# Introduction ryptosporidium species are ubiquitous and infect a wide range of vertebrate hosts, including humans and various domestic animals (Wang et al., 2010) and they cause enteric infections and severe diarrhoea in these host species. Cryptosporidial infections in pigs were first described by Bergeland (1977) and Kennedy et al. (1977), and in contrast to the numerous studies on bovine cryptosporidiosis (Ibrahim et al., 2007;Xiao and Fayer, 2008 In some studies, it was determined that the sensitivity of the ELISA was higher than those of various staining # Materials and Methods # a) Study period and area A total of 209 faecal samples were obtained from five piggeries and one slaughter slab in Ogun state, southwestern Nigeria. The collection of faecal samples was initiated in September, 2012 and ended in April, 2013. # b) Sample collection Faecal samples were collected per rectum from individual pigs. For pigs in which rectal sampling was not possible, such as neonates, freshly voided faeces were collected by the use of wooden tongue depressors which were used to scoop up the superficial layer of faeces without contacting the floor. The faeces were then dropped into individual universal sample bottles and labeled appropriately. These were then transported, in cold packs, to the laboratory where analysis was carried out immediately. When analysis was delayed, the samples were stored at 4oC until they were processed. c) Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts by microscopy Faecal sample concentration: This was achieved using the formalin-ethylacetate sedimentation method as previously carried out by Ayinmode and Fagbemi (2010) with few modifications. Briefly, 1g of solid faeces or 3ml of watery stool was washed in 8ml of 10% formalin and centrifuged at 650x g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was decanted, after which the sediment was resuspended with 7ml of 10% formalin. 3ml of ethylacetate was thereafter added, the mixture vigorously shaken and allowed to stand for 3 minutes. This was then centrifuged at 650x g for 10 minutes and the supernatant discarded. A small portion of the sediment was evenly spread on a microscopic slide and air dried for acid-fast staining. # Volume XV Issue 1 Version I Year 2015 d) Acid-fast staining Modified Kinyoun's acid-fast staining method was carried out. Briefly, the faecal smears were fixed with absolute methanol for 1 minute after which they were flooded with carbolfuscin for 15 minutes. The slides were then rinsed briefly with distilled water. The smears were immediately decolorized by flooding them with 10% sulphuric acid for 1 minute and then rinsed with distilled water. Counterstaining of the smears was done by flooding the smears with 0.4% Malachite green for 1 minute and rinsing with distilled water. The smears were air dried and examined initially at x400 and then at x1000 magnification for confirmation of the oocyst morphology. e) Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum antigens by ELISA The detection of Cryptosporidium parvum coproantigens in the samples was done using a commercially available ELISA kit for faecal samples (RIDASCREEN® Cryptosporidium; R-Biopharm AG, Germany). The procedure was carried out according to manufacturer's instruction. The optical densities (OD) of the samples were read at 450nm using an ELISA reader (Model: ELx800, Biotex Instruments, USA). Samples were analyzed using the manufacturer's cut-off calculations in the instruction manual. # III. # Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed on Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) on Windows 7. The Chi-squared test was used to compare the detection rates of the ELISA and microscopy at 5% level of significance. IV. # Results The detection rate of Cryptosporidium in the samples was significantly higher (p<0.05) with ELISA, which detected the coproantigens in 31.1% (65/209), when compared to the detection rate by microscopy, which detected Cryptosporidium oocysts in 16.3% (34/209) of the samples (Table 1). The sensitivities of the ELISA and MZN techniques were 100% and 52.3% respectively (Table1). Sensitivity: a. ELISA: (34/34) X 100 = 100% b. Microscopy: (34/65) X 100 = 52.3% While acid-fast staining of faecal smears may help identify Cryptosporidium oocysts, there is the need for experienced staff (Kuhnert-Paul et al., 2012). In contrast, ELISA, an antigen-based technique is easy to perform and its evaluation does not require considerable experience. The higher sensitivity of the ELISA than the modified Kinyoun's acid-fast staining technique in detecting Cryptosporidium infection in faeces of pigs As reported by Johnston et al. (2003), faecal samples containing only a few Cryptosporidium oocysts often yield a false-negative ELISA result. The lack of false-negative ELISA result observed in this study may therefore imply that the faeces of infected pigs contained at least 17.6 oocysts/µl of Cryptosporidium (Johnston et al., 2003). The ELISA detects a high molecular, soluble glycoprotein that is secreted by the parasite during replication (Kuhnert-Paul et al., 2012). This antigen may also appear in the faeces before and after the end of patency (oocysts excretion) (Ungar, 1990). This may therefore account for the false-positive results of ELISA observed in this study. The lesser detection of oocysts in stained faecal smears may be related to several aspects of the staining procedure, especially decolourization, which causes some of the oocysts to lose their stain (Baxby and Blundell, 1983). Furthermore, storage of the samples at 4oC may reduce the sensitivity of microscopy in detecting Cryptosporidium oocysts (Kuhnert-Paul et al. 2012). From our study, the ELISA, though more expensive than the acid-fast staining method, is more sensitive, easier to perform and evaluate, therefore more suitable for routine screening of porcine faecal samples in laboratories. It has however been suggested that ELISA should be carried out together with one of the staining techniques to increase the accuracy of diagnosis (Godekmerdan et al., 1999). The high prevalence rate of Cryptosporidium coproantigens observed in this study necessitates routine examination of symptomatic and asymptomatic V. # Discussion pigs. Thus, Cryptosporidium antigen screening of porcine stools by ELISA should be regularly carried out in laboratories in Nigeria. # Ethical consideration The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data. ![porcine cryptosporidiosis(Chen and Huang, 2007; Kvac et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2011). Different methods are used for diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis and these vary in their sensitivities, need for experienced staff and cost (Kuhnert-Paul et al., 2012). A conventional method of identification is the microscopic examination of faecal smears stained with acid-fast stains (Yatswako et al., 2007; Ayinmode and Fagbemi, 2010) and other staining methods (Mahdi and Ali, 2004; Hamedi et al., 2005; Kuhnert-Paul et al., 2012).](image-2.png "") 1MicroscopyMicroscopyTotalPositiveNegative(ELISA)ELISA Positive343165ELISA Negative0144144Total (Microscopy)34175209 ## Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. * Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle from southern Nigeria ABAyinmode BOFagbemi Veterinarski Archiv 80 6 2010 * Sensitive, rapid, simple methods for detecting Cryptosporidium in faeces DBaxby NBlundell Lancet 2 1149 1983 * Necrotic Enteritis in Nursing Piglets MJBergeland American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians 20 1977 * Comparison of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of seven Cryptosporidium assays used in the UK RMChalmers BMCampbell NCrouch ACharlett APDavies J Med Microbiol 60 2011 * Prevalence and phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium in pigs in eastern China FChen KHuang Zoonoses Public Health 54 2007 * Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp ZChen RMi HYu YShi YHuang YChen PZhou YCai PLin Veterinary Parasitology 181 2011 * ImmunoCard STAT! cartridge antigen detection assay compared to microplate enzyme immunoassay and modified Kinyoun's acid-fast staining technique for detection of Cryptosporidium in fecal specimens AAEl-Moamly MAEl-Sweify Parasitol Res 78 2011 * The use of Ziehl-Neelsen stain, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and nested Polymerase Chain Reaction in diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis in immunocompetent, -compromised patients AMEl-Shazly AGabr MSMahmoud SSAziz WASaleh J. Egypt Soc. Parasitol 32 2002 * Investigation of cryptosporidiosis by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay and microscopy in children with diarrhoea AGodekmerdan AKalkan AErensoy SSKilic HYilmaz TZeynep CMautalip Acta Parasitol. Turcica 23 4 1999. 2008 Saudi Med. J. * Cryptosporidium infection in diarrhoeic children in southeastern Iran YHamedi OSafa MHaidari Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J 24 2005 * Prevalence of cryptosporidiosis among captive wild animals and birds in the arid region of North-eastern Nigeria UIIbrahim AWMbaya HMahmud AMohamed Vet. Arch 77 2007 * Efficacy of different methods for detection of low Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst numbers or antigen concentrations in stool specimens RIgnatius MEisenblätter TRegnath UMansmann UFuth HHahn JWagner Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 16 1997 * Evaluation of three commercial assays for detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium organisms in fecal specimens SPJohnston MMBallard MJBeach LCauser PPWilkins J. Clin. Microbiol 41 2003 * Cryptosporidiosis in three pigs GAKennedy GLKreitner ACStrafuss J.Am. Vet. Med. Assoc 170 1977 * Cryptosporidiosis: comparison of three diagnostic methods and effects of storage temperature on detectability of cryptosporidia in cattle faeces YKuhnert-Paul BBerit DKatja DArwid SRonald Parasitol. Res 111 2012 * Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from pigs at slaughterhouses in South Bohemia MKvac BSak DHanzlikova JKotilova DKvetonova Parasitol. Res 104 2009 * Cryptosporidium infections in calves and piglets in some parts of Kaduna state JKKwaga EIUzor JUUmoh Nigeria. Z. Vet 3 1988 * Cryptosporidiosis and other intestinal parasitic infections in patients with chronic diarrhoea NKMahdi NHAli Saudi Med. J 25 2004 * Prevalence and risk factors associated with faecal shedding of Cryptosporidium oocysts in piglets BVMaikai JUUmoh JK BKwaga VAMaikai SCEgege Journal of Parasitology and Vector Biology 1 1 2011 * Enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of Cryptosporidium antigens in fecal specimens BL PUngar J. Clin. Microbiol 28 1990 * Prevalence and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp RWang SQiu FJian SZhang YShen LZhang LNing JCao MQi LXiao Parasitol. Res 107 2010 * Molecular characterisation of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission LXiao RFayer Int. J. Parasitol 38 2008 * SYatswako OOFaleke MLGulumbe AIDaneji Cryptosporidium oocysts and Balantidium 2007