners with andinterventionwithout ASD. 3Author(s), yearSampleAgeDesignInterventionFindingsKasari.,60 students8 y2 x 2 factorialSocial SkillsSignificant improvements can beRotheram-with ASDdesignmade in peer social connectionsFuller., Lockefor children with autism spectrumand Gulsurd.,disorders in general education2012classroomswithabriefintervention, and these gainspersist over time.McMahon.,28 students12 yClinic-basedSocialSkillsOverthecourseoftheVismara., andwith ASDinterventionTrainingintervention, participants madeSolomon, 2012fewerinitiatingandothervocalizations, more respondingvocalizations, spent more timeinteracting with a group of peersand spent marginally less timeinteracting with a leader.Sabey., Ross.,2 boys, and7-11 yObservationalSocialskillTheinterventionincreasedand Goodman,1 girl withandtrainingparticipants' social behaviour.2020ASDinterventionalHowever, its mixed results in thedesignquality of peer responses may bea more meaningful indicator of itseffect on the quality of social livesof the participants.Sansi.,45 students6-11 yMixed-methodPhysical ActivityThe IPA program increased theNalbant., andwith ASDsequentialProgram on themotor and social skills of ASDOzer, 2021exoplanetarymotorskills,students.designsocial skillsVincent et al.,3 boys, 16-8 ySingle-case2022girlwithexperimentalASDdesign 4).Collaborative learning focuses on five keycharacteristics (DatTran, 2013). The five pillars ofcollaborative learning theory are consistent with the A © 2023 Global Journ als Cooperative, Collaborative, and Related Strategies' Effect on Learning in Children with Autism * Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 2013 American Psychiatric Association th ed. * Increasing peer-to-peer social skills through direct instruction of two elementary school girls with autism DRBanda SLHart 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01149.x Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 10 2 2010. June * ECHO Evaluation of Participants' Perceptions of Collaborative Telementoring Network MBecevic PNair EWallach KHoffman KSohl 10.1177/23743735211065292 Journal of Patient Experience 8 237437352110652 2021. January * Tennessee Department of Education LBell EWCarter 2013 Peer-mediated support strategies * Increasing the Social Interaction of Two Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Peers ZBerman 10.20489/intjecse.506844 International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education 10 2 2019, January 2 * Exploring the social competence of students with autism spectrum conditions in a collaborative virtual learning environment -The pilot study YCheng JYe 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.011 Computers & Education 54 4 2010. May * Power-PALS (Peers Assisting, Leading, Supporting): Implementing a Peer-Mediated Intervention in a Rural Middle School Program LCollet-Klingenberg JNeitzel J 10.1177/875687051203100202 Rural Special Education Quarterly 31 2 2012. June * Improvement in Social Deficits in Autism Spectrum Disorders Using a Theatre-Based, Peer-Mediated Intervention BACorbett DMSwain CCoke DSimon CNewsom NHouchins-Juarez AJenson LWang YSong 10.1002/aur.1341 Autism Research 7 1 2013. October 22 * Effective Strategies for the Inclusion of Children with Autism in General Education Classrooms KCrosland GDunlap 10.1177/0145445512442682 Behavior Modification 36 3 2012 * The influence of disclosure of an autism diagnosis on peer engagement and interactions for a child with autism in summer camps: a case study LFan SShire MCouture LZwaigenbaum SThompson-Hodgetts 10.1080/09638288.2021.1904012 Disability and Rehabilitation 44 16 2021. March 26 * Effects of Peer-Mediated Implementation of Visual Scripts in Middle School JBGanz AKHeath EMLund SP HCamargo MJRispoli MBoles LPlaisance 10.1177/0145445512442214 Behavior Modification 36 3 2012, May) * Effects of Peer Networks on the Social Interactions of High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders KFGardner EWCarter JRGustafson JMHochman MNHarvey TSMullins HFan 10.1177/1540796914544550 Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 39 2 2014. June * Cooperative Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice RGillies 10.4135/9781483329598 2007 Sage Publications * Efficacy of Peer Networks to Increase Social Connections among High School Students with and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder JMHochman EWCarter KBottema-Beutel MNHarvey JRGustafson 10.1177/0014402915585482 Exceptional Children 82 1 2015. May 21 * Improving Collaborative Play Between Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Their Siblings: The Effectiveness of a Robot-Mediated Intervention Based on Lego® Therapy BHuskens APalmen MVan Der Werff TLourens EBarakova 10.1007/s10803-014-2326-0 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 45 11 2014. November 28 * Making the connection: randomized controlled trial of social skills at school for children with autism spectrum disorders CKasari ERotheram-Fuller JLocke AGulsrud 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02493.x Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53 4 2011, November 26 * The Effects of Peer Training on The Social Interactions of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Krebs Mcdaniel Neeley Education 131 2 2010 * Effects of script training on the peer-topeer communication of children with autism spectrum disorder KLedbetter-Cho RLang KDavenport MMoore ALee AHowell CDrew DDawson MHCharlop TFalcomata MO'reilly 10.1002/jaba.240 Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 48 4 2015. August 24 * Using Cooperative Physical Activities in Inclusive Settings to Enhance Social Interactions for Preschoolerswith Autism Spectrum Disorder in China GTLee LHe SXu 10.1177/10983007211035135 Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 24 3 2021, September 7 * Collaborative teaching: exploring the impact of coteaching practices on the numeracy attainment of pupils with and without special educational needs PLehane JSenior 10.1080/08856257 European Journal of Special Needs Education 35 3 2019. August 12. 2019.1652439 * Educational Psychology and the Effectiveness of Inclusive Education/Mainstreaming GLindsay 10.1348/000709906X156881 British Journal of Educational Psychology 77 2007 * EE GLundblom JJWoods 10.1177/1525740111404927 Working in the Classroom 2012. February 17 33 * Measuring Changes in Social Behavior During a Social Skills Intervention for Higher-Functioning Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder CMMcmahon LAVismara MSolomon 10.1007/s10803-012-1733-3 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43 8 2012. December 14 * Teaching typically developing children to promote social play with their siblings with autism MLOppenheim-Leaf JBLeaf CDozier JBSheldon JASherman 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.10.010 2012, April) 6 Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders * A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Play-Based, Peer-Mediated Pragmatic Language Intervention for Children with Autism LParsons RCordier NMunro AJoosten 10.3389/fpsyg Frontiers in Psychology 10 2019. August 27. 2019.01960 * Effects of a Social Skills Intervention on Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Peers with Shared Deficits KCRadley RDO'handley AABattaglia JD KLum KDadakhodjaeva WBFord MBMchugh 10.1353/etc.2017.0011 Education and Treatment of Children 40 2 2017 * Rituals, Stereotypies, and Obsessive-Compulsive Behavior JERingdahl 10.1007/978-1-4419-8065-6_30 International Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series JMatson PSturmey New York, NY Springer 2011 * Beyond topography: addressing the functional impact of social skills training for students with autism CSabey SRoss JGoodman 10.1080/02667363.2019.1703650 Educational Psychology in Practice 36 2 2020. January 15 * Improving the Process of Inclusive Education in Children with ASD in Mainstream Schools JosepSanahuja QinyiTan Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 2012 * Effects of an Inclusive Physical Activity Program on the Motor Skills, Social Skills and Attitudes of Students with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder ASansi SNalbant DOzer 10.1007/s10803-020-04693-z Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 51 7 2020. September 17 * The Use of Peer-Mediated Interventions to Promote the Generalization of Social Competence for Adolescents with High-Functioning Autism and Asperger's Syndrome CSchmidt JPStichter 10.1080/09362835.2012.669303 Exceptionality 20 2 2012. April 17 * Teaching the Hidden Curriculum of Group Work for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder KScott 10.1515/edu-2019-0008 2019. January 1 De Gruyter * Examining the Efficacy of Peer Network Interventions on the Social Interactions of High School Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder MASreckovic KHume HAble 10.1007/s10803-017-3171-8 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47 8 2017. May 31 * Theoretical perspectives underlying the application of cooperative learning in classrooms VDat Tran 10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p101 International Journal of Higher Education 2 4 2013 * Effects of Peer-Mediated Instruction to Teach Use of Speech-Generating Devices to Students with Autism in Social Game Routines NTrottier LKamp PMirenda 10.3109/07434618.2010.546810 Augmentative and Alternative Communication 27 1 2011, February 2 * Evaluating the effectiveness of a reverse inclusion Social Skills intervention for children on the Autism Spectrum LBVincent JMAsmus GLLyons TBorn MLeamon EDenbleyker HMcintire 10.1007/s10803-022-05513-2 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2022. April 20 * Effectiveness of peer-mediated intervention on social skills for children with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled trial BZhang SLiang JChen LChen WChen STu LHu HJin LChu 10.21037/tp-22-110 Translational Pediatrics 11 5 2022. May