\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Malocclusion, Phonetics \& Palatography: The Link Express},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2017 2017-01-15 (revised: 22 Year 2017 15 January 2017)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2017 2017-01-15}
\title{Malocclusion, Phonetics \& Palatography: The Link Express}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Dr. Jakati  Sanjeev}

             \affil[1]{  Dental college and hospital ,  Kolhapur}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 7 December 2016 Accepted: 1 January 2017 Published: 15 January 2017}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


A condition that has a stronger link to malocclusion is a forward resting posture of tongue. Correction of tongue function or posture facilitates correction of the lisp, or interdentalization of the /t/, /d/, /n/, and /l/ phonemes. A diagnosis is needed, that distinguishes learned behaviour from obligatory function due to physical deviation. Inquiry into these disorders identifies subgroups characterized by different combinations of functions, occlusion status, speech status, and forces obligating or predicting anterior tongue position.Aim: To correlate role of phonetics in various malocclusions & evaluate the same palatographically. Materials & method:The tongue was evenly painted with a thin mix of rubber base putty impression material & the speaker was prompted to say the target word. The entire pattern of contact is photographed / recorded palate graphically in different type of malocclusions. Conclusion:When Palatography is correlated to different malocclusions, the aetiology of phonetic disturbance can be incurred.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{malocclusion, }

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{I. Introduction}]{I. Introduction}\par
he multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing speech-language pathology and dentistry is associated with patterns of oral-facial-pharyngeal posture, function related to speech, occlusion \& malocclusion. A condition that has a stronger link to malocclusion is a forward resting posture of tongue. Such chronic postures can interfere with eruptive sequence of dentition and lead to malocclusion \hyperref[b0]{1} .\par
Diagnostic attention is directed toward determining whether a tongue-thrust swallow and a forward tongue resting posture coexist in a given patient. When these conditions coexist, a greater link to malocclusion would be expected than from a tonguethrust swallow alone \hyperref[b1]{[2]}\hyperref[b2]{[3]}\hyperref[b3]{[4]}\hyperref[b4]{[5]}\hyperref[b5]{[6]}\hyperref[b6]{[7]} . There is evidence that a tongueforward resting posture / tongue thrust swallow and lisping coexist Correction of tongue function or posture facilitates correction of the lisp, or interdentalization of the /t/, /d/, /n/, and /l/ phonemes. A diagnosis is needed, that distinguishes learned behaviour from obligatory function due to physical deviation. Primary goal is to retrain labial and lingual resting and functional patterns \hyperref[b7]{[8]}\hyperref[b8]{[9]} . Existing research is limited in quantity. Much research is flawed by the use of ex post facto methods of study. Inquiry into these disorders identifies subgroups characterized by different combinations of functions, occlusion status, speech status, and forces obligating or predicting anterior tongue position \hyperref[b7]{[8]}\hyperref[b8]{[9]} .\par
Information is needed about relationships among all of the following:\par
? Tongue morphology, position and movement;  
\section[{II. Materials \& Method}]{II. Materials \& Method}\par
The palatographic techniques used in our study was similar to the one summarized by Ladefoged  {\ref 10-12 1997, 2003} \& modified by Victoria B. Anderson \hyperref[b12]{[13]}\hyperref[b13]{[14]} University of Hawaii at M?noa 2008.\par
Step 1: A thin mix of rubber base putty impression material (Aquasil, Dentsply TM ) was used in our study. Chromatic alginate or an "edible paint" mixture of olive oil and powdered digestive charcoal can also be used. Although the speaker is meant to rinse out the mixture, i.e. entirely edible, and can be swallowed without danger.\par
Step 2: The tongue was evenly painted as far back as is comfort-able for speaker. Application on the tip of tongue was intended to record the speech sounds /t/, /d/ \& application on lateral borders of tongue was intended for sounds /s/, /z/ \& Th, sh, ch (voiced or voiceless). Step 3: Then the speaker was asked to return the tongue to a resting position inside the mouth, and keep her / his mouth relaxed and open so that no tonguepalate contact is made. Drooling may or may not occur; either is normal. The speaker was prompted to say the target word by giving its gloss. The palatography mirror was placed in her / his mouth to reflect the articulation, so that the entire pattern of contact can be seen (see figure  {\ref 1}) which is photographed / recorded.\par
Step 4: A sample of 10 patients each, belonging to different type of malocclusions were randomly selected from the department \& the above procedure was carried out in all of them \& the palatographic imprint of the same was recorded.  
\section[{IV. Discussion}]{IV. Discussion}\par
Evaluation of the structure, form and function of tongue is the first step in treatment planning. Sucking habits \hyperref[b15]{[16]}\hyperref[b16]{[17]}\hyperref[b17]{[18]}\hyperref[b18]{[19]} , when present, is usually eliminated before treatment for tongue thrust begins. Timing of treatment is following orthodontic treatment, but concurrent and pre-treatment is also common. Emphasis in treatment is on lingual and labial resting postures \hyperref[b7]{[8]}\hyperref[b8]{[9]} , but most approaches include a number of muscle retraining exercises, followed by instruction in handling and swallowing of solids, liquids, and saliva. Speech treatment is directed toward normalization of fronted lingual-alveolar consonants. Patients are seen for followup sessions for various periods but usually until completion of all orthodontic treatment. Length of treatment varies from 14 to 20 sessions or more, over 3 months to a year, depending on approach, age, and maturity of patient, and timing in relation to orthodontic treatment.\par
Palatography can be carried out either by a direct method or an indirect method. In the direct method described by Oakley Coles in 1872 he used gum Arabic \& flour.\par
During articulation, marking material is transferred to opposite articulator. This contact pattern is videotaped / recorded / photographed \& then marked on the palatal cast. The indirect method first described by Kingsley in 1880, he prepared an upper plate of black Indian rubber \& covered the tongue with a mixture of chalk \& ethanol. The contacts seen on palatal rubber plate were then transferred on to cast as in direct method.\par
Static palatography (also known as direct palatography) is a way to collect articulatory records about speech sounds that can be used either in field or in the laboratory \hyperref[b12]{[13]}\hyperref[b13]{[14]} . Palatography creates records of contact pattern of tongue on roof of mouth during an utterance, and when the actual dimensions of palate are known it can be a rich source of data about articulatory strategies. Movements of tongue depend on local conditions like malocclusion. Even though the tongue has an inherent capacity to compensate its position \& movements based on the type of occlusion / malocclusion it inevitably causes some kind of disturbance / defect in phonetics.\par
Other methods of collecting data on speech articulations include Dynamic palatography (Hardcastle 20 et al. 1989) and Portable ultrasound  {\ref (Gick 21 2002)}.\par
Dynamic palatography, also known as electropalatography (EPG), uses a plastic retainer-like device implanted with electrodes and worn on palate, to sample information about contact patterns on palate over time. A drawback is that EPG cannot provide information about tongue configurations / size during an utterance.\par
Portable ultrasound provides information on tongue shape and position during an utterance, but since it tracks soft tissue rather than bone, it cannot show tongue's position with respect to various areas on roof of mouth.\par
Front most contact on roof of mouth in midline is a common metric for indexing place of articulation  {\ref (Dart 22 1991,)}. Since this measure reflects size of cavity in front of constriction, it is associated with spectral shape of bursts  {\ref (Fant 23 1960)}.\par
Phonological distinctions such as apical versus laminal lead us to expect differences among categories of speech sounds based on length of contact from front to back in midline. Acoustic correlates of contact length relate to relative size and mass of active articulator. Small tongue tip will make a short contact; broader blade will make a longer contact. Expect the tip to be a While size of cavity in front of constriction can be expected to relate to spectral shape of bursts, cavity in back of oral closure can be expected to relate to formant transition loci at edges of neighbouring vowels  {\ref (Fant 23 1960)}. One index of oral cavity size behind the constriction involves measuring uncontacted region behind the constriction. The size of this space is affected by amount of raising of the sides of the tongue body, as well as the rear extent of midline contact; the more contact on the palate, the smaller this area will be. 
\section[{V. Conclusion}]{V. Conclusion}\par
Static palatography is a "field-friendly" technique that can provide valuable, detailed information about articulatory characteristics of speech sounds. However, the process is labor-intensive and time-consuming. When it is correlated to different malocclusions \& thus the aetiology of the resulting phonetic disturbance / lisping can be incurred. The test can be repeated after the correction of malocclusion as a confirmatory process to know whether the aetiology has been removed or not. \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{27}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}T 2 - 7 .}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{27}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png}
\caption{\label{fig_1}Figure 2 - 7 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 1 15}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.12304761904761904\textwidth}P{0.09876190476190476\textwidth}P{0.272\textwidth}P{0.35619047619047617\textwidth}}
mass and because\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Speech sound\tabcellsep Phonetic Type\tabcellsep Target words used\tabcellsep Dental problem\\
/s/, /z/\tabcellsep Sibilant\tabcellsep Soup, City, Science, Box, Zoo, Xylophone\tabcellsep Lisp due to large gap b/w incisors, missing incisors, open bite\\
/t/, /d/\tabcellsep Lingoalveolar stop\tabcellsep Teeth, Toast, Button, Guitar, Boat, Coat\tabcellsep Difficulty in production related to irregular incisors, supernumerary teeth, tongue tie\\
Th, sh, ch (voiced or voiceless)\tabcellsep Linguodental fricative\tabcellsep Shop, Share, Chain, Cheese, Church, When, Why, Think, Thumb, This, That\tabcellsep Distortion related to severe open bite, missing incisors\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 			\footnote{( )J} 			\footnote{© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)Year 2017} 		 		\backmatter  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Fant ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		\textit{Acoustic theory of speech production},  		 			Gunnar Fant 		.  		1960. The Hague: Mouton.  	 
\bibitem[Victoria (2008)]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Anderson University of Hawaii at M?noa’.  		 			B Victoria 		.  	 	 		\textit{Static Palatography for Language Field work Language Documentation \& Conservation},  				June 2008. 2 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dart ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		\textit{Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations. (UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79},  		 			Sarah Dart 		.  		1991.  		 			University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation 		 	 
\bibitem[Van Norman ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Digit sucking: It's time for an attitude adjustment or a rationale for the early elimination of digit sucking habits through positive behaviour modification’.  		 			R Van Norman 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Oral Myology}  		1985. 11 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hanson and Cohen ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Effects of form and function on swallowing and the developing dentition’.  		 			M L Hanson 		,  		 			M S Cohen 		.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Orthodontics}  		1973. 64 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Overstake ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Electromyographic study of normal and deviant swallowing’.  		 			C P Overstake 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Oral Myology}  		1975. 1 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Proffit and Proffit ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Equilibrium theory revisited’.  		 			W R Proffit 		,  		 			W R Proffit 		.  	 	 		\textit{Contemporary orthodontics},  				 			C V Mosby 		 (ed.)  		 (St. Louis)  		1978. 1986. 48 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ladefoged ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘Instrumental techniques for linguistic phonetic fieldwork’.  		 			Peter Ladefoged 		.  	 	 		\textit{The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences},  				 			William Hardcastle,  			John Laver 		 (ed.)  		 (Oxford)  		1997. Blackwell. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Labial-ingual Posturing Function American Speech-Language-Hearing Association ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Labial-ingual Posturing Function’.  	 	 		\textit{American Speech-Language-Hearing Association}  		1989.  	 	 (Technical Report) 
\bibitem[Bresolin et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Mouth breathing in allergic children: Its relationship to dentofacial development’.  		 			D Bresolin 		,  		 			P A Shapiro 		,  		 			G G Shapiro 		,  		 			M K Chapko 		,  		 			S Dassel 		.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Orthodontics}  		1983. 83 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hardcastle et al. ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		‘New developments in electropalatography: a state-of-the-art report’.  		 			William J Hardcastle 		,  		 			W Jones 		,  		 			C Knight 		,  		 			A Trudgeon 		,  		 			G Calder 		.  	 	 		\textit{Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics}  		1989. 3 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ladefoged ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		\textit{Phonetic data analysis},  		 			Peter Ladefoged 		.  		2003. Oxford: Blackwell.  	 
\bibitem[Modeer et al. ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Sucking habits and their relation to posterior crossbite in 4-year-old children’.  		 			T Modeer 		,  		 			L Udenrick 		,  		 			H Lindner 		.  	 	 		\textit{Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research}  		1982. 90 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ladefoged and Maddieson ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		\textit{The sounds of the world's languages. Ox-ford},  		 			Peter Ladefoged 		,  		 			Ian Maddieson 		.  		1996. Blackwell.  	 
\bibitem[Mason and Proffit ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘The tongue thrust controversy: Background and recommendations’.  		 			R M Mason 		,  		 			W R Proffit 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders}  		1974. 39  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Young and Vogel ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘The use of cueing and positive practice in the treatment of tongue thrust swallowing’.  		 			L D Young 		,  		 			V Vogel 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry}  		1983. 14 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Gick ()]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		‘The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork’.  		 			Bryan Gick 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of the International Phonetic Association}  		2002. 32 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Popovich and Thompson ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		‘Thumb and finger sucking: Its relation to malocclusion’.  		 			F Popovich 		,  		 			G W Thompson 		.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Orthodontics}  		1973. 63 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dworkin and Culatta ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Tongue strength: Its relationship to tongue thrusting, openbite, and articulatory proficiency’.  		 			J P Dworkin 		,  		 			K H Culatta 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders}  		1980. 45 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hanson and Andrianopoulos ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Tongue thrust and malocclusion’.  		 			J L Hanson 		,  		 			M V Andrianopoulos 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Orthodontics}  		1982. 29 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Andrianopoulos and Hanson ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Tongue thrust and the stability of overjet correction’.  		 			M V Andrianopoulos 		,  		 			M L Hanson 		.  	 	 		\textit{Angle Orthodontist}  		1987. 57  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Fletcher et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Tongue thrust swallow, speech articulation, and age’.  		 			S G Fletcher 		,  		 			R L Casteel 		,  		 			D P Bradley 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders}  		1961. 25 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bell and Profit ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{Whitr RP: surgical correction of dentofacial deformaties p},  		 			W H Bell 		,  		 			Profit 		.  		1980. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co. p. 113.  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}