# Introduction eptic ulcer disease (PUD) is one of the most common gastro intestinal disorders, which causes a high rate of morbidity. An estimated 15,000 deaths occur each year because of PUD. The prevalence of duodenal ulcer is dominant in western population whereas gastric ulcer is more frequent in most Asian countries 1 . The lifetime prevalence of peptic ulcer disease is 5 to 10% with about equal prevalence in men and women. The incidence of ulcer increases with age because of excessive use of NSAIDs and the reduction in the tissue prostaglandins 2 . In India, PUD is common and the Indian pharmaceutical industries share 6.2 billion rupee and occupy 4.3% of the market share in consuming the antacids and antiulcer drugs 3 . Peptic ulcer which is usually an asymptomatic gastrointestinal disorder defined as a breach in the mucosa of the alimentary tract, which extends through the muscularis mucosa into the submucosa or deeper. Peptic ulcer disease commonly occurs when the linings of stomach or proximal duodenum are corroded by the acid-peptic juices which are secreted by the stomach cells 4,5 . Peptic ulcer is caused by H. pylori infection, long term and high doses of drugs such as non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diseases like Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, other factors such as smoking; emotional stress and excessive alcohol consumption also may contribute. In Unani Medicine, gastric ulcer is known as Qarah-e-Medah. Unani scholars mentioned its causes as, Khilte Haad (hot and irritant humour), Fuzlat (waste products), intake of hot and spicy foods, excessive intake of rotten food, alcohol and hard fibrous diet, desensitization of internal surface of stomach which causes excessive gastric secretions, chronic gastritis and indigestion, prolonged stress and strains and unabsorbed gastric secretions. The modern approach to control gastric ulceration is to inhibit gastric acid secretion, to promote gastro protection, to block apoptosis and to stimulate epithelial cell proliferation for effective healing 6 . Hence, Conventional medicine treats Peptic ulcer by proton pump inhibitors (PPI), H2receptor antagonist, antacids and antibiotics for H. pylori. However, there are reports of adverse effects and relapse in the long run 7 that lead people to find the alternative medications. Furthermore, many of these drugs do not fulfill all the beneficial necessities 8 . The clinical evaluation of these drugs showed development of tolerance and incidence of relapse and side effects that make their efficacy debatable. This has been the rationale for the development of new, safe antiulcer drugs. Herbal drugs can provide lead for the development of such antiulcer drugs because these drugs are considered safer in view of their natural ingredients. In recent times, focus on plant research has increased all over the world and a large body of evidence has been collected to show immense potential of medicinal plants used in various traditional systems of medicine. More than 13,000 plants have been studied during the last few years 9 . Unani physicians in the treatment of gastritis, gastric ulcer and associated disorders due to its stomachic, astringent, desiccant, styptic, sedative and coolant activities 10 also use Post Sumaq (Fruit rind of Rhus coriaria Linn.) frequently. However, there is no scientific report regarding its efficacy in PUD. Therefore, the present study was carried out to examine the effect of Post Sumaq in gastric ulcer on animal model. # II. # Material and Methods # Preparation and Dose of the Test Drug The fruits of test drug were dried in shade, the Post (rind) was peeled off, and its therapeutic dose (5gm) as in Unani medicine was used to calculate the dose for experiment 11 . Thus, dose was found to be 580 mg /kg. Since, the test drug was studied at two different doses; therefore a second dose was also calculated by the method of Miller and Tainter (1944) 12 and found to be 990 mg/kg. As the hydro alcoholic extract was used for the study, the dose of the extract was calculated with reference to the dose of crude drug after obtaining the 25% yield percentage of extract. The hydro alcoholic extract of the drug was used in the dose of 145mg/kg and 248mg/kg. Standard drug, Omeprazole (Manufactured in India by Dr Reddys Laboratories Ltd. Village Manuja Thana) was used in the dose of 20mg/kg. IV. # Animals The study was carried out in healthy Wistar rats of either sex, weighing 150-250 gm. The animals were procured from Biogen Laboratory Animal Facility (Reg. No. 971/bc/06/CPCSEA), a registered breeder in Bangalore. They ware acclimatized to the laboratory condition for 7 days before the experimental studies. The rats were housed in polypropylene cages under controlled conditions of light (12/12) and temperature (23±20C) under strict hygienic conditions. The animals were given Standard food pellets (Hindustan Lever Ltd.) and tap water ad libitum. V. # Induction of Gastric Ulcer This test was carried out by the method described by Vogel 13 with minor modification in the treatment schedule. The animals were divided into 8 groups of 6 animals each. The animals in group I were administered with distilled water throughout study and served as Plain control and after 36 hours they were sacrificed while the animals in group II (after 24 hours of fasting) were treated with Indomethacin 20 mg/kg, once daily, orally for 5 days and served as negative control. The animals in group III, IV and V were treated with standard drug Omeprazole and hydro alcoholic extract of test drug in the dose 20 mg/kg, 145mg/kg and 248 mg/kg, respectively and served as pre-treated standard, Pre-treated test group A and Pre-treated test group B, respectively. These treatments were continued fasting ulcer was induced by the administration of Indomethacin in the dose of 20 mg/kg, for the next five days. Food was withdrawn for two hours after Indomethacin administration. On 5th day after 12 hours of fasting, the animals were treated with the last dose of Indomethacin and after five hours of administration of Indomethacin, the animals including negative control were sacrificed. While in Post treated standard and test groups the animals were first kept on fasting for 24 hours and ulcer induced by the administration of Indomethacin in the dose 20 mg/kg, daily for 5 days, thereafter the animals were treated with standard and test drug for next 5 days in the same dose and same manner as described above. On 6th day after 12 hours of fasting, the animals were sacrificed. The water immersion restraint induced gastric ulcer was done by the method of Hayaso and Takeuchi 14 . The animals in this model were also divided in to 8 groups of 6 animals each. The animals in Group I and II were treated with distilled water and were serve as Plain control and Negative control, respectively. While the animals in Group III, IV and V were treated with standard drug, and hydro alcoholic extract of the test drug in the dose of 20 mg/kg, 145mg/kg and 248mg/kg and served as Pre-treated standard, Pre-treated test group A and Pre-treated test group B, respectively. All the animals were treated in this way once daily for 5 days. They had free access to food and water during the treatment period. However, on 4 th day they were kept on fasting for 12 hours with water ad libitum. On 5 th day, 12 hour fasted rats were treated routinely and after one hour of treatment animals in Group I were sacrificed while in rest of the groups, ulcer was induced by water immersion restraint method. Then animals were sacrificed. The animals in Group VI, VII and VIII were also subjected to gastric ulceration in the same manner as mentioned above. After one hour of ulcer induction animals were treated with standard and test drug and served as Post-treated standard group (VI) and Posttreated test group A and group B (VII and VIII) , respectively. All the animals were treated in this manner orally, once daily for five days. On 5 th day, 12 hours fasted animals were treated routinely and after one hour of treatment, they were sacrificed. In all the above methods, the animals were sacrificed under The opent one anesthesia (40 mg/kg, IP). Stomach was removed from the body and opened along with the greater curvature, washed with fresh water and spread on cardboard with the mucous surface upwards. The mucosal surface was examined for ulceration with the help of magnifying lens (10 fold magnification) and scored by the method of Brzozowski et al 15,21,22 . # VI. Assessment of Extent of Ulceration The parameters viz. Ulcer score, ulcer index and reduction percentage in ulcer were taken to assess the for five days; however, on 6th day after 24 hours of anti ulcerogenic effect. Histopathological studies were also carried out to determine the nature and amount of damage and the improvement after treatment. # VII. Statistical Analysis The observations in various groups were expressed as Mean ± SEM. The ulcer score and index of various groups were compared with plain control group. The group comparison was analyzed by using ANOVA one way with Kruskall Wallis and Dunn's pair comparison test. # VIII. # Results Plain control (Group I), showed no pathological sign. In Group II (Negative control) where ulcer was induced by Indomethacin (20mg/kg) once daily for 5 days, the ulcer score was found to be 1.08±0.27. The test drug in low dose were found to be 1.16±0.30 &1.33±0.27 respectively when compared to negative control showed non-significant result. In pre-treated test Group B (Group V), the test drug was given orally in the dose of 248mg/kg ulcer score was found to be 0.66±0.27 with respect to negative control, showed non-significant decrease. In Post treated standard group (Group VI). Ulcer score was found to be 0.66±0.27 (insignificant) with respect to negative control. In Post treated test group A (VII) it was observed 1.08±0.27 (insignificant). In Post treated test group B (VIII) score was found to be 0.33±0. Ulcer score in Negative control was found to be significantly increased (p<0.01) 1.16±0.21 when compared to plain control. The ulcer score in pre-treated standard, test group A and test group B, score was found to be 0.91±0.27, 0.66±0.16, and 0.83±0.21 respectively. No significant reduction was observed when compared to negative control. While in Posttreated Group VI, Group VII and Group VIII first ulcer was graded and ulcer score was found to be 0.41±0.08, # Discussion Gastric ulceration has long been viewed as the disease of stress, hence central nervous system may also play role in production of ulcer by causing hyperacidity. The techniques of restraint in albino rats provide a model for the study of stress induced gastric ulceration. Water immersion induced restraint gastric ulcer model is suitable to see anti stress effect of drugs. Therefore, the test drug was also evaluated by using this model. In Water Immersion Induced restraint gastric ulcer model the test drug was found both precautionary and therapeutic in pre treated and Post treated test Groups at both dose level but the result was statistically non significant. The histopathological findings are also in consonance. The findings indicate that the test drug does not possess anti anxiety properties and the same has not also been mentioned in Unani classics. However, it is clear from the result that the test drug has preventive & curative effect only at higher dose. Phytochemicals in Rhus coraria are ellagic acid, gallic acid isoquercitrin, myricitrin, myricetin, quercetin, quercitrin and tannic acid and flavinoids. Flavonoids protect the gastrointestinal mucosa from lesions produced by experimental ulcer models and different necrotic agents. Several mechanisms of action may be involved in this protective effect. Quercetin has an anti secretary mechanism of action. However, the most important mechanism of action responsible for the antiulcer activity of flavonoids is the antioxidant properties. Tannins are gastro protective which are present in the drug in sufficient amount 16,17 . As per the Unani theories it seems that the drug may have acted by temperament, as the Mizaj of the test drug is cold whereas that of diseases is hot 18,19,20 # Conclusion Results of different experimental models revealed Post Sumaq to be a promising antiulcerogenic drug. The test drug possesses curative effect at higher dose against Indomethacin induced gastric ulcer. In Water Immersion-induced restraint gastric ulcer model the effect was less prominent therefore it can be concluded the test drug does not possess anti anxiety effect as this model produces ulcer due to stress. This is also evident from the literature that Post Sumaq is not used as an anti anxiety. The preventive effect of the test drug was more pronounced. This also validates the claim that herbal drugs are more preventive in nature. The drug is more effective at higher dose; therefore the dose of Post Sumaq should be revised after toxicity studies. XI. 1 2Year 2014ulcer scores in pre-treated standard and test groupsGroups Group I Plain control Group II Negative control Group III Pre-treated Stand Group IV Pre-treated test A Group V Pre-treated test B where the animals were treated with Standard drug & Treatment ADU(Mean± SEM) D W 0.08±0.08 D W + IM 20mg/kg dissolved in CMC 1.08±0.27 Omeprazole 20 mg/ kg + IM 20mg/kg Dissolved in CMC 1.16±0.30 Post Sumaq 145mg/kg+ IM 20mg/kg dissolved in CMC 1.33±0.27 Post Sumaq 248mg/kg IM 20mg/kg dissolved in CMC 0.66±0.27 Group VI IM 20mg/kg. dissolved in 0.66±0.27%RU 17% 100% 100% 100% 67% 50%Ulcer index 0.01 1.25 1.63 1.80 0.44 0.17%Reduction 94 ------7 -19 39 39Volume XIV Issue VII Version I ( B )Post-treated StandCMC+ omeprazole 20 mg/kgGroupVIIIM 20mg/kg. dissolved in CMC1.08±0.27100%1.670Post-treated test A+ Sumaq145 mg/kgGroup VIIIIM 20mg/kg. dissolved in CMC0.33±0.1067%0.2247Post-treated B+ Post Sumaq 248 mg/kg0.75±0.25 and 0.75±0.25 respectively, but nosignificant reduction was observed when compared tonegative control. The ulcer index in Negative control, Preand Post treated standard, test group A and B wasobserved 1.42, 0.76, 0.67, 0.83, 0.35, 0.76, and 0.83respectively and percentage of ulcer reduction wasfound to be 45, 60, 50, 75, 55, and 55 respectively.(Table no 2).GroupsTreatmentADU(Mean± SEM) %RUUlcer index%ReductionGroup ID.W0.08±0.0817%0.0193Plain control © 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US) ## Acknowledgement The authors are highly thankful to the authorities of for providing necessary facilities to carry out this research work. * Gastric duodenal antiulcer activity of alkaloids HSFalcao JALeite JMBarbosa-Filho FPAthayde-Filho Chaves Molecules 13 2008 * Anatomy and physiology in health and Illness RossWilson 2003 323 * Pathphysiology of duodenal and gastric ulcer and gastric cancer JCalam JHBaron Brit Med. J 323 2001 * s essentials of internal medicine HHumes Kelley 200l 2nd ed. Lippincott William and Wilkins * JGLedingham D AWarrell ConciseOxford 2000 Oxford University Press, Inc New York Text book of Medicine * The role of antioxidant activity of Phyllanthus emblica fruits on prevention from Indomethacin induced gastric ulcer SKBandyopadhyay CSatyesh APakrashi Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2000 * Evaluation of anti-ulcer activity of methanolic extract of Terminalia chebula fruits in experimental rats DRaju KIlango VChitra AshishK Journal Pharm. Sci. & Res 3 2009 * Allophylus serratus; A plant with potential anti-ulcerogenic activity PDharmani PKMishra RMaurya VSChauhan GPalit J. Ethno pharmacology 99 2005 * Pharmacology of Medicinal plants and natural products SADahnukar RAKulkarni NNRege Indian Journal of Pharmacology 32 2000 * NGhani KhazainulAdvia Idarah Kitabul Shifa 826 2011 3rd ed * Quantitative comprisom of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey and man EJFreirich EAGehan DPRall LHSchmidt HESkipper Cancer chemotherapy Report 50 4 1966 * L CMiller M LTainter Proc. Soc Expt. Biol, Med 1944 * Drug discovery and evaluation pharmacological Assays HGVogel Springer-verlag Berlin Heidel berg 2002 869 2nd edi * Gastric acid secretion and lesion formation in rats under water immersion stress MHayaso KTakeuchi Dig Dis Sci 1986 31 * Involvement of endogenous cholecystokinin and somatostatin in gastro protection induced by intra duodenal fat TBrzozowski SJKonturek SKwiecien RPajdo IBrzozowski EGHahn J Clin Gastroenterol 27 1998 * Antibacterial activity of Rhus coriaria extracts growing in Palestine BAbu AGhaleb ADauod KSafiya ASAdvan Journal of the Islamic University of Gaza (Natural Science Series) 13 2 2005 * Handbook of Medical Plants JADuke GMBogenschutz JDucellier PakDuke 2003 CRC Press Boca Raton * IHubal Kitabul Mukhtarat FilTibb Urdu translation by CCRUM) 2 nd , 3 rd , New Delhi 2004 1 235 Ministry of H and FW * Unani Description of Sumaq (Rhus Coriaria Linn.) and its Scientific Report AHaqeeq AFaiyaz HIzharul AShabbir Global journal of medical research 7 13 2013 * AHaqeeq AWadud JNasreen KMudasir * Evaluation of Anti-ulcer activity of hydro alcoholic extract of Post Sumaq (Rhus coriaria Linn.) in Ethanol induced Gastric ulcer in experimental Rats SGhulamuddin International Research Journal of Medical Sciences 1 10 2013 * ISina AlQanoon Urdu translation by Kantoori GH) New Delhi 2007 3 New Delhi; Idara Kitabush Shifa * st and 2 nd Deoband RTabri FirdosulHikmat Shah MA 2000 Faisal Publications 1