\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Antimicrobial Profile Investigation of Potential Ultrashort Acting Beta-Adrenoceptor Blocking Compounds Containing N-Phenylpiperazine Moiety},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2013-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2013)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2013-01-15}
\title{Antimicrobial Profile Investigation of Potential Ultrashort Acting Beta-Adrenoceptor Blocking Compounds Containing N-Phenylpiperazine Moiety}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Ivo  Malik}

             \affil[1]{  Faculty of Pharmacy/Comenius University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 14 December 2012 Accepted: 3 January 2013 Published: 15 January 2013}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


The set of original, highly lipophilic ultrashort acting beta-adrenoceptor antagonists containing N-phenylpiperazine fragment, labelled as 1â??"4, was in vitro screened for the activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans, respectively. Following the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay by the microdilution method, all the tested molecules were practically inactive against both selected Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains showing the MICs>1.00 mg·mL-1. From structural point of view, the presence of ester group and the position of carbamoyloxy moiety within the compounds 1â??"4 have appeared to be the most notable factors which have decisively influenced the effectiveness against S. aureus and E. coli compared to the importance of electronic or hydrophobic interactions, which have probably been involved by the presence of N-phenylpiperazine, with different membrane components of the bacteria. The current research has also pointed out that the increase in the lipophilicity has been regarded as favourable aspect for the potency of these compounds against C. albicans. From entire evaluated set, the molecule 4 has been considered the most active against mentioned yeast with MIC=0.78 mg·mL-1.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{antibacterial activity, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, lipophilicity.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
he term "non-antibiotics" has been taken to include a variety of the compounds that have been neither antibiotics nor antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents which have been emloyed in the management of pathological conditions of a nonpermeability and have shown broad-spectrum in vitro antimicrobial activity \hyperref[b0]{[1]}. In addition, some of nonantibiotics have been found to enhance the in vitro substances \hyperref[b1]{[2,}\hyperref[b2]{3]}. An antimicrobial potential of drugs classified as general or local anaesthetics, diuretics, anti-inflammatory compounds, mucolytic agents, proton pump inhibitors, calcium antagonists, antihistamines or psychotherapeutic agents has been already observed and reported in a review \hyperref[b0]{[1]}. An antimicrobial profile of the antagonists of beta-adrenergic receptors, have only been investigated sporadically, and their practical contribution to the management of microbial infections has not been intensively evaluated yet. Despite mentioned, the experimental investigations \hyperref[b3]{[4]}\hyperref[b4]{[5]}\hyperref[b5]{[6]} have indicated that some of them have been able to inhibit the microbial growth. Similarly, the surveillance study of Drug Institute in Warsaw \hyperref[b6]{[7]}, which was performed on standard ATCC microbial strains, has revealed the efficiency of matipranolol, therapeutically used as an antiarrhythmic drug and an antiglaucomicum, against Staphylococcus aureus as well as certain antihypertensives (i.e. losartan or telmisartan) against S. aureus and Escherichia coli.\par
The current article is the continuation of methodical searching and characterising the in vitro antimicrobial activity of selected non-antibiotic drugs against mentioned Gram-positive and Gram-negative microbial strains as well as against Candida albicans. From structural point of view, the compounds under the study, labelled as , belong to the class of ultrashort acting beta-adrenoceptor blockers due to the presence of the ester bond and connecting 2-hydroxypropaneinspected molecules is the incorporation of  
\section[{MATERIALS AND METHODS}]{MATERIALS AND METHODS} 
\section[{a) Chemicals and Reagents}]{a) Chemicals and Reagents}\par
The evaluated compounds labelled as 1-4 (Table \hyperref[tab_1]{1}), chemically N-(2-hydroxy-4-oxa-5-oxy-5-(4-? \& ? ? N-\par
-infectious aetiology, but which have modified cell -potency of certain antibiotics against specific bacteria to make them susceptible to previously ineffective unsubstituted N-phenylpiperazine moiety (or, to be more precise, substituted by hydrogen atoms only) which could play an essential role in terms of an antimicrobial efficiency due to possible electronic or hydrophobic interactions with different membrane components of the bacteria \hyperref[b7]{[8]}. Culture media. For a cultivation of the microorganisms, listed in the previous section of this paper, a blood agar, Endo agar and Sabouraud's agar (Imuna, ?ari?ské Micha?any, Slovak Republic) were used. Blood agar was prepared by adding 10\% of defibrine sheep's blood to melted and cooled (50ºC) competent components. 
\section[{Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).}]{Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).}\par
The MIC values of presently investigated compounds 1-4 were carried out by following the procedure previously published in literature \hyperref[b7]{[8,}\hyperref[b9]{10]}. The respective tested molecules have been dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) due to their very limited solubility in distilled water. Standard suspension of bacteria was prepared from their 24 h cultures which were cultivated on a blood agar (Gram-positive bacteria) and Endo agar (Gram-negative bacteria). Standard suspension of Candida was prepared from its 48 h cultures cultivated on Sabouraud's agar.\par
Prepared suspension contained the concentration of 5 × 10 7 colony forming unit (CFU) per mL of bacteria and 5 × 10 5 CFU?mL -1 of Candida, respectively. The UV/VIS spectrophotometry was used for the determination of the microorganisms concentration, all evaluated suspensions were adjusted to the absorbance output of 0.35 at the wavelength of 540 nm.\par
The suspension of microorganisms was added in the amount of 5 microL into the solutions of inspected compounds (100 microL) and to double concentrated peptone broth medium (8\%) for bacteria or to Sabouraud's medium (12\%) for Candida. The peptone broth and Sabouraud's media were purchased from Imuna (?ari?ské Micha?any, Slovak Republic).\par
Starting concentration of prepared stock solutions was 50.00 mg of respective compound per mL of distilled water. These stock solutions (5\%) were then serially diluted by a half and final concentrations were 25.00, 12.50, 6.25, 3.13, 1.56, 0.78, 0.39 and 0.20 mg?mL -1 , respectively. Antibacterial effect of present DMSO in thus diluted final testing medium was completely lost.\par
The quantitative screening was performed using sterile 96-well plastic microtiter plates (with roundcompletion of this process, the volume of 5 microL of evaluated suspension has been taken from each well by using transferring tool and cultured on a blood agar (S. aureus ATCC 6538), Endo agar (E. coli CNCTC 377/79) or on Sabouraud's agar (C. albicans CCM 8186), respectively. Petri dishes were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C.\par
Positive control using only an inoculation of the microorganisms and negative control using only DMSO were realized parallelly. Both DMSO and nutrient concentrations remained stable in each well, only the concentration of inhibitory compound has changed. All experiments were performed in duplicate. The MIC was regarded as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agent required to inhibit the visible growth of microorganism after incubation \hyperref[b10]{[11]}. The MIC was dependent on the presence/absence of the culture on used solid media after the transfer of 5 microL of suspension from each well. The values of MIC which have been estimated for tested compounds as well as for DMSO (due to comparison) are reported in Table \hyperref[tab_1]{1} in mg?mL -1 units. 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Results and Discussion}]{Results and Discussion}\par
Possible structural and physicochemical aspects of beta-adrenergic receptors antagonists under the study (Table \hyperref[tab_1]{1}) which could substantially affect their antimicrobial properties were: (i) the position of carbamoyloxy (NHCOO) group which has not been inserted between 2-hydroxypropane-1,3-diyl connecting chain and the aromate; (ii) the presence of carboxy (COO) group directly attached to lipophilic aromatic ring; (iii) possible electronic and hydrophobic effects which have been induced by the substituent forming basic part of the molecule; (iv) the lipohydrophilic properties.\par
Following the quantification of an antibacterial efficiency which has already been published in a paper  {\ref [12]}, the entire set of currently inspected compounds 1-4 has been regarded as completely inactive against both tested bacterial strains showing the MICs in the range of 6.25-25.00 mg?mL -1 for S. aureus and 6.25-12.50 mg?mL -1 for E. coli, respectively (Table \hyperref[tab_1]{1}). Previously performed experiments \hyperref[b7]{[8]} have pointed out that the incorporation orides, were purchased from Department of Chemical Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic. The estimation of their physicochemical properties, i.e. solubility profile, dissociation constant pK a , surface activity ? and lipophilicity descriptors (the log k´s from RP-HPLC, the R M s from RP-TLC), with appropriate readouts has been previously published in the paper \hyperref[b8]{[9]}.\par
-negative bacteria E. coli CNCTC 377/79\par
-alkoxycarbamoylphenyl)-N-phenyl-N-piperazinium chl--bottomed wells) with matching covers. Microorganisms were incubated in each well at 37 °C for 24 h. Upon of polar carbamoyloxy group between lipophilic aromatic ring and 2-hydroxypropane-1,3-diyl connecting chain has been considered very essential for the activity maintenance. On the contrary, the absence of direct covalent bond between carbamoyloxy moiety and given connecting string has led to the loss of the potency, as current experimental results have indicated. Identical conclusions have been also reported in previously published article of Malík et al. \hyperref[b9]{[10]}. Furthermore, current experimental data could lead to the assumption that ester bond within the structure of tested componds 1-4 would be splitted due to the enzymatic equipment of both tested bacterial strains. Possible electronic or hydrophobic interactions, induced by integrated N-phenylpiperazine moiety, with certain membrane elements of the bacteria have been previously considered important \hyperref[b7]{[8]} but the presence of direct bond between polar carbamoyloxy moiety and connecting chain has seemed to be more significant factor in terms of the activity against S. aureus and E. coli as well. It could be suggested that possible isosteric replacement of carboxy moiety for etheric bridge (the bond which would probably be more resistant to enzymatic splitting) could improve an antibacterial profile of such designed compounds.\par
All evaluated structures 1-4 have been regarded as highly lipophilic because of bearing two aromatic rings and hydrocarbon chain as well. Their lipophilicity enhancement due to alkyl substituent elongation has meant the decrease in the MIC values for S. aureus. However, as indicated in  \hyperref[b7]{[8]}. Additionally, the presence of highly lipophilic, sterically bulky substituent, which has shown primarily electron-withdrawing effect, attached to N-phenylpiperazine (trifluoromethyl group into metainterval of 0.10-0.20 mg?mL -1 . Following current experimental readouts, the increase in the lipophilicity of tested series 1-4 has meant a slight increase in the activity against mentioned yeast. The maximum of the effectiveness has been noted for the compound 4, as indicated in Table 1 (MIC=0.78 mg?mL -1 ). Furthermore, it could be assumed that eventual incorporation of i.e. compounds against C. albicans. 
\section[{IV.}]{IV.} 
\section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par
The results of current study have pointed out that the presence of polar ester group directly attached to 2-hydroxypropane-1,3-diyl moiety, which has been integrated within the structure of evaluated prospective beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, has propably been responsible for the complete loss of their activity against both tested bacterial strains, S. aureus and E. coli. Furthermore, assuming the position maintenance of ester (carboxy) moiety within currently inspected compounds, the nature of basic fragment, (substituted) N-phenylpiperazin-1-yl, and consequent electronic and hydrophobic interactions with specific components of bacterial membrane as well as the increase in the lipophilicity could be regarded as very substantial but probably not decisive factors which have positively Volume XIII Issue IV Version I -1 -position) has been considered favourable, leading to more effective molecules with their MIC outputs in the trifluoromethyl substituent into meta-position of N--phenylpiperazine fragment within the structure of investigated set 1-4 would even lead to more active ( ) B influenced the activity of such molecules against aforementioned tested microorganisms. On the contrary, relatively highly lipophilic antagonists of beta-V.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
Ultrashort Acting Beta-Adrenoceptor Blocking\\
b) The In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity Assay\\
Microorganisms. An antimicrobial profile of the\\
compounds 1-4 was investigated against Gram-positive\\
bacteria S. aureus ATCC 6538 (Micrococcaceae), Gram-\\
(Enterobacteriaceae) and yeast C. albicans CCM 8186\\
as well.\\
-1,3-diyl fragment as well. As indicated in Table 1,\\
another considerable feature within the structure of\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.07416107382550335\textwidth}P{0.15402684563758387\textwidth}P{0.18825503355704698\textwidth}P{0.25671140939597314\textwidth}P{0.17684563758389263\textwidth}}
Entry\tabcellsep R\tabcellsep S. aureus\tabcellsep MIC (mg?mL -1 ) E. coli\tabcellsep C. albicans\\
1\tabcellsep CH 3\tabcellsep 25.00\tabcellsep 6.25\tabcellsep 3.13\\
2\tabcellsep C 2 H 5\tabcellsep 25.00\tabcellsep 12.50\tabcellsep 3.13\\
3\tabcellsep C 3 H 7\tabcellsep 12.50\tabcellsep 6.25\tabcellsep 1.56\\
4\tabcellsep C 4 H 9\tabcellsep 6.25\tabcellsep 6.25\tabcellsep 0.78\\
DMSO\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 25.00\tabcellsep 25.00\tabcellsep 6.25\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 1 ,}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.545819397993311\textwidth}P{0.20468227424749164\textwidth}P{0.005685618729096989\textwidth}P{0.07107023411371237\textwidth}P{0.022742474916387957\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{It has been already reported that the}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{parameters characterising the lipophilicity have been}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{linearly related to the inhibitory activity against C.}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{albicans for structurally similar set of the compounds}\\
bearing\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{meta-alkoxyphenylcarbamoyloxy}\tabcellsep fragment\\
directly\tabcellsep bonded\tabcellsep to\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2-hydroxypropane-1,3-diyl}\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{connecting chain}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 		 		\backmatter   			 
\subsection[{Acknowledgement}]{Acknowledgement}\par
The authors are very grateful to Slovak Grant Agency for Science for supporting by the VEGA Grant Projects No. 1/0039/12 and No. 1/0055/11. The authors dearly thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and helpful revision suggestions. 			  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Cederlund and Mårdh ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Antibacterial activities of non-antibiotic drugs’.  		 			H Cederlund 		,  		 			P A Mårdh 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Antimicrob Chemother}  		1993. 32 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Schmidt and Rosenkranz ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Antimicrobial activity of local anaesthetics: lidocaine and procaine’.  		 			R M Schmidt 		,  		 			H S Rosenkranz 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Infect Dis}  		1970. 121 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Malík et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Antimicrobial activity of meta-alkoxyphenyl carbamates containing substituted N-phenylpiperazine fragment’.  		 			I Malík 		,  		 			M Bukovský 		,  		 			F Andriamainty 		,  		 			J Gali?inová 		.  	 	 		\textit{Braz J Microbiol}  		2012. 43 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Takahashi et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Antimicrobial activity of topical beta-adrenergic blocking agents’.  		 			N Takahashi 		,  		 			H Murota 		,  		 			I Sutoh 		.  	 	 		\textit{Ophthalmic Res}  		1983. 15 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Malík et al.]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		\textit{Basic physicochemical characterization of new potential ultrashort acting beta 1},  		 			I Malík 		,  		 			M Jano?cová 		,  		 			P Mokrý 		,  		 			J Csöllei 		,  		 			F Andriamainty 		.  		 	 
\bibitem[Malík et al. ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Contribution to antimicrobial profile investigation of phenylcarbamic acid derivatives containing substituted N-phenylpiperazine fragment’.  		 			I Malík 		,  		 			M Bukovský 		,  		 			T Gonec 		,  		 			J Csöllei 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int J Biol Med Res}  		2012. 3 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Andrews ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration’.  		 			J M Andrews 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Antimicrob Chemother}  		2001. 48 p. .  	 	 (Suppl. 1) 
\bibitem[Kruszewska et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Search of antimicrobial activity of selected non-antibiotic drugs’.  		 			H Kruszewska 		,  		 			T Zareba 		,  		 			S Tyski 		.  	 	 		\textit{Acta Pol Pharm}  		2002. 59 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Amaral et al.]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘The effect of chlorpromazine on the cell envelope of sensitive and resistent bacteria’.  		 			L Amaral 		,  		 			J E Kristiansen 		,  		 			V F Thomsen 		.  	 	 		\textit{Abstract of the 18 th International Congress of Chemotherapy},  				 	 
\bibitem[Kerenyi et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘The impact of esmolol on bacterial growth in vitro. A-551’.  		 			M Kerenyi 		,  		 			R Batai 		,  		 			V Juhasz 		,  		 			I Batai 		.  	 	 		\textit{Eur J Anaesthesiol}  		2004. 21 p. 135.  	 
\bibitem[Kristiansen and Amaral ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘The potential management of resistant infections with non-antibiotics’.  		 			J E Kristiansen 		,  		 			L Amaral 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Antimicrob Chemother}  		1997. 40 p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}