# Introduction here is an increase in obesity in developed countries, multifactorial in origin, which combines the lack of physical exercise, changes in diet composition and increased caloric intake. Although overweight is an increasingly important global health problem, the lack of motivation to face it more decisively in daily clinical practice is worrying. The World Health Organization defines normal weight, overweight, obesity and morbid obesity as body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 to 24.9; 25 to 29.9; 30 to 39.9 and 40 or higher, respectively. Spain is not an exception in this trend, but rather the opposite. Obesity in our country is reaching more worrying figures and comparative studies with other countries around place us at the forefront, with overall prevalence figures, both in children and adults, of around 25% (Finucane et al. 1980). According to the latest National Health Survey of Spain published in 2012, the main results highlight the continuous rise in obesity, affecting 17% of the adult population (INE 2013). The prevalence of obesity in women of reproductive age and pregnant women varies widely depending on the definition, the year and the characteristics of the study population, but it has increased in line with an increased prevalence of obesity in the general population. This alarming increase has made that more than a fifth of the European women who become pregnant in developed countries enter the clinical category of obesity (WHO 2014; Basterra-Gortari et al. 2011). Obesity in women can negatively affect the course of pregnancy, with complications for both the mother and the fetus. The main aim of our study is to evaluate obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes in patients with morbid obesity (BMI ? 40.0 kg/m²) controlled in the Obstetric Unit of Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset in Valencia, Spain. Its secondary objective is to compare the results obtained in morbidly obese patients with a control group of pregnant women with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²) controlled in the same Hospital Unit. # II. # Materials and Methods This is an observational and retrospective casecontrol study in which obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in patients with morbid obesity (BMI ? 40.0 kg/m²) were evaluated and compared with those in patients with normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m²) in the time period between May 2008 and July 2016. In the case group, patients with singleton pregnancies, controlled in our High Risk Obstetric Unit and who met the criteria for morbid obesity -defined as BMI ? 40 kg/m² according to the World H ealth Organization (WHO) -were included. The control group was made of patients with singleton pregnancies and normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²) controlled in the same Hospital Unit during the same period. The maternal characteristics included and compared between two groups age, parity, BMI, pregestational diabetes and chronic hypertension. The analyzed maternal outcomes included preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, spontaneous onset of labour versus induced labour, mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage and venous thromboembolism. As neonatal outcomes, gestational age at birth, prematurity (defined as gestational age less than 37 weeks), weight at birth, Apgar score at one minute and five minutes after birth and umbilical cord blood pH were included. The analysis of the data and the results were obtained by using the statistical software SPSS version 20 and Microsoft Excel 2007. For both groups descriptive statistics were used. The variables are expressed in percentages and means ± standard error. The statistical significance tests used were the Chisquare and Fisher's exact test for dichotomous qualitative variables and the Student t for continuous variables. For quantitative variables, multiple regression models were used. In all cases, statistically significant differences were considered when p <0.05. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Ethics in Clinical Research of the hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and the confidentiality of all of them was maintained. # III. # Results A total of 50 patients were included in both study groups. The demographic characteristics of both groups are shown in Table 1. Within the group of morbidly obese patients, the mean age was 30.95 years and the mean BMI 43.36 kg/m² (40-58). In the group of patients with normal weight, the average age was 29.76 years (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) and the average BMI 22.27 kg/m² (20-24.9). The morbidly obese patients had a higher rate of nulliparity (P = 0.03) and chronic hypertension (P = 0.008) than patients with normal weight. Neither statistically significant differences in the previous mode of delivery (caesarean section or vaginal) nor a history of pregestational diabetes were found. Maternal outcomes were obtained by univariate analysis and are shown in Table 2. In the group of morbidly obese patients, higher rates of preeclampsia (P = 0.03), gestational diabetes (P = 0.013) and delivery by caesarean section (P = 0.04) were recorded compared to control patients with normal weight. There were no differences in the onset of labour and in the occurrence of postpartum venous thromboembolism between the two study groups. However, there were more cases of postpartum hemorrhage in obese patients than in the group of patients with normal weight (14% vs 4%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Perinatal outcomes of the study are shown in Table 3. In our study, no statistically significant differences in terms of perinatal outcomes were found compared to those obtained in the group of patients with normal weight. IV. # Discussion Overweight and obesity among pregnant women have recently become a worldwide problem. Obesity during pregnancy is associated with many maternal and perinatal risks. The appearance of these risks is proportional to the degree of obesity presented by the patient (Torloni et al. 2009; Scott-Pillai et al. 2013; Blomberg et al. 2013). Managing these problems and potentially reduce their risks is currently a challenge for specialists in Obstetrics (Gunatilake et al. # 2011). In our review, morbidly obese patients (BMI ? 40.0 kg/m²) had higher nulliparity (40%) and chronic hypertension (20%) rates than control patients with normal weight. However no significant data regarding pregestational diabetes were found. These data are consistent with the study published by Crane et al (Crane et al. 2013), where pregnant women with extreme obesity (BMI ? 50 kg /m²) presented higher nulliparity (59.2%), chronic hypertension (7%) and pregestational diabetes (5.6%) rates than the control patients with normal weight. According to our figures, from the total of our obese pregnant patients, 10 (20%) had preeclampsia, 12 (24%) gestational diabetes and 22 (44%) delivered by caesarean section. 4 (8%) out of the obese pregnant women who developed preeclampsia during pregnancy, suffered already from chronic hypertension at the beginning of the study. These data are similar to those obtained in other studies (Crane et al. 2013;Weisset al. 2004). According to the literature reviewed, pregnant women with obesity (BMI ? 30.0 kg/m² have a higher prevalence of gestational diabetes (Ehrenberg et al. 2002, Gross et al.1980), higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (Robinson et al. 2005 We are aware of the limitations of our study. On the one hand, because of the retrospective nature of our research; on the other hand, because of the small sample size of the study group (N=50). This could explain the lack of statistical significance in most of the variables studied. V. # Conclusion Pregnant women with morbid obesity (BMI ? 40.0 kg/m²) present a higher risk of maternal and perinatal complications. Therefore, further development and the elaboration of programs from the preconception period are recommended. This should be done in specialized units that value individual needs and the risk factors of each patient in order to prevent, reduce properly handle the complications that may arise for both mother and fetus. macrosomia (Bianco et al. 1998), shoulder dystocia,stillbirth (Chu et al. 2007) and neonatal death(Kristensen et al. 2005).A 2010 publication of the Royal College ofObstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) gathers therate of complications associated with obesity duringpregnancy and includes: hypertensive disorders (OR3.3, 95% CI 2.7-3.9), venous thromboembolism (OR 9.7,95% CI 3.1-30.8), gestational diabetes (OR 2.4, 95% CI2.2-2.7), elective caesarean section (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.9-2.3), emergency caesarean section (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5), postpartum hemorrhage (OR 2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.6),surgical wound infection (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-2.6),congenital malformations (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.5),prematurity (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), macrosomia (OR2.4, 95% CI 2.2-2.5), shoulder dystocia (OR 2.9, 95% CI1.4-5.8), neonatal admission (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.3),stillbirth (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.7) and neonatal death(OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.8) (RCOG 2010). 1CharacteristicsPregnant women with normal weight (n=50)?Pregnant women with morbid obesity (n=50)?P valueAge (years)29.7630.95-BMI (kg/m²)22.2743.36-Nulliparous23 (46)Nulliparous20 (40)0.03ParityPrev. caesarean section 16 (32)Prev. caesarean section 19 (38)NSPrev. vaginal delivery10 (20)Prev. vaginal delivery11 (22)NSPregestational diabetes1 (2)5 (10)NSChronic hypertension1 (2)10 (20)0.008Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; NS, Not Significant.? Mean values ± standard deviations or percentage (%).? BMI 20.0-24.9 kg/m².? BMI ?40 kg/m². 2ResultsPregnant women with normal weight (n=50)?Pregnant women with morbid obesity (n=50)?P valuePreeclampsia2 (4)10 (20)0.03Gestational diabetes3 (6)12 (24)0.013Onset of labourSpontaneous27 (54)Spontaneous14 (28)NSInduced23 (46)Induced36 (72)NSDeliveryVaginal36 (72)Vaginal28 (56)NSCaesarean section 14 (28)Caesarean section 22 (44)0.04Postpartum hemorrhage2 (4)7 (14)NSVenous tromboembolism00NSAbbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; NS, Not Significant.? Mean values ± deviations or percentage (%).? BMI 20.0-24.9 kg/m².? BMI ?40 kg/m². 3ResultsPregnant women with normal weight (n=50)?Pregnant women with normal obesity (n=50)?P valueGestational age > 37 weeks49 (98)48 (96)NSGestational age < 37 weeks1 (2)2 (4)NSWeight after birth (g)3668±1583880±191NSWeight after birth > 4000g4 (8)8 (16)NSWeight after birth < 2500g2 (4)4 (8)NSApgar < 7 (1 minut)1 Year 2018; O'Brien et al. 2003; Gaillard et al. 2011) and a higher rate of induction and failure of labour induction (Denison et al.2008; Wolfe et al. 2011) than the general obstetric population. In our study, a total of 7 patients (14%) had postpartum hemorrhage, all managed by conservative measures. 3 Global Journal of Medical Research Volume XVIII Issue III Version I ( D D D D ) © 2018 Global Journals E ## Acknowledgement The authors extend their appreciation to JJT for the statistical analysis. ## Declaration of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors are the only responsible for the content and the writing of the paper. ## Funding This study was undertaken without specific financial support. * Interventions to reduce and prevent obesity in pre-conceptual and pregnant women: a systematic review and metaanalysis MAgha RAAgha JSandell Plos One 9 5 e95132 2014 * Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis DAune ODSaugstad THenriksen STonstad JAMA 311 1536 2014 * Increasing Trend in the Prevalence of Morbid Obesity in Spain: From 1.8 to 6.1 per Thousand in 14 Years FJBasterra-Gortari JJBeunza MBes-Rastrollo EToledo MGarcía-López MAMartínez-Gonzalez Revista Española Cardiología 64 2011 * Effect of Body Mass Index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies SBhattacharya DMCampbell WAListon SBhattacharya BMC Public Health 7 1 168 2007 * Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese woman ATBianco SWSmilen YDavis SLopez RLapinski Obstetrics and Gynecology 91 1 1998 * Maternal obesity, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcome MBlomberg Obstetrics and Gynecology 122 50 2013 * Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a metaanalysis SYChu SYKim JLau CHSchmid PMDietz American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197 3 2007 * Maternal and perinatal outcomes of extreme obesity in pregnancy JmgCrane PMurphy LBurrage DHutchens Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 35 7 2013 * Maternal obesity, length of gestation, risk of postdates pregnancy and spontaneous onset of labour at term FCDenison JPrice CGraham BJOG 115 720 2008 * Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health, Why Mothers Die JDrife Journal of Royal College of Physicians Edinburgh 35 2005. 2000-2002 * Prevalence of maternal obesity in an urban center HMEhrenberg LDierker CMilluzzi BMMercer American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187 1189 2002 * National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants MMFinucane GAStevens MJCowan GDanaei JKLin CJPaciorek Lancet 377 2011 * Associations of maternal obesity with blood pressure and the risks of gestational hypertensive disorders. The Generation R Study RGaillard EASteegers AHofman VWJaddoe Journal of Hypertension 29 937 2011 * Obesity in pregnancy: risks and outcome TGross RJSokol KCKing Obstetrics and Gynecology 56 446 1980 * Obesity and pregnancy: clinical management of the obese gravida RPGunatilake JHPerlow American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 204 106 2011 * Prepregnancy weight and the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death JKristensen MVestergaard KWisborg UKesmodel NJSecher BJOG 112 4 2005 * Maternal smoking, obesity, and risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium: A population-based nested casecontrol study TBLarsena HTSørensenb MGislumb SPJohnsen Thrombosis Research 120 4 2007 * The impact of obesity on female fertility and pregnancy FSNuthalapaty DJRouse 2016 UpToDate * Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview TEO'brien JGRay WSChan Epidemiology 14 368 2003. 2005 * Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity HERobinson CMO'connell KSJoseph NLMcleod Obstetrics and Gynecology 106 1357 * Management of Women with Obesity in Pregnancy Guideline. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologistis Rcog 2010 * The impact of body mass index on and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study in a UK obstetric population RScott-Pillai DSpence CRCardwell BJOG 120 932 2013. 2004-2011 * Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287, 213 pregnancies in London NJSebire MJolly JPHarris JWadsworth MJoffe International Journal of Obesity 25 8 2001 * Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis SAStothard PWTennant RBell Rankinj JAMA 301 636 2009 * Prepregnancy BMI and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis MRTorloni APBetrán BLHorta Obesity Reviews 10 194 2009 * Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women AVahratian JZhang JFTroendle DASavitz AMSiega-Riz Obstetrics and Gynecology 104 2004 Pt 1 * The independent effects of maternal obesity and gestational diabetes on the pregnancy outcomes HAWahabi AAFayed RAAlzeidan AAMandil BMC Endocrine Disordes 13 47 2014 * Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate: A population-based screening study JLWeiss FDMalone DEmig American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 190 2004 * WHO Global Database on Body Mass Index. World Health Organization 2014 * The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor KBWolfe RARossi CRWarshak American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 205 e1 2011