\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Effect of Fermented Kepok Banana Corm Inclusion in the Diet on the Nutrient Digestibility and Mineral Ca and P Retention of Growing Pigs}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2020 2020-01-15 (revised: 2 Year 2020 15 January 2020)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2020 2020-01-15} \title{Effect of Fermented Kepok Banana Corm Inclusion in the Diet on the Nutrient Digestibility and Mineral Ca and P Retention of Growing Pigs} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Dr. Sabarta Sembiring} \author[2]{Pratiwi Trisunuwati} \author[3]{Osfar Sjofjan} \author[4]{Irfan H. Djunaidi} \affil[1]{ Nusa Cendana University} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 15 December 2019 Accepted: 2 January 2020 Published: 15 January 2020} \maketitle \begin{abstract} Sixteen crossbred growing pigs Duroc x Landrace, (10 weeks of age; initial body weight 27 ± 3.92 kg) were allotted into four treatments in a randomized block design to evaluate the effects of inclusion of fermented kepok banana corm (FKBC) in the diet on the nutrient digestibility and mineral ca and p retention of growing pigs. There were four treatments diets offered: basal diets without FKBC (R0); basal diets + 7% FKBC (R1); basal diets + 14% FKBC (R2); basal diets + 21% FKBC (R3). Results of the study showed that inclusion of 21% FKBC in the diet of pigs significantly reduced (P <0.01) dry matter intake and organic matter compared to the control diet. There were no significant difference between 14% and 21% FKBC on the intake and digestibility of dry matter and organic matter of the pigs. However, inclusion of FKBC at the level of 7% showed the optimum digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and energy with the average value of 66.57%, 70.48%, 83.43% and 70.76%, respectively. In addition, mineral consumption and retention of Ca and P were 14.30 and 9.10 g/day, respectively with the value of mineral retention both Ca and P were 11.90 and 7.50 g/day, respectively. It can be concluded that inclusion of FKBC at the level of 7% increased dry matter digestibility and organic matter. \end{abstract} \keywords{corm, fermented, nutrient digestibility, mineral retention, growing pig.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par ig production in East Nusa Tenggara (ENT) Province, Indonesia is not only to fulfil meat demands, it also uses as savings, as social status and for religious ceremonies, respectively \hyperref[b4]{(Anonymous, 2017)}. The ENT pig population is estimated at ± 1.70 million \hyperref[b2]{(Anonymous, 2014)}, with ± 85\% being owned by smallholder farmers (ACIAR, 2010). Pig demand in ENT was 1,134,552 animals per year and pork are a critical source of protein for domestic consumption where about 90\% of the population of 5 million are non-Muslim and considered as pork eaters \hyperref[b4]{(Anonymous, 2017)}. However, pig production in this area is still low due to the insufficient of feed both quantity and quality \hyperref[b1]{(Anonymous, 2010)}. In addition, most of raw materials used in the feed industry such as corn and wheat are imported, and consequently resulting in the increase of cost production {\ref (Dwyanto and Priyanti, 2009)}. The utilization of local feed from agricultural by products, on the other hand, are less desirable due to its low nutrients quality. Alternatively, processing such products that locally available through fermentation by utilizing yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and fungus (Aspergillus niger) prior to offered to animal as source of feed is necessarily important.\par Kepok banana corm (Musa paradisiaca) or locally known as fried banana (plantain banana) is usually left in the farm after harvesting the banana fruits and it classified as waste, with its potential production about 40\% \hyperref[b12]{(Emaga et al., 2011)}. The kepok banana corm utilization as feed sources for livestock, however, is still constrained by the presence of high crude fiber, complex carbohydrates and antinutrition. It has been reported that the starch composed of amylose and amylopectin, which would be hard to be digested by digestive enzymes {\ref (English et al., 2007)}. Therefore, complex molecules of starch of kepok banana corm is expected to reduce, through fermentation since yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and fungus (Aspergillus niger) contained some enzymes that can broke down the hard part of starch. Previous studies reported that yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) contained ?-amilase, glukoamilase, selulase, sakrosidase dan lipase \hyperref[b0]{(Aiyer, 2005;}\hyperref[b30]{Winarno,} \hyperref[b26]{(Sembiring et al., 2017)}. However, there is limited information regarding the utilization of yeast and fungus in kepok banana corm fermentation in ENT province, Indonesia. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the kepok banana corm fermented with yeast and fungus on grower pig nutrient digestibility and mineral Ca and P retention. The hypothesis was that the II. \section[{Materials and Methods}]{Materials and Methods} \section[{a) Animals, experimental design and feeding management}]{a) Animals, experimental design and feeding management}\par The study was conducted in Noelbaki Village, Kupang-ENT Province, the village located at distance of ± 25 km to the capital of the ENT Province -Kupang, with altitude of ± 100 m. Sixteen crossbred growing pigs Duroc x Landrace, (10 weeks of age; initial body weight 27 ± 3.92 kg), which were obtained from the local farm nearby Kupang city were used. The animals were randomly allotted into one of the four treatments in a randomized block design (n = 4 in each treatment groups). The treatments were consisted of R0: basal feed without FKBC; R1: feed + 7\% FKBC; R2: feed + 14\% FKBC and R3: feed + 21\% FKBC. Feed and water were offered ad libitum throughout the course of experiment. The animals were offered feed at three times (08.00, 12.00 and 17.00 oclock) daily to ensure ad libitum intakes. Water was provided separately in the bucket. \section[{b) Banana corm processing and fermentation}]{b) Banana corm processing and fermentation}\par Fresh kepok banana corms, were obtained from local farmers in the district of Kupang, ENT-Indonesia. The microbial yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) used had 1.25 x 10 13 CFU/g and Aspergillus Niger had 1.03 x 10 12 CFU/g, as determined by the Laboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nusa Cendana University (2015). Kepok banana corms fermentation: Fresh banana corms were sliced from the peal, cut and sun dried for 3 days and ground into flour through a 2 mm screen. Steamed kepok banana corm flour (substrate) was inoculated with the liquid culture at 10\% w/v, as recommended by \hyperref[b6]{Azizah et al. (2012)}. The inoculated substrates were enclosed within sealed polybags (2 kg capacity) and fermented under aerobic conditions. The fermentation product was inactivated by drying at 60 o C for 24 h, as described by \hyperref[b23]{Ozturk et al. (2009)} and Jenses et al.\par (2013) with modifications, and then stored in sterile plastic bags at 4°C until analysis.\par The composition of the feeds used in the present experiment were locally available in this area and commonly used by pig farmers such as corn flour, concentrate, rice bran, fish meal, salt and pigmix. Regarding the present study, corn and rice bran were used as a source of energy and fish meal as a source of protein. The nutrient content of feed used is presented in Table \hyperref[tab_1]{1}. The banana corm used in the present study was a fermentation product using a combination of yeast and mold. The treated feeds tested on pigs were formulated with the composition and nutrient content as in Table \hyperref[tab_2]{2}. \section[{*Determined values from Table 1 c) Data collection and measurement}]{*Determined values from Table 1 c) Data collection and measurement}\par The measurement of feed consumption included intake of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), Crude protein (CP) and energy were calculated by substracting the daily refusal weight from the weight of the feed offered in the previous day. The digestibility of DM, OM, CP and energy were calculated as the difference between the amount of feed eaten and the amount voided in the faeces. Body weight gain of the pigs were obtained by weighed the animal every week or at the commencement of the study and the end of the study and feed conversion was calculated by deviding the daily intake of nutrients from the body weight gain of the pigs. Retention Mineral Ca and P were calculated by substracting the daily refusal weight of mineral from the weight of the mineral feed offered in the previous day. \section[{d) Statistical analysis}]{d) Statistical analysis}\par Data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as the sole source of variation in the model. The ANOVA was performed using the IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22. Duncan multiple range test was also performed where the level of significant was set at P < 0.05. \section[{III.}]{III.} \section[{Results and Discussion}]{Results and Discussion} \section[{a) Chemical composition of the experimental diets}]{a) Chemical composition of the experimental diets}\par The kepok banana corm was chosen in the present study as an alternative feed supplementation to pigs due to its potential production during harvesting seasons but low utilisation particularly in ENT Province, Indonesia where the quantity and quality of feed is mainly constrained on pig production. The diets contained FKBC in the feed composition contain crude protein as high as 21.00\%, which indicates high quality feed for growing pigs. The crude protein and energy concentrations are suited and slightly above the needs of grower pigs (Table \hyperref[tab_3]{3}) based on the recommendations of NRC (1998). Mineral P in feed from vegetable was generally low and almost insufficient to meet the needs of animals \hyperref[b5]{(Anselme, 2006)}. Minerals content of the diets used in the study are still as recommended needs for growing pigs.\par The FKBC used in the diet test contained DM and OM of 89.35±1.06 and 86.36±1.12\%, respectively. The crude protein content and crude fat were 4.40 and 1.32\%. The content of crude fibre, NDF and energy were 17.51±0.99 and 41.23±1.12\% and 3511±48.29 Kcal /kg respectively. The content of starch, resistant starch and total sugar ware 35.54±8.43, 25.91±6.85 and 4.11±2.54 g/100g, respectively (Laboratory of the Department of Food Science and Technology, FTP-IPB-Bogor, Indonesia, 2015). Proximate analysis results of the diets was shown in Table \hyperref[tab_3]{3}. Dry matter intake of pigs fed the control diets were significantly higher than those fed the test diets (P< 0.05; Table \hyperref[tab_4]{4}). The DM intake in this study is consistent with results of previous studies \hyperref[b9]{(Cloutier et al., 2015)} using growing pigs with body weight of 25-50 kg, given a diet containing the amino acid lysine as a supplement, proved that intake of dry matter was 1840 g/day and the mean body weight gain of 802 g/day. The pig intake and growth can be affected by types of feed used and also influenced by different individual pigs. \hyperref[b21]{Mwesigwa et al., (2013)} stated that feed sources helped influence feed intake. Total feed intake can also be influenced by the concentration of energy, palatability, nutritional content, breed and growth rate \hyperref[b27]{(Tillman et al, 1989;}\hyperref[b19]{Kyriazakis, 1994;}\hyperref[b22]{Ngoc et al., 2013)}.\par Organic matter intake tends to decline with increasing levels of FKBC in the diet. However, there were no significant difference between the four treatments (P > 0.05) on OM intake (Table \hyperref[tab_4]{4}). This is due to the energy content in the feed is relatively same. Results of previous studies in pigs fed diets containing wheat bran can increase the intake of OM (protein and energy) compared to those containing feed mixed with corn bran and corn seeds \hyperref[b21]{(Mwesigwa et al., 2013)}. This result implies energy sources may influenced the OM intake figures of pigs.\par Intake value in the study tends to decrease was because of high starch content in the diet which is still difficult to be digested by the digestive tract of growing pigs. The starch in the FKBC diets is still wrapped by polysaccharides.\par The DM and OM digestibility tended to decrease at inclusion level of FKBC of 21\%. Diet containing 7\% FKBC (R1) was not significantly (P> 0.05) reduced digestibility of either DM or OM compared with the control diet (R0). Feeding growing pigs with 7\% FKBC in the diet (R1), however had higher values of DM and OM digestibility than the other treatments.\par DM and OM digestibility were not significantly different (P> 0.05) among treatments R0 compared to R1 and between treatment R2 to R3 (Table \hyperref[tab_4]{4}). This finding indicates increasing the level using of the FKBC from 14 up to 21\% has not been significantly reduced digestibility of DM and OM. This results are in line with \hyperref[b14]{Hanson et al., (2012)} states that utilization of available energy and other nutrients may increase the production of feces and excretion of nutrients.\par In this study, DM and OM digestibility tended to decrease indicated that high content of crude fiber and starch in FKBC resulted in duration of component digesta in the digestive tract be short \hyperref[b22]{(Ngoc et al., 2013)}. Since polysaccharide consisting of high starches and resistant starch in the feeds, it will difficult to digest \hyperref[b13]{(Englyst et al., 2007;}\hyperref[b10]{Cummings and Stephen, 2007)}. The ability of the digestive tract to digest and absorb carbohydrates (polysaccharide) is influenced by the degree of polymerization, starches physical shape, size and structure of the constituent starch granules \hyperref[b7]{(Bijttebier et al., 2008)}.\par Digestibility of feed containing high starch was also affected by balancing level of amylose: amylopectin of the starch, the higher the amylose content resulted in the lower the digestibility \hyperref[b31]{(Yin et al., 2010)}, the consequence is the value of the glycemic index increase and occur insulin response \hyperref[b17]{(Jun et al., 2010 )}. Intake of CP and energy tended to decrease with increase level of FKBC inclusion. Duncan test on intake of CP and energy indicated that pigs fed the control diets had significantly higher compared to the rest of treatment diets (P<0.05; Table \hyperref[tab_5]{5}). CP digestibility decreases was also due to feed composition, nutrient levels and the possibility of containing protein inhibitors, tannin and saponin. Levels of tannin and saponin in FKBC used in the feed composition were 915.98 and 360 mg/100g. Tannins in feeds, especially high condensed tannin in nonruminant feeds can lead to be less digest and absorb, less palatabel due to bitter taste and the protein bond \hyperref[b15]{(Huisman, 1989;}\hyperref[b20]{Lipsa et al., 2012)} and also due to bind starch and resistant starch bond \hyperref[b32]{(Zeeman et al., 2010)}.\par The study showed that using FKBC up to the level of 21\% significantly decreased both intake and digestibility of energy. High starch content in FKBC of 350.50 g/kg, resulted in decreasing the energy digestibility of grower pigs. June et al., (2010) stated that starch as a source of energy has low digestibility especially when a proportion of amylose: amylopectin is wide. Decomposition of the starch in the digestive tract becomes difficult to digest if containing high amylopectin \hyperref[b8]{(Carre, 2004)}. \section[{d) Effect of treatment on pig performances}]{d) Effect of treatment on pig performances}\par The present study noted that feed intake of pigs fed R3 diet tended to decrease (Table \hyperref[tab_6]{6}). In other word, the higher the level of FKBC, the lower the feed intake. It was notable that the animal offered R3 diets had the lowest average daily gain (ADG) compared to those fed the control diets. Pigs given feed containing 21\% FKBC (R3) tend to consume less feed and less average daily gain. The intake of growing pig was influenced by individual animal, age and environment \hyperref[b24]{(Reeds et al., 1993)}, and affected by the concentration of energy \hyperref[b19]{(Kyriazakis, 1994)}, palatability, nutrient content, breeds and the rate of growth \hyperref[b22]{(Ngoc et al., 2013)}. Feed with high fibers can cause feed conversion increased as a result of duration of digesta in the digestive tract become shorter \hyperref[b22]{(Ngoc et al., 2013)}.\par The average value of feed conversion showed no differences (P> 0.05) among four diets. This means that the level of 21\% FKBC can be administered to growing pigs without lowering the feed conversion. The average feed conversion values obtained are relatively similar between the treatment was due to the nutrient content of feed almost the same (Table \hyperref[tab_3]{3}). Differences in feed conversion rate according to \hyperref[b25]{Rideout et al., (2008)} is closely connected with the process of fermentation in the intestines especially on high starch and resistant starch feeds. Individual animals can also affect the feed conversion \hyperref[b24]{(Reeds et al., 1993)}. Feed with high crude fibre can cause feed conversion increased \hyperref[b22]{(Ngoc et al., 2013)}. \section[{e) Mineral Intake and Retention of Ca and P in the growing Pigs}]{e) Mineral Intake and Retention of Ca and P in the growing Pigs}\par Mineral intake of Ca and P found tends to decrease with increasing the levels of FKBC inclusion, as shown in Table \hyperref[tab_7]{7}. Mineral intake of Ca and P decreased significantly (P <0.05) between the control diet and the rest. The highest value was achieved in the control diet (RO) and followed by R1, R2 and R3 diets respectively. Duncan's test show the average value of mineral Ca and P intake were no significant difference (P> 0.05) between R2 and R3 diet. Increasing the level of FKBC from 14 to 21\% does not significantly reduced mineral Ca and P intake. This presumably due to the mineral content in the FKBC was low.\par Mineral Ca retention in pigs fed R0 (control) showed highly significant (P <0.01) compared with R2 diet, whereas the Ca retention between diet R1, R2 and R3 were significant difference (P <0.05). The achievement in study was in line with \hyperref[b25]{Rideout et al., (2008)} stated that source of starch may influence digestibility of mineral Ca and P in growing pigs at 30 kg body weight. Mineral Ca absorption was affected by the balance of Ca and P in the diet \hyperref[b27]{(Tillman et al., 1989;}\hyperref[b29]{Whittemore, 1993)}.\par Mineral P retention was found highly significant (P <0.01) between control diet (R0) compare with R2 and R3 diets. Minerals retention of Ca and P at FKBC inclusion up to 21\% was decreased due to high levels of starch and resistant starch content in the FKBC. Previous studies using corn and potato in diet at level of 2 Year 2020 \section[{Performance variables}]{Performance variables}\par Treatment diets - {\ref ------------------------------------------------------------------------------} 10\% fed in grower pig with body weight of 30 kg was found significantly reduced the digestibility of crude protein and reduces the retention of mineral Ca and P \hyperref[b25]{(Rideout et al., 2008)}. This sudy indicated that using diets containing hight content of resistant starch has a negative effect on mineral retention of Ca and P in grower pigs. \section[{IV. Conclusions and Recommendations a) Conclusion}]{IV. Conclusions and Recommendations a) Conclusion}\par The inclusion of fermented kepok banana corm at the level of 7\% in the diet increased the digestibility in vivo of dry matter from 65.05 to 66.57 (2.3\%) and organic matter from 68.95 to 70.48 (2.2\%). Inclusion of fermented product up to 21\% was not reduce the performance of grower pigs. It can be recommended banana corm fermented product can be applied as feeds at the level of 21\% in grower pigs diet without retarded the intake and growth.\begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.3240625\textwidth}P{0.3028125\textwidth}P{0.223125\textwidth}} Feeds sources\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Nutrient content}\\ \tabcellsep Crude Protein (\%)\tabcellsep Gross energy (Kcal/kg)\\ Corn*\tabcellsep 8.50\tabcellsep 4426\\ Concentrate**\tabcellsep 37.00\tabcellsep 3769\\ Fish meal*\tabcellsep 62.90\tabcellsep 3770\\ Rice bran***\tabcellsep 13.10\tabcellsep 4650\\ FKBC****\tabcellsep 4.40\tabcellsep 3511\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: *) Analysis of Feed Chemicals Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Nusa Cendana University, 2014. **) Commercial Feed Concentrate for Pig. ***) Robles and Ewan, 1982. ****) FKBC = The fermented kepok banana corm, Analysis of Livestock Breeding Center, Bogor, 2015.]} \caption{\label{tab_1}Table 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.40780346820809243\textwidth}P{0.10563583815028901\textwidth}P{0.1203757225433526\textwidth}P{0.11054913294797687\textwidth}P{0.10563583815028901\textwidth}} Feed sources\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Diet\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep R0\tabcellsep R1\tabcellsep R2\tabcellsep R3\\ Corn meal (\%)\tabcellsep 48.00\tabcellsep 47.00\tabcellsep 46.50\tabcellsep 45.50\\ Concentrate (\%)\tabcellsep 17.50\tabcellsep 18.00\tabcellsep 18.00\tabcellsep 18.50\\ Fish meal (\%)\tabcellsep 12.00\tabcellsep 12.50\tabcellsep 13.00\tabcellsep 13.50\\ Rice bran (\%)\tabcellsep 21.00\tabcellsep 14.00\tabcellsep 7.00\tabcellsep -\\ FKBC (\%)\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 7.0\tabcellsep 14.0\tabcellsep 21.00\\ Pigmix (\%)\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 1.00\\ Salt (\%)\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\\ Total\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 100\\ * Nutrient composition\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Gross energy (Kkal/kg)\tabcellsep 4068\tabcellsep 3985\tabcellsep 3950\tabcellsep 3925\\ Crude protein (\%)\tabcellsep 20.85\tabcellsep 20.65\tabcellsep 20.33\tabcellsep 20.13\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_2}Table 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.5420517560073936\textwidth}P{0.0754158964879852\textwidth}P{0.08170055452865065\textwidth}P{0.0754158964879852\textwidth}P{0.0754158964879852\textwidth}} Composition\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Diet\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep R0\tabcellsep R1\tabcellsep R2\tabcellsep R3\\ Dry matter (\%)\tabcellsep 92.07\tabcellsep 90.92\tabcellsep 89.61\tabcellsep 90.54\\ Oganic matter (\%)\tabcellsep 89.02\tabcellsep 88.90\tabcellsep 87.48\tabcellsep 84.88\\ Crude protein (\%)\tabcellsep 22.79\tabcellsep 22.27\tabcellsep 22.73\tabcellsep 21.00\\ Crude fat (\%)\tabcellsep 6.50\tabcellsep 5.32\tabcellsep 5.98\tabcellsep 5.45\\ Crude fibre (\%)\tabcellsep 5.39\tabcellsep 5.52\tabcellsep 5.82\tabcellsep 6.04\\ CHO (\%)\tabcellsep 59.73\tabcellsep 62.70\tabcellsep 60.90\tabcellsep 64.09\\ NFE (\%)\tabcellsep 54.34\tabcellsep 57.18\tabcellsep 55.08\tabcellsep 58.05\\ Gross energy (Kcal/kg)\tabcellsep 4.303\tabcellsep 4.299\tabcellsep 4.305\tabcellsep 4.294\\ Ca (\%)\tabcellsep 0.95\tabcellsep 0.81\tabcellsep 0.79\tabcellsep 0.70\\ P (\%)\tabcellsep 0.53\tabcellsep 0.51\tabcellsep 0.50\tabcellsep 0.50\\ \multicolumn{5}{l}{Analysis of feed Chemical Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Nusa Cendana University (2015). CHO = Carbohydrate; NFE =}\\ Nitrogen Free Extract\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{b) Intake and digestibility of dry matter and organic}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ matter\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}Table 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.3444556451612903\textwidth}P{0.10796370967741935\textwidth}P{0.13024193548387097\textwidth}P{0.10625\textwidth}P{0.1028225806451613\textwidth}P{0.05826612903225806\textwidth}} Variables\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Treatment diets}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Anova P values\\ \tabcellsep R0\tabcellsep R1\tabcellsep R2\tabcellsep R3\tabcellsep \\ DM intake\tabcellsep 1870,99 ± 37,62 c\tabcellsep 1654,70 ± 28,92 b\tabcellsep 610,07 ± 47,93 a\tabcellsep 1610,07± 42,95 a\tabcellsep 0.718\\ OM intake\tabcellsep 1665,19 ±33,48 c\tabcellsep 1595,32 ±26,11 b\tabcellsep 1482,77 ±42,95 a\tabcellsep 1457,75 ±54,95 a\tabcellsep 0.892\\ DM\tabcellsep 65,05 ±5,45 bc\tabcellsep 66,57 ±6,34 c\tabcellsep 60,90 ±1,50 ab\tabcellsep 57,21 ±2,64 a\tabcellsep 0.010\\ digestibility\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ OM\tabcellsep 68,95 ±4,72 bc\tabcellsep 70,48 ±6,34 c\tabcellsep 65,21 ±1,35 ab\tabcellsep 62,04 ±2,64 a\tabcellsep 0.013\\ digestibility\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{4}{l}{a,b,c, values within a row with different superscripts differ, P < 0.05; n = 4 pigs/group}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{c) Intake and digestibility of crude protein and energy}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_4}Table 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{5} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.16120689655172413\textwidth}P{0.1367816091954023\textwidth}P{0.18563218390804598\textwidth}P{0.14410919540229883\textwidth}P{0.14166666666666666\textwidth}P{0.08060344827586206\textwidth}} Variables\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Treatment diets}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Anova\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep P values\\ \tabcellsep R0\tabcellsep R1\tabcellsep R2\tabcellsep R3\tabcellsep \\ CP intake\tabcellsep 426,30±10.89 b\tabcellsep 393.48±12.53 a\tabcellsep 376.11±6.44 a\tabcellsep 338.11±42,95 a\tabcellsep 0.979\\ Energy intake\tabcellsep 8049.49±161.89 c\tabcellsep 7596.96±124.36,11 b\tabcellsep 7596.92±124.36 b\tabcellsep 7125.05±256.39 a\tabcellsep 0.908\\ CP digestibility\tabcellsep 83.74 ± bc\tabcellsep 66,57 ±6,34 c\tabcellsep 60,90 ±1,50 ab\tabcellsep 57,21 ±2,64 a\tabcellsep 0.810\\ Energy\tabcellsep 68,95 ±4,72 bc\tabcellsep 70,48 ±6,34 c\tabcellsep 65,21 ±1,35 ab\tabcellsep 62,04 ±2,64 a\tabcellsep 0.724\\ digestibility\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: a,b,c, values within a row with different superscripts differ, P < 0.05; n = 4 pigs/group]} \caption{\label{tab_5}Table 5 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{6} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} a,b, values within a row with different superscripts differ, P < 0.05; n = 4 pigs/group\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_6}Table 6 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{7} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.3117414248021108\textwidth}P{0.10765171503957784\textwidth}P{0.14129287598944593\textwidth}P{0.10765171503957784\textwidth}P{0.10540897097625329\textwidth}P{0.0762532981530343\textwidth}} Variables\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Treatment diets}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Anova P values\\ \tabcellsep R0\tabcellsep R1\tabcellsep R2\tabcellsep R3\tabcellsep \\ Ca intake\tabcellsep 17,82±0,35 d\tabcellsep 14,32±0,23 c\tabcellsep 13,20±0,38 b\tabcellsep 11,28±0,41 a\tabcellsep 0.989\\ P intake\tabcellsep 9,91±0,19 d\tabcellsep 9,08±0,14 b\tabcellsep 8,35±0,24 a\tabcellsep 8,06±0,29 a\tabcellsep 0.949\\ Ca retention\tabcellsep 15,08±1,18 d\tabcellsep 11,87±0,86 c\tabcellsep 10,77±0,78 b\tabcellsep 8,59±0,75 a\tabcellsep 0.978\\ P retention\tabcellsep 8,20±0,57 c\tabcellsep 7,49±0,49 b\tabcellsep 6,66±0,30 a\tabcellsep 6,30±0,17 a\tabcellsep 0.932\\ \multicolumn{4}{l}{a,b,c,d values within a row with different superscripts differ, P < 0.05; n = 4 pigs/group}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_7}Table 7 :}\end{figure} \footnote{Effect of Fermented Kepok Banana Corm Inclusion in the Diet on the Nutrient Digestibility and MineralCa and P Retention of Growing Pigs} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Tillman et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} \textit{}, A D Tillman , H Hartadi , R Soedomo , P Soeharto , L Soekanto . \textit{Animal Feeds Fundamental} 1989. Gajah Mada University Press. Faculty of Animal Science-UGM \bibitem[Bijttebier et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} ‘Amylase Action Pattern on Starch Polymers’. A Bijttebier , H Goesaert , J A Delcour . \textit{Biologia} 2008. 63 p. . \bibitem[Aiyer ()]{b0}\label{b0} ‘Amylases and Their Applications’. P V Aiyer . \textit{Review. African Journal of Biotechnology} 2005. 4 (13) p. . \bibitem[Anonymous ()]{b3}\label{b3} Anonymous . \textit{Aspergillus niger. Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia}, 2016. \bibitem[Anonymous ()]{b4}\label{b4} \textit{ARISA, Applied Research \& Innovation Systems in Agriculture. PRISMA, Promoting Rural Income through Support for Markets in Agriculture}, Anonymous . 2017. p. . (Pig Market in Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT)) \bibitem[Cummings and Stephen ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘Carbohydrate Terminology and Classification’. J H Cummings , A M Stephen . \textit{European Journal of Clinical Nutrition} 2007. p. . (suppl 1) \bibitem[Carre ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Causes for variation in starch digestibility of feedstuffs among the World's’. B Carre . \textit{Poultry Science Journal} 2004. 60 p. . \bibitem[Ozturk et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} ‘Characterization of Resistant Starch Samples Prepared from Two High-Amylose Maize Starches Through Debranching and Heat treatments’. S Ozturk , Koksel , K W Perry , Ng . \textit{Cereal Chemistry} 2009. 86 (5) p. . \bibitem[Yin et al. ()]{b31}\label{b31} ‘Digestion Rate of Dietary Starch Affects Systemic Circulation of Amino Acids in Weaned Pigs’. F Yin , Z Zhang , J Huang , Y Dan Yin . \textit{British J. of Nutr} 2010. 103 p. . \bibitem[Anonymous ()]{b2}\label{b2} \textit{East Nusa Tenggara in the figure. The Central Bureau of Statistics East Nusa Tenggara Province-Indonesia}, Anonymous . BPS catalog: 1102001.53. 2014. \bibitem[Azizah et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Effects of Duration of Fermentation on the Production of Alcohol, pH and Gas ProductionDuring Bioetanol Processing of Whey Substituting by Waste Pineapple’. N Azizah , A N Al-Baari , S Dan Mulyani . \textit{Journal of Food Application Technology} 2012. 1 (2) p. . \bibitem[Kaur and Sekhon ()]{b18}\label{b18} ‘Enzymes as Drugs: an Overview’. R Kaur , B S Sekhon . \textit{J. Pharm. Educ. Res} 2012. 3 (2) p. . \bibitem[Cloutier et al. ()]{b9}\label{b9} ‘Evaluation of a real-time method Estimating individual in two lines lysine requirements of growing-finishing pigs’. L Cloutier , C Pomar , M P L Montminy , J F Bernier , J Pomar . \textit{Animal} 2015. 9 (4) p. . \bibitem[Huisman et al. ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘Factors antinutritional (ANFs) in the Nutrition of monogastric Farm Animals’. J Huisman , E J Van Weeden , J Huisman , Pudoc Wageningen . \textit{Nutrition and Digestive Physiology in monogastric Farm Animals}, (Netherlands) 1989. p. . \bibitem[Anonymous ()]{b1}\label{b1} \textit{Final Report Swine Livestock Farming Commercial Use by Small Farmers in ENT -Opportunity for Better market integration. ACIAR GPO Box 1571 Canberra ACT 2601}, Anonymous . 2010. Australia. p. . \bibitem[Winarno ()]{b30}\label{b30} \textit{Food Enzymes. Revised Edition}, F G Winarno . 2010. Bogor: Publisher M-Brio Press. \bibitem[Reeds et al. ()]{b24}\label{b24} ‘Growth Regulation with Particular Reference to the Pig’. P J Reeds , D G Burrin , T A Davis , M A Fiorotto , H J Mersmann , W G Pond . \textit{Growth of the Pig}, G R Hollis (ed.) 1993. p. . \bibitem[Uthumporn et al. ()]{b28}\label{b28} \textit{Hydrolysis of granular starch at subgelatinization temperature using a mixture of amylolytic enzymes. Food and bioproducts processing}, U Uthumporn , I S M Zaidul , A A Karim . 2010. 8 p. . \bibitem[Hanson et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} ‘Impact of dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) and diet formulation methods on dry matter, calcium, and phosphorus retention and excretion in nursery pigs’. A R Hanson , G Xub , M Lia , M H Whitneyc , Shursona , Gc . \textit{Animal Feed Science and Technology} 2012. (Published by Elsevier B.V) \bibitem[Ngoc et al. ()]{b22}\label{b22} ‘Impact of fibre intake and fibre source on digestibility, gut development, retention time and growth performance of indigenous and exotic pigs’. T T B Ngoc , N Len , J E Lindberg . \textit{Animal} 2013. 7 (5) p. . \bibitem[Sembiring et al. ()]{b26}\label{b26} \textit{Inclusion of Kepok Banana Corm Fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus niger as feed and Its Implications on Nutrient digestibility and Performance of Growing Pigs. Disertation at Faculty of Animal Husbandry}, S Sembiring , T Pratiwi , S Osfar , Irfan H Dj . 2017. Malang-Indonesia. Brawijaya University \bibitem[Emaga et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} \textit{Influences Ripening Banana and Plantain Peels Composition and Energy Content. Tropical Animal Health Production}, T H Emaga , J Bindelle , R Agneesens , A Buldgen , B Wathelet , M Paquot . 2011. p. . \bibitem[Jun et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} ‘Metabolic and transcriptomic Responses of weaned Pigs Induced by Different Dietary amylose and amylopectin ratio’. H Jun , C Daiwen , Y Bing . \textit{Journal PLoS One} 2010. 5 (11) p. . \bibitem[Mwesigwa et al. ()]{b21}\label{b21} ‘Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. 10 th Revised Edition. Nutrient Requirements of Swine’. R Mwesigwa , D Mutetikka , D R Kugonza . \textit{Tropical Animal Health Production} 2013. 1998. National Academy Press. 45 p. . (Performance of growing pigs fed diets based on by-products of maize and wheat processing) \bibitem[Rideout et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} ‘Nutrient Utilisation and Intestinal Fermentation are Differentially Affected by the Consumption of Resistant starch Varities and Conventional Fibres in Pigs’. T C Rideout , Q Liu , P Wood , M Z Fan . \textit{British Journal of Nutrition} 2008. 99 p. . \bibitem[Englyst et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Nutritional characterization and Measurement of Dietary Charbohydrates’. K N Englyst , S Liu , H N Englyst . \textit{Review. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition} 2007. p. . (Suppl. I) \bibitem[Jensen et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} ‘Prevention of Post Weaning Diarrhoea by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae -Derived Product based on Whole Yeast’. K H Jensen , B M Damgaard , L O Andresen , E Jorgensen , L Carstensen . \textit{Animal Feed Sci. and Technol} 2013. 183 p. . \bibitem[Lipsa et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} ‘Quantitative genetic analysis of condensed tannins in oilseed rape meal’. F D Lipsa , R Snowdon , W Friedt . \textit{Euphytica} 2012. 184 p. . \bibitem[Anselme ()]{b5}\label{b5} \textit{Secretary General Inorganic Feed Phosphates. A practical guide on the use of inorganic feed phosphates and microbial phytase}, P Anselme . 2006. Cefic. (Phosphorus optimizing utilization in pig and poultry diets) \bibitem[Zeeman et al. ()]{b32}\label{b32} ‘Starch: Its Metabolism, Evaluation, and Biotechnological Modification in Plants’. S C Zeeman , J Kossmann , A M Smith . \textit{Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol} 2010. 61 p. . \bibitem[Diwyanto and Priyanti ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘The Livestock Industry Development Based on Local Resources’. K Diwyanto , A Priyanti . \textit{Development of Agricultural Innovation} 2009. 2 (3) p. . \bibitem[Whittemore ()]{b29}\label{b29} \textit{The Sciece and Practice of Pig Production}, C T Whittemore . 1993. England: Longman Scientific \& Technical. \bibitem[Kyriazakis ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘The Voluntary Food Intake and Diet Selection of Pigs’. I Kyriazakis . \textit{Principles of Pig Science}, D J A J Cole, M A Wiseman, Varley (ed.) 1994. Nottingham University Press. p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}