\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Snodgrass Hypospadius Repair, One Stage Urethroplasty for Mid-Shaft and Distal Hypospadias. Clinical Experience and outcome of 44 Patients},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2014-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2014)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2014-01-15}
\title{Snodgrass Hypospadius Repair, One Stage Urethroplasty for Mid-Shaft and Distal Hypospadias. Clinical Experience and outcome of 44 Patients}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Ibrahim Falih  Noori}

             \affil[1]{  Basra University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 6 December 2013 Accepted: 2 January 2014 Published: 15 January 2014}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


Background : Hypospadias is a common anomaly of male external gentalia. Most cases of hypospadias are distal type. Snodgrass procedure or tubularized incised plate urethroplasty has become the preferable and optimal treatment for primary and distal cases of hypospadias. The aim of this study was to study the effectiveness and evaluate the outcome of Snodgrass procedure presented for 44 patients with distal and mid-shaft hypospadias. Patients and method; from April 2011 to May 2014; 36 patients with distal hypospadias and 8 patients with mid-shaft hypospadias, (total 44 patients) had been submitted to corrective surgery foe their hypospdias by single stage Snodgrass TIP technique. Results: mean age of patients and mean operative time in this study were 2.8±1.8, 52.7±9.4 respectively. The functional and cosmetic results were excellent. The overall complications rate recorded was 13.6%. Urethro-cutaneous fistula developed n 3 patients (6.8%), meatal stenosis occurred in 2 patients (4.5%) while wound infection and dehiscence noted in 3 patients. Penile torsion was not encountered in this study. Conc usion: Snodgrass TIP technique is the most preferable and reliable repair for most patients with primary and distal hypospadias cases. It is simple, safe, effective and versatile with excellent functional and cosmetic results. The compli ations rate s relatively low and acceptable.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{hypospadias, snodgrass operation, tabularized incised plate urethroplasty.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Snodgrass Hypospadius Repair, One Stage}]{Snodgrass Hypospadius Repair, One Stage}\par
Urethroplasty for Mid-Shaft and Distal Hypospadias. Clinical Experience and outcome of 44 Patients 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
Hypospadias is defined as abnormal ventrally placed external urethral meatus. It is typically consisted of three abnormalities. These are: first, ectopic site of urethral meatus, second, ventral curvature of penis, known as chordate and finally hooded foreskin resulting in excess foreskin on the dorsum of penis more than the ventrum \hyperref[b0]{[1]}. Some or all of these abnormalities may occur. Hypospadius may occur in isolation, or be a part of sexual development disorders. It is very important to address the isolated cases of hypospadius than those cases associated with sexual developmental anomalies. \hyperref[b1]{[2]} Hypospadias are among the most common birth anomaly of male genitalia, second only to maldesended testes \hyperref[b2]{[3]}. The incidence of hypospadius is approximately 1 of every 300 live male births and in some families with disorders of sexual differentiation, may be as high as 1 in every 80-100 lives male births. The incidence of hypospadias had been doubled over the last century mainly in the western countries \hyperref[b3]{[4]}.\par
The exact etiology of hypospadius is still unclear \hyperref[b4]{[5]}. Many theories were put to explain the occurrence of hypospadius. These include increased level of androgens or estrogens during embryogenesis or could be a genetic component. The severity of hypospadius is different among patients. It classically classified as proximal, midshaft and distal \hyperref[b5]{[6]}. With proximal hypospadius, the severity of chordee will be more than in distal hypospadias when the extent of chordee, if present, will be very minimal. Distal hypospadias represents the vast majority of the cases. Proximal hypospadias occurs in less than 10\% of the cases \hyperref[b6]{[7]}.\par
Despite its etiology, the treatment of hypospadius in all cases is the same, which is surgical repair. There have been over 200 different operations for correction of hypospadias \hyperref[b7]{[8]}. Most of these surgeries can be categorized into one to three types of surgeries. These include correction of chordee (orthoplasty), reconstruction of the missing piece of distal urethra ( urethroplasty)and reconstruction of the ventral side of penis (meatoplasty and glanuloplasty). The most commonly practiced surgical procedures for hypospadias repair are MAGPI (Meatal advancement and glanuloplasty) for glanular hypospadias, Thiersch Duplay Mathieu, and Snodgrass (TIP procedure) \hyperref[b8]{[9]}. In this study, we discuss and evaluate our experience regarding the functional and cosmetic outcomes of TIP repair (Tubularized incised plate) or Snodgrass repair done for 44 patients with distal and mid shaft hyospadias, in addition to the rate of main complications. The vast majority of the hypospadias in this study were distal type (36 patients) and only 8 patients have midshaft hypospasias. All patients in this study were examined preoperatively for the presence of chordee which was further confirmed during surgical repair by inducing artificial erection. Primary hypospadias only were included in this study. Children with history of previous failed hypospadias corrective surgery, those with concomitant urogenital anomalies and history of prior circum cision were excluded. All the operations had been done by same surgeon. The hospital stay in this study ranged from 2 to 5 days (average 3.5 days). Patients after discharge were followed week after surgery, then every 2 weeks for the first 2 months and every month for the first year to assess the functional and cosmetic outcome and to detect any complications. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Patients and Methods}]{Patients and Methods} 
\section[{Operative technique}]{Operative technique}\par
The operative procedure of Snodgrass TIP hypospadias repair can be summarized by the following steps: first, the appropriate set-up and fine instruments and equipment is essential to a successful hypospadias surgery. The main set-up and equipments include fine pickups and needle drivers such as a Castroviejo type, fine knife such as Weck knife, fine sutures such as 5-0, 6-0 Vicryl and PDS sutures and flexible feeding catheter of appropriate size.\par
The operation is carried out under general anesthesia. Initially, the penis is prepped and draped in sterile fashion. Adhesions between the dorsal hood and glans are broken down and re-prepped again with povidone iodine. The presence of significant chordee after the adhesion is taken down becomes clear and evident. The presence of significant chordee is usually caused by shortage of skin on the ventral side or it may result from fibrous band which extends from the base of the penis along the lateral side and rarely, due to urethral plate tethering the penis or due to corporal body disproportion. The first step in TIP Snodgrass procedure is to put a traction suture in the glans penis. Traction suture allows the penis to be placed on ample tension so the tissue can be divided accurately. After that, hypospadias repair is mapped out. The urethral plate is first mapped out, next, marking is extended proximally and laterally to form firlit collar, the marking is extended onto dorsum of penis in circumferential manner. A soft catheter is inserted through the ectopic urethral opening to visualize the location and quality of the urethral meatus.\par
The operation began by degloving of penis. The more distal portion of the urethral meatus is usually very hypoplastic. Therefore, the meatus has to be cut back to site of adequate corpos spongiosm tissue covering the urethra. Tourniquet is placed at the base of penis to control the blood loss for better visualization of surgical field. The tourniquet used is a rubber band placed over gauze to prevent excessive compression of the urethra but allow adequate haemostasis.\par
The next step of procedure is isolation of urethral plate by making a U-shaped incision using a very sharp and fine knife like a Weck knife extending along the edges of urethral plate to healthy skin 2 mm proximal to meatus and the incision should be made perpendicular to the urethral plate down into glans while the glans is placed on traction to allow for a straight and vertical incision rather than a skiving incision that may affect the quality of urethral plate. The incision of urethral plate should not be extended too distal in the glans as it may result in meatal stenosis. After the incisions are made on both sides of urethral plate, it is extended circumferentially on the dorsum of penis. The incision is carried along the firlit collar to develop 3mm mucosal cuff that can be re-approximated over the tubularized urethra and to give a penis a more normal circumcised appearance. The circumferential incision should be sharp and all subcutaneous tissue is left with the dorsal foreskin, so it will be harvested as a sub-dartos flap.\par
The process of dissection and degloving should be continued to the peno-scrotal junction both on the ventral and dorsal side. The urethra should be carefully seen during dissection to avoid its injury proximally. Laterally, the fibrous bands, if present, must be taken down to correct the chordee. The presence of chordee is confirmed operatively by inducing artificial erection with normal saline infusion of corpus spongiosus.The incisions lateral to the urethral plate is deepened to form glans wings, which can be rotated ventrally and reapproximated and sutured in the midline.\par
Next in the procedure, is the tubularization of urethral plate which begins by making a midline incision in the urethral plate to increase the circumference and allow tubularization of the urethral plate easily with 6-0PDS or Vycril over appropriate size and flexible catheter, usually of 6 to 8 Fr. size. The midline plate incision should not extend beyond the mid of glans penis to avoid meatal stenosis and to give the neomeatus more vertical and slit-like shape. All sutures should be in subcuticular fashion to ensure good approximation and healing. The second layer of the dartos pedicle flap is then obtained from the subcutaneous tissue of the dorsal preputial skin and transported ventrally through a buttonhole in the dartos flap which is sutured over the neourethra.\par
Glans wings are then approximated for galnuloplasty. Lastly Byars flap is made for ventral skin cover with creation of midline skin raphe and the access skin is cut and trimmed to give the penis the circumcised appearance. At the end of the procedure, gauze dressing was applied. Catheter and dressing removed 7 to 10 days post-operatively.  
\section[{III. Results}]{III. Results}\par
All 44 patients underwent Snodgrass TIP repair. The positions of the ectopic urethral meatus were coronal in \hyperref[b13]{15}  The functional and cosmetic results with a normal looking slit-like vertical shaped meatus at the tip of glans were achieved in all 44 patients. The overall complication rate in this study was 13.6 \%( 6 patients).\par
Urethrocutaneous fistula was recorded in 3 patients (6.8\%) in this study. The location of these fistulas was midshaft in 2 patients and subcoronal (distal) in one patient. Reoperation was needed for only one midshaft fistula 3 months after the first surgery and the operation was successful with good results. The other 2 cases were managed conservatively by urethral dilatation and insertion of urethral catheter which was fixed and kept for 2 weeks and the fistula closed spontaneously.\par
Meatal stenosis in this study was occurred in 2 patients (4.5\%) manifested as poor urinary stream 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. These stenoses were managed conservatively by serial and regular dilatation of urethra and meatoplasty was not needed.\par
Skin dehiscence and disruption was recorded in 3 patients (6.8\%), two of them was associated with fistula formation and one cases due to wound infection. The dehiscence however was small and partial and treated conservatively by treatment of associated fistula and infection.\par
Penile torsion was not encountered in any patients in this study. Regarding the cosmetic outcomes 3 months was very satisfactory. The external urethral meatus was vertical, slit-like and centrally located in all patients.  
\section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par
Hypospadia is very common congenital abnormalties of external genitalia in males. The severity of this disorder varies among boys according to the position of ectopic urethral meatus, on which, it is mainly classified in to proximal, midshaft and distal types. About 90\% 0f children have the distal type of hypospadias  {\ref [10]}. The surgical aims of any hypospadias surgery are complete straightening of penis during erection, creation of neourethra which should be hairless and of adequate size and lumen, slitlike, vertical and centrally located urethral neomeatus, urination with a straight normal flow, well aimed stream, cosmetically acceptable penile appearance and lastly the surgery should be with few complications \hyperref[b9]{[11]}. More than 200 operations or their modifications had been described for correction of hypospadias but none of these operations have met the above criteria or considered as gold standared for all patients and for all types of hypospadias, thus hypospadias surgery still one of urosurgical \hyperref[b10]{[12]}.\par
The tabularized incised plate (TIP) repair was introduced by Snodgrass 1994 \hyperref[b11]{[13]}. It depends on previous principle of urethral plate tubularization which is known as the Thiersch-duplay operation. The main limitation of this type of hypospadias repair was the narrow width of the urethral plate, so that the urethral groove was not wide enough for insitu tubularization. The Snodgrass repair is based on the fact that the midline incision into the urethral plate will widen it sufficiently allowing for urethroplasty without stricture Snodgrass TIP urethroplasty is a single stage corrective procedure with excellent short-term and longterm functional and cosmetic outcomes with relatively few complications \hyperref[b12]{[14]}.\par
The age of most patients in this study were below 3 years ( mean age 2.8±1.8 years) which was comparable to the age reported by Saleem et al \hyperref[b13]{[15]} and Anwar-ul-haq et al \hyperref[b14]{[16]} and less than the age reported by Raashid H et al \hyperref[b15]{[17]} in their comparative study of Snodgrass and Mathieus procedure for primary hypospadias repair. The position of ectopic urethral meatus was distal in the majority of our patients, 36 patients (81.8\%) in this study presented with coronal and subcoronal (distal) type and only 8 patients presented with midshaft hypospadias. These findings were consistent with that recorded by Sugerman et al \hyperref[b16]{[18]}, Cheng et al \hyperref[b17]{[19]} and Bath et al \hyperref[b18]{[20]}.\par
Chordee in this study was noted in 12 patients (27.3\%). The degree of chordee, however, was minimal in all cases. Patients with severe chordee were not included in this study. The incidence of associated chordee with hypospadias was different in various similar studies. It ranged from 100\% in the study of Tonvichien and Niramis \hyperref[b19]{[21]} to 0\% in similar study of Snodgrass procedure for various types of hypospadias conducted by Hombalkar et al \hyperref[b20]{[22]}. The presence of chordee was noted in 19.9\% in Singh et al study \hyperref[b21]{[23]} and was recorded in 35\% in Sweet et al series \hyperref[b22]{[24]}. We believe that the peresence of severe degree of chordee is associated with increased risk of urethrocutaneous fistulas postoperatively and so, patients with such findings should be excluded for Snodgrass repair.\par
The complications of hypospadias surgery are not infrequent. These include urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, urethral strictures, wound infection and dehiscence, penile torsion, and cosmetically unacceptable penile appearance. The most feared and undesirable complication is the formation of urethrocutaneous fistula.Selection of the patients is very important for successful hypospadias surgery. Since the introduction the principle of incising the urethral plate by Rich et al  {\ref [25]} in 1989, it was mostly used for distal type and less commonly the midshaft hypospadias for better cosmetic results of hypospadias repair.\par
Snodgrass developed this procedure by extending the urethral plate incision from the ectopic meatus to the tip of the glans in order to construct a new urethra from the already existing urethral plate. Presently, this procedure has gained popularity and wide acceptance among surgeons for correction of distal type of hypospadias because of its simplicity, versatility, less complications rate,and reliability to form vertical slit-like meatus. Although this procedure can be applied for patients with proximal type of hypospadias, it is better to be avoided in these patients with proximal type and also in those with significant and severe chordee in order to decrease the incidence of complications.\par
The overall complications rate in this study was 13.6\%. Certain precautions had been adapted in this study to decease the incidence of unwanted complications. These include: delicate and gentle tissue handling, preservation of periurethral vascular supply which is very essential for procedure success by avoiding the use of cautery, but instead, we applied a rubber tourniquet over a piece of gauze at the base of penis in order to achieve relatively bloodless field, avoidance any tension, usage of magnification loupe, the use adequate length and well vascularized dorsal subdartos to avoid tension and necrosis of the flap and the use of appropriate size and flexible catheter to stent the neourethra and prevent obstruction and stenosis. By using these measured in our series, we obtained satisfactory results and acceptable complications rate of 6 in 44 patients which was less than the complications rate reported by Shanberg et al \hyperref[b23]{[26]} and Borer et al \hyperref[b24]{[27]} which were 15\% and 24\% respectively.\par
The incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula after Snodgrass repair in this study was 6.8\%. Zhou et al \hyperref[b25]{[28]} recorded 12.5\% urethrocutaneous fistula after Snodgrass TIP repair. The rate of urethrocutaneous fistula noted by Cheng et al \hyperref[b17]{[19 ]} and Akmal et al \hyperref[b26]{[29]} Volume XIV Issue VI Version I was ranging from 0.6\% to 16\% while Jayanthi VR \hyperref[b27]{[30]} and Ikramuddin et al \hyperref[b28]{[31]} reported a fistula rate of 1\% and 2\% respectively. Uzair M et al \hyperref[b29]{[32]} reported post Snodgrass repair urethrocutaneous fistula rate of 9.6\%. It had been suggested that several factors affect the formation of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery. The main factors are the type of surgical procedure, patient age, severity of hypospadias, surgeon experience, tissue handling, presence and degree of chordee, and construction of waterproof urethroplasty. Snodgrass \hyperref[b11]{[13]} has recommended two layer urethral palate closures to decease the fistula formation. He found that the incidence of urethrocutanous fistula decrease from 33\% to 11\% or even less when two layer urethroplasty was performed. Snodgrass also added that the incidence of fistula can be reduced to nearly 0\% when the two layer urethroplasty was covered with a tunica vaginalis flap instead of dartos flap. Willcox et al \hyperref[b30]{[33]} suggested in his study that the incidence if fistula formation will be reduced when a second layer of well vascularized pedicle subcutaneous layer from dorsal hooded prepuce to cover the neourethra.\par
Alsharbaini R et al \hyperref[b31]{[34]} noted in his series of 320 cases of distal and midshaft hypospadias treated by Snodgrass urethroplasty that the rate of fistula formation is related to the extent of urethral plate incision with lower incidence of fistula in those patients in whom the the incision extended to mid-glans than in those patients with incision extended to tip of glans. On the other hand, Khairi A et al \hyperref[b32]{[35]} showed in his series that the thickness of the flap was an important factor in fistula prevention. They found that the flap when thick, nontransparent, allowing bulky vascular flap to be laid over the neourethra decreased the incidence of fistula.\par
Perlumutter et al \hyperref[b33]{[36]} have been suggested that age at operation has an effect on the development of fistula. He noted that the fistula formation was significantly lower in patients less than 6 months than in older patients. In our study, all children who developed urethrocutaneous fistula were more than 2 year old.\par
Meatal stenosis after corrective hypospadias surgery is usually due technical reasons. The incidence of meatal stenosis in this study was 4.5\% (2 patients only) which was treated conservatively by regular dilatation. Snodgrass \hyperref[b6]{[7,}\hyperref[b7]{8,}\hyperref[b11]{13]} recorded meatal stenosis rate less than 1\% and the lumen of neourethra was adequate which allow the introduction of 10 Fr easily. O´Connor et al \hyperref[b34]{[37]} reported a high rate of meatal stenosis in their similar study. About 21\% of their patients developed meatal stenosis which required correction under general anesthesia. Bath et al \hyperref[b18]{[20]} noted that 6\% of their patients had meatal stenossis post Snodgrass repair. Raashid H et al \hyperref[b15]{[17]} reported that meatal stenosis rate of 5.3\% in their series of TIP hypospadias repair. Holland et al \hyperref[b35]{[38]} in their study of 59 patients submitted to Snodgrass repair reported meatal stenosis rate of 5\%in Gurdal et al \hyperref[b36]{[39]} study of 70 patients, only one patient developed meatal stenosis who required meatomy.\par
Alshabaini R et al \hyperref[b31]{[34]} and Khairi A et al \hyperref[b32]{[35]} concluded that extending the plate incision to the neomeatus site is a predisposing factor for meatal stenosis. They found that when a shorter urethral plate incision to the mid-glans is adapted and when neomeatus was not included in the urethral plate incision, the rate of meatal stenosis will be reduced. Besides, the appearance of the neomeatus was cosmetically better as vertical slit-like shape.\par
The rate of urethral stricture reported by many authors \{7, \hyperref[b37]{40,}\hyperref[b38]{41,}\hyperref[b39]{42,} {\ref 43,}\hyperref[b40]{44]} after Snodgrass repair were low. The longitudinal incision in the urethral plate described by Snodgrass is important invention of hypospdias corrective surgery. It permits urethral plate preservation and facilitate the formation of tension free tubularization of narrow urethral plate to form a neouretha of good size. The low rate of urethral stricture after Snodgrass operation could be explained according to Bluestein et al \hyperref[b41]{[45]} by the fact that the healing of midline incision of urethral plate occurred by reepitheliazation with normal tissue in-growth without scaring or stricture. Snodgrass had shown in his series that the re-epithelization occurs by second intention after incision of urethral plate, so that the meatal stenosis and urethral strictures is unlikely to occur after TIP repair especially for distal type of hypospadias.\par
Penile torsion was not recorded in our study. This could be explained by the fact that patients with sever chordee were excluded. The chordee in our patients was absent or of minimal degree. Other factor which prevents the development of torsion was the way by which the dorsal preputial flap is transferred ventrally. This way entailed formation of window in the midline of the flap through which the penile shaft transferred to pull and transfer the dartos flap ventrally over neourethra. The rates of penile torsion in Al-Hunayan et al \hyperref[b42]{[46]} and Soygur et al \hyperref[b43]{[47]} studies of Snodgrass TIP repair were similar to our results. The extent effect of penile degloving on the rate of penile torsion is an issue of controversy. Degloving in our study was complete and extended to penoscrotal junction and induction of artificial erection was done to prevent postoperative torsion. Same trend was recommended by Snodgrass \hyperref[b11]{[13]} and Sozubir \hyperref[b44]{[48]}, while Turialis et al \hyperref[b45]{[49]} advised limited extent of degloving to decrease the length of the covering dorsal flap of the neourethra.\par
The functional and cosmetic results of Snodgrass repair in our study were excellent (100\%). Re-operation was needed for one patient only who developed wound dehiscence and fistula formation. Our results were in agreement with those of Bath et al \hyperref[b18]{[20]}, Jayanthi VR \hyperref[b27]{[30]}, and Stehr et al \hyperref[b46]{[50]}. There are two important criteria in order to obtain good functional and cosmetic results: the urethra plate should not be less than 1 cm wide and there should be no associated severe chordee. Furthermore, the cosmetic and functional results in a study conducted by Abolyosor \hyperref[b47]{[51]}, all 156 boys with distal and midshaft hypospadias repaired by Snodgrass repair had satisfied with the cosmetic and functional outcomes. Aslam R et al \hyperref[b48]{[52]} who conducted a single-stage Snodgrass hyposadias repair for 74 patients with distal hypospadias recorded that only 2 patients showed residual bulkiness of skin around the corona with additional 2 patients developed meatal stenosis but with no functional symptoms.\par
Lastly, several studies were conducted to compare between Snodgrass and Mathieu technique regarding the outcomes and complications. Anwar-ulhaq et al \hyperref[b14]{[16]}, Oswald J et al \hyperref[b38]{[41]}, Guo Y et al \hyperref[b49]{[53]}, Hashem M et al \hyperref[b50]{[54]} and Moradi M et al \hyperref[b39]{[42]} noted that in their comparative studies that Snodgrass repair technique were superior on Mathieu technique, while in other 2 studies done by Germiyanoglu C et al \hyperref[b51]{[55]} and Ververidis M et al  {\ref [43]}showed no difference between the two techniques in respect to complications but the cosmetic and functional results were better In Snodgrass repair.  
\section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par
Since the introduction of Snodgrass tabularized incised plate urethroplasty in 1994, this operation had gained a wide acceptance and popularity. It is simple, versatile and effective corrective surgery for patients with distal and mid-shaft hypospadias which constitute the vast majority of patients. The functional and cosmetic results of this technique which are the main concern to parents and patients are usually excellent. The rate of the main postoperative complications, namely, urethracutaneous fistula and meatal stenosis is usually low and acceptable. We advise Snodgrass TIP repair as first choice operation for all boys with distal and mid-shaft hypospadias.  
\section[{Volume XIV Issue VI Version I}]{Volume XIV Issue VI Version I}\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_3}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.33958333333333335\textwidth}P{0.04583333333333334\textwidth}P{0.41875\textwidth}P{0.04583333333333334\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{surgery for their hypospadias by Snodgrass TIP}\tabcellsep \\
procedure.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Year 2014\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep ypo\\
\tabcellsep ate\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep in 3\tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{s (4.5 5\%)}\tabcellsep \\
3\tabcellsep ti nt . .\tabcellsep \\
y. o on n\tabcellsep ion n:\tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{le distal ypo o versatile h excel ll l nt rel li ia abl le s e co li tio o r i}\tabcellsep h\tabcellsep D D D D ) I (\\
.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
c\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
abn\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
s t\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep This is a prospective study conducted in one\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep major hospital in Basra, Iraq from April 2011 to May\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2014, in which 44 consecutive male children presented\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep with primary hypospadias submitted to correction\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.5755208333333334\textwidth}P{0.11067708333333334\textwidth}P{0.16380208333333335\textwidth}}
P Patients characters and site of\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep Mean, \%\\
ectopic urethral meatus\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Patient age (mean)\tabcellsep 8 months-12\tabcellsep 2.8±1.8 years\\
\tabcellsep years\tabcellsep \\
Presence of chordee\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep 27.3\\
Coronal\tabcellsep 15\tabcellsep 34.1\\
Sub-coronal or distal\tabcellsep 21\tabcellsep 47.7\\
Mid-shaft\tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep 18.2\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.4956842105263158\textwidth}P{0.14494736842105263\textwidth}P{0.11094736842105263\textwidth}P{0.09842105263157895\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{3}{l}{mid-shaft in 8 cases. Mean age in this study was}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Year 2014\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 18.2 2\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{w w}\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep D D D D ) I\\
pa\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep (\\
Operative details Operative time Hospital stay Overall complications Urethra-cutaneous fistula Meatal steanosis 2 : t t i i E e ails s\tabcellsep mints. 2-5 days 6 3 2\tabcellsep Mean ,\% 52.7±9.4 3.5 days 13.6 6.8 4.5 mints.\tabcellsep Global Journal of Medical Research\\
Wound dehiscence\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep 6.8\tabcellsep \\
Penile torsion\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep \\
Position and shape of neomeatus.\tabcellsep Central,\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep vertical and\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep slit-like\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Functional and cosmetic outcome\tabcellsep Very\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep satisfactory-\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep excellent\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: 21Volume XIV Issue VI Version I © 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US)]} 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.20256410256410257\textwidth}P{0.049999999999999996\textwidth}P{0.11282051282051282\textwidth}P{0.06923076923076923\textwidth}P{0.06153846153846154\textwidth}P{0.05641025641025641\textwidth}P{0.15897435897435896\textwidth}P{0.13846153846153847\textwidth}}
O Operative\tabcellsep Sample\tabcellsep Mean\tabcellsep Overall\tabcellsep Fistula\tabcellsep Meatal\tabcellsep Shape\tabcellsep Cosmesis\\
outcomes\tabcellsep size\tabcellsep age\tabcellsep complications\tabcellsep formation\tabcellsep stenosis\tabcellsep of neo-\tabcellsep outcome\\
Literature\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep (months)\tabcellsep (\%)\tabcellsep (\%)\tabcellsep (\%)\tabcellsep meatus\tabcellsep \\
Samuel [4]\tabcellsep 65\tabcellsep 14 m.\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
Anwar-ul-haq\tabcellsep 45\tabcellsep 36 m.\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
{}[16]\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Cheng[19]\tabcellsep 414\tabcellsep \textunderscore \tabcellsep 0.2\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep 0.2\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
Rashid [17]\tabcellsep 52\tabcellsep 6.2 y.\tabcellsep 11.5\tabcellsep 5.76\tabcellsep 5.3\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Good\\
Bath[20]\tabcellsep 16\tabcellsep 2.6\tabcellsep 12\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
Jayanthi [30]\tabcellsep 110\tabcellsep 9.5m.\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 0.9\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
Alsharbaini[34]\tabcellsep 320\tabcellsep 18m\tabcellsep 14.1\tabcellsep 2.5\tabcellsep 3.1\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
Moradi [42]\tabcellsep 33\tabcellsep 7.06\tabcellsep 12.6\tabcellsep 13.3\tabcellsep 6.6\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
Sozubir [48\}\tabcellsep 75\tabcellsep 20\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep 0\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
Aslam[52]\tabcellsep 74\tabcellsep 3.5y.\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep 2.7\tabcellsep 2.7\tabcellsep Vertical\tabcellsep Good\\
Gue [53]\tabcellsep 36\tabcellsep \textunderscore \tabcellsep 22.2\tabcellsep 8.3\tabcellsep 5.6\tabcellsep Vertical\tabcellsep Good\\
Ours\tabcellsep 44\tabcellsep 2.8\tabcellsep 13.6\tabcellsep 6.8\tabcellsep 4.5\tabcellsep Slit-like\tabcellsep Excellent\\
V.\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{Snodgrass Hypospadius Repair, One Stage Urethroplasty for Mid-Shaft and Distal Hypospadias. Clinical Experience and outcome of 44 Patients} 		 		\backmatter  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Sozbir and Snodgrass ()]{b44}\label{b44} 	 		‘A new algorithm for primary hypospadias repair based on TIP urethroplasty’.  		 			S Sozbir 		,  		 			W Snodgrass 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Pediatr Surg}  		2003. 38 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Al-Hunayan et al. ()]{b42}\label{b42} 	 		‘Almukhtar RS. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: Modification and outcome’.  		 			A A Al-Hunayan 		,  		 			E O Kehinde 		,  		 			M A Elsalam 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int Nephrol}  		2003. 35 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Snodgrass ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Changing concept in hypospadias repair’.  		 			W T Snodgrass 		.  	 	 		\textit{Curr Opin Urol}  		1999. 9 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Holland et al. ()]{b35}\label{b35} 	 		‘Clinical review of the Snodgrass hypospadias repair’.  		 			A J Holland 		,  		 			G H Smith 		,  		 			D T Cass 		.  	 	 		\textit{Aust N Z J Surg}  		2000. 70 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Saleem et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Comparative study between tabularized incised plate( Snodgrass) urethroplasty and reverse flap (Mathieu) repair in distal hypospadies’.  		 			M S Saleem 		,  		 			M S Rasool 		,  		 			Pantosa 		,  		 			S A Tabasum 		.  	 	 		\textit{Annals of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences}  		2012. 6 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Anwar-Ul-Haq et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		‘Comparative study of Mathieu and Snodgrass repair of anterior hypospadias’.  		 			Anwar-Ul-Haq 		,  		 			N Akhter 		,  		 			Nilofer 		,  		 			Javeria Samiullah 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Ayub M Coll Abbottabted}  		2006. 18 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Raashid et al. ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Comparative study of Snodgrass and Mathieu procedure for primary hypospadias repair’.  		 			H Raashid 		,  		 			A Aejaz 		,  		 			Baba 		,  		 			H Altaf 		,  		 			Shera 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/249765}{10.1155/2014/249765}.  	 	 		\textit{ISRN}  		2014. p. 249765.  	 
\bibitem[Guo et al. ()]{b49}\label{b49} 	 		‘Comparison of Mathieu and the Snodgrass urethroplasty in distal hypospadias repair’.  		 			Y Guo 		,  		 			G Ma 		,  		 			Z Ge 		.  	 	 		\textit{Nat J Androl}  		2004. 10 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Moradi et al. ()]{b39}\label{b39} 	 		‘Comparison of Snodgrass and Mathieu surgical techniques in anterior distal shaft hypospadias repair’.  		 			M Moradi 		,  		 			A Moradi 		,  		 			F ; M Ghaderpanah 		,  		 			A P Dickson 		,  		 			D C Gough 		.  	 	 		\textit{Urology journal}  		2005. 2005. 2  (1)  p. .  	 	 (BJU Int) 
\bibitem[Imamoglu and Bakirtas ()]{b37}\label{b37} 	 		‘Comparison of two methods-Mathieu and Snodgrass-in hypospadias repair’.  		 			M A Imamoglu 		,  		 			H Bakirtas 		.  	 	 		\textit{Urol Int}  		2003. 71 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Borer and Retik ()]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		‘Current trend in hypospadias repair’.  		 			J G Borer 		,  		 			A B Retik 		.  	 	 		\textit{Urol Clin North Am}  		1999. 26 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Samuel et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Distal hypospadias: which repair?’.  		 			M Samuel 		,  		 			S Capps 		,  		 			A Worthy 		.  	 	 		\textit{Br J Urol Int}  		2002. 90 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Uzair et al. ()]{b29}\label{b29} 	 		‘Frequency of urethrocutaneous following Snodgrass hypospadias repair in children’.  		 			M Uzair 		,  		 			M Ahmed 		,  		 			M Hussain 		,  		 			M Yonnus 		,  		 			K Khan 		,  		 			K Khan 		.  	 	 		\textit{J pPostgrad Med Inst}  		2013. 27  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sweet et al. ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		‘Hinging the urethral plate in hypospadias in hypospadias meatoplasty’.  		 			R A Sweet 		,  		 			H G Schroht 		,  		 			R Kurland 		,  		 			Os ; Culp 		,  		 			A M Rich 		,  		 			M A Keating 		,  		 			Syder Hm 		,  		 			J W Duckett 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		1989. 142 p. .  	 	 (Study of the incidence of hypospadiasin Rochester 25) 
\bibitem[Akmal et al. ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		‘Hypospadias repair: seven years experience at Allied Hospital Faisalabad’.  		 			M Akmal 		,  		 			S H Javed 		,  		 			G M Subhani 		,  		 			A A Jafari 		,  		 			N Ashraf 		,  		 			M Hussain 		.  	 	 		\textit{Ann Punjab Med Coll}  		2008. 2 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Manzoni et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Hypospadias surgery: When, what and by whom?’.  		 			G Manzoni 		,  		 			A Bracka 		,  		 			E Palminteri 		,  		 			G Marrocco 		.  	 	 		\textit{BJU Int}  		2004. 94 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Perlumtter et al. ()]{b33}\label{b33} 	 		‘Impact of patient age on distal hypospadiasrepair: Asurgical perspective’.  		 			A E Perlumtter 		,  		 			R Morabito 		,  		 			W F Tarry 		.  	 	 		\textit{Urology}  		2006. 68 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Gurdal et al. ()]{b36}\label{b36} 	 		‘Intermediate-term functional and cosmetic results of the Snodgrass procedure in distal and midpenile hypospadias’.  		 			M Gurdal 		,  		 			A Tekin 		,  		 			S Kirecci 		,  		 			F Sengor 		.  	 	 		\textit{Pediatr Surg INT}  		2004. 20 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Germiyanglu et al. ()]{b51}\label{b51} 	 		‘Investigation of factors affecting result of distal hypospadias repair: Comparison of two techniques’.  		 			C Germiyanglu 		,  		 			B Nuhoglu 		,  		 			A Ayyildiz 		,  		 			K T Akgul 		.  	 	 		\textit{Urology}  		2006. 68 p. .  	 
\bibitem[O´connor and Keily ()]{b34}\label{b34} 	 		‘Lessons learned using Snodgrass hypospadias repair’.  		 			K M O´connor 		,  		 			E A Keily 		.  	 	 		\textit{Irish J Med Sci}  		2006. 175 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Singh and Pavithran ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		‘Lessons learnt from Snodgrass tip urethroplasty: A study of 75 cases’.  		 			R B Singh 		,  		 			N M Pavithran 		.  	 	 		\textit{Pediatr Surg Int}  		2004. 20 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Wilcox and Snodgrass ()]{b30}\label{b30} 	 		‘Long-term outcome following hypospadias repair’.  		 			D Wilcox 		,  		 			W Snodgrass 		.  	 	 		\textit{World J Urol}  		2006. 24 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bleustein et al. ()]{b41}\label{b41} 	 		‘Mechanism of healing following Snodgrass repair’.  		 			C B Bleustein 		,  		 			M P Esposito 		,  		 			R A Soslow 		,  		 			D Felsen 		,  		 			D P Poppas 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		2001. 165 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Aslam et al. ()]{b48}\label{b48} 	 		‘Medium and long-term results following single stag Snodgrass hypospadias repair’.  		 			R Aslam 		,  		 			K Campbell 		,  		 			S Wharton 		,  		 			A Braka 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg}  		2013. 66 p. .  	 
\bibitem[42-El-Kassaby et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Modified tubularized incised plate urethroplastyfor hypospadias repair: long-term results of 764 patients’.  		 			A W 42-El-Kassaby 		,  		 			Al-Kandari Am El-Zayat 		,  		 			T Shokeir 		,  		 			AA 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		2008. 71 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Oswald et al.]{b38}\label{b38} 	 		 			J Oswald 		,  		 			I Korner 		,  		 			M Riccabonna 		.  		\textit{Comparison of perimeatal-based flap (Mathieu) and the},  				 	 
\bibitem[Guralnic et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Outcome of hypospadias repair using the tabularized incised plate urethroplasty’.  		 			M L Guralnic 		,  		 			A Shammari 		,  		 			P E Willot 		,  		 			M P Leonard 		.  	 	 		\textit{Can J NUrol}  		2000. 7 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hesham ()]{b50}\label{b50} 	 		‘Primay distal hypospadias repair: Tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty( Snodgrass) versus the perimeatal-based flap ( Mathieu)’.  		 			M Hesham 		.  	 	 		\textit{Egypt J Plast Reconstr Surg}  		2004. 28 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Shangbergam and Duel ()]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		‘re-operative hypospadiias repair using the Snodgrass incised plate urethroplasty’.  		 			Sanderson K Shangbergam 		,  		 			B Duel 		.  	 	 		\textit{BJU Int}  		2001. 87 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Abolyosor ()]{b47}\label{b47} 	 		‘Snodgrass hypospadias repair with onlay overlapping double-layered doesal dartos flap without urethrocutaneous fistula: Experience of 156 cases’.  		 			A Abolyosor 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Pedatr Urol}  		2010. 6  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Cheng et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		‘Snodgrass hypospadias repair with vascularized dartos flap: The perfect repair of virgin cases of hypospadias’.  		 			E Y Cheng 		,  		 			S N Vemulapali 		,  		 			B P Kropp 		,  		 			J C Pope 		,  		 			P D Furness 		,  		 			W E Kaplan 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		2002. 168 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Soygor et al. ()]{b43}\label{b43} 	 		‘Snodgrass hypospadias repair with ventral based dartos flap in combination with mucosal collars’.  		 			T Soygor 		,  		 			N Arikan 		,  		 			A E Zumrutbas 		,  		 			O Gulpinar 		.  	 	 		\textit{Eur Urol}  		2005. 47 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Zhou et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		‘Snodgrass procedure for primary hypospadias repair’.  		 			Y Zhou 		,  		 			J Lu 		,  		 			G Takarashi 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		2002. 9 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hombalkar et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		‘SNODGRASS procedure-A Versatile technique for various type of hypospadias repir’.  		 			N Hombalkar 		,  		 			P Guray 		,  		 			P Dhandor 		,  		 			R Parmar 		.  	 	 		\textit{JKIMSU}  		2013. 2 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Khairi ()]{b32}\label{b32} 	 		\textit{Snodgrass repair for distal hypospadias: a review of 75 cases. Annal of Pediatric surgery},  		 			A Khairi 		.  		2012. 8 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ikramuddin and Yunas ()]{b28}\label{b28} 	 		‘Snodgrass repair of anterior hypospadias’.  		 			Obaidlla Ikramuddin 		,  		 			M Yunas 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Postgrad Med Inst}  		2008. 22 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Snodgrass ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘Snodgrass technique for hypospadias repair’.  		 			W T Snodgrass 		.  	 	 		\textit{BUJ Int}  		2005. 95 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Alsharbaini and Almaramhy ()]{b31}\label{b31} 	 		‘Snodgrass urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: A retrospective comparison of two variations of the technique’.  		 			R Alsharbaini 		,  		 			H Almaramhy 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences}  		2014. 9  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Turial et al. ()]{b45}\label{b45} 	 		‘Stent free tabularized incised plate repair of distal and mid-shaft hypospadias irrespective of age’.  		 			S Turial 		,  		 			J Enders 		,  		 			V Engel 		.  	 	 		\textit{Eur J Surg}  		2011. 21 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Jayanthi ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		‘The modified Snodgrass hypospadias repair: reducing the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis’.  		 			V R Jayanthi 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		2003. 170 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sugerman et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Tubularization of the incised urethral plate (Snodgrass procedure) for primary hypospadias surgery’.  		 			I D Sugerman 		,  		 			J Trevett 		,  		 			P S Malone 		.  	 	 		\textit{BJU Int}  		1999. 83 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Snodgrass ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate (TIP) hypospadias repair’.  		 			W T Snodgrass 		.  	 	 		\textit{Urol Clin North Am}  		2002. 29 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Stehr et al. ()]{b46}\label{b46} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate (TIP)urethroplasty (Snodgrass) in primary hypospadias repair’.  		 			M Stehr 		,  		 			M Lehner 		,  		 			T Schuster 		,  		 			M Heinrich 		,  		 			H G Dietz 		.  	 	 		\textit{Eur J Pediatr Surg}  		2005. 15 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Snodgrass ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: indication,technique and complications’.  		 			W T Snodgrass 		.  	 	 		\textit{Urology}  		1999. 54 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Snodgrass et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: results of multicenter experience’.  		 			W Snodgrass 		,  		 			M Koyle 		,  		 			G Manzoni 		,  		 			R Horowitz 		,  		 			A Caldamone 		,  		 			R Ehrlich 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		1996. 156 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Snodgrass et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate repair for proximal hypospadias’.  		 			W Snodgrass 		,  		 			M Koyle 		,  		 			G Manzoni 		,  		 			R Hurwitz 		,  		 			A Caldamone 		,  		 			R Ehrilch 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		1998. 159 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Orkiszewski ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate repair, also known as the Snodgrass procedure’.  		 			M Orkiszewski 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Pediatr Surg}  		2006. 41 p. 1786.  	 
\bibitem[Snongrass ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate uretheroplasty for distal hypospadias’.  		 			W Snongrass 		.  	 	 		\textit{J Urol}  		1994. 151 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Barrack and Namdun ()]{b40}\label{b40} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias’.  		 			S M Barrack 		,  		 			S H Namdun 		.  	 	 		\textit{East Afr Med J}  		2001. 78 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Huang et al. (ed.) ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		\textit{Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for hypospadias in children},  		 			L Huang 		,  		 			Y Tang 		,  		 			M Wang 		,  		 			S Chen 		.  		Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhe (ed.)  		2006. 20 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Tonvichien and Niramis ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in hypospadias repair: Experience at Queen Sirkit National institute of Child Health’.  		 			L Tonvichien 		,  		 			R Niramis 		.  	 	 		\textit{J med Assoc Thailand}  		2003. 86 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bath et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Tubularized incised plate urethroplaty: a simple versatile technique’.  		 			A S Bath 		,  		 			P S Bhandari 		,  		 			M K Mukherje 		.  	 	 		\textit{Indian J Plast Surg}  		2003. 36 p. .  	 	 (Repair of distal hypospadias) 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
