\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Genetic Epidemiological Studies of Hearing Loss in Faisalabad City, Pakistan}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2014-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2014)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2014-01-15} \title{Genetic Epidemiological Studies of Hearing Loss in Faisalabad City, Pakistan} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Fazeela Yaqoob} \author[2]{Sumaira Iqbal} \affil[1]{ Government College University} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 11 December 2013 Accepted: 4 January 2014 Published: 15 January 2014} \maketitle \begin{abstract} Basic aim of the study was to investigate the incidence, prevalence, disease pattern and the etiology of the non-syndromic congenital deafness in a selected population from different areas and schools for special education of Faisalabad District, Pakistan. An epidem-iological study was carried out through a questionnaire including different standard parameters like surname, parental marriage age, parental relationship of marriage, their family history including information about number of offspring, sex, birth order, number of normal and diseased individuals and age of onset. Information about economic status and educational qualification of parents, their locality, food habits and paternal smoking or non-smoking habits were also recorded. In a total of 436 deaf cases, 55.0% were males and 44.95% were females while 22 families were selected for pedigree analysis. Urban population (79.58%) was affected more than rural population (20.41%). Mean maternal and paternal marriage age was 20.63 ± 0.163 and 24.989 ± 0.217, respectively with smaller (0-4 years) marriage age difference. First (24.54%) and second (22.24%) birth order showed maximum deaf patients. Offspring of first cousin marriages (67.66%) had significantly higher congenital hearing loss affliction than of unrelated couples as demonstrated by consanguineous studies. Coefficient of inbreeding was (F=0.051) high than in general population (F=0.0271). Autosomal recessive mode of inheritance was observed in twenty-two affected families. \end{abstract} \keywords{epidemiology, deafness, inheritance, pedigree.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par eafness, a sensory defect, affecting 1 / 500-650 newborn children and 250 million people worldwide \hyperref[b16]{(Olusanya et al., 2007)}, of whom two thirds are in developing countries. It is considered to be second major cause of disability. Frequency of hearing loss in Southeast Asia varies from 4.6\% to 8.8\% \hyperref[b9]{(Garg et al., 2009)}. There are approximately 63 million (India) 28 million (USA) and 9 million (UK) hearing impaired people according to WHO survey. Deafness can be categorized as genetic or non-genetic, prelingual or postlingual, and syndromic or non-syndromic.\par Approximately 60\% cases of deafness have genetic basis \hyperref[b15]{(Mehl and Thomson, 2002)}. Environmental factors are responsible for upto 40\% cases and few are due to unknown causes \hyperref[b22]{(Willems, 2000;}. In genetic cases, 85\% of the hearing impairment is described as non-syndromic {\ref (Kenneson et al., 2002)}.\par Comparatively to advanced countries, people from developing countries are three to four times more susceptible to deafness largely because of unfavourable environmental factors. Asian, African and Latin American population practice consanguineous marriages frequently, so siblings of these marriages are at high risk of autosomal recessive disorder. Consanguinity basically disturbs the normal genetic pathway and paves the way for the development of hearing loss . Autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment (ARNSHI) can be traced easily in Pakistani population due to the availability of large extended and highly consanguineous pedigrees \hyperref[b20]{(Santos et al., 2005)}. The prevalence of bilateral deafness in Pakistani population is as high as 1.6 per 1000, 60\% higher than the world average \hyperref[b7]{(Elahi et al., 1998)}. In Pakistani population 80\% marriages are first-cousin and 60\% are consanguineous \hyperref[b10]{(Hussain, 1998)}. Neonatal, infant and childhood periods face the highest death rates because of this consanguinity \hyperref[b4]{(Bittles, 2001)}.\par For present epidemiological study deaf population was selected at district level to collect data for determination of prevalence rates. Effect of consanguinity on congenital deafness, social and economic status impacts and mode of inheritance of genetic cases were studied. \section[{II.}]{II.} \section[{Materials and Methods}]{Materials and Methods}\par The families for genetic epidemiological studies were collected from different schools for special education of district Faisalabad, Total twenty-two families were scored by collecting data of about 436 deaf patients from special schools and different areas of Faisalabad city. These families provided necessary relevant information for genetic epidemiological studies. Family consisted of 4 or 5 generations was considered in which at least 4 or 5 individuals were afflicted with congenital deafness, to get better results.\par The details of the family were traced back through the proband. The information was collected from subjects with the help of a data sheet including their surname, parental marriage age, parental relationship of marriage, their family history including information about number of offsprings (sex, birth order), similar and other disease in family, number of normal and diseased individuals in family and the age of onset of disease. \section[{a) Data analysis}]{a) Data analysis}\par The data was analyzed in three ways. Firstly, the sample was analyzed as a whole to get information of population and second in relation of consanguinity. Third pedigrees were draw in order to evaluate the mode of inheritance of disease. Genetic relationships in marriages were classified into first cousins (1C), first cousin once removed (11/2C), second cousins (2C), distant relatives (DR), bradari (B) and unrelated (U) {\ref (Shami and Iqbal, 1983)}. \section[{b) Statistical analysis}]{b) Statistical analysis}\par The statistical analysis carried out for this study included percentage (\%), mean (M), standard error (S.E) and chi-square test (? 2 ). Mean coefficient of inbreeding (F-value) was calculated by following the method of \hyperref[b23]{Wright (1992)}. \section[{III. a) General population study}]{III. a) General population study}\par Out of 436 deaf patients, 347 belonged to urban areas and 89 belonged to rural. Male patients were 65.165\% in rural and 52.44\% in urban areas whereas females were 34.83\% and 47.55\%, respectively. \section[{b) Parental marriage age}]{b) Parental marriage age}\par In case of female patients mean maternal marriage age was 20.61±0.262 years whereas mean paternal marriage age was 25.010±0.335 years. Similarly in case of male deaf patients mean maternal and paternal marriage age was 20.654±0.207 and 24.971±0.284, respectively. It was seen that second age group (18-22 years) of maternal marriage was more commonly distributed in deaf male and females than any other age group (Table \hyperref[tab_0]{-1}).Children of couples with age difference ranged from 0-4 years had high percentage (59.63 \%) of disease. Difference of 2, 3, 4 and 5 years at marriage have high percentages 20.87\%, 13.76\%, 10.55\% and 11.46\% of deaf patients, respectively. The number mentioned within parenthesis ( ) is the number of deaf patients. \section[{c) Birth order}]{c) Birth order}\par Different birth orders of 436 deaf patients were recorded up to 12th birth order. Percentage distribution of combined sex in different birth orders shows that 1st (24.54\%), 2nd (22.24\%) and 3rd (17.20\%) birth order had the highest representation while 9th (0.45\%), 10th (0.68\%) and 12th (0.229\%) birth order had the lowest representation. In male deaf patients 1st (29.16\%) and 2nd (22.08\%) birth order and in female deaf patients 2nd (22.44\%) and 4th (21.42\%) birth order showed maximum percentages. Tenth and 12th birth order (0.416\%) in males and 8th birth order (0.51\%) in females were least suffered (Table-2).\par Volume XIV Issue I Version I Year ( ) Highest percentage representation of deaf patients was seen in skilled manual occupation (43.34\%), followed by professional-managerial (19.03\%) and unskilled categories (14.90\%), respectively. Distribution of deaf patients according to their educational level was in primary (49.77\%), Middle (14.90\%), Matric (13.30\%) and college education (2.52\%), respectively. Ratio of uneducated smokers (53.45\%) and non-smokers (34.29\%) were highest in representation as compared to educated non-smokers (4.33\%) and smokers (0.628\%), respectively. \section[{e) Consanguinity and deafness}]{e) Consanguinity and deafness}\par Deaf patients were explored on the parental consanguinity basis, showed first cousin (67.66\%), first cousin once removed (0.458\%), second cousin (0.68\%), distant relations (11.23\%), bradari (5.27\%) and unrelated spouses (14.67\%), respectively. First cousin marriage couples had maximum number of affected children as compared to unrelated. Table-3 shows analysis of goodness of fit for father's occupation and different genetic relationships of deaf patients, which indicated that father's occupation and genetic relationships had highly significant effect on the development of deafness (? 2 = 68.774; d.f = 25; p< 0.01). Educational contributions and different genetic relationships of parents were also compared in deaf patients that indicated a highly significant effect of education and genetic relationships on deafness (Table-4) (? 2 = 349.41; d.f = 40; p< 0.01). In 436 deaf patients, 282 (64.67\%) cases had this disease in their family. Out of which 148 (52.48\%) males and 134 (47.51\%) females were those who had the same disease in their family, whereas 92 male (59.74\%) and 62 female (40.25\%) cases did not have family history for the disease. Table-5 represents the distribution of deaf males and their relatives diagnosed for the same disease. One forty eight affected males had 284 (47.17\%) affected relatives. Among those the close blood relatives such as father, mother, daughter, son, sister and brother were 181 (63.73\%) followed by 13 paternal (4.57\%) and 8 maternal relatives (2.8\%). 82 affected relatives (28.87\%) were kept in category of others. One thirty four affected females had higher affected relative number (318) than that of males (284) and these affected relatives consisted of 188 close blood relation (59.11\%), 15 maternal (4.71\%), 14 paternal relatives (4.4\%) and 101 (31.76\%) included all these three relations (Table-6). \section[{g) Pedigree analysis}]{g) Pedigree analysis}\par After studying the genetic cases of disease, twenty-two patients with family disease history were selected in total scored cases. Among Mendelian modes of inheritance only autosomal recessive mode was observed.\par IV. \section[{Pedigree a) Epidemiology}]{Pedigree a) Epidemiology}\par Pedigree (Fig- 1) is an illustration of a Rajput family who is settled in Ali Hassan colony of Faisalabad. Eleven members including six males and five females were affected with congenital deafness. Individual III-5 was proband through which disease was traced back in his family. In first three generations, no affected individual was found except one affected male (III-5) produced in third generation. In this generation, first consanguineous marriage produced two affected sons (IV-1 and IV-3) and two affected daughters (IV-4, IV-6). But the second first cousin marriage of an affected male and normal female (III-5 and III-4) produced one affected daughter (IV-10), two affected sons (IV-7 and IV-8) and one normal son (IV-12). In fourth generation, two marriages were practiced, first was a consanguineous marriage between two congenitally deaf persons (IV-6 and IV-7) that produced all affected offsprings including one male (V-3) and two females (V-1 and V-2). Whereas second consanguineous marriage between an affected female and normal male (IV-10 and IV-11) produced three normal daughters (V-4, V-5 and V-6). \section[{b) Result}]{b) Result}\par This pedigree also shows an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance (Fig- 1). \section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par This study showed that males were more liable to congenital deafness as compared to females. Same results were found by \hyperref[b12]{Liu et al. (1999)} \section[{F}]{F}\par According to birth order study, 1st (24.54\%), 2nd (22.24\%) and 3rd (17.20\%) birth orders were mostly affected with disease as compared to other birth orders irrespective of sex . No supporting evidence is encountered on the importance of birth order because detailed literature review is silent on this aspect. Present study revealed that disease was common in lower social class (Category-IV), which was the case of skilled manual. This finding is comparable with the work of Bafaquee et al. {\ref (1994)}.\par Highest percentage of deaf offspring was observed in uneducated people (49.77\%) sector as compared to educated ones (2.52\%). These investigations clearly show that lack of education increases the risk of disease that was also reported by Bafaquee et al. {\ref (1994)}.\par In Pakistan first cousin marriages are more common and rates of inbreeding ranges from 37.8\% to 48.9\%. Calculated coefficient of inbreeding (F) for general population ranged from 0.0236 to 0.0286 \hyperref[b21]{(Shami et al., 1990)}. \hyperref[b6]{Das (2006)} examined that there was an increase in genetic disorders with an increase in inbreeding in almost all populations. Consanguineous children had more familial aggregation of disease. The consanguinity rate was too high which is in agreement with \hyperref[b1]{Ansari et al. (2004)}. In Iran, the frequency of consanguinity of parents was 59.7\% in congenitally malformed population and 31.5\% in normal population (Khushki and Zeyghami, 2005).\par It was found that most common parental relationship was 1st cousin marriages (67.66\%) than unrelated marriages (14.67\%). These findings are in accordance with those of Bafaquee et al. Socio economic status showed significant (P<0.01) influence on occurrence of congenital deafness among different marriage relationships. Education of parents also had significant effects (P<0.01) on the occurrence of disease in their children. . Similar arguments are reported by \hyperref[b4]{Bittles (2001)} and \hyperref[b0]{Aber et al. (2005)} for Muslim populations.\par Only Mendelian mode of autosomal recessive inheritance pattern was observed in this study. \hyperref[b14]{Marazita et al. (1993)} found that 62.8\% causes of early onset deafness were genetic in which 47.1\% were recessive and 15.7\% were with dominant cases. Same analysis was revealed by {\ref Longtiano and Brunoni (2000)} \begin{quote} .\end{quote} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png} \caption{\label{fig_0}? 2 =}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png} \caption{\label{fig_2}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.10855421686746988\textwidth}P{0.24987951807228917\textwidth}P{0.2621686746987952\textwidth}P{0.22939759036144577\textwidth}} Age groups at\tabcellsep Maternal age of\tabcellsep Maternal age of\tabcellsep Sexes Combined\\ marriage\tabcellsep male patients\tabcellsep female patients\tabcellsep (X ± S.E)\\ (Years)\tabcellsep (X ± S.E)\tabcellsep (X ± S.E)\tabcellsep \\ 13-17\tabcellsep 16.20 ± 0.208\tabcellsep 16.136 ± 0.136\tabcellsep 16.170 ± 0.127\\ \tabcellsep (25)\tabcellsep (22)\tabcellsep (47)\\ 18-22\tabcellsep 19.940 ± 0.123\tabcellsep 19.609 ± 0.127\tabcellsep 19.793 ± 0.089\\ \tabcellsep (166)\tabcellsep (133)\tabcellsep (299)\\ 23-27\tabcellsep 24.341 ± 0.155\tabcellsep 24.645 ± 0.189\tabcellsep 24.472 ±0.120\\ \tabcellsep (41)\tabcellsep (31)\tabcellsep (72)\\ 28-32\tabcellsep 29.571 ± 0.481\tabcellsep 29.571 ± 0.297\tabcellsep 29.571 ± 0.272\\ \tabcellsep (7)\tabcellsep (7)\tabcellsep (14)\\ 33-37\tabcellsep 37.0 ± 0.00\tabcellsep 35.333 ± 0.333\tabcellsep 35.750 ± 0.479\\ \tabcellsep (1)\tabcellsep (3)\tabcellsep (4)\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: ? 2=223.96; d.f=9, P<0.001 ]} \caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.04732739420935412\textwidth}P{0.030289532293986635\textwidth}P{0.046380846325167036\textwidth}P{0.07667037861915367\textwidth}P{0.06815144766146994\textwidth}P{0.028396436525612474\textwidth}P{0.11926503340757239\textwidth}P{0.0586859688195991\textwidth}P{0.022717149220489976\textwidth}P{0.07383073496659243\textwidth}P{0.08329621380846325\textwidth}P{0.0160913140311804\textwidth}P{0.07761692650334076\textwidth}P{0.022717149220489976\textwidth}P{0.07856347438752784\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1 st\tabcellsep 2 nd\tabcellsep 3 rd\tabcellsep 4 th\tabcellsep 5 th\tabcellsep 6 th\tabcellsep 7 th\tabcellsep 8 th\tabcellsep 9 th\tabcellsep 10 th\tabcellsep 11 th\tabcellsep 12 th\\ Sex\tabcellsep \tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\tabcellsep order\\ Males\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep 70\tabcellsep 53\tabcellsep 36\tabcellsep 31\tabcellsep 20\tabcellsep 14\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep \%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{29.16 22.08}\tabcellsep 15.0\tabcellsep 12.91\tabcellsep 8.34\tabcellsep 5.83\tabcellsep 2.5\tabcellsep 2.5\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.834 0.416}\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 0.416\\ Females\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep 37\tabcellsep 44\tabcellsep 39\tabcellsep 42\tabcellsep 18\tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\\ \tabcellsep \%\tabcellsep 18.87\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{22.44 19.89}\tabcellsep 21.42\tabcellsep 9.18\tabcellsep 4.08\tabcellsep 2.55\tabcellsep 0.51\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 1.02\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\\ Combined\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep 107\tabcellsep 97\tabcellsep 75\tabcellsep 73\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 1\\ Sex\tabcellsep \%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{24.54 22.24 17.20}\tabcellsep 16.74\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{8.715 5.04}\tabcellsep 2.52\tabcellsep 1.60\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{0.45 0.68}\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 0.229\tabcellsep Year 2014\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Volume XIV Issue I Version I\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep D D D D ) F\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep (\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Genetic relationships 1C}\tabcellsep I 57 (56.16)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{II 39 (32.48)}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Father's occupation IV V 125 (127.88) 2 (2.71)}\tabcellsep VI 42 (43.98)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{VII 30 (31.80)}\tabcellsep Total 295 (295.0)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Medical Research\\ \tabcellsep 1 1/2 C 2C B\tabcellsep \tabcellsep -(0.38) 1 (0.57) 4 (4.38)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{-(0.22) -(0.33) 2 (2.53)}\tabcellsep -(0.87) 2 (1.30) 11 (9.97)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1 (0.02) -(0.03) 1 (0.21)}\tabcellsep 1 (0.30) -(0.45) 3 (3.43)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{-(0.22) -(0.32) 2 (2.48)}\tabcellsep 2 (2.00) 3 (3.00) 23 (23.00)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Global Journal of\\ \tabcellsep DR\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 24\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 49\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep (9.33)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{(5.39)}\tabcellsep (21.24)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{(0.45)}\tabcellsep (7.31)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{(5.28)}\tabcellsep (49.00)\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep U\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 12\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 27\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 10\tabcellsep 10\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 64\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep (12.18)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{(7.05)}\tabcellsep (27.74)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{(0.59)}\tabcellsep (9.54)\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{(6.90)}\tabcellsep (64.00)\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 83\tabcellsep 48\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 189\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 65\tabcellsep 47\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 436\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: ? 2 = 68.774; d.f =25 P < 0.01. The value mentioned within parenthesis ( ) is the expected value 1C= First cousin.1 1/2 = First cousin once removed.2C= Second cousin.B = Bradari]} \caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.06319702602230483\textwidth}P{0.09953531598513012\textwidth}P{0.08847583643122676\textwidth}P{0.09005576208178438\textwidth}P{0.09637546468401487\textwidth}P{0.12481412639405204\textwidth}P{0.07109665427509294\textwidth}P{0.07425650557620818\textwidth}P{0.07109665427509294\textwidth}P{0.07109665427509294\textwidth}} Genetic\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{FATHER / MOTHER'S EDUCATION}\tabcellsep \\ Relationships\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep N/N\tabcellsep N/S\tabcellsep S/N\tabcellsep S/S\tabcellsep S/C\tabcellsep C/N\tabcellsep C/S\tabcellsep C/C\tabcellsep U/U\\ 1C\tabcellsep 106\tabcellsep 10\tabcellsep 61\tabcellsep 85\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 19\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 6\\ \tabcellsep (106.23)\tabcellsep (15.56)\tabcellsep (52.10)\tabcellsep (87.96)\tabcellsep (1.35)\tabcellsep (2.30)\tabcellsep (16.92)\tabcellsep (6.09)\tabcellsep (6.77)\\ 1 1/2 C\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep (0.72)\tabcellsep (0.11)\tabcellsep (0.35)\tabcellsep (0.60)\tabcellsep (0.01)\tabcellsep (0.01)\tabcellsep (0.11)\tabcellsep (0.04)\tabcellsep (0.05)\\ 2C\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\\ \tabcellsep (1.08)\tabcellsep (0.16)\tabcellsep (0.53)\tabcellsep (0.89)\tabcellsep (0.01)\tabcellsep (0.02)\tabcellsep (0.17)\tabcellsep (0.06)\tabcellsep (0.07)\\ DR\tabcellsep 17\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 17\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 3\\ \tabcellsep (17.64)\tabcellsep (2.58)\tabcellsep (8.65)\tabcellsep (14.61)\tabcellsep (0.22)\tabcellsep (0.34)\tabcellsep (2.81)\tabcellsep (1.01)\tabcellsep (1.12)\\ B\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep -\\ \tabcellsep (8.28)\tabcellsep (1.21)\tabcellsep (4.06)\tabcellsep (6.86)\tabcellsep (0.11)\tabcellsep (0.16)\tabcellsep (1.32)\tabcellsep (0.47)\tabcellsep (0.53)\\ U\tabcellsep 27\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 18\tabcellsep -\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep -\\ \tabcellsep (23.05)\tabcellsep (3.38)\tabcellsep (11.30)\tabcellsep (19.08)\tabcellsep (0.29)\tabcellsep (0.44)\tabcellsep (3.67)\tabcellsep (1.32)\tabcellsep (1.47)\\ Total\tabcellsep 157\tabcellsep 23\tabcellsep 77\tabcellsep 130\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep (157.0)\tabcellsep (23.00)\tabcellsep (77.00)\tabcellsep (130.0)\tabcellsep (2.00)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}Table 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{5} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.2977958236658933\textwidth}P{0.4378190255220417\textwidth}P{0.07099767981438515\textwidth}P{0.04338747099767981\textwidth}} Type of Relation\tabcellsep Affected Relatives\tabcellsep Relatives No of Affected\tabcellsep No of cases\\ Only Close Blood Relation\tabcellsep Only Sister\tabcellsep 19\tabcellsep 18\\ Relatives\tabcellsep Only Brother\tabcellsep 51\tabcellsep 42\\ \tabcellsep Only Mother\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 1\\ \tabcellsep Sister + Brother\tabcellsep 88\tabcellsep 34\\ \tabcellsep F+ M+ S+ B+ D+ Son\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 7\\ Only Maternal\tabcellsep M.G.F+ M.G.M+ M.A+\tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep 7\\ Relatives\tabcellsep M.U+ M.C\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Only Paternal\tabcellsep P.G.F + P.G.M + P.A +\tabcellsep 13\tabcellsep 11\\ Relatives\tabcellsep P.U + P.C\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Close blood relation\tabcellsep F+ M+ S+ B+ D+ Son+\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Relatives\tabcellsep P.G.F+ P.G.M+ P.U+ P.A+\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \&\tabcellsep P.C+ M.G.F+ M.G.M+\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Maternal-Paternal\tabcellsep M.A+ M.C+ M.U+ M.N+W\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Relatives\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_4}Table 5 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{6} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.2544910179640718\textwidth}P{0.42245508982035923\textwidth}P{0.11706586826347305\textwidth}P{0.05598802395209581\textwidth}} Type of Relation\tabcellsep Affected Relatives\tabcellsep No of Affected\tabcellsep No of cases\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Relatives\tabcellsep \\ Only Close Blood\tabcellsep Only Sister\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ Relation Relatives\tabcellsep Only Brother\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Only Son\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep Sister + Brother\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep F+ M+ S+ B+ D+ Son\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_5}Table 6 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} 2014\\ Volume XIV Issue I Version I\end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: Year( )]} \caption{\label{tab_6}}\end{figure} \footnote{© 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US)} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Aber et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} ‘Awareness about problems associated with consanguineous marriages: survey among Israeli Arab adolescents’. L Aber , O Romano , G J Halpern , I Livne , M Green , T Shohat . \textit{J. Adolesc. Health} 2005. 36 p. 530. \bibitem[Wright ()]{b23}\label{b23} ‘Coefficient of inbreeding and relationships’. S Wright . \textit{Am. Nat} 1992. 56 p. . \bibitem[Estivill et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Connexin-26 mutations in sporadic and inherited sensorineural deafness’. X Estivill , P Fortina , S Surrey , R Rabionet , S Melchionda , L Agruma , E Mansfield , E Rappaport , N Govea , M Mila , L Zelante , P Gasparini . \textit{Lancet} 1998. 351 p. . \bibitem[Bener and Hussain ()]{b3}\label{b3} ‘Consanguineous unions and child health in the state of Qatar’. A Bener , R Hussain . \textit{Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology} 2006. 20 p. . \bibitem[Zakzauk ()]{b24}\label{b24} ‘Consanguinity and hearing impairment in developing countries: a custom to be discouraged’. S Zakzauk . \textit{J. Laryngol. Otol} 2002. 116 (10) p. . \bibitem[Bittles ()]{b4}\label{b4} ‘Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics’. A H Bittles . \textit{Clin. Genet} 2001. 60 p. . \bibitem[Ansari et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} ‘Consanguinity, as a cause of deafness and hearing impairment in Karachi’. M A Ansari , I Hirani , I A Muhammad , S H Zaidi , J Alam , F Naqvi . \textit{Pakistan. J. Otolaryngol} 2004. 20 (2) p. . \bibitem[Shami et al. ()]{b21}\label{b21} ‘Consanguinity, spousal age at marriage and fertility in seven Pakistani Punjab cities’. S A Shami , L H Schmitt , A H Bittles . \textit{Annals of Human Biology} 1990. 17 p. . \bibitem[Garg et al. ()]{b9}\label{b9} ‘Deafness: Burden, prevention and control in India’. S Garg , S Chadha , S Malhotra , A K Agarwal . \textit{The National Medical Journal of India} 2009. 22 p. . \bibitem[Liu et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} ‘Epidemiological and genetic studies of congenital profound deafness in the general population of Sichuan’. X Liu , L Xu , S Zhang , Y Xu . \textit{China. J. Med. Genet} 1999. 36 p. . \bibitem[Willems ()]{b22}\label{b22} ‘Genetic causes of hearing loss’. P J Willems . \textit{The New England journal of medicine} 2000. 342 (15) p. . \bibitem[Marazita et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} ‘Genetic epidemiological studies of earlyonset deafness in the U.S. school-age population’. M L Marazita , L M Ploughman , B Rawlings , E Remington , K S Arnos , W E Nance . \textit{Am. J. Med. Genet} 1993. 46 p. . \bibitem[Longhitano and Brunoni ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Genetic hearing loss: a study of 228 Brazilian. 15. patients’. S B Longhitano , D Brunoni . \textit{Genetics and Molecular Biology} 2000. 23 (1) p. . \bibitem[Zlotogora and Barges ()]{b25}\label{b25} ‘High incidence of profound deafness in an isolated community’. J Zlotogora , S Barges . \textit{Mary. Ann. Liebert. Inc} 2003. 7 (2) p. . \bibitem[Santos et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} ‘Low prevalence of Connexin 26 (GJB2) variants in Pakistani families with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment’. R L P Santos , M Wajid , T L Pham , J Hussan , G Ali , W Ahmad , S M Leal . \textit{Clin. Genet} 2005. 67 p. . \bibitem[Calapoglu et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} ‘Non syndromic recessive hearing loss linkaged TMPRSS3 gene in the Turkish population’. N S Calapoglu , N Calapoglu , A Karaguzel . \textit{Typ. Fak. Derg} 2005. 12 (3) p. . \bibitem[Park et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} ‘Origins and frequencies of SLC26A4 (PDS) mutations in east and south Asians: global implications for the epidemiology of deafness’. H J Park , S Shaukat , X Z Liu , S H Hahn , S Naz , M Ghosh , H N Kim , S K Moon , S Abe , K Tukamoto , S Riazuddin , M Kabra , R Erdenetungalag , J Radnaabazar , S Khan , A Pandya , S I Usami , W E Nance , E R Wilcox , S Riazuddin , A J Griffith . \textit{Journal of Medical Genetics} 2003. 40 p. . \bibitem[Elahi et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} ‘Paediatric hearing loss in rural Pakistan’. M M Elahi , F Elahi , A Elahi , S B Elahi . \textit{J. Otolaryngol} 1998. 27 (6) p. . \bibitem[Olusanya et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} ‘Progress towards early detection services for infants with hearing loss in developing countries’. B O Olusanya , D W Swanepoel , M J Chapchap , S Castillo , H Habib , S Z Mukari , N V Martinez , H C Lin , B Mcpherson . \textit{BMC. Health. Serv Res} 2007. 7 p. 14. \bibitem[Bafaqeeh et al. ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘Relevant demographic factors and hearing impairment in Saudi children: epidemiological study’. A S Bafaqeeh , S M Zakzouk , H Al-Muhammeid , Essa , R . \textit{The Journal of Laryngology \& Otology} 1994. 108 p. . \bibitem[Reddy et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} ‘Role of consanguinity in congenital neurosensory deafness’. M V V Reddy , H Bindu L , P P Reddy , Rani , PU . \textit{Int. J. Hum. Genet} 2006. 6 (4) p. . \bibitem[Reddy et al. ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘Role of intrauterine Rubella infection in the causation of congenital deafness’. M V V Reddy , L H Bindu , P P Reddy , Rani , PU . \textit{Ind. J. Hum. Genet} 2006. 12 (3) p. . \bibitem[Mehl and Thomson ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘The Colorado newborn hearing-screening project,1992-1999. On the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening’. A L Mehl , V Thomson . \textit{Pediatrics} 2002. 109 (1) p. . \bibitem[Kushki and Zeyghami ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘The effect of consanguineous marriages on congenital malformation’. A M Kushki , B Zeyghami . \textit{Journal of Research in Medical Sciences} 2005. 10 (5) p. . \bibitem[Das ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘The effect of Inbreeding on mortality and morbidity among Telugu-speaking populations of Kharagpur, west Bengal’. B K Das . \textit{India. International Journal of Anthropology} 2006. 21 (2) p. . \bibitem[Hussain and Bittles ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan’. R Hussain , A H Bittles . \textit{J. Biosoc. Sci} 1998. 30 p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}