\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Knife by using ATP Inspection -Comparison of Handle and Blade},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2020-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2020)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2020-01-15}
\title{Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Knife by using ATP Inspection -Comparison of Handle and Blade}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Naomi  Katayama}

             \author[2]{Akemi  Ito}

             \author[3]{Mayumi  Hirabayashi}

             \author[4]{Shoko  Kondo}

             \author[5]{Yui  Nakayama}

             \author[6]{Ayari  Naka}

             \affil[1]{  Nagoya Women?s University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 16 December 2019 Accepted: 3 January 2020 Published: 15 January 2020}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


In Japan, the number of food poisoning cases and the number of patients have been gradually decreasing in the last ten years. However, from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the number of bacterial food poisoning cases has been approximately 41% of the total number in the past five years, which is still high. Therefore, in this study, to prevent food poisoning, we conducted hygiene education using the ATP test and confirmed the educational effect by comparing before and after education. ATP luminescence kit (Lumitester PD-10, LuciPac Pen) manufactured by Kikkoman Corporation used for the microbiological test. Before the hygiene education, the ATP of the knife handle, and the ATP of the knife blade measured before and after cooking. Twelve knives for vegetables and 12 knives for meat targeted. Before the hygiene education, the handle and the blade of the meat knife measured of ATP, that before cooking and washed after cooking. Further, the handle and blade of the kitchen knife for vegetables were also measured for ATP in the same manner as the knife for meat.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{gender; ATP test, the handle of the knife, the blade of the knife, hygiene education, double wash.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Knife by using ATP Inspection -Comparison of Handle and Blade}]{Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Knife by using ATP Inspection -Comparison of Handle and Blade}\par
Naomi Katayama ? , Akemi Ito ? , Mayumi Hirabayashi ? , Shoko Kondo ? , Yui Nakayama ¥ , Ayari Naka § , Natuki Sasaki ? , Moe Inuzuka ? \& Takashi Tamura ? Abstract-In Japan, the number of food poisoning cases and the number of patients have been gradually decreasing in the last ten years. However, from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the number of bacterial food poisoning cases has been approximately 41\% of the total number in the past five years, which is still high. Therefore, in this study, to prevent food poisoning, we conducted hygiene education using the ATP test and confirmed the educational effect by comparing before and after education. ATP luminescence kit (Lumitester PD-10, LuciPac Pen) manufactured by Kikkoman Corporation used for the microbiological test. Before the hygiene education, the ATP of the knife handle, and the ATP of the knife blade measured before and after cooking. Twelve knives for vegetables and 12 knives for meat targeted. Before the hygiene education, the handle and the blade of the meat knife measured of ATP, that before cooking and washed after cooking. Further, the handle and blade of the kitchen knife for vegetables were also measured for ATP in the same manner as the knife for meat. As a result, the ATP value was higher than that before cooking even though both the handles and blades of vegetable and meat knives washed after cooking. After the hygiene education, the handle and blade of the meat knife were measured of ATP, that before cooking and washed after cooking. Further, the handle and the blade of the kitchen knife for vegetables also measured for ATP in the same manner as the knife for meat. As a result, the ATP value was statistically significantly lower than that before cooking by cleaning the handle and blade of both knives after cooking. However, even after the hygiene education, the handle of the meat knife did not have an ATP value of less than 100. It has found that the handle of meat knives needs to be given a more thorough hygiene education before cooking to thoroughly washing. 
\section[{I. Introduction}]{I. Introduction}\par
n Japan, the number of food poisoning cases and the number of patients have been gradually decreasing in the last ten years (2009-2018). The reduction of bacterial food poisoning is implementation. Thorough hygiene management at food manufacturing plants is carried out and increased awareness of hygiene, such as hand washing at home. According to statistical data on food poisoning from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the number of bacterial food poisoning cases has been approximately 41\% of the total number in the past five years, which is still high (2014-2018). Some hospitals have already conducted hygiene tests using ATP test kits, and the results have been reported \hyperref[b0]{1,}\hyperref[b1]{2)} . Throughout the hospital, surface wiping test using ATP test kits have shown effectiveness in hygiene education. Because microorganisms are invisible, it is hard to work hygienically. However, the hygiene test using the ATP test kit allows seeing the number of bacteria with our eye, thus improving the hygiene condition on the spot. The control of microorganisms at the cooking site is becoming more and more stringent due to the need to comply with HACCP \hyperref[b2]{3,}\hyperref[b3]{4)} . Japan is a super-aged society. Therefore, there is a need for hygiene management and hygiene education in nursing homes. Especially, hygiene education for cooks in the kitchen emphasized. Reports on educational achievements have also made in recent years \hyperref[b4]{5)} . Therefore, in this study, using the ATP test kit, we focused on the kitchen knife most touched by the cooks in the kitchen before and after the hygiene education. The inspection results obtained for both the kitchen knife handle and blade, and for both vegetables and meat. 
\section[{II. Materials and Methods}]{II. Materials and Methods} 
\section[{a) Kitchen knife}]{a) Kitchen knife}\par
The 12 kitchen vegetable knives and 12 kitchen meat knives prepared in the kitchen were stored in the sterilization storage the day before the start of cooking. 
\section[{b) ATP inspection procedure}]{b) ATP inspection procedure}\par
Each of the 24 cooks carried a kitchen knife for vegetables or meat at the start of their work and bring it to the cooking table. Before the education of hygiene, the work start time depends on the working conditions of the cooks. Still, the inspector always performed an ATP inspection before using vegetables or meat with a kitchen knife. Then, each cook finished the work, washed the kitchen knife by himself, and they inspected the ATP inspection by the inspector again. The value of ATP recorded. In the same way, after the education of hygiene, the work start time depends on the working conditions of the cooks. Still, the inspector always performed an ATP inspection before using vegetables or meat with a kitchen knife. Then, each cook finished the work, washed the kitchen knife by himself, and they inspected the ATP inspection by the inspector again. The value of ATP recorded. 
\section[{c) Hygiene education procedure i. Cleaning instruction}]{c) Hygiene education procedure i. Cleaning instruction}\par
While showing the ATP result before the hygiene education to the cook, ATP inspector wash both the knife handle and the blade firmly with detergent and sponge, wash with water for 30 seconds or more. Then, the inspector washes again both the knife handle and the blade carefully with detergent and sponge, and rinse again with water for 30 seconds or more. The cook tries to do it as same as the inspector dose. Then, the cook tries to do it next cooking. That ATP result of the after education recorded. 
\section[{ii. Statistical processing}]{ii. Statistical processing}\par
The results obtained compared using statistical methods. The compared data was subjected to an F test to determine whether to use a parametric test or nonparametric test. When there is no difference in the F test, the presence or absence of a significant difference was confirmed using the student-t-test with or without a correspondence. If there was a difference in the F test, the presence or absence of a significant difference was confirmed using the Wilcoxon test with a pair or the Mann-Whitney test without correlation. 
\section[{III. Results}]{III. Results} 
\section[{a) Meat knife: ATP results of before hygiene education i. Meat knife handle and blade}]{a) Meat knife: ATP results of before hygiene education i. Meat knife handle and blade}\par
The ATP inspection result of the knife handle and blade before hygiene education shown in Table \hyperref[tab_0]{1} and Table \hyperref[tab_1]{2}. Despite the completion of cooking and washing, the knife blade had a higher ATP average value than before using it. Since both ATP data did not fall below 100 even after cleaning, it can see that selfflow is insufficient for washing. The ATP inspection result of the kitchen meat knife handles and blade after hygiene education shown in Table \hyperref[tab_3]{3 and Table 4}. Meat knives after hygiene education had lower average ATP values for both handle and blade than before cooking. In particular, the knife blade had an ATP value of less than 100. It cleaned well. 
\section[{c) Vegetable knife: ATP results of before hygiene education i. Vegetable knife handle and blade}]{c) Vegetable knife: ATP results of before hygiene education i. Vegetable knife handle and blade}\par
The ATP inspection result of the kitchen vegetable knife handles and blade before hygiene education shown in Table \hyperref[tab_4]{5} and Table \hyperref[tab_5]{6}. Despite cleaning after cooking, the knife handle had a higher average ATP value than before cooking. It turned out that self-washing was not hygienic. The knife blade after cleaning was lower than that before cooking, but it did not fall below 100. It is not thoroughly washed.  
\section[{Vegetable knife handle and blade}]{Vegetable knife handle and blade}\par
The ATP inspection result of the kitchen vegetable knife handle and blade after hygiene education shown in Table \hyperref[tab_11]{7and Table 8}.\par
Vegetable knives after hygiene education had lower average ATP values for both handle and blade than before cooking. In particular, both knife handle and blade had an ATP value of less than 100. It was cleaned well more than a meat knife. 
\section[{IV. Statistical Processing Results}]{IV. Statistical Processing Results} 
\section[{a) Comparison of ATP test values of meat knife handle: before and after education}]{a) Comparison of ATP test values of meat knife handle: before and after education}\par
The results of the statistical comparison of meat knife handle before and after hygiene education shown in Table \hyperref[tab_7]{7}. It can be seen that, in the handle of the meat knife, there is no statistically significant difference in selfwashing between before cooking and the cleaning of after cooking. However, there was a statistically significant difference in ATP test values between before cooking and the cleaning after cooking after hygiene education. 
\section[{b) Comparison of ATP test values of meat knife blade: before and after education}]{b) Comparison of ATP test values of meat knife blade: before and after education}\par
The results of the statistical comparison of the meat knife blade before and after hygiene education shown in the Table \hyperref[tab_8]{8}. Both before and after hygiene education, the knife blades washed before and after cooking had a statistically significantly lower ATP value.\par
However, the ATP value shows that the cleaning effect is more effective after hygiene education.  The results of the statistical comparison of vegetable knife handle before and after hygiene education shown in the Table \hyperref[tab_12]{9}. It can see that, in the handle of the vegetable knife, there is no statistically significant difference in self-washing between before cooking and the cleaning of after cooking. However, there was a statistically significant difference in ATP test values between before cooking and the cleaning of after cooking after hygiene education. In particular, after hygiene education, the knife handle had an ATP value of less than 100. It cleaned well more than before cooking. 
\section[{d) Comparison of ATP test values of vegetable knife blade: before and after education}]{d) Comparison of ATP test values of vegetable knife blade: before and after education}\par
The results of the statistical comparison of vegetable knife blade before and after hygiene education shown in the Table \hyperref[tab_13]{10}. It can be seen that, in the blade of the vegetable knife, there is no statistically significant difference in self-washing between before cooking and the cleaning after cooking. However, there was a statistically significant difference in ATP test values between before cooking and the cleaning of after cooking after hygiene education. In particular, after hygiene education, the knife handle had an ATP value of less than 100 (less than 20). It cleaned well more than before cooking.   
\section[{V. Discussion}]{V. Discussion}\par
Hygiene control points that should observed at the cooking site are three principles to prevent food poisoning: to prevent bacterial, to be fussy, and to kill. In this study, bacteria that cannot see with the naked eye are expressed by visible numbers by detecting ATP \hyperref[b5]{6)} , and by providing hygiene education, it becomes possible to handled knives most accessible to humans in a hygienic manner. The ATP wiping test has been widely used for hygiene management in hospitals and has produced results \hyperref[b6]{7)} . Even during cooking, it expected that the hygiene education effect will be high because the bacteria test result can show to the cook as an ATP value within one minute \hyperref[b7]{8)} . This time, 24 cooks had kitchen knives for vegetables and meat and had the inspectors measure the ATP value after cleaning the knives before and after cooking. As a result, when the cooks washed their kitchen knives, the ATP value could be lower or higher, and there was no statistically significant difference in the handle of the knives. While showing the results to the cooks on the spot, they showed how to wash the kitchen knife handle and blade with a detergent, and repeated the method of cleaning with running water for 30 seconds twice. After this hygiene education, the cook again cooked using the same kitchen knife and asked the inspector to perform an ATP inspection on the kitchen knife that had washed before and after cooking. After the hygiene education, the handle and blade of vegetables knives and the handle and blade of meat knives all had statistically significantly lowered ATP values, and hygienic cleaning was possible. However, since the handle of the kitchen knife for meat did not have an ATP value of less than 100 even after washing, it was found that more careful washing is necessary. Further guidance to cook is needed. 
\section[{VI. Conclusions}]{VI. Conclusions}\par
The purpose was to utilize the ATP test, which used for hygiene tests in hygiene education in the kitchen. An ATP wiping test performed on the kitchen knife handle and blade. Comparison of ATP test values before and after hygiene education in both meat and vegetable knives. As a result of averaging 12 ATP values for each data, and comparing them, before hygiene education, before and after cooking, we compared the handle of the kitchen knife and the blade of it, but it is not said that sufficient cleaning can done. However, after the hygiene education, the handle and blades of knives had a statistically significant lower ATP value than the handle and blades of knives, which had washed after cooking. However, the handle of the meat knife had a higher ATP value than the blade, and it did not become less than 100. On the other hand, the kitchen knife for vegetables has an ATP value of 100 or less after washing both the handle and the blade after hygiene education, confirming the sufficient washing effect. It found that the knife for meat needs to politely washed more politely than the vegetable knife. Cautions in future hygiene education.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.23815789473684212\textwidth}P{0.12894736842105264\textwidth}P{0.08552631578947367\textwidth}P{0.22105263157894736\textwidth}P{0.09736842105263158\textwidth}P{0.07894736842105263\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{before cleaning}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{before cleaning}\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{instruction}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{instruction}\\
Meat knife handle\tabcellsep before\tabcellsep after\tabcellsep Meatknife blade\tabcellsep before\tabcellsep after\\
Handle 1\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 550\tabcellsep Blade 1\tabcellsep 52\tabcellsep 71\\
Handle 2\tabcellsep 222\tabcellsep 576\tabcellsep Blade 2\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 90\\
Handle 3\tabcellsep 16464\tabcellsep 706\tabcellsep Blade 3\tabcellsep 61\tabcellsep 91\\
Handle 4\tabcellsep 4268\tabcellsep 731\tabcellsep Blade 4\tabcellsep 84\tabcellsep 170\\
Handle 5\tabcellsep 6438\tabcellsep 783\tabcellsep Blade 5\tabcellsep 48\tabcellsep 291\\
Handle 6\tabcellsep 723\tabcellsep 845\tabcellsep Blade 6\tabcellsep 400\tabcellsep 322\\
Handle 7\tabcellsep 4769\tabcellsep 980\tabcellsep Blade 7\tabcellsep 116\tabcellsep 433\\
Handle 8\tabcellsep 1335\tabcellsep 1219\tabcellsep Blade 8\tabcellsep 48\tabcellsep 610\\
Handle 9\tabcellsep 1407\tabcellsep 2432\tabcellsep Blade 9\tabcellsep 1982\tabcellsep 924\\
Handle 10\tabcellsep 581\tabcellsep 2438\tabcellsep Blade 10\tabcellsep 101\tabcellsep 1208\\
Handle 11\tabcellsep 5448\tabcellsep 3084\tabcellsep Blade 11\tabcellsep 40\tabcellsep 1468\\
Handle 12\tabcellsep 4807\tabcellsep 8123\tabcellsep Blade 12\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 11680\\
Average\tabcellsep 3873.6667\tabcellsep 1872.25\tabcellsep Average\tabcellsep 244.75\tabcellsep 1446.5\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Standard deviation 4581.2532 2147.5009}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Standard deviation 557.010221 3255.4904}\\
Median\tabcellsep 2837.5\tabcellsep 912.5\tabcellsep Median\tabcellsep 56.5\tabcellsep 377.5\\
Maximum\tabcellsep 16464\tabcellsep 8123\tabcellsep Maximum\tabcellsep 1982\tabcellsep 11680\\
Minimum\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 550\tabcellsep Minimum\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 71\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: ATP test result of the meat knife blade before cleaning instruction b) Meat knife: ATP results of after hygiene education i. Meat knife handle and blade]} 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.2504830917874396\textwidth}P{0.12113526570048308\textwidth}P{0.07254428341384864\textwidth}P{0.23337359098228663\textwidth}P{0.11566022544283414\textwidth}P{0.056803542673107894\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{after cleaning}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{after cleaning}\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{instruction}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{instruction}\\
Meat knife handle\tabcellsep before\tabcellsep after\tabcellsep Meat knife blade\tabcellsep before\tabcellsep after\\
Handle 1\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 13\tabcellsep Blade 1\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 0\\
Handle 2\tabcellsep 436\tabcellsep 37\tabcellsep Blade 2\tabcellsep 28\tabcellsep 6\\
Handle 3\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep Blade 3\tabcellsep 232\tabcellsep 6\\
Handle 4\tabcellsep 81\tabcellsep 39\tabcellsep Blade 4\tabcellsep 232\tabcellsep 6\\
Handle 5\tabcellsep 45\tabcellsep 61\tabcellsep Blade 5\tabcellsep 332\tabcellsep 6\\
Handle 6\tabcellsep 146\tabcellsep 61\tabcellsep Blade 6\tabcellsep 49\tabcellsep 11\\
Handle 7\tabcellsep 4642\tabcellsep 66\tabcellsep Blade 7\tabcellsep 804\tabcellsep 13\\
Handle 8\tabcellsep 2045\tabcellsep 94\tabcellsep Blade 8\tabcellsep 208\tabcellsep 28\\
Handle 9\tabcellsep 1221\tabcellsep 97\tabcellsep Blade 9\tabcellsep 208\tabcellsep 28\\
Handle 10\tabcellsep 61\tabcellsep 158\tabcellsep Blade 10\tabcellsep 2994\tabcellsep 46\\
Handle 11\tabcellsep 887\tabcellsep 363\tabcellsep Blade 11\tabcellsep 155\tabcellsep 55\\
Handle 12\tabcellsep 3546\tabcellsep 540\tabcellsep Blade 12\tabcellsep 104\tabcellsep 68\\
Average\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1095.8333 130.5833}\tabcellsep Average\tabcellsep 446.25\tabcellsep 22.75\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Standard deviation 1549.1016 159.0469}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Standard deviation829.19952 22.474733}\\
Median\tabcellsep 291\tabcellsep 63.5\tabcellsep Median\tabcellsep 208\tabcellsep 12\\
Maximum\tabcellsep 4642\tabcellsep 540\tabcellsep Maximum\tabcellsep 2994\tabcellsep 68\\
Minimum\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 13\tabcellsep Minimum\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 0\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{before cleaning}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{before cleaning}\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{instruction}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{instruction}\\
Vegitable knife handle\tabcellsep before\tabcellsep after\tabcellsep Vegetable knife blade\tabcellsep before\tabcellsep after\\
Handle 1\tabcellsep 343\tabcellsep 248\tabcellsep Blade 1\tabcellsep 71\tabcellsep 49\\
Handle 2\tabcellsep 88\tabcellsep 324\tabcellsep Blade 2\tabcellsep 84\tabcellsep 57\\
Handle 3\tabcellsep 575\tabcellsep 424\tabcellsep Blade 3\tabcellsep 96\tabcellsep 59\\
Handle 4\tabcellsep 472\tabcellsep 545\tabcellsep Blade 4\tabcellsep 85\tabcellsep 124\\
Handle 5\tabcellsep 867\tabcellsep 559\tabcellsep Blade 5\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep 142\\
Handle 6\tabcellsep 1352\tabcellsep 763\tabcellsep Blade 6\tabcellsep 219\tabcellsep 159\\
Handle 7\tabcellsep 4119\tabcellsep 903\tabcellsep Blade 7\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 201\\
Handle 8\tabcellsep 2581\tabcellsep 1210\tabcellsep Blade 8\tabcellsep 19\tabcellsep 238\\
Handle 9\tabcellsep 569\tabcellsep 1769\tabcellsep Blade 9\tabcellsep 17942\tabcellsep 239\\
Handle 10\tabcellsep 98\tabcellsep 3002\tabcellsep Blade 10\tabcellsep 68\tabcellsep 800\\
Handle 11\tabcellsep 402\tabcellsep 6856\tabcellsep Blade 11\tabcellsep 205\tabcellsep 1072\\
Handle 12\tabcellsep 5163\tabcellsep 19136\tabcellsep Blade 12\tabcellsep 135\tabcellsep 3582\\
Average\tabcellsep 1385.75\tabcellsep 2978.25\tabcellsep Average\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1580.9167 560.166667}\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Standard deviation 1678.5821 5416.3923}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Standard deviation 5152.8196 1003.56572}\\
Median\tabcellsep 572\tabcellsep 833\tabcellsep Median\tabcellsep 84.5\tabcellsep 180\\
Maximum\tabcellsep 5163\tabcellsep 19136\tabcellsep Maximum\tabcellsep 17942\tabcellsep 3582\\
Minimum\tabcellsep 88\tabcellsep 248\tabcellsep Minimum\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 49\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}Table 5 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
: ATP test result of the vegetable knife blade\\
before cleaning instruction\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 6}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{7} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_7}Table 7 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{8} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_8}Table 8 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{7} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
Year 2020\\
2\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_9}Table 7 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{8} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_11}Table 8 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{9} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_12}Table 9 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{10} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_13}Table 10 :}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2020 Global Journals} 			\footnote{Results of Hygiene Education of Kitchen Knife by using ATP Inspection -Comparison of Handle and Blade} 		 		\backmatter   			 
\subsection[{Acknowledgments}]{Acknowledgments}\par
We would like to thank all the cooks who participated in this experiment. Also, we would like to thank the inspectors who also performed the ATP inspection. 			  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Stanley ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘A review of bioluminescent STP techniques in papid microbiology’.  		 			P E Stanley 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Biolumin Chemilumin}  		1989. 4  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Griffith et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘An evaluation of hospital cleaning refimes and standards’.  		 			C J Griffith 		,  		 			R A Coooper 		,  		 			J Gilmore 		,  		 			C Davies 		,  		 			M Lweis 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Hosp Infect}  		2000. 45  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Lee ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘An investigation of Factors that influence Hygiene Practices at a small Day Care Center’.  		 			J H Lee 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Food Prot}  		2018. 2018. 81  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Osimani et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Bioluminescence ATP monitoring for the routine assessment of food contact surface cleanliness in a university canteen’.  		 			A Osimani 		,  		 			C Garofalo 		,  		 			F Clementi 		,  		 			S Tavoletti 		,  		 			L Aquilanti 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int J Environ Res Public Health}  		2014. 17  (10)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Aycieck et al. ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional ygiene swabbing methods for the deteminaton of surface cleanliness at a hospital kitchen’.  		 			H Aycieck 		,  		 			U Oquz 		,  		 			K Karci 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int J Hyg Environ Health}  		2006. 209  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Nante et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Effectiveness of ATP bioluminescence to assess hospital cleaning: a review’.  		 			N Nante 		,  		 			E Ceriale 		,  		 			G Messina 		,  		 			D Lenzi 		,  		 			P Manzi 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Prev. Med. Hyg}  		2017. 58  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Stannard and Gibbs ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Rapid microbiology: application s of bioluminescence in the food industry-a review’.  		 			C J Stannard 		,  		 			P A Gibbs 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Biolumin Chemilumin}  		1986. 1  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Amodio and Dubi ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Use of ATP bioluminescence for assessing h eclealiness of hospital surfaces: a review of the published literature’.  		 			E Amodio 		,  		 			C Dubi 		.  	 	 		\textit{J infect Public Health}  		1990-2012. 2014. 7  (2)  p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
