# Introduction oronaviruses are a large family of enveloped RNA viruses that mostly infect birds and mammals, with humans being particularly vulnerable to infection and transmission of the virus. 1 The previous outbreaks of coronaviruses such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) show similarities to the novel coronavirus. 2 Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by the new coronavirus strain SARSCoV-2, has become a serious public health concern worldwide. 3 The outbreak was first revealed in Wuhan city, in the Hubei Province of China, in late December 2019. 4 The severity of COVID-19 had been underestimated until the national health commission classified it as a B type infectious disease and took actions to fight against this disease on 20 January 2020. 5 Additionally, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency of international concern on 30 January 2020. 6 The outbreak soon spread to the whole country, reached beyond the border, and eventually, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a pandemic on March 11, 2020. 8,9. Lockdown measures were perceived as necessary to control the spread of the virus as rapid human-to-human transmission occurred and much about the virus remained unknown. 10 Due to the obscurity of this novel virus, there has been a lot of confusion and misunderstanding about the virus, how it can spread and the necessary precautions that should be taken to prevent infection. This becomes increasingly challenging with the vast amount of misinformation and disinformation shared on social media that is clouding people's understanding of COVID-19. 11,12. To halt the spread of covid-19, public adherence towards infection control measures is much expected and their knowledge and practices towards this infection is the key to mitigate the outbreak, hence the present study is undertaken to assess the knowledge of non-medical and medical graduates and postgraduates of Telangana state. # II. # Materials and Methods The survey was prepared in the form of an online questionnaire (google form) and was circulated among medical and non-medical graduates and postgraduates of Telangana state. The self-administered questionnaire consists of 17 questions based on knowledge and awareness related to COVID-19 disease which were adapted from Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Myth busters (By WHO).The main instrument to collect data was an online questionnaire using Google forms and it is available at: https://forms.gle/KZwNYLoRChbwzT2c7. A standardized general description about the survey was given in the WhatsApp message before the link was provided to both English and Telugu versions of the questionnaire. so as to ensure linguistic and conceptual equivalence. Convenient sampling method was used for data collection, and the distribution of responses was presented as frequencies and percentages. Sub-groups were classified on the basis of gender, age (<25, 25-35, 36-45, and >45 years), educational qualification (Medical/Non-Medical-Graduate/Postgraduate). Data was tabulated in excel, we analyzed the data from about 504 participants using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 25.0. Descriptive statistics and Student's t test were performed. Confidence interval was set at 95%. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Knowledge score was computed for questions 1 to 16. Knowledge score was computed, Correct answer was coded as 3, Don't know as 2 and Wrong answer as 1. A participant can score a minimum of 16 points and maximum of 48 points based on his/her responses. Finally in the 17 th question, the source of the individuals' information about COVID-19 was recorded. # III. # Results A total of 504 individuals from the state of Telangana, India, responded to the survey. The majority of the responders were from the age group of 25-35 years, which is about 54.6%, followed by <25 years which is about 27.2%. Among all the responders, 58.1% were females, 41.9% were males and 51% were from medical field and 49% were from non-medical field and 57.5% were graduates and 42.5% were postgraduates. # a) The comparison of knowledge scores between Males and Females The mean knowledge score among females (37.58±5.52), which is slightly higher than the mean knowledge score of males (37.17±5.99), with the p value of 0.42, which is not statistically significant (Figure 1), (Table1). The mean knowledge score among participants of medical field (38.87±5.50), which is higher than the mean knowledge score among participants of nonmedical field (35.89±5.57) with the p value < 0.001, which is statistically significant (Figure 2), (Table2) 37.17 The mean knowledge score among postgraduates of medical field (39.65±5.79), which is slightly higher than the mean knowledge score among graduates of medical field (38.29±5.22) with the p value of 0.05, which is not statistically significant (Figure 3), (Table3). The mean knowledge score among postgraduates of non-medical field (36.21±5.75), which is slightly higher than the mean knowledge score among graduates of non-medical field (35.65±5.43) with the p value of 0.44, which is not statistically significant (Figure 4), (Table 4). # Discussion Although health authorities have been consistently disseminating correct information regarding COVID-19 since the inception of the disease, there has also been an upsurge in false and inaccurate information. The overload of information/opinions without scientific basis may have caused confusion and difficulty ascertaining correct information. The novelty COVID-19, along with its uncertainties, make it critical for health authorities to plan appropriate strategies to prepare and manage the public. 12 WHO reports that the best measure to prevent and slow down the transmission of COVID-19 is to precisely and widely inform the public about the disease, the causes, mode of transmission, and simple prevention methods. 13 The primary step to fight any disease which is pandemic in nature is to evaluate and improve the knowledge and preventive practices about the disease among the public. The present study evaluated the knowledge score of graduates and postgraduates of Telangana state, the participants expressed poor knowledge (38.3%) regarding the fact that being able to hold breath for 10 seconds or more without coughing or feeling discomfort does not mean that we are free from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) or any other lung disease. This finding is in accordance with the study conducted by G. Narayana et al. 14 15 In the present study the knowledge score of postgraduates is slightly higher than the knowledge score of graduates which is in accordance with the study conducted by G. Narayana et al. 14 in which they found a positive correlation between higher education level and high knowledge scores. The knowledge score of participants of Medical field is higher than the knowledge score of participants of Non-Medical field which is in accordance with the study conducted by G. Narayana et al. 14 in which they concluded that Respondents belong to the health care profession have high knowledge and perception scores than nonhealthcare profession and also in accordance with the study conducted by Defar A et al. 16 who observed that Being a health professional was associated with better knowledge about COVID-19. In the present study the knowledge score of females is slightly higher than the knowledge score of males towards COVID-19. These findings are also in agreement with the study conducted by Erfani A et al. 17 on Knowledge, attitude and practice towards the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak-a population-based survey in Iran and concluded that a significant correlation exists between female gender, higher age, and higher education with knowledge, attitude, and practice towards COVID-19. In the present study the knowledge score of both medical and non-medical postgraduates is slightly higher than the knowledge score of graduates respectively. This finding of the present study is in agreement with the study conducted by Zhong B-L et al. 18 in Chinese residents and concluded that there is a significant positive association between education levels and COVID-19 knowledge scores. V. # Conclusion The result of the present study displayed a significant correlation between female gender, higher education and pursuing medical profession with higher knowledge levels towards COVID-19 and also revealed that there still exists a larger percentage of population who strongly believe in myths/misinformation that are prevailing in the social media which indeed is misleading/misguiding people regarding control measures, practices and treatment of COVID-19. Information from social media serves as a double edged sword as it serves to disseminate facts as well as myths. The findings of the study are useful for public health policy-makers and health workers to identify target populations for COVID-19 prevention, control and health education. 1![Fig. 1: Graph shows the comparison of knowledge scores between Males and Females](image-2.png "Fig. 1 :") 1VariableMeanMaleSDMeanFemaleSDtP valueKnowledge score37.175.9937.585.52-0.8080.42b) Comparison of knowledge score of participants ofMedical and Non-Medical field regarding COVID-19 2VariableMedical Field Mean SDNon-Medical Field Mean SDtP valueKnowledge score38.875.5035.895.576.04<0.001*c) Comparison of knowledge score of graduates andpostgraduates of Medical field regarding COVID-19 3VariableNGraduates MeanSDNPostgraduates MeanSDtP valueKnowledge score14838.295.2210939.655.79-1.970.05d) Comparison of knowledge score of graduates andpostgraduates of Non-Medical field regardingCOVID-19 4VariableNGraduates MeanSDNPostgraduates MeanSDtP valueKnowledge Score14235.655.4330810536.215.75409-0.7730.44IV. 36.336.2136.236.13635.935.835.735.6535.635.535.435.3Knowledge scoreineffective in detecting people infected with the newGraduates coronavirus.78.6% of the participants of the presentPost Graduatesstudy rightly accepted that fact that People without anysymptoms of COVID-19 can also shed the virus andinfect the people nearby. Only 34.1% of the participantsof the present study rightly acknowledged thatIndividuals with symptoms of COVID-19 virus infection,with history of travel from effected regions are notconsidered as positive cases.54.6% of the participantsof the present study rightly agreed that antibiotics areineffective in preventing and treating the newcoronavirus. This finding is in accordance with thefinding of the study conducted by Narayana et al. 14 inwhich 60.9% agreed that antibiotics are not effectiveagainst COVID-19. 73.4% of the participants of presentstudy agreed that there are no specific medicines toprevent or treat the new coronavirus. This finding of thestudy is in agreement with the study conducted byNarayana et al. 14 in which 75.4% rightly perceived thatthere is no medication available to treat COVID-19.68.1% of the participants of the study accepted that wecannot self-treat for COVID-19 by taking Chloroquine orHydroxychloroquine.61.3% of the participants of thepresent study rightly agreed the fact that vaccinesagainst pneumonia cannot protect against the newcoronavirus.All the above discussed facts are citedfrom-Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for thepublic: Mythbusters. * Coronavirus envelope protein: current knowledge DSchoeman BCFielding Virology journal 16 1 2019 * The epidemic of 2019-novelcoronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia and insights for emerging infectious diseases in the future JYLi ZYou QWang ZJZhou YQiu RLuo XYGe Microbes and infection 22 2 2020 * Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2): an update MPal GBerhanu CDesalegn VKandi Cureus 3 12 2020 * World Health Organization Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report-1 30thMarch 2021 * The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: a study on active Weibo users SLi YWang JXue NZhao TZhu International journal of environmental research and public health 17 6 2032 2020 * Coronavirus disease 2019 2020. March 2021 * Relationship between Knowledge, Preventive Practices and Fear from COVID-19 among Middle Aged and Older Adults: During the Novel Coronavirus Outbreak SM EIbrahim MA MMahmoud American Journal of Nursing Science 9 5 333 2020 * WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic DCucinotta MVanelli Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis 91 1 157 2020 * MSIslam MG IEmran MERahman RBanik MTSikder LSmith SHossain 2020 * Knowledge, attitudes and practices associated with the COVID-19 among slum dwellers resided in Dhaka City: a Bangladeshi interview-based survey Journal of Public Health * Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 102 patients with coronavirus disease JCao WJTu WCheng LYu YKLiu XHu QLiu Clinical Infectious Diseases 71 15 2020. 2019 * COVID-19 and communication planning for health emergencies EMohamad AAAzlan Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 1 36 2020 * Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia AAAzlan MRHamzah TJSern SHAyub EMohamad Plos one 15 5 e0233668 2020 * Safe Ramadan practices in the context of the COVID-19 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) * GNarayana BPradeepkumar JDRamaiah TJayasree DLYadav BKKumar April. 2020 * Knowledge, perception, and practices towards COVID-19 pandemic among general public of India: A cross-sectional online survey. Current medicine research and practice 10 * COVID-19) advice for the public: Mythbusters Coronavirus disease July 2020 * Knowledge, practice and associated factors towards the prevention of COVID-19 among highrisk groups: a cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa ADefar GMolla SAbdella MTessema MAhmed ATadele ..Tollera G Ethiopia. PloS one 16 3 e0248420 2021 * AErfani RShahriarirad KRanjbar AMirahmadizadeh MMoghadami 2020 * Knowledge, attitude and practice toward the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: a populationbased survey in Iran 30(10.2471 Bull World Health Organ * Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey BLZhong WLuo HMLi QQZhang XGLiu WTLi YLi International journal of biological sciences 16 10 1745 2020