\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Carcass Characteristics, Hematology, Serum Chemistry, and Enzymes in Broiler Chickens Fed Maggot Meal as a Protein Substitute for Fishmeal},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2019 2019-01-15 (revised: 13 Year 2019 15 January 2019)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2019 2019-01-15}
\title{Carcass Characteristics, Hematology, Serum Chemistry, and Enzymes in Broiler Chickens Fed Maggot Meal as a Protein Substitute for Fishmeal}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Mbiba Hassanu  Fanadzenyuy}

             \author[2]{Etchu K.  A.}

             \author[3]{Ndamukong 3  K}

             \affil[1]{  Institute of Agricultural Research for Development}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 14 December 2018 Accepted: 2 January 2019 Published: 15 January 2019}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


Conventional protein sources used in poultry farming are extensively competed for, by livestock and humans leading to high prices and reduced returns. Focus on better utilization of available alternative feed resources with little or no negative impacts on the health of broilers and consumers is useful. The objective of this research was to assess the performance of carcass characteristics, hematology, serum chemistry, and enzymes in broiler chickens fed maggot meal as a protein substitute for fishmeal. 225 Tropical Broc day old chicks brooded for two weeks and fed the control diet, were distributed in a completely randomized block design with five treatments and three replicates each consisting of the starter and finisher phases and the experiment conducted for eight weeks. Diets were compounded with maggot meal (MM) replacing FM at 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. On the last day of week 8, 30 birds, 2 from each replicate, were randomly selected and weighed, each bird slaughtered and allowed to bleed for 2 minutes while blood samples collected from one bird per replicate were put into 2 tubes (one with EDTA and the other without) for studies of Hb, WBCS and RBCs, total protein, albumin, and globulin, AST and ALT. 

\end{abstract}


\keywords{maggot meal, hematology, serum chemistry, enzymes, carcass characteristics.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
roiler production is one of the main areas in animal farming that involves quite a large section of the population either skilled or unskilled. One important advantage in this is the fact that poultry meat is very rich in unsaturated fatty acids as against saturated fatty acids. Both turkey and chicken have about 30\% saturated fatty acids, 43\% monounsaturated fatty acids, and 22\% polyunsaturated fatty acids. The ratio is a clear indication that poultry meat may stand a better position as a more healthful alternative for red meat (Encyclopaedia \hyperref[b10]{Britannica, 2014)}. Notwithstanding there are some challenges in areas of nutrition, health, and management \hyperref[b6]{(Awoniyi, 2004)}. Feeding alone accounts for 60-70\% of the total production cost in modern poultry production systems  {\ref (Smith, 1990;}\hyperref[b9]{Church, 1991;} {\ref Wilson and Beyer, 2000)}. Conventional protein sources used are extensively competed for, by other livestock and humans \hyperref[b11]{(Gadzirayi et al., 2012)}, thereby leading to very high prices and reduced returns. Any attempt to improve commercial poultry production and increase its efficiency, therefore needs to focus on better utilization of alternative but available feed resources. Knowledge of nutritional characteristics of these feeds and optimal levels of inclusion in rations and optimum combination of ingredients is useful \hyperref[b13]{(Kamalzadeh et al., 2008)}. Competition for conventional protein sources has prompted researchers to embark on research for alternatives like MM that are cheaply available and comparable to FM. The crude protein content of maggots is high (39-63\%) \hyperref[b3]{(Aniebo and Owen, 2010)} and akin to that of fish meal  {\ref (Veldkamp et al., 2012)}.\par
Even though MM may reduce competition between man and other livestock, there is very high need to investigate its health implications in broiler and humans as well the effects on performance of broilers \hyperref[b6]{(Awoniyi, 2004)}. A study of the carcass characteristics, blood indices and enzymes should correlate the benefits of MM as a protein source in poultry feed vis-à-vis the physiological status of the birds. The study of these B physiological parameters will serve to bridge the gap as work done in Cameroon on this aspect is scanty. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Materials and Methods}]{Materials and Methods} 
\section[{a) Study area}]{a) Study area}\par
The study was carried out at Muyuka Agro-Industrial Farm situated between latitudes 4?16? and 4?23?N and longitudes 9?21? and 9?28?E in the fourth agro-ecological zone of Cameroon (AEZ IV). Muyuka on the windward side of mount Cameroon, experiences very high temperatures ranging from 25°C during the rainy season (March to September) to about 30°C in the dry season (October to March). The climate is typical of the equatorial type. The monthly rainfall ranges between 9.2mm to 374.1mm, the lowest realized in January while the heaviest is in August. 
\section[{b) Birds}]{b) Birds}\par
Two hundred and twenty-five Tropical Broc day-old broilers used for the experiment fed on the control diet (Table \hyperref[tab_0]{1}) during the brooding period of two weeks. Coal pots provided heat supplementation and prophylactic measures employed. Daylight served as the main lighting source during the day and electric current at night; lanterns served as the illuminating source in cases of power outage. 
\section[{c) Experimental design}]{c) Experimental design}\par
The trial used a completely randomized block design (CRBD) in which two weeks old chicks were randomly allocated to 5 treatments, each containing 45 birds; and each treatment had three replicates with 15 birds each. Diets formulated using maggot meal (MM) substituted fishmeal (FM) at graded levels; 0\%, 25\%, 50\%, 75\% and 100\% at both the starter and finisher phases. Mineral and vitamin premixes customary to poultry production, oyster shell, salt, and bone served as complements (Tables \hyperref[tab_1]{1 and 2}).\par
Birds lived on deep litter while enjoying natural ventilation, Feed, and water ad libitum. Broiler starter, 23\% crude protein, sustained for four weeks followed by broiler finisher, 19\% crude protein from the end of the 4 th week till slaughter (8 th week). 
\section[{d) Ration formulation for experimental diets}]{d) Ration formulation for experimental diets}\par
The feed ingredients used in this study included: Yellow maize, fishmeal, maggot meal, groundnut cake, kernel cake, soybean cake, wheat bran, and premixes. Proximate analysis gave crude protein and ME values for maggot meal while the nutrient master plan (livestock feeds) provided those for other ingredients. Levels of inclusion of protein (maggot meal and fishmeal) and energy sources to meet the protein and energy requirements were manipulated using Pearson's Square method and the various percentages calculated as indicated in Tables \hyperref[tab_1]{1  and 2} with the help of a nutrient master plan which gave the protein and energy contents of each ingredient.\par
After all the ingredients were measured and put together at the same spot on the cardboard paper, they were mixed with the hand, making at least three complete turns to ensure proper mixing, and then put into bags with treatment labels. Determination of carcass characteristics took place on the last day of the 8th week. After recording live weights of 30 randomly selected birds, two from each replicate, we slaughtered each bird and allowed to bleed for about two minutes before putting in hot water for almost a minute to soften the skin for easy plucking. Dressed weight represented the bulk after removal of the shanks, crop, entrails and other organs. The carcass parts consisted of head, neck, wings, breast, back, thigh and drumstick.\par
We discarded entrails and weighed eviscerated birds, livers, gizzards, and carcass parts. Then averages from each replicate statistically analyzed for any significant differences between treatments. 
\section[{f) Studies of hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and enzymes}]{f) Studies of hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and enzymes}\par
Studies of hematological parameters (hemoglobin, white and red blood cells), serum chemistry (total protein, albumin, and globulin), and enzymes (aspartate amino-transaminase and alanine amino-transaminase) were carried out at the end of the experiment. Blood was collected at the time of slaughter for carcass analysis into 30 tubes from 15 birds; fifteen tubes had the anticoagulant ethylene diamine tetraacetate (EDTA) to prevent clotting, and the rest of the cylinders had no anticoagulant. Two hoses (one with EDTA and the other without the anticoagulant) were used to collect blood from one bird per replicate. 
\section[{g) Method of data processing and analysis}]{g) Method of data processing and analysis}\par
Data were organized in Microsoft Office Excel Version 2010 and analyzed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc, 2008). Data screened for exploration using Kolmogorov Smirnov and Shapiro Wilk tests revealed that the data departed from the normal distribution. The non-parametric test, notably Kruskal Wallis test, was then used to compare groups for significant differences (Nana, 2012) and the Dunnett T 3 test used for paired comparisons. We took measurements of central tendencies and dispersion, presented the data using statistical tables and charts, and discussed at the 95\% CL (Alpha=0.05). 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Results and Discussion}]{Results and Discussion} 
\section[{a) The chemical composition of experimental diets}]{a) The chemical composition of experimental diets}\par
Table \hyperref[tab_2]{3} reveals a drop in the CP value of analyzed components for all the treatments, except for the 100\% MM. There was a reasonable increase in ME values, especially in 75\% and 100\% MM.\par
Table  {\ref 5} shows a drop in the crude protein content of the control and 25\% MM and a slight increase in the rest of the analyzed feed composition compared to the calculated feed composition. There was a considerable increase in ME values of the evaluated components compared to the premeditated constituents across the treatments.\par
The differences observed in the calculated and the analyzed compositions for both the starter and finisher diets may have been due to variations between the tabulated nutrient content values used in the calculations and the actual nutrient contents of the ingredients used in the experiment. Doing proximate analysis for all components before formulating and compounding the various feeds for the trial keeps this situation in check. Increase in ME with increasing maggot meal in the diets may be explained by the high fats in the maggots which release a lot of energy when oxidized \hyperref[b0]{(Adeniji, 2007)}.  
\section[{b) Carcass analysis}]{b) Carcass analysis}\par
Table  {\ref 5} indicates the effects of graded level inclusion of MM in broiler diets on carcass characteristics. Live weight, dressed weight, eviscerated weight, carcass characteristics and organs were all significantly different (P<0.001) between treatments except for the liver which was not significantly different (P>0.05). Generally, the weight of carcass parts increased from T0 to T4. This increase in weight agrees with the findings of \hyperref[b12]{Hwangbo et al. (2009)}. The general increase in bulk of the carcass parts with increase inclusion of MM in the diets may have been due to the live weight which also increased with increased levels of maggot inclusion. \hyperref[b1]{Agbede and Aletor (2003)} found no significant change in all carcass characteristics and organs except for the relative weights of the neck and heart which were significantly higher in diets containing 7.24\% of gliricidia leaf protein concentrate in place of FM. \hyperref[b5]{Awoniyi et al. (2003)}  The weight of the liver was not significantly different between the control and experimental diets, although higher (P>0.05) in treatment groups than in non-experimental diet. \hyperref[b12]{Hwangbo et al. (2009)} and Okah and Onwujiariri (2012) also found no significance (P>0.05) in weight of the liver amongst treatments. This indifference in bulk of the liver may have been an indication that there was no infection in the maggot meal that could cause undesirable effects on the nutrition of broilers as indicated by \hyperref[b12]{Hwangbo et al. (2009)} and Okah and Onwujiariri (2012). These results differed from those of Teguia et al.  {\ref (2002)} who obtained proportional increases in weights of the liver and gizzard from the control through treatment groups and linked it to toxicity. Live and dressed weights were significantly higher (P<0.001) in treatment groups than in control. T 4 was, in turn, higher (P<0.001) than the rest of the treatment groups which didn't differ significantly (P>0.05) between themselves in live and dressed weights. Eviscerated weight in T 4 was significantly (P<0.001) higher than in the rest of the treatments which were, in turn, greater than the control though not significantly (P>0.05) Gadzirayi et al., (2012) using mature Moringa oleifera leaf meal as a protein supplement to soybean meal but goes contrary to the outcome of Yisa et al., (2013) who stated that complete withdrawal of FM implied poorer development of the meat yielding parts. 
\section[{Table 5: Comparison of carcass parts between treatments}]{Table 5: Comparison of carcass parts between treatments}\par
a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, I, j Dunnett T 3 : Paired comparison between treatments and within weeks; pairs with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 Level. 
\section[{c) Hematology, serum chemistry, and enzyme studies}]{c) Hematology, serum chemistry, and enzyme studies}\par
The results presented in Table \hyperref[tab_5]{6} reveal that there was a significant difference (P<0.001) between treatments in the hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and enzymes studied, except for albumin which was the same throughout the control and treatment groups. T 2 recorded the lowest total protein and globulin and T 3 the highest. ALT was significantly lower (P<0.001) in control compared to the rest of the treatment groups and topmost in T 2 , but not significantly different (P>0.05) from the rest of the treatment groups.  
\section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par
Conclusions derived from this study follows thus: Better carcass characteristics in treatments with maggot meal is an indication that maggot meal is not inferior to fishmeal. Lower amounts of white blood cells in the treatment groups with maggot meal than in control indicate the absence of any infection in the system attributable to MM. The stable values of RBCs and Hb were an indication that the birds were not suffering from anemia, thereby indicating that MM did not upset the physiological status of the birds. The values of total protein, globulin, and enzymes studied did not show any defined trend in their variations between the various treatments. Given that broilers with the best carcass characteristics performance were those with 100\% maggot meal inclusion and that physiological parameters were not deviated from normal values in birds fed experimental diets, it can be concluded from this study that maggot meal can entirely replace fish meal at 5\% in broiler feed for better carcass characteristics, and a stable physiological profile.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.08146651270207851\textwidth}P{0.29445727482678985\textwidth}P{0.17863741339491918\textwidth}P{0.0628175519630485\textwidth}P{0.0628175519630485\textwidth}P{0.08441108545034642\textwidth}P{0.08539260969976906\textwidth}}
Year 2019\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
8\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Volume XIX Issue I Version I\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
D D D D ) G\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
(\tabcellsep \multicolumn{6}{l}{inclusion levels and chemical composition of experimental diets for broiler}\\
Medical Research\tabcellsep Ingredients Soya bean cake(SBC) Maize\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{starter (weeks 1-4) Treatment Composition Control (T 0, 0\%) T 1 (25\%) T 2 (50\%) 48.00 12.50 48.00 12.50 48.00 12.50}\tabcellsep T 3 (75\%) 48.00 12.50\tabcellsep T 4 (100\%) 48.00 12.50\\
Global Journal of\tabcellsep Fishmeal (FM) Maggot meal (MM) Groundnut cake (GNC) Palm kernel cake (PKC) Wheat bran (WB) Premix Bone meal (BM) Salt\tabcellsep 5.00 0.00 17.00 5.00 10.50 0.75 0.50 0.25\tabcellsep 3.75 1.25 17.00 5.00 10.50 0.75 0.50 0.25\tabcellsep 2.50 2.50 17.00 5.00 10.50 0.75 0.50 0.25\tabcellsep 1.25 3.75 17.00 5.00 10.50 0.75 0.50 0.25\tabcellsep 0.00 5.00 17.00 5.00 10.50 0.75 0.50 0.25\\
\tabcellsep Oyster shell\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\\
\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\\
\tabcellsep Crude Protein (\%CP) Metabolizable energy (ME) Kcal/Kg\tabcellsep 23.20 2882.72\tabcellsep 22.99 2888.25\tabcellsep 22.79 2893.78\tabcellsep 23.58 2899.31\tabcellsep 22.37 2904.85\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.3133640552995392\textwidth}P{0.10837173579109062\textwidth}P{0.14231950844854072\textwidth}P{0.08617511520737327\textwidth}P{0.09923195084485407\textwidth}P{0.10053763440860215\textwidth}}
Ingredients\tabcellsep Control (T 0 0\%)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Treatment Composition T 1 (25\%) T 2 (50\%)}\tabcellsep T 3 (75\%)\tabcellsep T 4 (100\%)\\
Maize\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\\
Soya bean cake(SBC)\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\\
Fishmeal (FM)\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 3.75\tabcellsep 2.50\tabcellsep 1.25\tabcellsep 0.00\\
Maggot meal (MM)\tabcellsep 0.00\tabcellsep 1.25\tabcellsep 2.50\tabcellsep 3.75\tabcellsep 5.00\\
Groundnut cake (GNC)\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\\
Palm kernel cake (PKC)\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\\
Wheat bran (WB)\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\\
Premix\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\\
Bone meal (BM)\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\\
Salt\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\\
Oyster shell\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\\
Total\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\\
Crude Protein (\%CP)\tabcellsep 19.53\tabcellsep 19.36\tabcellsep 19.12\tabcellsep 18.91\tabcellsep 18.70\\
Metabolizable energy\tabcellsep 2811.57\tabcellsep 2817.10\tabcellsep 2822.63\tabcellsep 2828.16\tabcellsep 2833.70\\
(ME) Kcal/Kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
e) Carcass characteristics\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.35227272727272724\textwidth}P{0.10568181818181818\textwidth}P{0.09772727272727273\textwidth}P{0.09772727272727273\textwidth}P{0.09772727272727273\textwidth}P{0.09886363636363636\textwidth}}
Ingredients\tabcellsep Control (T 0 0\%)\tabcellsep T 1 (25\%)\tabcellsep T 2 (50\%)\tabcellsep T 3 (75\%)\tabcellsep T 4 (100\%)\\
Maize\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\\
Soya beans cake (SBC)\tabcellsep 12.50\tabcellsep 12.50\tabcellsep 12.50\tabcellsep 12.50\tabcellsep 12.50\\
Fishmeal (FM)\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 3.75\tabcellsep 2.50\tabcellsep 1.25\tabcellsep 0.00\\
Maggot meal (MM)\tabcellsep 0.00\tabcellsep 1.25\tabcellsep 2.50\tabcellsep 3.75\tabcellsep 5.00\\
Groundnut cake (GNC)\tabcellsep 17.00\tabcellsep 17.00\tabcellsep 17.00\tabcellsep 17.00\tabcellsep 17.00\\
Palm kernel cake (PKC)\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 5.00\\
Wheat bran (WB)\tabcellsep 10.50\tabcellsep 10.50\tabcellsep 10.50\tabcellsep 10.50\tabcellsep 10.50\\
Premix\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\\
Bone meal (BM)\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\\
Salt\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\\
Oyster shell\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\\
Total\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\\
Calculated composition\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Crude Protein (\%CP)\tabcellsep 23.20\tabcellsep 22.99\tabcellsep 22.79\tabcellsep 23.58\tabcellsep 22.37\\
Metabolizable energy\tabcellsep 2882.72\tabcellsep 2888.25\tabcellsep 2893.78\tabcellsep 2899.31\tabcellsep 2904.85\\
(ME) Kcal/Kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Analyzed composition\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Crude Protein (\%CP)\tabcellsep 20.4\tabcellsep 18.9\tabcellsep 20.4\tabcellsep 20.7\tabcellsep 22.4\\
Metabolizable energy\tabcellsep 3114.9\tabcellsep 3121.7\tabcellsep 3121.5\tabcellsep 3359.8\tabcellsep 3205.5\\
(ME) Kcal/Kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.35227272727272724\textwidth}P{0.10568181818181818\textwidth}P{0.09772727272727273\textwidth}P{0.09772727272727273\textwidth}P{0.09772727272727273\textwidth}P{0.09886363636363636\textwidth}}
Ingredients\tabcellsep Control (T 1 0\%)\tabcellsep T 2 (25\%)\tabcellsep T 3 (50\%)\tabcellsep T 4 (75\%)\tabcellsep T 5 (100\%)\\
Maize\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 48.00\\
Soya beans cake (SBC)\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\tabcellsep 9.00\\
Fishmeal (FM)\tabcellsep 5.00\tabcellsep 3.75\tabcellsep 2.50\tabcellsep 1.25\tabcellsep 0.00\\
Maggot meal (MM)\tabcellsep 0.00\tabcellsep 1.25\tabcellsep 2.50\tabcellsep 3.75\tabcellsep 5.00\\
Groundnut cake (GNC)\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\\
Palm kernel cake (PKC)\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\tabcellsep 15.00\\
Wheat bran (WB)\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\tabcellsep 10.00\\
Premix\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\tabcellsep 0.75\\
Bone meal (BM)\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\\
Salt\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\tabcellsep 0.25\\
Oyster shell\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\\
Total\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\tabcellsep 100.00\\
Calculated composition\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Crude Protein (\%CP)\tabcellsep 19.53\tabcellsep 19.36\tabcellsep 19.12\tabcellsep 18.91\tabcellsep 18.70\\
Metabolizable energy\tabcellsep 2811.57\tabcellsep 2817.10\tabcellsep 2822.63\tabcellsep 2828.16\tabcellsep 2833.70\\
(ME) Kcal/Kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Analyzed composition\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Crude Protein (\%CP)\tabcellsep 17.1\tabcellsep 16.0\tabcellsep 20.4\tabcellsep 19.0\tabcellsep 20.0\\
Metabolizable energy\tabcellsep 3253.4\tabcellsep 3166.6\tabcellsep 3015.7\tabcellsep 3418.1\tabcellsep 3296.6\\
(ME) Kcal/Kg\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
no significant effect on the relative length, breadth or\\
weight of muscles of key economic importance in\\
chickens. His report is similar to that of Quinton (2011).\\
Amal et al., (2013), Meseret et al., (2012) and Bello et\\
al., (2012) found no significant (p>0.05) differences\\
between all treatments groups in Live weight,\\
eviscerated weight of carcass cuts, dressing\\
percentage, edible inner organs (liver, gizzard,\\
and heart).\\
Year 2019\\
10\\
Volume XIX Issue I Version I\\
D D D D ) G\\
(\\
Medical Research\\
Global Journal of\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
Year 2019\\
11\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 6 :}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2019 Global Journals} 			\footnote{© 2019 Global Journals 1} 		 		\backmatter   			 
\subsection[{Acknowledgment}]{Acknowledgment}\par
We acknowledge the great support from Mr. ZHU LYING who granted us free access to his poultry farm (Muyuka Agro-Industrial Farm) and materials to carry out this research from the beginning till the end, and the moral support from his staffs. 			  			 			 			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[ Pakistan Journal of Nutrition]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		\textit{},  	 	 		\textit{Pakistan Journal of Nutrition}  		9  (5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[ Revista Lusófona de Ciência e Medicina Veterinária]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		\textit{},  	 	 		\textit{Revista Lusófona de Ciência e Medicina Veterinária}  		5 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Awoniyi and Adetuyi ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		\textit{},  		 			T A M Awoniyi 		,  		 			Adetuyi 		.  		2004.  	 
\bibitem[Martinho ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{Blood transfusion in birds},  		 			F Martinho 		.  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[Church ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		 			D C Church 		.  		\textit{Livestock Feeds and Feeding},  				 (New Jersey. USA)  		1991. Prentice Hall. Incorporation cliffs. 465 p. pp.  	 
\bibitem[Adeniji ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Effect of replacing groundnut cake with maggot meal in the diet of broilers’.  		 			A A Adeniji 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Poultry Science}  		2007. 6  (11)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Aniebo and Owen ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		\textit{Effects of age and method of drying on the proximate composition of housefly larvae (Muscadomestica) meal (HFLM)},  		 			A O Aniebo 		,  		 			O J Owen 		.  		2010.  	 
\bibitem[Meseret et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		\textit{Effects of Replacing Peanut Seed Cake with Brewery Dried Yeast on Laying Performance},  		 			G Meseret 		,  		 			T Berhan 		,  		 			D Tadelle 		.  		2012. Egg Quality.  	 
\bibitem[Agbede and Aletor ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Evaluation of fish meal replaced with leaf protein concentrate from glycricidia in diets for broiler-chicks: effect on performance, muscle growth, haematology and serum metabolites’.  		 			J O Agbede 		,  		 			V A Aletor 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Poultry Science}  		2003. 2  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Kamalzadeh et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Livestock production systems and trends in livestock industry in Iran’.  		 			A Kamalzadeh 		,  		 			M Rajabbeygi 		,  		 			A Kiasat 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Agricultural and Social Science}  		2008. 4 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Microbiological investigation of maggot meal, stored for use as livestock feed component Agriculture and Environment]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Microbiological investigation of maggot meal, stored for use as livestock feed component’.  	 	 		\textit{Agriculture and Environment}  		2 p. .  	 	 (Journal of Food) 
\bibitem[Awoniyi et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Performance of broiler -chickens fed on maggot meal in place of fishmeal’.  		 			T A M Awoniyi 		,  		 			V A Aletor 		,  		 			J M Aina 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Poultry Science}  		2003. 2  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Gadzirayi et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Performance of broiler chickens fed on mature Moringaoleifera leaf meal as a protein supplement to soybean meal’.  		 			C T Gadzirayi 		,  		 			B Masamha 		,  		 			J Mupangwa 		,  		 			S Washaya 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Poultry Science}  		2012. 11  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bello et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Performance, carcass characteristics and blood composition of broilers fed varying levels of palm kernel meal (elaiseguinensis) supplemented with different levels of fishmeal’.  		 			M K Bello 		,  		 			O E Oyawoye 		,  		 			E S Bogoro 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Poultry Science}  		2012. 11  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Britannica ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		\textit{Poultry processing},  		 			Encyclopaedia Britannica 		.  		2014.  	 
\bibitem[Amal et al. ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Use of Halfa Bar Essential Oil (HBO) as a Natural Growth Promoter in Broiler Nutrition’.  		 			O A Amal 		,  		 			A M Mukhtar 		,  		 			K A Mohamed 		,  		 			A H Ahlam 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Poultry Science}  		2013. 12  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hwangbo et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Utilization of housefly maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens’.  		 			J Hwangbo 		,  		 			E C Hong 		,  		 			A Jang 		,  		 			H K Kang 		,  		 			J S Oh 		,  		 			B W Kim 		,  		 			B S Park 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Environmental Biology}  		2009. 30  (4)  p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}