\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Evaluation of Sensitivity of Commonly used Antibiotics in Staphylococcus Epidermidis Clinical Isolates From Assir Region, Saudi Arabia}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2014-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2014)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2014-01-15} \title{Evaluation of Sensitivity of Commonly used Antibiotics in Staphylococcus Epidermidis Clinical Isolates From Assir Region, Saudi Arabia} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Nazar Mohamed Abdalla} \affil[1]{ Medicine/ Gezira University} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 16 December 2013 Accepted: 2 January 2014 Published: 15 January 2014} \maketitle \begin{abstract} Background: Multidrugs resistance is an emerging health problem that ultimately will lead to vanishing of effective medicine against infections including Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Aim: This a prospective hospital base study of 58 Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates in Assir region aim at evaluating the sensitivity profile of commonly used antibiotic during the period of March 2011- Sep. 2011. Materials and Methods: Bacteriology procedures ; staining, culture, catalase, coagulase and antibiotics sensitivity test using diffusion disc test, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and molecular (PCR) for confirmation of Staphylococcal species and detection of the Mec A gene. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded in special formats and analyzed by statistical computer program (SPSS). Result: 58 Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates including 14 diabetics. Age groups include 29 (0-15yrs), 14 (16-50yrs) and 15 (50yrs& above). The total resistance cases to Oxacillin/ Mithicillin was found to be 56 cases (96.4%); all non diabetics were resistance. Resistance and sensitivity to Ciprofloxacin among diabetic and non diabetic were 75.9% and 24.1% respectively. Total resistance to Fusidin were 81%, while total resistant to Erythromycin in all ages groups were 86.2%. In age group (0-15) years 93.1% were resistant to the drug which comprises, 54%of the total resistant cases (n=50) and 46.6% from all Staphylococcus epidermidis cases (n=58). Conclusion: Staphylococcus epidermidis is a pathogen associated with community acquired and nosocomial infections. The nosocomial infections are predominant in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Resistance of Erythromycin in S. epidermidis cases among children is highly observed as this drug is commonly used by this age group. Diabetes has equivocal effect on drugs sensitivity. The frequency of staphylococcus multi-drugs resistance is rising. \end{abstract} \keywords{staphylococcus epidermidis, coagulasenegative staphylococci (CoNS), antimicrobial resistance (AMR), nosocomial infections, diabetes.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par riedrich Julius Rosenbach distinguished S. epidermidis from S. aureus in 1884, initially naming S. epidermidis as S. albus. He chose aureus and albus since the bacteria formed yellow and white colonies, respectively. S. epidermidis causing nosocomial and community acquired infections \hyperref[b0]{[1]} S. epidermidis is a very hardy microorganism, consisting of nonmotile, Gram-positive cocci, arranged in grape-like clusters. It forms white, raised colonies approximately 1-2 millimeter in diameter after overnight incubation, and is nonhemolytic on blood agar. It is a catalase-positive, coagulase-negative, facultative anaerobe that can grow by aerobic respiration or by fermentation. Some strains may not ferment \hyperref[b1]{[2]}.\par Biochemical tests indicate this microorganism also carries out a weakly positive reaction to the nitrate reductase test. It is positive for urease production, is oxidase negative, and can use glucose, sucrose, and lactose to form acid products. In the presence of lactose, it will also produce gas. S. epidermidis does not possess the gelatinase enzyme, so it cannot hydrolyze gelatin. It is sensitive to novobiocin, providing an important test to distinguish it from Staphylococcus saprophyticus, which is coagulase-negative, as well, but novobiocin-resistant. Similar to those of Staphylococcus aureus, the cell walls of S. epidermidis have a transferrin binding protein that helps the organism obtain iron from transferrin. The tetramers of a surface exposed protein, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, are believed to bind to transferrin and remove its iron. Subsequent steps include iron being transferred to surface lipoproteins, then to transport proteins which carry the iron into the cell \hyperref[b2]{[3]} Result: 58 Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates including 14 diabetics. Age groups include 29 (0-15yrs), 14 (16-50yrs) and 15 (50yrs\& above). The total resistance cases to Oxacillin/ Mithicillin was found to be 56 cases (96.4\%); all non diabetics were resistance. Resistance and sensitivity to Ciprofloxacin among diabetic and non diabetic were 75.9\% and 24.1\% respectively. Total resistance to Fusidin were 81\%, while total resistant to Erythromycin in all ages groups were 86.2\%. In age group (0-15) years 93.1\% were resistant to the drug which comprises, 54\% of the total resistant cases (n=50) and 46.6\% from all Staphylococcus epidermidis cases (n=58).\par Conclusion: Staphylococcus epidermidis is a pathogen associated with community acquired and nosocomial infections. The nosocomial infections are predominant in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Resistance of Erythromycin in S. epidermidis cases among children is highly observed as this drug is commonly used by this age group. Diabetes has equivocal effect on drugs sensitivity. The frequency of staphylococcus multi-drugs resistance is rising.\par Keywords: staphylococcus epidermidis, coagulasenegative staphylococci (CoNS), antimicrobial resistance (AMR), nosocomial infections, diabetes.\par quantitative PCR are being employed for the rapid detection and identification of Staphylococcus strains \hyperref[b3]{[4]} 4 . Normally, sensitivity to desferrioxamine can also be used to distinguish it from most other staphylococci, except in the case of Staphylococcus hominis, which is also sensitive. In this case, the production of acid from trehalose by S. hominis can be used to tell the two species apart.\par Resistance to antimicrobial agents (AMR) has resulted in morbidity and mortality from treatment failures and increased health care costs. Although defining the precise public health risk and estimating the increase in costs is not a simple undertaking, there is little doubt that emergent antibiotic resistance is a serious global problem. Appropriate antimicrobial drug use has unquestionable benefit, but physicians and the public frequently use these agents inappropriately.\par Aseer Central Hospital is almost 600 bedded and it is accredited from The Central Board of Arab Health. It's laboratory is a regional referral hub. The other hand, the hospital is affiliated to the medical college of king Khalid University. This study aimed at evaluating the commonly used antibiotics resistant and the factors affecting the drugs sensitivity of Staphyloccocus epidermidis isolates from nasal swabs of patients presented at Aseer Central Hospital General Lab. \section[{II.}]{II.} \section[{Material and Methods}]{Material and Methods}\par The patients in this study were informed about the study content and procedures with preservation of human rights in concordance with the research ethics of the Deanship of Scientific Research and Research Center For Medical College, King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.\par A total of 58 clinical isolates including; respiratory infection, central nervous system infections, urogenital infection, musculoskeletal (Joints) infections and skin infection were included. Blood, urine and swabs (nasal, skin and conjunctivae) specimens have been tested by bacteriology, chemical and PCR Assay. Bacteriology procedures ; staining, culture, catalase, coagulase and antibiotics sensitivity test using diffusion disc test, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) \hyperref[b4]{[5]} and molecular (PCR) for confirmation of Staphylococcal species \hyperref[b5]{[6]} and detection of the Mec A gene \hyperref[b6]{[7]}. General primers for detection of positive Staphylococcal isolates not carrying the Mc Agene were used. The codes and sequences of the primers (50 pmol of primer per reaction) were as follows: ERIC-1R, 59-ATG TAA GCT CCT GGG GAT TCA C-39; ERIC-2, 59-AAG TAA GTG ACT GGG GTG AGC G-39; (Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 chromosome, complete genome NCBI Reference Sequence: NC\textunderscore 004461.1). The PCR mixture was overlaid with 5 ul of mineral oil to prevent evaporation. Amplification of DNA fragments was performed in a Biomed thermo-cycler (model 60; Biomed, Theres, Germany) with predenaturation at 94C o for 4 min, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 94C o , 1 min at 55C o , and 2 min at 74 C o . Amplicons were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis containing 1\% agarose (Hispanagar; Sph. Leiden, The Netherlands) in 0.53 Trisborate-EDTA (TBE) in the presence of ethidium bromide (0. 0.3 mg/ml) at a constant current of 100 mA for 1 h. \section[{a) Statistical Study}]{a) Statistical Study}\par Clinical and Laboratory data were recorded in special formats and entered in stat computer program (SPSS). Descriptive and analytical statistical analysis were performed and final results were plotted in tables. \section[{III.}]{III.}\par Results \section[{Staphylococcus epidermidis and negative}]{Staphylococcus epidermidis and negative}\par Mec A gene clinical isolates including 14 diabetics. Age groups include 29 (0-15yrs), 14 (16-50yrs) and 15 (50yrs\& above). 29 patients (50\%) have presented with skin sepsis this due to the fact that S. epidermidis is a known normal flors of the skin. Distribution of patients according to their sex and diagnosis . Table \hyperref[tab_2]{1}.\par Distribution of patients according to their presence in hospital revealed that; 35 patients were in intensive care units and 24 patients were in PICU and NICU (Pediatric and Neonates). Table \hyperref[tab_3]{2}.\par The total resistance cases to Oxacillin/ Mithicillin was found to be 56 cases (96.4\%); 12 diabetic patients ( 21.4\%) and 44 non diabetic ( 78.6\%). So all non diabetics were resistance. Table \hyperref[tab_6]{3}.\par Resistance and sensitivity to Ciprofloxacin in all 58 Staphylococcus epidermidis diabetic and non diabetic patients under study were 75.9\% and 24.1\% respectively. Table \hyperref[tab_4]{4}.\par Total resistance to Fusidin were 47 cases (81\%) and total sensitivity to Fusidin were 11 cases (19\%). Table \hyperref[tab_5]{5} Total resistant and sensitivity to Erythromycin in all ages groups were 86.2\% and 13.8\% respectively. In age group (0-15) years 93.1\% were resistant to the drug which comprises, 54\% of the total resistant cases ( n=50) and 46.6\% from all Staphylococcus epidermidis cases ( n=58). Table \hyperref[tab_7]{6}. \section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par Staphylococcus epidermidis is one of 33 known species belonging to the genus Staphylococcus. The taxonomy of this bacteria is; Kingdom: Bacteria. Phylum: Firmicutes. Class: Cocci. Oreder: Bacillales. Family: Staphylococcaceae. Genus: Satphylococcus. Species: S. epidermidis. It is part of human skin flora (commensal), and consequently part of human flora. It can also be found in the mucous membranes and in animals. Due to contamination, it is probably the most common species found in laboratory tests \hyperref[b7]{[8]} 7 . Although S. epidermidis is not usually pathogenic, patients with compromised immune systems are often at risk for developing an infection. These infections can be both nosocomial or community acquired, S. epidermidis is also a major concern for people with catheters or other surgical implants because it is known to cause biofilms that grow on these devices [9] 8 . S. epidermidis causes biofilms to grow on plastic devices placed within the body \hyperref[b9]{[10]} 9 . This occurs most commonly on intravenous catheters and on medical prostheses. Infection can also occur in dialysis patients or anyone with an implanted plastic device that may have been contaminated. Another disease it causes endocarditis \hyperref[b10]{[11]}. In some other cases, sepsis can occur in hospital patients. Resistant organisms are most commonly found in the intestine, but organisms living freely on the skin can also become resistant due to routine exposure to antibiotics secreted in sweat \hyperref[b11]{[12]} 12 . Detection of the mecA gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). PCR assays, employing MR1-MR2 primers (primer set 1) and MR3-MR4 primers (primer set 2) to generate 154 and 533 bp fragment, respectively, are most widely used for amplification of mecA gene \hyperref[b12]{[13]} 13 .Spread of S. spp. (including MRSA) generally is through human-to-human contact, although recently some have discovered the infection can be spread through pets, with environmental contamination.\par Cases of S. spp. Nosocomial infections have reported to be transported by polyester, the main material used in hospital curtains in hospitals across America \hyperref[b13]{[14]} 14 . An important and previously unrecognized means of community-associated MRSA colonization and transmission is during sexual contact \hyperref[b14]{[15]} 15 . It was discovered that there are two different strains of S. epidermidis, one that inhibits biofilm formation by S. aureus, S. epidermidis strain JK16 (inhibitory type), and one that does not (non-inhibitory type) S. epidermidis strain JK11 \hyperref[b15]{[16]} 16 . Staphylococcal resistance to penicillin is mediated by penicillinase (a form of ?-lactamase) production: an enzyme that cleaves the ?-lactam ring of the penicillin molecule, rendering the antibiotic ineffective. Penicillinase-resistant ?-lactam antibiotics, such as methicillin, nafcillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin, dicloxacillin, and flucloxacillin, are able to resist degradation by staphylococcal penicillinase. Resistance to methicillin is mediated via the mec operon, part of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec).\par Resistance is conferred by the mecA gene, which codes for an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a or PBP2') that has a lower affinity for binding ?-lactams (penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems). This allows for resistance to all ?-lactam antibiotics, and obviates their clinical use during MRSA infections. As such, the glycopeptide vancomycin is often deployed against MRSA \hyperref[b16]{[17]} evolved mechanisms to inhibit the aminoglycosides' action, which occurs via protonated amine and/or hydroxyl interactions with the ribosomal RNA of the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit \hyperref[b17]{[18]} 18 . There are three main mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance mechanisms which are currently and widely accepted: aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, ribosomal mutations, and active efflux of the drug out of the bacteria \hyperref[b19]{[19]} 19 . MRSA infections in both the hospital and community setting are commonly treated with non-?lactam antibiotics, such as clindamycin (a lincosamine) and co-trimoxazole (also commonly known as trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole). Resistance to these antibiotics has also led to the use of new, broadspectrum anti-Gram-positive antibiotics, such as linezolid, because of its availability as an oral drug. So it is nowadays highly recommended to use combined therapy to treat severe cases of S. aureus infections such as pneumonia, meningitis and toxic shock syndrome \hyperref[b20]{[20]}. 20 .All 29 S. epidermidis isolates were found to be resistant to oxacillin and were positive for the mecA gene. The isolates showed several multidrugresistance patterns; the resistance rates to gentamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and \hyperref[b21]{[21]}were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, rifampin, synercid, and ciprofloxacin. Several genotypic and phenotypic patterns were detected among the S. epidermidis isolates: antibiogram typing showed seven different patterns, one of which was shared by 65\% of the isolates, whereas the most prevalent RAPD genotype was shared by only five S. epidermidis isolates \hyperref[b22]{[22]}, and did not correlate with antibiotic resistance phenotype. The diverse clonal origin of tested isolates indicates the presence of multiple S. epidermidis strains among neonates in the NICU setting \hyperref[b23]{[23]} 21 . In another study the nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant coagulasenegative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) is highly prevalent in community subjects \hyperref[b24]{[24]} 22 . Few studies on staphylococcal infections and drugs sensitivity were conducted in Saudi Arabia {\ref [25] [26]} [27] , 24, 25, 26 . Resistance is conferred by Penicillinase-resistant ?-lactam antibiotics and the mec A gene, which codes for an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP') that has a lower affinity for binding ?-lactams (penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems). This allows for resistance to all ?lactam antibiotics, and obviates their clinical use during MRSA infections. Mec A gene is known associated factor of drug resistance for Oxacillin/Mithcillin drug as all isolates were Mec A gene negative, the resistance could be explained by the thick biofilm caused by this bacteria which guard against drug penetration \hyperref[b28]{[28]} [29],\par V. \section[{Acknowledgement}]{Acknowledgement}\par We confer our gratitude to the laboratory of Assir Central Hospital. Our sincere thanks to the department of microbiology, College of Medicine, King Khalid University (Saudi Arabia) and Ribat National University (Sudan). \section[{VI.}]{VI.} \section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par Staphylococcus epidermidis is a pathogen associated with community acquired and nosocomial infections. These infections were predominant among children in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) .\par Resistance of Erythromycin in S. epidermidis cases among children is highly observed as this drug is commonly used by this age group.\par Diabetes has equivocal effect on drugs sensitivity. The frequency of staphylococcus multi-drugs resistance is rising as well in Asser region), involving variable drugs mode of actions; cell wall inhibitors, protein synthesis inhibitors and DNA gyrase inhibitors.\par Rising of multidrug resistance could be attributed to genetic clone and the adherence of the pathogen to devices like ventilators and catheters . \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_1}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} Volume XIV Issue II Version I\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_2}Table 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.15519662921348315\textwidth}P{0.3127808988764045\textwidth}P{0.14325842696629212\textwidth}P{0.05252808988764045\textwidth}P{0.13370786516853933\textwidth}P{0.05252808988764045\textwidth}} \tabcellsep Diagnosis\tabcellsep Sex\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Male\tabcellsep Female\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Acute Abdomen\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep Sepsis\tabcellsep 18\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep 29\\ \tabcellsep URI\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 2\\ \tabcellsep Post Surgery\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep CVA\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 7\\ \tabcellsep ESRD\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep RDS\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep PUO(Pyrexia)\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep ELEC Burn\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep Trauma\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 2\\ \tabcellsep RTA\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 7\\ \tabcellsep Head Inj.\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 2\\ \tabcellsep DM\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 3\\ \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 39\tabcellsep 19\tabcellsep 58\\ Department\tabcellsep ( 0-15 )years\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Age (16 -50 ) years}\tabcellsep 51 years and more\tabcellsep Total\\ OPD\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 8\\ MMW\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\\ MFSW\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ MSW\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 3\\ FMW\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 3\\ PMW\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ ER\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 2\\ PICU\tabcellsep 15\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 16\\ MOW\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\\ ICU\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 4\\ IMCU\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 6\\ CCU\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\\ NICU\tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 8\\ BU\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ MNW\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ MUW\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ Total\tabcellsep 29\tabcellsep 14\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 15\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}Table 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_4}Table 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{5} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} among diabetics and non diabetics\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: Year ( ) 2014 C © 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US)]} \caption{\label{tab_5}Table 5 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.09429260450160772\textwidth}P{0.0662781350482315\textwidth}P{0.2992765273311897\textwidth}P{0.11889067524115754\textwidth}P{0.03621382636655948\textwidth}P{0.10864147909967846\textwidth}P{0.12640675241157556\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \multicolumn{5}{l}{cases among diabetics and non diabetics}\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Antibiotic sensitivity profile}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Diabetes mellitus Yes No}\tabcellsep Total Yes\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{12}\tabcellsep 44\tabcellsep 56\\ \tabcellsep R\tabcellsep \% within Oxacillin/ Mithicillin \% within Diabetes mellitus\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{21,4\% 85,7\%}\tabcellsep 78,6\% 100,0\%\tabcellsep 100,0\% 96,6\%\\ Oxacillin/\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% of Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{20,7\%}\tabcellsep 75,9\%\tabcellsep 96,6\%\\ Mithicillin\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 2\\ \tabcellsep S\tabcellsep \% within Oxacillin/ Mithicillin \% within Diabetes mellitus\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{100,0\% 14,3\%}\tabcellsep ,0\% ,0\%\tabcellsep 100,0\% 3,4\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% of Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3,4\%}\tabcellsep ,0\%\tabcellsep 3,4\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{14}\tabcellsep 44\tabcellsep 58\\ Total\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% within Oxacillin/ Mithicillin \% within Diabetes mellitus\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{24,1\% 100,0\%}\tabcellsep 75,9\% 100,0\%\tabcellsep 100,0\% 100,0\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% of Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{24,1\%}\tabcellsep 75,9\%\tabcellsep 100,0\%\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Antibiotic sensitivity profile}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Diabetes mellitus}\tabcellsep Total\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Yes\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep Yes\\ Ciprofloxacin\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Count \% within Ciprofloxacin}\tabcellsep 10 19,5\%\tabcellsep 34 80,5\%\tabcellsep 44 100,0\%\\ \tabcellsep R\tabcellsep \% within Diabetes mellitus\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 57,1\%\tabcellsep 75,0\%\tabcellsep 70,7\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% of Total\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 13,8\%\tabcellsep 56,9\%\tabcellsep 70,7\%\\ \tabcellsep S\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Count \% within Ciprofloxacin}\tabcellsep 4 28,6\%\tabcellsep 10 71,4\%\tabcellsep 14 100,0\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% within Diabetes\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 28,6\%\tabcellsep 22,7\%\tabcellsep 24,1\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep mellitus \% of Total\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 6,9\%\tabcellsep 17,2\%\tabcellsep 24,1\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 14 24.1\%\tabcellsep 44 75.9\%\tabcellsep 58 100\%\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Antibiotic sensitivity profile}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Diabetes mellitus yes no}\tabcellsep Total\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 36\tabcellsep 47\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% within Fusidin\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{18,5\%}\tabcellsep 81,5\%\tabcellsep 100,0\%\\ R\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{\% within Diabetes mellitus}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{78.5\%}\tabcellsep 81.8\%\tabcellsep 81\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% of Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{18.9\%}\tabcellsep 62.1\%\tabcellsep 81\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep 11\\ Fusidin\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% within Fusidin\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{27,3\%}\tabcellsep 72,7\%\tabcellsep 100,0\%\\ S\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{\% within Diabetes mellitus}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{21,4\%}\tabcellsep 18,2\%\tabcellsep 19,0\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \% of Total\tabcellsep 5,2\%\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 13,8\%\tabcellsep 19,0\%\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{14 24.1\%}\tabcellsep 44 75.9\%\tabcellsep 58 100\%\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_6}Table 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{6} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_7}Table 6 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.07047377326565143\textwidth}P{0.2531302876480541\textwidth}P{0.12656514382402706\textwidth}P{0.08197969543147207\textwidth}P{0.09348561759729272\textwidth}P{0.1524534686971235\textwidth}P{0.07191201353637902\textwidth}} \multicolumn{2}{l}{Antibiotic sensitivity profile}\tabcellsep 0-15\tabcellsep age group 16-50\tabcellsep 51+\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep \\ Erythromycin\tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep 27\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep 12\tabcellsep 50\tabcellsep \\ R\tabcellsep \% within Erythromycin \% within age group\tabcellsep 54 \% 93,1\%\tabcellsep 22 \% 78,6\%\tabcellsep 24 \% 80 \%\tabcellsep 100,0\% 84,5\%\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \% of Total\tabcellsep 46,6\%\tabcellsep 19,0\%\tabcellsep 19,0\%\tabcellsep 86,2\%\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep \\ S\tabcellsep \% within Erythromycin \% within age group \% of Total\tabcellsep 25,0\% 6,9\% 3,4\%\tabcellsep 37,5\% 21,4\% 5,2\%\tabcellsep 37,5\% 20,0\% 5,2\%\tabcellsep 100,0\% 13,8\% 13,8\%\tabcellsep Year 2014\\ \tabcellsep Count\tabcellsep 29\tabcellsep 14\tabcellsep 15\tabcellsep 58\tabcellsep \\ Total\tabcellsep \% within Erythromycin \% within age group \% of Total\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{50,0\% 100,0\% 100,0\% 24,1\% 50,0\% 24,1\%}\tabcellsep 25,9\% 100,0\% 25,9\%\tabcellsep 100,0\% 100,0\% 100,0\%\tabcellsep Volume XIV Issue II Version I\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep D D D D ) C\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep (\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep © 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US)\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_8}}\end{figure} \footnote{© 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US)} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Kayser et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} \textit{}, J E Kayser , R Kb , Zinkernagel . \textit{Medical Microbiology Thieme} 2005. p. 724. \bibitem[ Antimicrob Agents Chemother ()]{b18}\label{b18} \textit{}, \textit{Antimicrob Agents Chemother} 2013. 57 (10) p. . \bibitem[Nandwani et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} ‘A case of Staphylococcus toxic shock syndrome presenting with multiple pneumatocoeles in the chest’. S Nandwani , A Pande , M Saluja . \textit{Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci} 2013. 55 (1) p. . \bibitem[Bek-Thomson ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘Acne is Not Associated with Yet-Uncultured Bacteria’. M E Bek-Thomson . \textit{Journal of Clinical Microbiology} 2008. 46 (10) p. . \bibitem[El Hafez ()]{b7}\label{b7} ‘An outbreak of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis among neonates in a hospital in Saudi Arabia’. Abd El Hafez , M . \textit{J Infect Dev Ctries} 2011. 5 (10) p. . \bibitem[Crum-Cianflone ()]{b14}\label{b14} \textit{Association of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization with high-risk sexual behaviors in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Medicine (Baltimore)}, N F Crum-Cianflone . 2011. 90 p. . \bibitem[Bacteria ()]{b1}\label{b1} \textit{Bacteria Genomes -Staphylococcus epidermidis . Karyn's Genomes}, Bacteria . 2011. EMBL-EBI. \bibitem[Dumitrescu ()]{b29}\label{b29} ‘Beta-lactams interfering with PBP1 induce Panton-Valentine leukocidin expression by triggering sarA and rot global regulators of Staphylococcus aureus’. O Dumitrescu . \textit{Antimicrob Agents Chemother} 2011. 55 (7) p. . \bibitem[Brackman ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Biofilm inhibitory and eradicating activity of wound care products against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in an in vitro chronic wound model’. G Brackman . \textit{J Appl Microbiol} 2013. 114 (6) p. . \bibitem[Liu ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary’. C Liu . \textit{Clin Infect Dis} 2011. 52 (3) p. . \bibitem[Widerstrom ()]{b22}\label{b22} ‘Coagulase-negative staphylococci: update on the molecular epidemiology and clinical presentation, with a focus on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus’. M Widerstrom . \textit{Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis} 2012. 31 (1) p. . \bibitem[Cotter ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘Disinfection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms using a remote non-thermal gas plasma’. J J Cotter . \textit{J Hosp Infect} 2011. 78 (3) p. . \bibitem[Endocarditis ()]{b10}\label{b10} Endocarditis . \textit{Endocarditis}, 2011. Mayo Clinic. \bibitem[Siripornmongcolchai et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Evaluation of different primers for detecting mecA gene by PCR in comparison with phenotypic methods for discrimination of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus’. T Siripornmongcolchai , C Chomvarin , E A Chaicumpar , K . \textit{Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health} 2002. 33 (4) p. . \bibitem[Abdalla ()]{b25}\label{b25} ‘Evaluation of resistance of commonly used antibiotics on clinical case of Staphylococcus capitis from Assir region, Saudi Arabia’. N M Abdalla . \textit{Indian J Med Sci} 2011. 65 (12) p. . \bibitem[Alreshidi ()]{b26}\label{b26} ‘Genetic variation among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cancer patients in Saudi Arabia’. M A Alreshidi . \textit{Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis} 2013. 32 (6) p. . \bibitem[Donovan ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of neonatal suppurative parotitis: a report of two cases and review of the literature’. S T Donovan . \textit{Ear Nose Throat J} 2013. 92 (6) p. . \bibitem[Aiba]{b17}\label{b17} \textit{Mutation of RNA polymerase betasubunit gene promotes heterogeneous-tohomogeneous conversion of beta-lactam resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus}, Y Aiba . \bibitem[Van Leeuwen and Sm ()]{b5}\label{b5} ‘On the nature and use of randomly amplified DNA from Staphylococcus aureus’. W Van Leeuwen , Sm . \textit{J Clin Microbiol} 1996. 34 (11) p. . \bibitem[Hamid ()]{b27}\label{b27} \textit{Prevalence of Bacterial Pathogens in Aseer Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Emphasis on Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus}, M E Hamid . 2011. Oman Med J. 26 p. . \bibitem[Francois ()]{b3}\label{b3} ‘Rapid Diagnosis and Typing of Staphylococcus aureus’. P S J Francois . \textit{Staphylococcus: Molecular Genetics}, 2008. Caister Academic Press. \bibitem[Kane and Bretz ()]{b24}\label{b24} ‘Reduction in coagulasenegative staphylococcus infection rates in the NICU using evidence-based research’. E Kane , G Bretz . \textit{Neonatal Netw} 2011. 30 (3) p. . \bibitem[Toba ()]{b28}\label{b28} ‘Role of biofilm in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis ventricular assist device driveline infections’. F A Toba . \textit{J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg} 2011. 141 (5) p. . \bibitem[Geva ()]{b23}\label{b23} ‘Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a large tertiary NICU: network analysis’. A Geva . \textit{Pediatrics} 2011. 128 (5) p. . \bibitem[Pasko ()]{b12}\label{b12} ‘Staph ID/R: a rapid method for determining staphylococcus species identity and detecting the mecA gene directly from positive blood culture’. C Pasko . \textit{J Clin Microbiol} 2012. 50 (3) p. . \bibitem[Otto ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘Staphylococcus epidermidis -the 'accidental' pathogen’. M Otto . \textit{Nature Reviews Microbiology} 2009. 7 (8) p. . \bibitem[Otto ()]{b0}\label{b0} ‘Staphylococcus epidermidis and other Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci’. S Q A M Otto . \textit{Staphylococcus: Molecular Genetics}, 2008. Caister Academic Press. \bibitem[Baillif ()]{b9}\label{b9} ‘Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation and structural organization on different types of intraocular lenses under in vitro flow conditions’. S Baillif . \textit{Ophthalmic Res} 2013. 50 (2) p. . \bibitem[Abdalla ()]{b21}\label{b21} ‘Study on Antimicrobial Resistant in Saudi Arabia’. N Abdalla . \textit{Research Journal of Medical Sciences} 2011. 5 (2) p. . \bibitem[Bassetti ()]{b16}\label{b16} ‘Vancomycin susceptibility of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia isolates in an Italian hospital’. M Bassetti . \textit{Int J Antimicrob Agents} 2011. 38 (5) p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}