\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Prophylaxis of Imune Deficiencies and Neonatal Diarrhea Syndrome among Sucking Piglets by Administration of Organic Selenium (Sel-Plex)},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2013-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2013)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2013-01-15}
\title{Prophylaxis of Imune Deficiencies and Neonatal Diarrhea Syndrome among Sucking Piglets by Administration of Organic Selenium (Sel-Plex)}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{S.  BAflAfnescu}

             \affil[1]{  The State Agrarian University of Moldova}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 14 December 2012 Accepted: 5 January 2013 Published: 15 January 2013}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


In this study, it was investigated the action of the Sel-Plex product that was included in the combined forage for milking swine and sucker piglets. There were investigated 10 parturient swine and 101 piglets of 1-42 days.It was concluded that the addition in basic ration of organic selenium has a benefic effect for swine growing and development that was expressed through:? Mortality and neonatal diarrhea reduction, weight increase with 2.5 kg for the swine treated with Sel-Plex (P<0,05); ? Significant increase of the total number of T-lymphocytes (P<0,001), of the subpopulation of active Tlymphocytes (P<0,01) and of B-lymphocytes (P<0,01).

\end{abstract}


\keywords{milking swine, neonatal diarrhea, profilaxy, sucking piglets, sel-plex.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 \par
Prophylaxis of Imune Deficiencies and Neonatal Diarrhea Syndrome among Sucking Piglets by Administration of Organic Selenium (Sel-Plex) 
\section[{S. B?l?nescu}]{S. B?l?nescu}\par
Abstract-In this study, it was investigated the action of the Sel-Plex product that was included in the combined forage for milking swine and sucker piglets. There were investigated 10 parturient swine and 101 piglets of 1-42 days.\par
It was concluded that the addition in basic ration of organic selenium has a benefic effect for swine growing and development that was expressed through: 
\section[{?}]{?}\par
Mortality and neonatal diarrhea reduction, weight increase with 2.5 kg for the swine treated with Sel-Plex (P<0,05); ? Significant increase of the total number of T-lymphocytes (P<0,001), of the subpopulation of active T-lymphocytes (P<0,01) and of B-lymphocytes (P<0,01). 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
urrently, studies on birds, pigs and calves show that in the first days of life, in the first months respectively, diarrhea is the most significant cause of illness and treatments performed \hyperref[b14]{[13,}\hyperref[b6]{6]}. Animal health and performance depend on many factors and it is considered more and more that diet plays an essential role in maintaining health and preventing illness.\par
The main role of the gastrointestinal tract is to extract nutrients from the diet ingested, after which nutrients are absorbed into the bloodstream. Therefore, the gastrointestinal tract is principal interphase of the internal hostile environment and host organism metabolism.\par
Research conducted at the swine complexes and traditional farms in the Republic of Moldova have clearly shown that infant animals are in great danger of gastrointestinal tract illness following exposure to a variety of risks from pathogen germs invasion to toxins in alimentation, dangerous metabolites produced by normal intestinal microflora or due to the lack of a complex microflora and a functional system at full capacity \hyperref[b16]{[14,}\hyperref[b3]{4]}.\par
In recent decades studies have shown that obtaining animal uncontaminated products with nitrates (nitrates) and nitrogen (nitrites), or presents of antibiotics residues represent one of the most important challenges in European Union countries.\par
Today it was necessary to find solutions to improve animal health by increasing their natural resistance to disease avoiding the use of antibiotics. Previous research conducted by us in industrial swine breeding conditions have certainly demonstrated that resulting from the increased bioavailability and biological activity of organic selenium (Sel-Plex) than inorganic forms (sodium selenite), it is applied in practice Veterinary Medical our country \hyperref[b1]{[2,}\hyperref[b12]{12,}\hyperref[b2]{3]}.\par
It was found that supplementation of basic ration with organic selenium to pregnant sows and during piglet growth, besides improving animal performance, have a positive influence on their health.\par
In specialized literature we often find statements that affirm that the only way to combat antibiotic biopersistence is elaboration new products, more active than those previously elaborated. But the rush for an "ideal product" that would combat "supermicrobes" can not remove the "reality". So instead of "defeating" or reducing resistance to antibiotics it is necessary only to decrease the number of recommendations for antibiotics \hyperref[b10]{[10]}.\par
Currently, in the new European context, remarkable efforts are made to substitute antibiotics with natural growth promoters, such as acids, prebiotics, probiotics, feed enzymes. Their major effect is to correct and maintain healthy intestinal environment through which to potentiate the use of digestive food.\par
This paper is aimed at studying the action of Sel-Plex product included in the mixed fodder for milking swines and sucking piglets on clinical and paraclinical indicators of milking swines and sucking piglets in 1-42 days post-partum. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Materials and Methods}]{Materials and Methods}\par
The research was conducted on 10 multiparous milking swines with similar weights in 10-12 days before parturition and 101 piglets aged 1-42 days, belonging to tri-racial commercial hybrid (Large White, Landras, Diuroc), which were divided into two groups: control and experimental. Both groups of animals were kept inside the same technology equipped compartments entirely respecting the microclimate conditions, feeding, watering and free spaces.\par
Experimental and control groups were fed with mixed fodder for each animal category: milking swines in lactation period, sucking piglets, respecting the average structure and basic parameters recommended by the specialized literature. Basic ration of milking swines in the amount of 100 kg per-total included (in kg): corn -32, barley -19, grain -19, sunflower meal -5.5, soybean meal -6.5, wheat bran -13, calcium carbonate -1.1, sodium chloride -0.4, zoofort -0.5. Recipe for mixed fodder used to feed sucking piglets in the amount of 100 kg per total included (in kg): corn -41, wheat -20, barley -16, soybean meal -12, vegetable fat -1.9, calcium carbonate -0.5, phosphate calcium -0.9, sodium chloride -0.2. zoofort -1, bonemeat meal -6,5.\par
Milking swines in both groups received daily 5 kg of mixed fodder for two times for each animal. The difference between groups was that in the fodder for the milking swines from the experimental group Sel-Plex was added at a rate of 1 kg / tone. The introduction of mixed fodder in sucking piglets forage was performed after the first week of life, which in the experimental group was supplemented with Sel-Plex in proportion of 1 g to 1 kg of mixed fodder.\par
The action of Sel-Plex on milking swines and sucking piglets was tested by assessment of the clinical state (body temperature, pulse, respiration, general condition, morbidity and mortality, feed consumption, daily surplus) and hematologic data (total number of leukocytes, leukocyte formula and classes of T and B lymphocytes, malonic dialdehyde content (DAM) and AAT (total antioxidant activity) in plasma and erythrocytes. Blood samples were taken in the 7th, 21st and 32nd day postpartum. 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Results and Discussions}]{Results and Discussions}\par
Milking swines in both groups during the investigation were fed and watered, according to the established schedule. 10-12 days before parturition and during the 42 days postpartum, the basic daily ration of the animals from experimental group was supplemented with Sel-Plex (1 kg per tonne of mixed fodder), which corresponded to 5.76 kg of the product, which is an average consumption (table \hyperref[tab_0]{1}). Piglets in the experimental group after the first week of life together with mixed fodder daily received Sel-Plex in proportion 1g -1kg of feed. Thus, milking swines in the experimental group from 10 to 12 days before parturition and piglets in this group after the first week of life received mixed fodder supplemented with Sel-Plex.  \hyperref[tab_0]{1} represent the consumption of combined fodder during the research. Both groups were healthy: food and water were consumed, animals were active and showed no deviations in behavior. However, in the experimental group an average daily consumption of fodder was with 0.12 kg more than in the control group.\par
Differences between the two groups of piglets were not significant, the total fodder consumption being by only 0.416 kg more than in the experimental group.\par
Table \hyperref[tab_1]{2} presents the evolution of body weight of piglets from the control and experimental groups. In the first day of life the piglets from both groups on average weighed 1.22 kg. At the age of 13 days piglets body weight consisted 2,8 ± 0,07 and 3,01 ±0,16 in the control group and experimental group accordingly. At the end of the third week piglets from the experimental which consumed Sel-Plex, had a daily surplus higher body mass daily, equal to 0.2 kg (P> 0.05). The trend of better growth was maintained during the 32-42 days that ended with a growth increase of 520 g / day in experimental group and 325 g / day in control group.\par
Average weight per capita was 10.3 ± 0.91 kg in control group and 12.8 ± 1.04 kg in the experimental group, the difference of 2.5 kg (24.2\%) between the two groups being significant (P <0.05).\par
The positive effect of supplementation with organic selenium on growth and development of piglets is confirmed by leukocyte indices and in particular lymphocytes. Obtained indices are shown in Table  {\ref 3}.\par
The number of leukocytes in the first research (21 days after birth), consisted 7.95 ± 0.54 for animals in the control group and 9.28 ± I .33 for experimental group (P1, 2> 0.05). By the day 32 there was registered a significant increase (P1, 2 <0.05) of the total number of leukocytes that we consider as a positive effect of the refill of basic ration with Sel-Plex. Simultaneously, the dynamics of T-lymphocytes, which are key cells in the immune system expression, on the first survey (21 days postpartum) of piglets in the experimental group was expressed by a significant increase (P1, 2 <0.02). Also there was a fast growth to 25.4 ± 1.67\% on the 21 day and to 36.0 ± 0.70\% on the 32 day (P1, 2 <0.001).\par
According to data, received by ?tefan ?urcanu and col. (  {\ref 2003}) cellular immune status of piglets in ontogenesis is formed at a certain stage of physiological maturity of the body. As to the T-lymphocytes, a considerable increase up to 41.6\% was observed by day 7 and 27.6\% at the age of 3 weeks. An unessential increase of number of these cellules the authors observed by day 42 after birth, which consisted 13.4\%. 
\section[{Table 3 : Dynamics of T and B lymphocytes in piglets blood}]{Table 3 : Dynamics of T and B lymphocytes in piglets blood}\par
In Table  {\ref 3} it can be noted that active Tlymphocytes subpopulation has essentialy increased, with a high degree of authenticity P1, 2 <0.05 in the first research and P1, 2 <0.01 in the second research (32 days after birth) for the piglets in the experimental group. The first survey (day 21) and the second one of the piglets in the experimental group showed that T-lymphocytes helpers subpopulation had a percentage of 37.6 ± 0.54 and 39.8 ± 1.30\%, accordingly. In the control group this index was 34.2 ± 1.92\% on 21st day, and it was followed by a decrease of up to 31.0 ± 1.22\% on the 32nd day after birth.\par
Regarding the dynamics of B-lymphocytes, during this study there was proved a significant increase (P1, 2 <0.05, day 21 and P1, 2 <0.01 on the 32nd day) at piglets from the experimental group.\par
In Table \hyperref[tab_3]{4} there are presented data referring to the content of erythrocytes, quantity of hemoglobin and leukocytes at piglets in both groups.  The first research showed similar data which are statistically unreliable (P> 0.05). It is necessary to mention that the second research showed that the number of erythrocytes of the amount of hemoglobin has essentially increased at the piglets in the experimental group (P <0.05) and (P <0.001). 
\section[{Volume XIII Issue II Version}]{Volume XIII Issue II Version}\par
The amount of leucocytes at piglets in the experimental group was stable and consisted 7.76 + 0.49 x 109/L initially and 6.98 + 0.55 x 109 / L at the following assessment. The piglets in the control group suffered a decrease of number of leukocytes from 20,72 + 0,56 at the first assessment to 10,59 + 0,58 x 109/L at the second one.\par
Table  {\ref 5} presents data on Malonic dialdehyde content (DAM) determined in plasma and erythrocytes.\par
Table  {\ref 5} : Enzymatic components of antioxidant system of piglets following administration of Sel-Plex by milking swines During lipid metabolic processes, particularly through oxidation, the body accumulates a number of intermediate compounds and final products of their peroxidation, among which is the DAM. Data show that in the blood of piglets in the experimental group there was marked a tendency of decreasing concentration of DAM in plasma (P <0.02) and erythrocytes (P <0.05) compared to piglets from the control group, which is characteristic in case of reduction of lipid peroxidation Plasma total antioxidant activity is an index that reflects the ability of blood plasma to inhibit induced oxidation process of a model system. AAT shows us therefore that the summary content of compounds in blood plasma with antioxidative properties. Table  {\ref 3} shows that AAT in plasma of animals from the experimental group has a tendency to be maintained at the level of 66.43 + 3.34\% at the first survey (the 7th day of piglets life) and 77.2 + 2 , 44\% at the end of research (32nd day of the piglets life), while among the animals from the second control group, this index essentially decreased from 63,43 + 3,21\% to 47,29 + 3,12\%.\par
AAT in erythrocytes on the 7th day after birth in the control group initially was 127,74 + 11,02\% which at the end of research (day 32) reached 100,77+ Given that research has been conducted on young animals, i.e in the development, the dynamics of AAT in plasma can be interpreted as a consequence of age particularities.\par
The results clearly demonstrate a beneficial effect of organic selenium (Sel-Plex) on clinical indices, hematologics and antioxidant system.\par
The data presented in Table  {\ref 6} represent the percentage of the morbidity of piglets in both groups during the period from birth until weaning.  {\ref Table 6 :} Morbidity and mortality of sucking piglets It was found a higher percentage of morbidity among piglets from the control group and it constituted 22\%, compared to 9.8\% in the experimental group. Lethality percentage was 18\% and 7.8\% accordingly. At the age of 42 days there survived 82\% of piglets from the control group and 92.2\% in II-experimental group, the ration of which was supplemented with selenium of organic origin.\par
V.  {\ref Cociu et.al (2005)} communicates that in the R.of Moldova there are two essential trace elements -Iodine and Selenium are not included in the premixes composition. Here is meant that the deficiency of these minerals is usually manifested latently affecting animal productivity and achieved product quality. These indices, however, in the subsisting village farms are not always taken into account.\par
Deficit of a single element in the organism such as Selenium, which is necessary in insignificant amounts (0.5 to 0.7 ppm) causes a variety of morbid states in various animal species \hyperref[b0]{[1]}. Rations containing large amounts of unsaturated fat which are lacking protein as well, particularly those in sulfur amino acids, are factors that cause disease \hyperref[b8]{[8]}. P.F. Surai, 2007, communicates that the content of selenium in foddle depends on region of cultivation, soil and a number of other factors. N. Abraham (1992) states that the content of selenium in foddle depends to a large extent on the amount of selenium in the soil, there being a close soil-plant-animal relation.\par
In recent years several studies have been devoted to testing Sel-Plex product action in maintaining the antioxidant-prooxidant balance in the digestive tract, blood and in prevention of the decline of productive and reproductive performance of milking swines and their offspring (11.2.12).\par
Our results allow us to conclude that the inclusion in the basic ration of Sel-Plex product had a positive impact on the general condition of milking swines and their offspring on, being manifested by a lower morbidity and mortality, so that the percentage of viability consisted 92.2\% for the experimental group and 82\% for the control group.\par
IV. 
\section[{Conclusions}]{Conclusions}\par
1. Sel-Plex administered with food in proportion of 1kg per ton has a positive effect on reproductive indices (total number of piglets born alive, the birth weight, sucking piglets viability). 2. Mortality losses in the experimental group from birth to weaning were lower (7.8\% of actual) than in the control group (18\%). 3. Body weight of 42 days old piglets constituted alc?tuit 10,3±0,91 kg and 12,8±1,04 kg in experimental and control groups respectively, the difference between the two groups being significant (P1, 2 <0.05) . 4. Sel-Plex has a positive impact on the immune system, which is manifested by a significant increase (P1, 2 <0.05) of the total number of leukocytes, of total T-lymphocytes (P1, 2 <0.001 of active lymphocyte subpopulations (P1, 2 <0.01). Dynamics of B-lymphocyte growth was manifested by authentic (P1, 2 <0.05) and day 21 (P1, 2 <0.01) in the 32-day piglets in the experimental group.\par
5. Sel-Plex exercises an antioxidant effect at enzyme and hematopoietic level on the body, which is manifested by the significant increase of the number of erythrocytes and amount of hemoglobin (P <0.05), the reduction of the DAM level (Dealdehid Malonic) in blood plasma, the significant increase (P <0.01) of AAT (total antioxidant activity in blood serum.\par
6. The results show that it is time to replace sources of organic and inorganic selenium with organic \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.20816326530612245\textwidth}P{0.2125\textwidth}P{0.19081632653061223\textwidth}P{0.23852040816326528\textwidth}}
Group\tabcellsep Milking swines daily\tabcellsep Piglets daily consumption\tabcellsep Piglets total fodder\\
\tabcellsep consumption (kg/unit)\tabcellsep (kg/unit)\tabcellsep consumption (10-42 days)\\
I (control)\tabcellsep 5,64\tabcellsep 0,365\tabcellsep 11,68\\
II (experimental)\tabcellsep 5,76\tabcellsep 0,378\tabcellsep 12,096\\
Data from Table\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.19266666666666665\textwidth}P{0.102\textwidth}P{0.011333333333333334\textwidth}P{0.05893333333333333\textwidth}P{0.09293333333333334\textwidth}P{0.09746666666666666\textwidth}P{0.11106666666666665\textwidth}P{0.08839999999999999\textwidth}P{0.09519999999999999\textwidth}}
013\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Year\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
58\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Volume XIII Issue II Version I\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
D D D D ) G\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
(\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Medical Research\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Global Journal of\tabcellsep Group\tabcellsep n\tabcellsep Statistic data\tabcellsep Days 1-2\tabcellsep Day 13\tabcellsep Body weight Day 21\tabcellsep Day 32\tabcellsep Day 42\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep 1,22±0,04\tabcellsep 2,8±0,076\tabcellsep 5,1±0,16\tabcellsep 6,75±0,25\tabcellsep 10,3±0,91\\
\tabcellsep I (control)\tabcellsep 50\tabcellsep Lim\tabcellsep 1,1-1,3\tabcellsep 2,33-3,0\tabcellsep 4,7-5,8\tabcellsep 5,8-7,5\tabcellsep 9,4-12,5\\
\tabcellsep II\tabcellsep \tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep 1,23±0,10\tabcellsep 3,013±0,162\tabcellsep 5.3±0.08\tabcellsep 7.6±0.957\tabcellsep 12.8±1.04*\\
\tabcellsep (experimental)\tabcellsep 51\tabcellsep Lim\tabcellsep 1,2-1,25\tabcellsep 2.41-3.75\tabcellsep 5.3-7.37\tabcellsep 6.25-9.5\tabcellsep 10.8±15.2\\
\tabcellsep * P 1,2 <0,05\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.18108695652173912\textwidth}P{0.02217391304347826\textwidth}P{0.10532608695652174\textwidth}P{0.0942391304347826\textwidth}P{0.10347826086956521\textwidth}P{0.09978260869565217\textwidth}P{0.09793478260869565\textwidth}P{0.10902173913043478\textwidth}P{0.03695652173913043\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 013\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Year\\
Group\tabcellsep Days\tabcellsep Lymphocytes (\%)\tabcellsep T-total (\%)\tabcellsep T-active (\%)\tabcellsep T-helper (\%)\tabcellsep T-supres. (\%)\tabcellsep B-lymphocytes (\%)\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep M±m\tabcellsep \\
I (control)\tabcellsep 21\tabcellsep 25,4±1,67\tabcellsep 50,6±1,34\tabcellsep 25,8±1,48\tabcellsep 34,2±1,92\tabcellsep 16,4±0,89\tabcellsep 25,4±1,34\tabcellsep \\
II\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep D D D D ) G\\
(experim.)\tabcellsep 21\tabcellsep 31,8±2,77*\tabcellsep 53,6±2,07\tabcellsep 29,6±1,14 *\tabcellsep 37,6±0,54\tabcellsep 16,0±2,34\tabcellsep 31,5±3,96*\tabcellsep (\\
I (control)\tabcellsep 32\tabcellsep 28,6±0,89\tabcellsep 50,6±0,89\tabcellsep 27,6±0,89\tabcellsep 31,0±1,22\tabcellsep 19,6±1,51\tabcellsep 24,4±0,54\tabcellsep \\
II\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
(experim.)\tabcellsep 32\tabcellsep 36±0,70***\tabcellsep 55,8±1,64\tabcellsep 32,8±1,09**\tabcellsep 39,8±1,3***\tabcellsep 16,0±1,01\tabcellsep 37,0±5,6**\tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{* P 1,2 <0,05; ** P 1,2 <0,01; *** P 1,2 <0,001}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.050173611111111106\textwidth}P{0.1859375\textwidth}P{0.0019675925925925924\textwidth}P{0.19380787037037037\textwidth}P{0.02065972222222222\textwidth}P{0.1554398148148148\textwidth}P{0.03836805555555555\textwidth}P{0.0265625\textwidth}P{0.1564236111111111\textwidth}P{0.02065972222222222\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{INDICATORS}\tabcellsep GROUP\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{STUDY}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep I\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep II\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Day 7\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Day 32i\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep n\tabcellsep M+n\tabcellsep P\tabcellsep n\tabcellsep M+n\tabcellsep P\\
\tabcellsep Hemoglobin\tabcellsep \tabcellsep I -experimental\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 107,6+0,55\tabcellsep P 1,2 >0,05\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 143,26+0,55\\
\tabcellsep g/L\tabcellsep \tabcellsep II -control\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 106,23+0,56\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 122,9+0,56\tabcellsep P<0,001\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Erythrocytes ( x 10 12 /L )}\tabcellsep I -experimental II -control\tabcellsep 5 5\tabcellsep 4,55+0,56 4,42+0,49\tabcellsep P 1,2 >0,05\tabcellsep 5 5\tabcellsep 7,08+0,55 5,41+0,56\tabcellsep P<0,05\\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Leukocytes ( x 10 9 / L )}\tabcellsep I -experimental II -control\tabcellsep 5 5\tabcellsep 7,76+0,49 20,72+0,56\tabcellsep P 1,2 >0,05\tabcellsep 5 5\tabcellsep 6,98+0,56 10,59+0,56\tabcellsep P<0,001\\
013\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Year\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Volume XIII Issue II Version I\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{INDICATORS DAM in plasma (nmol/L)}\tabcellsep GROUP I -experimental II -control\tabcellsep n 5 5\tabcellsep I Day 7 M+n 11,926+ 14,205+\tabcellsep \tabcellsep STUDY n 5 5\tabcellsep II Day 32 M+n 9,57+ 14,296+\\
( D D D D ) G\tabcellsep DAM in erythrocytes\tabcellsep \tabcellsep I -experimental II -control\tabcellsep 5 5\tabcellsep 0,87+0,01 0,89+0,10\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5 5\tabcellsep 0,75+0,016 0,82+002\\
\tabcellsep (nmol/L)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Antioxidative\tabcellsep \tabcellsep I -experimental\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 66,43+3,34\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 67,7+2,44\\
\tabcellsep activity\tabcellsep in\tabcellsep II -control\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 63,43+3,21\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 47,29+3,12\\
\tabcellsep plasma (\%)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep AAT in\tabcellsep \tabcellsep I -experimental\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 134,85+12,4\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 126,09+9,31\\
\tabcellsep erythrocytes\tabcellsep \tabcellsep II -control\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{127,74+11,02}\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 100,77+4,95\\
\tabcellsep (\%)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.1531055900621118\textwidth}P{0.02639751552795031\textwidth}P{0.1425465838509317\textwidth}P{0.13198757763975155\textwidth}P{0.19006211180124225\textwidth}P{0.09503105590062112\textwidth}P{0.1108695652173913\textwidth}}
Group\tabcellsep n\tabcellsep Diarrhea suffering\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Died\tabcellsep Survived\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep (\%)\tabcellsep due to\tabcellsep Due to other\tabcellsep (\%)\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep diarrhea (\%)\tabcellsep infections (\%)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
I control\tabcellsep 50\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 12\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 82\tabcellsep 013\\
experimental II\tabcellsep 51\tabcellsep 9,8\tabcellsep 3,92\tabcellsep 3,92\tabcellsep 92,2\tabcellsep Year 2\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep D D D D ) G\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep (\end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: sources such as the product enriched with selenium, Sel-Plex.]} 
\caption{\label{tab_5}}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 		 		\backmatter  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[ Analele Universit??ii Spiru Haret. Seria Medicina Veterinar?.anul 1. nr. 1 Bucure?ti. p]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		\textit{},  	 	 		\textit{Analele Universit??ii Spiru Haret. Seria Medicina Veterinar?.anul 1. nr. 1 Bucure?ti. p}  		p. .  	 
\bibitem[Barza et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		\textit{},  		 			H Barza 		,  		 			A Popovici 		,  		 			Coman Sofia 		.  		2000.  	 	 (Interven?ii curative-profilactice în gastroenteropatiile suinelor) 
\bibitem[???????? ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		\textit{??? 4, ?????? 1, ??????-????},  		 			???????? 		.  		2007. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ð?"????? et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		\textit{?????????? ???????? ???????. ????? «??????? ????? ? ???????},  		 			Ð?" Ð?"????? 		,  		 			? ????????? 		,  		 			Ð?" Ð?"????? 		.  		1989. p. .  	 
\bibitem[????????? and ?????]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{???????????? ????????????? ?????????????? ???????? ?????????? ??? ??????? ??????? ??????? ???????????????? ???????????????},  		 			? ????????? 		,  		 			? ????? 		.  		 	 
\bibitem[?????????]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		\textit{????????????? ????????? Sel-Plex ??? ???????????? ??????????????? ? ??????????????. ?: ??????-???????????? ??????. ?????? ??????? ?????????? ??????????? «????????? ?????? «???? ??????},  		 			? ????????? 		.  		 	 	 (Ð?"?????????????? ???????? ????????????) 
\bibitem[????????? ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘????????????? ????????? Sel-Plex ??? ???????????? ???????????????? ????????? ? ???????-???????. ????????? ????????????? ??????-???????????? ??????????? / ????????????? ??????? ?????? ? ??????? ??????? ??????????????’.  		 			? ????????? 		.  	 	 		\textit{???????}  		2001.  (6) .  	 
\bibitem[??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ???????? ??. ????. ??. ??????? ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘??????????????? ?????? ???????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ????????’.  	 	 		\textit{??. ????. ??. ???????}  		1985. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Balanescu et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Ac?iunea produsului Sel-Plex asupra puilor de g?in?’.  		 			S Balanescu 		,  		 			D Holban 		,  		 			E Voini?chi 		.  	 	 		\textit{În: ?tiin?a Agricol?}  		2005.  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Surai et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Antioxidantprooxidant balance in the intestine. Food for thoregh’.  		 			K P Surai 		,  		 			P F Surai 		,  		 			D K Speake 		.  	 	 		\textit{Nutrition Genomies and Functional Foods}  		2003. 1 p. .  	 
\bibitem[?urcan and Fargu?u ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Cercet?ri privind formarea statusului imunologic celular la purcei în antogenez?’.  		 			S ?urcan 		,  		 			N Fargu?u 		.  	 	 		\textit{Lucr?ri ?tiin?ifice}  		2003. 11 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Spring]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Cre;terea reyisten'ei antiinfec'ioase la nivel intestinl. Rolul glicobiologiei ]n optimiyarea s[n[t[?ii intestinale. Viitorul promotorilor de cre;tere’.  		 			Peter Spring 		.  	 	 		\textit{European Lector Tour}  		p. .  	 
\bibitem[Cociu et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Research on the hight againtst oligomineraloses of bovins’.  		 			V Cociu 		,  		 			S Co?man 		,  		 			D Holban 		,  		 			S Balanescu 		.  	 	 		\textit{Buletinul Universit??ii de ?tiin?e agricole ?i Medicin? Veterinar?},  		seria Medicin? Veterinar?  		 (Cluj-Napoca)  		2005. 62 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Peter and Surai ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		\textit{Selenium in Nutrition and Health Hottingham University Press},  		 			F Peter 		,  		 			Surai 		.  		2007. p. 974.  	 
\bibitem[Peter et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		\textit{Situa?ia actual? ?i tendin?ele dezvolt?rii sectorului avicol din R. Moldova la nivel interna?ional},  		 			Zoltan Peter 		,  		 			E Voini?chi 		,  		 			I Be?ivu 		,  		 			S Balanescu 		.  		2011. Chi?in?u. 116 p. p.  	 
\bibitem[Balanescu and Popovici ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		\textit{Statutul Seleniului în furaje colectate din zona de nord ?i centru al R. Moldova. În: Lucr?ri ?tiin?ifice},  		 			S Balanescu 		,  		 			M Popovici 		.  		2008. UASM, Chi?in?u: Medicin? Veterinar?. 19 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Baker et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Trace mineral metabolism in ruminant: impact production, reproduction and the enviroment’.  		 			D S Baker 		,  		 			I K Ahola 		,  		 			P D Birus 		,  		 			T E Eugle 		.  	 	 		\textit{Nutritional Biothechnology in the Feed and Food indastries. Proceedinos of Alltech is Nemeteenth Anual Sympozous},  				2003. p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
