\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Use of Different Immunoresponse Assays for Evaluation of Live Attenuated Sheep Pox Vaccine in Comparison with Challenge Test}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2017 2017-01-15 (revised: 42 Year 2017 15 January 2017)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2017 2017-01-15} \title{Use of Different Immunoresponse Assays for Evaluation of Live Attenuated Sheep Pox Vaccine in Comparison with Challenge Test} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Sonia A. Rizk} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 11 December 2016 Accepted: 2 January 2017 Published: 15 January 2017} \maketitle \begin{abstract} Sheep pox (SP) is one of the priorities, high-impact animal diseases in many developing countries, where live attenuated vaccines are routinely used against sheep pox virus (SPV). Sheep pox virus is a member of the family Poxviridae, genus Capri poxvirus. In this study, live attenuated Sheep pox vaccines were evaluated for humoral and cellular immunity using virus neutralization index (NI), ELISA and lymphocyte proliferation assay (XTT) beside routinely titration of life attenuated virus content of vaccine in Vero cell line which gives mean satisfactory TCID 50 /dose (3.34) for used vaccine batches, in addition to clinical examination of vaccinated sheep and also application of challenge test.Sixty susceptible lambs were divided into (10) groups and vaccinated with field and safety doses of (10) different batches of live attenuated vaccine intradermal (I/D) in tail fold while three lambs kept as control. The results showed that lymphocyte proliferation began to increase till reach to its peak (1.312) at 10 th day post vaccination then decrease after that with re-increasing after challenge , serological assays results revealed that protective serum antibody titer started at 10 th day post vaccination with mean titer (1.6 and 1.99), mean absorbance (1.56 and 2.02) and at three weeks the mean titer (2.35 and 2.61) , mean absorbance (2.43 and 2.51) for NI and ELISA respectively, also all vaccinated lambs showed satisfactory levels of protection against the virulent SPV through challenge test as SID 50 more than (2.5) for all batches of vaccine.The results demonstrated that vaccine titration in Vero cell line and evaluation of humoral, cellular immuneresponses using different assays for vaccinated lambs were possible to be an accurate parameter for evaluation of life attenuated sheep pox vaccine equivalent the protective results obtained against a virulent SPV in challenge test. \end{abstract} \keywords{} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \par countries, where live attenuated vaccines are routinely used against sheep pox virus (SPV). Sheep pox virus is a member of the family Poxviridae, genus Capri poxvirus. In this study, live attenuated Sheep pox vaccines were evaluated for humoral and cellular immunity using virus neutralization index (NI), ELISA and lymphocyte proliferation assay (XTT) beside routinely titration of life attenuated virus content of vaccine in Vero cell line which gives mean satisfactory TCID50/dose {\ref (3.34)} for used vaccine batches, in addition to clinical examination of vaccinated sheep and also application of challenge test. Sixty susceptible lambs were divided into \hyperref[b9]{(10)} groups and vaccinated with field and safety doses of \hyperref[b9]{(10)} different batches of live attenuated vaccine intradermal (I/D) in tail fold while three lambs kept as control. The results showed that lymphocyte proliferation began to increase till reach to its peak (1.312) at 10th day post vaccination then decrease after that with re-increasing after challenge , serological assays results revealed that protective serum antibody titer started at 10th day post vaccination with mean titer (1.6 and 1.99), mean absorbance (1.56 and 2.02) and at three weeks the mean titer (2.35 and 2.61) , mean absorbance (2.43 and 2.51) for NI and ELISA respectively, also all vaccinated lambs showed satisfactory levels of protection against the virulent SPV through challenge test as SID50 more than (2.5) for all batches of vaccine. \hyperref[b0]{(1)}. Sheep pox is a disease of sheep and goats characterized by pyrexia, generalized skin and internal pox lesions, and lymphadenopathy \hyperref[b1]{(2)}. Sheep pox and goat pox are ancient diseases that are currently endemic in the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent, and Central and Northern Africa. Kids and lambs are generally more susceptible than adults \hyperref[b2]{(3)}. \section[{GJMR-G Classification}]{GJMR-G Classification}\par Vaccination has been considered to be the cheapest and sustainable means of disease control in the enzootic situation like India, Egypt and Middle East Author ?: e-mail: sonia\textunderscore rizk@yahoo.com \hyperref[b3]{(4)}. Prophylaxis using attenuated vaccines is the choice of control measure as the immunity is long lasting \hyperref[b4]{(5)}. Vaccines are considered among the most valuable and cost-effective tools for the control of infectious diseases. The development of safe and effective vaccines for the prevention and control of emerging and neglected infectious diseases is an international priority (6) and \hyperref[b6]{(7)}.\par In endemic countries a variety of attenuated live vaccines have been used against SPV. Live attenuated vaccine protection is mediated by both cellular and humoral immunity \hyperref[b7]{(8)} and \hyperref[b8]{(9)}. The virus neutralization test is the most specific serological test for evaluation of immunity against SPV, also the enzyme linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA) had already been proved to have great potentiality as a quantitative serological tool in the detection of antibodies against several viral infections including the pox viruses. It had been proved that the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA are superior to those of other serological tests \hyperref[b9]{(10)} and \hyperref[b10]{(11)}.\par A significant number of veterinary vaccine potency tests for serial release are conducted using in vitro methods. For live viral vaccines, these include culture techniques to quantify microbial content as an indicator of antigenic content of the vaccine \hyperref[b11]{(12)} and \hyperref[b12]{(13)}.\par Potency testing for inactivated veterinary vaccines has traditionally used challenge testing of vaccinated animals with live microbes to determine the quantity of vaccine necessary to provide adequate protection. Inadequately protected and control animals that become infected usually develop significant clinical signs of the disease and/or die. However, in recent years, antibody quantification procedures have been developed and validated and subsequently replaced the challenge test for several vaccines \hyperref[b13]{(14)}, \hyperref[b14]{(15)} and \hyperref[b15]{(16)}.\par The global veterinary vaccine industry continues to actively pursue in vitro assays and the reduction in the use of animals for in-process antigen measurement and finished product potency testing \hyperref[b16]{(17)}, \hyperref[b17]{(18)} and \hyperref[b18]{(19)} The present work aims to use different immuneresponse assays for evaluation of live attenuated sheep pox vaccine as alternatives to challenge test. \section[{S}]{S}\par II. \section[{Material and Methods}]{Material and Methods} \section[{a) Virus}]{a) Virus}\par Virulent sheep pox virus, Egyptian strain of sheep pox virus was obtained from the Pox Department, VSVRI Abbassia, Cairo. The virus had been previously isolated from a local outbreak \hyperref[b19]{(20)} and was used for challenge test. \section[{c) Animals}]{c) Animals}\par Sixty three susceptible native breed sheep 6 months old were screened using serum neutralization test and found to be free from antibodies against SPV. \section[{d) Experimental Design}]{d) Experimental Design}\par The experimental sheep were divided into ten groups (contain 6 animals/each) and each group divided into two subgroups as described in Table \hyperref[b0]{(1)}.Beside control group (Gp Co.) contains three animals, were kept unvaccinated as negative control. \hyperref[b9]{(10)} batches of vaccine, beside one control group, kept unvaccinated as negative control. The animals were clinically observed daily to detect post-vaccinal reaction, and different blood samples were collected for cellular and humeral immune responses were evaluated.\par 3. Challenge test: was applied according to (10); 3 weeks post vaccination, all sheep groups and control group, inoculated with 0.5 ml of the virulent SPV through the intradermal route as five inoculums for each dilution of six tenfold serial diluted virus in both body sides of sheep. The challenged animals were kept in separate isolator under observation for (7) days, then exanimate for count of button shaped lesion and calculated sheep infected dose fifty (SID 50 ). \section[{f) Samples}]{f) Samples}\par -Heparinized blood samples were collected from vaccinated and control animals before and after vaccination at different intervals (0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days) for application of the cellular immuneresponse assay. -Whole blood samples for separation of serum were collected also for application of the humoral immuneresponse assay at different intervals (0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days). \section[{g) Evaluation of cellular immune response of the vaccine Batches}]{g) Evaluation of cellular immune response of the vaccine Batches}\par The cellular immunity was evaluated by application of Lymphocyte blastogenesis assay. It was carried out according to ( {\ref 21}) and ( {\ref 22}) using XTT cell viability assay kit (AppiChem). h) Evaluation of humoral immune response of the vaccine Batches -Serum neutralization test (SNT): It was carried out using the microtitre technique according to \hyperref[b23]{(23)} where SP antibody titer was expressed as neutralizing index (NI) according to \hyperref[b24]{(24)}.\par -Indirect ELISA: It was performed to evaluate the humoral immune response according to the method described by \hyperref[b25]{(25)} and the results were expressed by Mean of Absorbance (Ab). \section[{III.}]{III.} \section[{Results}]{Results}\par Table \hyperref[b1]{(2)}: Showed the titer values of life sheep pox virus of different Batches of vaccine using Vero cell line (T.C) which calculated as TCID 50 . F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x 1-(2016) - - - - - - + + ++ + + - - - - - - 2-(2015) - - - - + ++ + + ++ + + - - - - - - 3-(2015) - - - - - - + ++ + + - - - - - - 4-(2015) - - - - - - + + ++ + + - - - - - - 5-(2015) - - - - - - + + ++ + + - - - - - - 6-(2015) - - - - + ++ + + ++ + + - - - - - - 7-(2015) - - - - - - + ++ + + - - - - - - 8-(2015) - - - - - - + + ++ + + - - - - - - 9-(2015) - - - - - - + + ++ + + - - - - - - 10-(2015) - - - - + ++ + + ++ + + - - - - - - Controls - - - - - - -F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x 1-(2016) - - - - - - + + - - - - - - V V 2-(2015) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V V 3-(2015) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V V 4-(2015) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V V 5-(2015) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V V 6-(2015) - - - - - - + + - - - - - - V V 7-(2015) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V V 8-(2015) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V V 9-(2015) - - - - - - + + - - - - - - V V 10-(2015) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V V Controls - - - - - - - \section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par Immunity to sheep pox involves both humoral and cellular responses \hyperref[b26]{(26)}. Antigens on the envelope and on the tubular elements of the virion surface stimulate protective antibodies. Even though it is the cell mediated immune response which eliminates the infection, antibodies limit the spread of the infection within the body. Neutralizing antibodies do play a significant role in the immunity as they have been shown to be an essential component of the protective immune response against sheep pox as the same was found to be absent in unvaccinated and pre-vaccinal serum samples \hyperref[b27]{(27)} .Current evaluation of animal vaccines still focuses on the potency of final products in a batch-wise manner. All recent researches go in way to shafting from in-vivo to in-vitro for replacement the animal models, to ensure relevant quality attributes of vaccine batches by in-vitro evaluation of vaccines rather than by in-vivo potency tests on the final product \hyperref[b28]{(28)}.\par For evaluating veterinary vaccines challenge studies were widely used under controlled conditions and sero-conversion studies, but the potency test in animals requires a large number of animals and involves unrelieved pain and suffering. A relevant in-vitro assay should provide a more accurate, reproducible, rapid, safe, vaccine potency test \hyperref[b29]{(29)}.\par So, this study was performed for evaluation of live attenuated sheep pox vaccine by using different immuneresponse assays as alternatives to challenge test.\par Table \hyperref[b1]{(2)}: Shows the titer values of life sheep pox virus of the ten different Batches of vaccine using Vero cell line (T.C) which calculated as (TCID 50 ) . The titer values were (? 2.5 TCID 50 / dose) for all batches in comparing with used control sheep pox virus (2.1 TCID 50 / 0.1ml) so all vaccine batches were considered Satisfactory on the level of tissue culture and these results agree with protocol of life attenuated sheep pox vaccine evaluation (30) and \hyperref[b30]{(31)}.\par Table \hyperref[tab_0]{(}3-1) Shows the post vaccinal body temperature changes (thermal response) of all vaccinated animals and control ones through different follow up intervals of experiment and till application of challenge test. The body temperature elevated only in sheep groups of batches (2, 6 and 10) at 5 th days post vaccination, while at 7 th and 10 th days the thermal reaction recorded in all sheep groups as the result of using the live attenuated vaccine. Also there was a mild thermal reaction for all vaccinated groups while control unvaccinated group showed severe thermal reaction post challenge due to the development of protective humoral and cellular immuneresponse of vaccinated sheep as shown in Tables (5,6 and 7) these results agree with \hyperref[b31]{(32)}.\par Clinical examination of all sheep groups explained in Table G reactions appeared on the previously vaccinated animals, are due to the circulating antibodies derived through vaccination, which limits spread virus in animals (33) and \hyperref[b34]{(34)},the results also were agreement with \hyperref[b35]{(35)}.\par Table \hyperref[b3]{(4)}: Shows the titration of Vaccine Batches using Challenge Test in Sheep after being challenged with different dilutions of virulent field strain of sheep pox virus, then calculated as SID 50 and the difference between the values SID 50 of used control animal group and vaccinated groups were more than (2.5) for the vaccines and all batches considered satisfactory, these method of calculation and results were agree with (30) and \hyperref[b30]{(31)}.\par It is known that sheep pox immunity depends mainly on the cell-mediated immune response in comparison to the humoral immune response \hyperref[b11]{(12)} and (33).\par The results of cell mediated immune response (XTT) expressed as the mean of absorbance in Table \hyperref[b4]{(5)} showed the gradual increasing in lymphocyte proliferation as reached its peak on the 10 th day (1.312 and 1.415 ) then decrease to lowest level at 21 th day post vaccination (0.544 and 0.612) and re-increased to (0.827 and 0.860) post application of challenge test. These results agree with those of ( {\ref 36}) and \hyperref[b37]{(37)}. Our results were in agreement with, ( {\ref 38}) and ( {\ref 39}) who reported the increase of lymphocyte activity by the 3 rd day post vaccination and reached its peak on the 10 th day then decreased.\par Table {\ref (6 \& 7)} showed the results of SNT and ELISA assays. The humeral immune response increased gradually to be detected by the 10 th day post vaccination as the mean NI was (1.6 and 1.99) more than protective level (>1.5) and mean absorbance of ELISA was (1.56 and 2.02) also more than protective level (> 1) then reached to the highest level mean of NI (2.35 and 2.61) and mean absorbance of ELISA (2.43 and 2.51) at the 21 st day. These results also documented by \hyperref[b9]{(10)} that reported neutralizing Index (NI) ?1.5 considered protective mean against Capri pox viruses and were found by ( {\ref 27}) and \hyperref[b40]{(40)} , mentioned that serum neutralizing antibodies develop on the 2 nd day and a significant rise of antibody titer was detected from the 21 st to 42 nd day post inoculation. Neutralization is very specific for almost all viruses \hyperref[b39]{(39)}. Results also harmonize with \hyperref[b41]{(41)} and \hyperref[b42]{(42)} who concluded that the serum neutralizing antibodies do play a significant role in the immunity against sheep pox and agree with \hyperref[b43]{(43)} pox vaccines is the most effective immunogenic available and provide strong humoral immune response.\par Table {\ref (8 \& 9)} and fig .\par (1) Showed the collective results obtained from all methods used for evaluation of live attenuated sheep pox vaccine either in-vivo or invetro. The pattern of these results indicated the presence of co-relation between different vaccine evaluation assays with the same value and accuracy to overcome and solve the safety problems and precautions of Challenge Test. ( {\ref 14}), \hyperref[b14]{(15)} and \hyperref[b15]{(16)}.\par So the positive concordance found between the antibody levels and protection in tested lambs indicates that using immuneresponse assays as method for evaluation of live attenuated sheep pox vaccine appears to be as accurate as challenge test and presents several advantages in terms of costs and speed of issue of results.\par We conclude that NI and ELISA as immuneresponse assays can be reliable measure of the efficacy of vaccine batches, provided that a good correlation has been demonstrated between protective immunity and resistance to challenge in vivo. So NI and ELISA can be used as alternatives to challenge test.\begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png} \caption{\label{fig_0}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{(} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.6375\textwidth}P{0.05059523809523809\textwidth}P{0.11130952380952382\textwidth}P{0.05059523809523809\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1): Experimental Design\tabcellsep \\ Groups\tabcellsep Batches of SHEEP POX Vaccine\tabcellsep Sub Groups (a) Field (b) 20X (Safety dose dose)\tabcellsep Number of Sheep/Gp\\ Gp CO.\tabcellsep CONTROL\tabcellsep 3 Sheep\tabcellsep Total \# 63 Sheep\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{e) Evaluation of life attenuated sheep pox vaccine}\tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{1. Titration of live attenuated sheep pox in Vero cell}\tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Line by using tenfold serially dilutions of vaccine}\tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{and calculation of tissue culture infective dose fifty /}\tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{dose for each vaccinal batch (TCID 50 /dose)}\tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{2. Potency field tests: Ten groups of sheep were}\tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{vaccinated by inoculated subcutaneously in the}\tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{ventral aspect of the tail fold with the field and (20X)}\tabcellsep \\ safety dose of different\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_0}Table (}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{(} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.039473684210526314\textwidth}P{0.16315789473684209\textwidth}P{0.006578947368421052\textwidth}P{0.10657894736842105\textwidth}P{0.16315789473684209\textwidth}P{0.007894736842105263\textwidth}P{0.11842105263157894\textwidth}P{0.21842105263157896\textwidth}P{0.02631578947368421\textwidth}} \tabcellsep Batches of\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Virus Titer of\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Virus Titer of}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep SHEEPPOX\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Vaccine\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Vaccine}\tabcellsep Lot Dose\tabcellsep CONCLUSION\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Vaccine\tabcellsep \tabcellsep (TCID 50 /dose)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{(TCID 50 /1ml)}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 1-(2016)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2.5\tabcellsep 3.5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 2-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2.7\tabcellsep 3.7\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 3-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4.5\tabcellsep 6.5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 100 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 4-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4.3\tabcellsep 5.3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 5-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2.5\tabcellsep 3.5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 6-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4.1\tabcellsep 5.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 7-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4.3\tabcellsep 6.3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 100 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 8-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3.3\tabcellsep 5.3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 100 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 9-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2.7\tabcellsep 3.7\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep 10-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2.5\tabcellsep 3.5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10 dose\tabcellsep Satisfactory\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Virus Control\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2.1/0.1 ml\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{4.1/1ml}\tabcellsep ---\tabcellsep Control\tabcellsep \\ Days\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{3-1-Thermal Response (Reaction)}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Post Vaccination}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Post Challenge\\ Batches\tabcellsep Day 0\tabcellsep Day 3\tabcellsep Day 5\tabcellsep Day 7\tabcellsep Day 10\tabcellsep Day 14\tabcellsep Day 21\tabcellsep Day 28\\ of SHEEP\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ POX Vaccine\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Challenge Test in Sheep\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: Table(3-1) Showed the post vaccinal body temperature changes (thermal response) of all vaccinated animals and control ones through different follow up intervals of experiment and till application of challenge test. the thermal reaction elevated only in sheep groups of batches (2, 6 and 10) at 5 th days post vaccination, while at 7 th and 10 th days the thermal reaction recorded in all sheep groups, and there was mild thermal reaction for all vaccinated groups while control unvaccinated group showed severe thermal reaction post challenge.Table (3): Field follow up for Different Batches of SHEEP POX Vaccine post Vaccination]} \caption{\label{tab_1}Table ( 2}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{(} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.3965177398160315\textwidth}P{0.05919842312746386\textwidth}P{0.13961892247043364\textwidth}P{0.09494086727989487\textwidth}P{0.1597240473061761\textwidth}} Batches of\tabcellsep Post Challenge\tabcellsep Titer of Vaccine Post Challenge\tabcellsep Deference Between\tabcellsep \\ SHEEPPOX\tabcellsep (I/D) Button\tabcellsep Test in sheep [Average of sheep\tabcellsep SID 50 of Control \&\tabcellsep CONCLUSION\\ Vaccine\tabcellsep Shaped Lesion\tabcellsep infective dose 50 ] (SID50)\tabcellsep vaccinated Groups\tabcellsep \\ 1-(2016)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 2.3\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 2-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 2.1\tabcellsep 3.2\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 3-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 0.5\tabcellsep 4.8\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 4-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 0.7\tabcellsep 4.6\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 5-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 2.4\tabcellsep 2.9\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 6-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 0.9\tabcellsep 4.4\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 7-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 0.6\tabcellsep 4.7\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 8-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 1.7\tabcellsep 3.6\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 9-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 2.2\tabcellsep 3.1\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ 10-(2015)\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 2.6\tabcellsep 2.7\tabcellsep Satisfactory\\ Mean for all Batches\tabcellsep +\tabcellsep 1.6\tabcellsep 3.7\tabcellsep ------\\ Virus Control\tabcellsep +++\tabcellsep 5.3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep control\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{NB . Laboratory follow up of Different Batches of SHEEP POX}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Vaccine\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Table (5): Showed the results of cell mediated}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{immune response (XTT) expressed as the mean of}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{absorbance and clarified that the lymphocyte}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ proliferation.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_4}Table ( 4}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{(} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.043428237129485174\textwidth}P{0.020388065522620905\textwidth}P{0.039781591263650544\textwidth}P{0.0023205928237129483\textwidth}P{0.6292121684867394\textwidth}P{0.017404446177847113\textwidth}P{0.004806942277691108\textwidth}P{0.0028178627145085803\textwidth}P{0.0011602964118564742\textwidth}P{0.0006630265210608424\textwidth}P{0.006630265210608425\textwidth}P{0.0006630265210608424\textwidth}P{0.008950858034321373\textwidth}P{0.0011602964118564742\textwidth}P{0.004972698907956318\textwidth}P{0.0028178627145085803\textwidth}P{0.0011602964118564742\textwidth}P{0.04972698907956318\textwidth}P{0.011934477379095164\textwidth}} \multicolumn{2}{l}{Days Vaccine Batches 1-(2016) 2-(2015) 3-(2015) 4-(2015) 5-(2015) 6-(2015) 7-(2015) 8-(2015) 9-(2015) 10-(2015) Mean of means Controls Days Vacc Batches 1-(2016) 2-(2015) 3-(2015) 4-(2015) 5-(2015) 6-(2015) 7-(2015) 8-(2015) 9-(2015)}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Day 0 0.075 F 0.076 20x 0.071 0.073 0.074 0.073 0.072 0.074 0.075 0.076 0.073 0.073 0.072 0.075 0.074 0.072 0.075 0.077 0.070 0.071 0.073 0.074 0.078 Day 0 F 20x 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{13}{l}{Cell mediated immune response(XTT) (Mean of Absorbance) Post Vaccination Day 5 Day 7 Day 10 Day 14 F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x 0.421 0.518 Day 3 20x 0.370 F 0.600 1.035 1.052 1.320 1.420 1.041 1.061 0.501 Day 21 F 20x 0.635 0.365 0.410 0.517 0.590 1.032 1.048 1.290 1.400 1.036 1.058 0.490 0.580 0.366 0.413 0.516 0.611 1.033 1.050 1.300 1.415 1.039 1.058 0.498 0.621 0.369 0.419 0.515 0.632 1.031 1.052 1.315 1.421 1.040 1.060 0.500 0.610 0.370 0.410 0.516 0.607 1.030 1.049 1.310 1.412 1.039 1.059 0.490 0.609 0.370 0.411 0.517 0.590 1.036 1.050 1.321 1.420 1.042 1.061 0.501 0.612 0.368 0.412 0.514 0.570 1.030 1.051 1.291 1.391 1.038 1.060 0.940 0.609 0.372 0.420 0.518 0.622 1.037 1.053 1.325 1.429 1.042 1.067 0.507 0.617 0.371 0.418 0.516 0.608 1.035 1.051 1.320 1.421 1.041 1.063 0.503 0.614 0.370 0.423 0.517 0.633 1.032 1.054 1.326 1.416 1.040 1.064 0.508 0.610 0.369 0.416 0.516 0.606 1.0331 1.051 1.312 1.415 1.040 1.061 0.544 0.612 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.078 Table (6): Neutralizing antibody titers Humoral immune response (mean results of Serological Examination)( NI) Post Vaccination Challenge Test in Sheep Day 3 Day 5 Day 7 Day 10 Day 14 Day 21 F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.4 2.4 2.7 0.4 0.8 0.7 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.6 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.6 0.4 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.4 2.7 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.6 0.5 0.9 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.5 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 Table (7): ELISA Titer * Mean of Absorbance > one considered positive (protective samples) Days Batches Of SHEEP POX Vaccine Post Challenge Day 28 F 20x 2.25 2.45 2.25 2.35 2.30 2.35 2.40 2.45 2.35 2.40 2.30 2.35 2.30 2.45 2.40 2.45 2.40 2.45 2.30 2.40 2.33 3.41 1.9 Challenge Test in Sheep Post Challenge Day 28 F 20x 0.827 2.21 3.41 0.860 1.00 1.9 1.043 2.05 2.33 Humoral immune response (mean results of Serological Examination) (ELISA) (Mean of Absorbance) Post Vaccination Challenge Test in Sheep Day 0 Day 3 Day 5 Day 7 Day 10 Day 14 Day 21 F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x 1-(2016) 0.36 0.44 0.43 0.73 0.54 1.02 0.68 1.60 1.50 2.20 2.30 2.50 2.35 2.55 2-(2015) 0.28 0.29 0.37 0.68 0.56 0.92 0.70 1.40 1.40 1.89 2.30 2.40 2.35 2.45 3-(2015) 0.46 0.28 0.41 0.65 0.60 0.90 0.83 1.09 1.60 1.90 2.35 2.40 2.40 2.45 4-(2015) 0.37 0.45 0.45 0.75 0.64 0.98 0.90 1.20 1.60 2.22 2.45 2.50 2.50 2.55 5-(2015) 0.28 0.35 0.36 0.70 0.62 0.92 0.98 1.30 1.70 1.98 2.40 2.45 2.45 2.50 6-(2015) 0.36 0.28 0.44 0.67 0.61 0.96 0.88 1.20 1.30 1.90 2.35 2.40 2.40 2.45 7-(2015) 0.25 0.45 0.35 0.75 0.59 0.97 0.90 1.50 1.60 2.20 2.40 2.50 2.45 2.55 8-(2015) 0.43 0.30 0.42 0.65 0.66 0.90 0.94 1.30 1.70 1.92 2.45 2.50 2.50 2.55 9-(2015) 0.26 0.38 0.36 0.70 0.67 0.94 0.97 1.50 1.80 1.94 2.45 2.50 2.50 2.55 10-(2015) 0.23 0.29 0.31 0.66 0.61 0.98 0.84 1.10 1.40 2.00 2.35 2.50 2.40 2.50 Mean of means 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.64 0.61 0.95 0.86 1.32 1.56 2.02 2.38 2.47 2.43 2.51 Controls 0.35 0.33 0.35 0.34 0.44 0.45 0.40 Days Exam Assay Mean of means Post Vaccination Day 0 Day 3 Day 5 Day 7 Day 10 Day 14 Day 21 F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x F 20x Cellular immune. (XTT). 0.073 0.074 0.369 0.416 0.516 0.606 1.033 1.051 1.312 1.415 1.040 1.061 0.544 0.612 Controls 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.078 0.078 Humoral immune. ( NI) 0.32 0.33 0.52 0.83 0.82 1.13 1.36 1.42 1.6 1.99 1.99 2.36 2.35 2.61 Controls 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 Humoral immune. ( ELISA) 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.64 0.61 0.95 0.86 1.32 1.56 2.02 2.38 2.47 2.43 2.51 Controls 0.35 0.33 0.35 0.34 0.44 0.45 0.40 Table (8): Collective Immuneresponse Evaluation of Different Batches of SHEEP POX Vaccine}\tabcellsep Challenge Test in Sheep Post Challenge Post Challenge Day 28 F 20x 0.832 0.864 0.820 0.859 0.822 0.861 0.825 0.860 0.830 0.856 0.823 0.858 0.824 0.862 0.830 0.856 0.829 0.863 0.833 0.857 0.827 0.860 1.043 Day 28 F 20x 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1\tabcellsep Global Journal of Medical Research Volume XVII Issue II Version I\\ 10-(2015)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0.4\tabcellsep 0.3\tabcellsep 0.6\tabcellsep \multicolumn{10}{l}{0.8 Table (9): Collective virus Titeration for all vaccine Batches 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.4}\tabcellsep 2.3\tabcellsep 2.6\tabcellsep 2.0\tabcellsep 2.2\\ Mean of\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0.32\tabcellsep 0.33\tabcellsep 0.52\tabcellsep 0.83\tabcellsep 0.82\tabcellsep 1.13\tabcellsep 1.36\tabcellsep 1.42\tabcellsep 1.6\tabcellsep 1.99\tabcellsep 1.99\tabcellsep 2.36\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2.35}\tabcellsep 2.61\tabcellsep 2.05\tabcellsep 2.21\\ means\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Mean of\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Virus Titer of Vaccine}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Batches}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{CONCLUSION}\\ Controls\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{0.2 Titer for all Batches in cells (TCID 50 /dose)}\tabcellsep 0.2\tabcellsep 0.3\tabcellsep 3.34\tabcellsep 0.4\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.4 10 Batches}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0.3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{0.4 Satisfactory}\tabcellsep 1.00\\ \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Virus Control}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2.1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep ---\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{control}\\ \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{Titer for all Batches in Sheep (Challenge Test)}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1.6\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{10 Batches}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{Satisfactory (as deference: 5.3 -1.6 = 3.7 > 2.5 )}\\ \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Virus Control}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5.3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep ---\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{control}\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: * Cell mediated immune response of control animals (absorbance) not exceeded, just between 0.07 -0.08 all over the time of study up to Challenge Test.Humoral ImmuneresponsesTable(6 and 7) showed the results of SNT and ELISA assays, expressed as mean NI and absorbance (Ab).]} \caption{\label{tab_5}Table ( 5}\end{figure} \footnote{© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)Year 2017} \footnote{© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[ Spectochim Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc]{b22}\label{b22} \textit{}, \textit{Spectochim Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc} \bibitem[Rao and Bandyopadhyay ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘A comprehensive review of goat pox and sheep pox and their diagnosis’. T V Rao , S K Bandyopadhyay . \textit{Anim Health Res Rev} 2000. 1 (2) p. . \bibitem[Gibert et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} ‘A relevant in vitro ELISA test in alternative to the in vivo NIH test for human rabies vaccine batch release’. R Gibert , M Alberti , B Poirier , C Jallet , N Tordo , S Morgeaux . \textit{Vaccine} 2013. 5. \bibitem[Mirzaie Kamran, Seyed Mohammad Barani and Saied Bokaie ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘A review of sheep pox and goat pox: perspective of their control and eradication in Iran’. \textit{J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res} Mirzaie Kamran, Seyed Mohammad Barani and Saied Bokaie (ed.) 2015. 2 (4) p. . \bibitem[Agag et al. ()]{b40}\label{b40} B I Agag , S Mousa , H B Hassan , M S Saber , N S El-Deghidy , A M Aziz . \textit{Clinical serological and biochemical studies on LSD. Lumpy Skin Veterinary Sciences}, 1992. 33 p. . \bibitem[Anderson et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} ‘An enzyme linked immunosorbant assay for the detection of IgG, IgA and IgE antibodies’. J Anderson , L W Rowe , W Taylor , J P \& Crowther . \textit{Res. Vet. Sci} 1982. 32 (2) p. . \bibitem[Buller et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} R M Buller , Arif , Bm , Black , Dn . \textit{Poxviridae. In: Virus Taxonomy: Eight Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses}, (Oxford) 2005. Elsevier Academic Press. (pp 117) \bibitem[Madhavan et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} ‘Capripoxviruses of Small Ruminants: Current Updates and Future Perspectives’. Aparna Madhavan , G Venkatesan , Amit Kumar . \textit{Asian J.Anim.Vet.Adv} 2016. 11 (12) p. . \bibitem[Carn ()]{b35}\label{b35} V Carn . \textit{Control of capripox viruses infections}, 1993. 11 p. . \bibitem[Kalra and Sharma ()]{b26}\label{b26} ‘Cell-mediated and humoral immune response of sheep to attenuated sheep pox-virus’. S B Kalra , U R Sharma . \textit{Indian J. Anima Sci} 1984. 54 p. . \bibitem[Oie Terrestrial ()]{b30}\label{b30} \textit{Chapter 2.7.13 Sheep pox and goat pox in manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals}, Manual Oie Terrestrial . 2017. p. . \bibitem[Oie Terrestrial ()]{b9}\label{b9} \textit{Chapter 2.7.14 Sheep pox and goat pox in manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals}, Manual Oie Terrestrial . 2010. p. . \bibitem[Khalid Omari Tadlaoui and Harrak ()]{b33}\label{b33} ‘Comparative innocuity and efficacy of live and inactivated sheeppox vaccines’. Mehdi El Khalid Omari Tadlaoui , Harrak . \textit{BMC Vet Res} 2016. 12 p. 133. \bibitem[Daouam]{b32}\label{b32} Samira Daouam . \textit{Imane Belkourati; Lamya Rafi; Eeva Tuppurainen}, \bibitem[Rashwan et al. ()]{b41}\label{b41} ‘Determination of sheep pox circulating neutralizing antibodies in immunized sheep and goats in the north region of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia’. S M Rashwan , H N Khalaf , M I Hammad , M H Baky . \textit{J. Appl. Anim. Res} 2001. 19 p. . \bibitem[Fakri et al. ()]{b43}\label{b43} ‘Development and field application of a new combined vaccine against Peste des Petits Ruminants and Sheep Pox’. F Fakri , F ; Ghzal , S Daouam , A Elarkam , L Douieb , Y Zouheir , K Tadlaoui , O Fassi-Fihri . \textit{Trials in vaccinology} 2015. 4 p. . \bibitem[Bhanuprakash et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Evidence of Sheeppox Virus Infection in Goats’. V Bhanuprakash , G Venkatesan , V Balamurugan . \textit{Pox outbreaks in Sheep and Goats at Makhdoom}, (Uttar Pradesh), India) 2010. 57 p. . \bibitem[Alvero et al. ()]{b21}\label{b21} \textit{FT-IR and NMR investigation of 1-phenylpiperazine: Acombined experimental and theoretical study}, O Alvero , C Parlak , M Senyel . 2006. \bibitem[Mohamed et al. ()]{b37}\label{b37} ‘Immune response of sheep vaccinated with capripox vaccine’. A A Mohamed , M M Mukhtar , A M Elhussein , A M Tageldin , M Fadol . \textit{Vet.Res} 2007. 1 (1) p. . \bibitem[Kubiak ()]{b16}\label{b16} ‘In vitro antigen measurement and potency tests: challenges encountered during method development’. V Kubiak . \textit{International Alliance for Biological Standardization Dev Biol (Basel)} 2012. 134 p. . \bibitem[Kitching ()]{b1}\label{b1} ‘Infectious Diseases of Livestock Second Edition’. R P Kitching . \textit{Sheep pox and goat pox}, Jaw Coetzer, R C Tustin (ed.) 2004. 2 p. . \bibitem[Rai-El-Balhaa et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} ‘Lymphocyte transformation assay of sheep peripheral blood lymphocyte a new rapid assay to read technique’. C Rai-El-Balhaa , J L Pellerin , G Bodin , A Abdullah , H Hiron . \textit{Commp. Immunol., Microbiol. Infect. Dis} 1985. 8 (3/9) p. . \bibitem[Maas et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} P A Maas , M P M Winter , S Venema , H L Oei , I J Claassen . \textit{Antigen quantification as in vitro alternative for potency testing of inactivated viral poultry vaccines}, 2000. 22 p. . \bibitem[Martin et al. ()]{b24}\label{b24} W B Martin , M Erhan , B Onar . \textit{Studies on sheep pox vaccine, serum -virus neutralization test. Pendik Veteriner Kontrol Ve Arastirm Institusu Dergisi}, 1975. 8 p. . \bibitem[Rossiter et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} ‘Micro neutralization systems for use with different strains of PPR virus and rinderpest virus’. P B Rossiter , D Jessett , W M\& Taylor . \textit{Trop.Anim.Hlth.prad} 1985. 17 p. . \bibitem[Bachh et al. ()]{b36}\label{b36} ‘Observation on cellular response in experimentally sheep pox -infected lambs’. A S Bachh , G C Ram , J Hopkins , \& M Bansal . \textit{Indian. J. Anim .Sci} 1997. 64 p. . \bibitem[Amitha et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} ‘of Evaluation of humoral immune response to sheep pox vaccine’. R Amitha , Gomes; Raveendra Hegde , S M Byregowda , Vijayashree Varadarajan , S L Yeshwant , P Giridhar , C Renukaprasad . \textit{J. Veterinary \& Animal Sciences} 2010. 6 (5) p. . \bibitem[Horvath et al. ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘Potency test of inactivated Newcastle disease vaccines by monoclonal antibody blocking ELISA’. E Horvath , G Czifra , E Nagy , B Engstrom , M Merza . \textit{Vaccine} 1999. 1999. 17 p. . \bibitem[Kamphuis et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} ‘Potency Testing of Inactivated Rabies Vaccines Using a’. E Kamphuis , B Krämer , H Schildger , K Duchow . \textit{Serological Method Dev Biol (Basel)} 2012. 134 p. . \bibitem[Lewis et al. ()]{b29}\label{b29} ‘Potency testing of veterinary rabies vaccines: replacement of challenge by in vitro testing: considerations for development of alternative assays’. C E Lewis , A M Fry , J R Hermann , D Siev , D Dusek , D M Gatewood . \textit{Dev Biol (Basel)} 2012. 134 p. . \bibitem[Jungbäck ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Potency Testing of Veterinary Vaccines for Animals: The Way From in Vivo to in Vitro’. C Jungbäck . \textit{International Alliance for Biological Standardization Dev Biol (Basel)} 2012. 134 p. . \bibitem[Romberg et al. ()]{b28}\label{b28} ‘Potency testing of veterinary vaccines: the way from in vivo to in vitro’. J Romberg , S Lang , E Balks , E Kamphuis , K Duchow , D Loos , H Rau , A Motitschke , C Jungbäck . \textit{Biologicals} 2012. 40 (1) p. . \bibitem[Zeidan et al. ()]{b42}\label{b42} ‘Preliminary study for preparation of cmbined attenuated vaccine against sheep pox and PPR viruses’. S M Zeidan , Namaa A Mohamed , . S Hananm , Elzawahry , M A Saad , Olfat E Nakhla , Afaf A Abdel-Wahab , Abeer A Tammam , A El-Dakhly . \textit{International Journal of Advanced Research} 2016. 4 (4) p. . \bibitem[Heba et al. ()]{b39}\label{b39} ‘Preparation and field evaluation of live attenuated sheep pox vaccine for protection of calves against lumpy skin disease’. A Heba , Mohamed G Khafagy , Abdelmoneim M Abdelwahab , Mohamed A Mustafa , Saad . \textit{Benha Vet. Med. J} 2016. 31 (2) p. . \bibitem[Mahmood et al. ()]{b31}\label{b31} ‘Preparation of live goat pox tissue culture vaccine’. M A Mahmood , A Sajid , M Ahmad , Z Hassni , M S Khan . \textit{Pakistan. J. Vet. Res} 1989. 2 p. . (Zineb Boumart) \bibitem[Kallesh et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} ‘Quantitative PCR: A quality control assay for estimation of viable virus content in live attenuated goat pox vaccine’. D J Kallesh , M Hosamani , V Balamurugan , V Bhanuprakash , V Yadav , R K Singh . \textit{Ind. J. Exper. Biol} 2009. 47 p. . \bibitem[Stokes et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘Recent Progress and Future Directions for Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement of Animal Use in Veterinary Vaccine Potency and Safety Testing’. W S Stokes , J Kulpa-Eddy , K Brown , Srinivas , R Mcfarland . \textit{Dev Biol (Basel)} 2012. 2012. 134 p. . \bibitem[Sabban ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘Sheep pox and its control in Egypt’. M S Sabban . \textit{Bull. Off. Int. Epiz} 1960. 53 p. . \bibitem[Olfat et al. ()]{b38}\label{b38} ‘Studies on cell mediated immune response of Goats vaccinated with Goat pox vaccine. 6th’. E Olfat , S S Nakhla; Samir , Manal , M Soad , Soliman , A M Daoud . \textit{Vet. Med. Zag. Conference} 2002. p. . \bibitem[Kitching ()]{b7}\label{b7} ‘The control of sheep and goat pox’. R P Kitching . \textit{Rev Sci Tech} 1986. 5 p. . \bibitem[Bhanuprakash et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} ‘The current status of sheep pox disease’. V Bhanuprakash , B K Indrani , M Hosamani , R K Singh . \textit{Comp. Immuno. Microbio. and Infect. Dis} 2006. 29 (1) p. . \bibitem[Tuppurainen et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} E S M Tuppurainen , E H Venter , J L Shisler , G Gari , G A Mekonnen , N Juleff , N A Lyons , ;K. De , Clercq , C Upton , T R Bowden , S Babiuk , L A Babiuk . \textit{Review: Capripoxvirus Diseases: Current Status and Opportunities for Control}, 2017. 64 p. . \bibitem[Alan and Lawrence ()]{b5}\label{b5} \textit{Vaccines for biodefense and emerging and neglected diseases}, D T B Alan , R S Lawrence . 2009. Elsevier inc. \bibitem[Yogisharadhya et al. ()]{b34}\label{b34} R Yogisharadhya , V Bhanuprakash , M Hosamani , G Venkatesan , V Balamurugan , D P Bora , V Bhanot , M Prabhu , R K Singh . \textit{Comparative efficacy of live replicating sheeppox vaccine strains in Ovines Biologicals}, 2011. 39 p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}