# I. Introduction a) Background njection is an infusion method of administering drugs or fluids into the body with a hollow needle and a syringe. The uses of injectable drugs have many disadvantages including sepsis at administration, risk of tissue toxicity, costly difficulties in correcting the error. Injections are very expensive compared to other dosage forms and require skilled personnel for administration. Apart from this, unhygienic use of injections can enhance the hazard of transmission of potentially serious pathogens, such as hepatitis, HIV/AIDS, and blood-borne diseases [1]. According to WHO report about 16 billion injections are undertaken in developing countries annually [2]. Injectable drugs are often irrationally used. Use of Drugs involves the prescribing, dispensing and the interaction between the prescriber and the patient. These behaviors include the process of making a diagnosis, prescribing, dispensing, and use of drugs by the patient [3]. According to World Health Organization (WHO) definition the rational use of injectable drugs requires that patient receive the right medications at the right dose, right frequency and duration of therapy and in the lowest cost that could be afford by them and their community. Rational use of drugs is also one indispensible element in achieving quality of health and medical care for patients and the community as a whole [5]. According to a study done in the northern, central, eastern, western and southern areas of Tehran in 1999, the average prescription injectbable drugs for each encounter was equivalent to 3.6 which 39% of it consisted of injection medicines [6]. Another study conducted in Tehran revealed that the average prescribed items were equivalent to 2.85 and at least one injection item was among 28.96% of them [7]. Rational prescription could be achieved if the prescribers have access to an essential drugs list and the essential drugs are available on a regular basis. In the absence of such facility-related factors, the risk of irrational prescribing could raise several folds. Irrational use of drugs is presently a major health problem in medical practice whose consequences include ineffective treatment, unnecessary prescription of drugs particularly antimicrobials and injections, development of resistance to antibiotics, adverse effects and economic burden on both patients and society. It has been estimated that 50% or more expenditure on medicines is being wasted through irrational prescribing, dispensing and usage [8]. # b) Statement of the Problem Globally, it is anticipated that more than 30% of injections prescribed, dispensed or sold improperly. Irrational use of injection has been found to be a frequent problem in various parts of the world, especially in developing countries. Irrational prescription of injection medicines is also one of the common problems of medical treatments in developing countries [2]. Nonetheless, overuse of injection medicines is an additional current health problem in developing countries, On top of this, the practice of irrational prescribing is a global major problem of health care delivery. However, this problem is most commonly pronounced in developing countries where health budgets are small and 30 -40 % of the total health budget is spent on drugs [8]. c # e) Inclusion and exclusion criteria i. Inclusion criteria ? All prescription containing injectable drugs. Prescription of injectable drugs carries all necessary information, such as name, age, and address of the patient together with a brief diagnosis of the condition targeted by the drug treatment. However, most prescription did not contain this information [9] ii. # ? Socio demographic characteristics h) Data collection process The data was collected by four trained data collectors (pharmacy Graduating class students) using pretested data collection formats. Data was collected from the prescription paper. The collected data was checked for completeness and consistency before processing. # i) Data quality control The quality and completeness of the data was checked by the principal investigator. Pretest was performed as a part of training and the data collectors were guided by the investigators. # j) Data processing and data analyzing Data were complied, analyzed and summarized then interpreted by using tables or graphs. The collected data were carefully analyzed by using calculator manually. # k) Ethical approval Ethical clearance was obtained from Ethical Review Board of College of Medicine and Health Sciences of Ambo University to conduct this study. # l) Operational Definitions ? Prescriber: Any medical practitioner who is authorized/licensed to write prescription. ? Injectable drugs: Are drugs which were administered parenteral route. ? Prescription: Is a written form of communication between any authorized body and pharmacists to dispense drugs. ? Poly pharmacy: Is when the prescription contains three or more drugs at once. ? Injection: Is an infusion method of putting drugs or fluids in to the body with a hollow needle and a syringe. # IV. Results # a) Patient related information During the study period five hundred (500) encounters were successfully evaluated. The percentage of prescriptions containing name of the patient, sex, age, address, date and card number were 490 (98%), 395 (79%), 405 (81%), 250 (50%), 300 (60%) and 480 (96%) respectively (Figure 1). Among the individual prescribed injections ceftriaxone (10.4%) and diclofenac (8.8%) were highly prescribed (Table 3). Regarding the number of drugs per encounter 25%, 50%, 15% and 10% of the prescription were prescribed with one, two, three and four drugs respectively (Fig. 2). # V. Discussions In appropriate prescription of injectable drugs might reduce the quality of medical care, patient safety, and leads to wastage of resources. An encounter provides an insight into a prescriber's attitude to the diseases being treated and the nature of health care delivery system in the community. According to this study, 490 (98%) prescription papers contain name of patients. This was comparable when compared with a study conducted in Nigeria for which 99.86% of the prescriptions contained patients name (9). Even if the figure is low 10 (2%), it might have created problem during dispensing of the right drug to the right patient, and wrong drug might have been given to wrong patient. In this study, about 105 (21%), 95 (19%), 250 (50%), 200 (40%) and 20 (4%) prescriptions did not contain patients sex, age, address, date and card number respectively. When compared with study done in Health facilities in North Ethiopia, prescriptions which did not contain any information on patient address (6.02%), age (2%), and sex (4.03%) were higher in this study. But figures for sex, age and address were lower in this study when compared with another study in hospital pharmacy in Saudi Arabia and France which showed prescriptions that did not contained age, and sex were 22.7 and 49.7%, and no prescription contained patient address (4 ,9). Regarding to prescriber related information, only 38%, 13% and 96% of the prescription papers were names, qualification and signature of the prescribers specified respectively. About 310 (62%) prescriptions did not contain name and 435 (87%) did not specify the qualification of prescribers, but all most all prescriptions (96%) were signed. This was different from a study done in hospital pharmacy in Saudi Arabia where 83.3%, 9.6% and 81.9% of the prescriptions contained name, qualification and signature for the prescribers, respectively and in France where full name and signature was written only for 7.8% of prescriptions (4,9). Of a total of 600 prescribed drug products, the most commonly prescribed drugs were antibiotics (25.7%), ant pains (20%) and diuretics (11%) (Table2). The percentage of drugs prescribed by generic names at AHMC was 96% which approaches the Standard value set by WHO (100%) and higher than the national value reported by Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health (FDREMOH) in 2003(87%). However, lesser value was reported in India (48.5%) [10].This might be because of prescribers well trained, experienced, and qualified. In this study, from a total of 600 injectable drugs prescribed, the average number of drugs per encounter was 1.2; this is lower when compared with the standard (1.6-1.8). The value from this study is also much lower Year 2015 © 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) Volume XV Issue IV Version I ( ) B as compared with the study conducted in Hawassa University Hospital, which was 1.9 [1].This might be so due to prescribers qualification and experience. Essential drugs offer a cost-effective solution to many health problems in developing countries. The national EDL were selected regarding to disease frequency, affordability, with assured quality and availability in appropriate dosage forms. Regarding the percentage of drugs prescribed in AHMC from the essential drug list was 94.7%, which is less than the ideal value of 100% set by WHO, and other studies results reported by Desalegn in 2013 from Hawassa university hospital (96.6%) [1] and Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health (FMOH) national report in 2003 (99%). This may be due to lack of awareness of Essential Drug List and deficiency of availability of Essential Drug List. In this study about 582(97%) of drugs were prescribed with its frequency and about 18(3%) were not prescribed with its frequency. This is comparable with study conducted in Iran for which 96.5% and 17.3% of the drugs were prescribed with correct and incorrect frequency, respectively. The present study raveled that analgesics were the second most commonly prescribed drugs group in this health facility. This may be so due to patients demand and the primary instinct of pain alleviation by prescribers. However, higher values of 64.3 and 41 % have been reported from other studies in Nigeria [11,12]. Vitamins were prescribed in 7 % of encounters in this study. This figures is much lower than those found in the India study where 62.9 % of prescriptions had vitamins prescribed [11]. This may be so due to patients' low demand of vitamins. In this study all drugs (100%) were prescribed in correct strength. This was different from the study conducted in Nigeria where 84% of drugs were prescribed by correct strength. This difference is might be due to prescribers experience toward writing the correct strength of drugs [12]. From a total of prescribed drugs about 15(2.5%) and 9(1.5%) were prescribed as over and under dose. This is was different from study done Iran hospital for which over and under dose was 5.01% and 8.5%, respectively. This may be because of variation in prescribers' knowledge and experience on drug dose [13]. # VI. Conclusion Most of the injectable drugs were prescribed in their generic name even if a few of them were prescribed in brand form. The percentage of injectable antibiotics prescribed was high which could contribute for drug resistance and all of the prescriptions found with no diagnosis. Some prescriptions missed relevant information especially with regard to patient and prescriber related information. Based on the findings of this study, the prescribing practice for injection exhibited deviation from the standard recommended by WHO and prescribing in generic name were found to be a problem in this study. # VII. Recommendation Based on the result the following recommendations were forwarded. ? Prescribers: All of the drugs should be prescribed in their generic name and it is better if the diagnosis is written on the prescription because it helps for the pharmacists to ensure that the drugs prescribed are appropriate for the patient condition. ? Ministry of Health: There is a clear need for medical education programs which could rationalize the prescribing of injection and the prescribers should clearly complete information on the prescriptions. Authors' contribution BKG; carried out the research drafting, design, statistical analysis and interpretation as well as coordinating all activities in the research, AF; participate in the sequence alignment and drafted a manuscript, GTT; participates in the design of the study and performs statistical analysis, ADD; participate in the design, analysis and interpretation of the research, JLL; participated in literature review, identified the research design issues, participated in coordination, and reviewed the manuscript. # Competing interest # None declared # VIII. Acknowledgement Authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Ambo University. 1![Figure 1: Patient related information on the prescription in AHMC from March 20 -May 20, 2015](image-2.png "Figure 1 :") ? To determine the percentage of injectionsprescribed by generic name per encounter.? To determine the type of drugs commonlyprescribed.III. Methods and Materialsa) Study areaAdama Hospital Medical College is located inthe Middle East Ethiopia, Oromia Regional state, inAdama town 99km from Addis Ababa to the South East.It was established in 1946 by Italian missionaries. Thehospital was named as Hailemariam Mamo memorialhospital little bit after establishment, but its name waschanged to Adama Referral Hospital in mean time andnow it renamed as Adama Hospital Medical College byOromia regional state health bureau after it start to teachaccelerated medicine, Emergency surgery and some) Significance of the study ? Most prescription of injectable drugs do not full fill the requirement information on the prescription paper such as patient related information, drug related information and prescriber related information. The finding of this study would enable to improve such problems and to fill the gap that observed on the prescription pattern of inject ableSpecialty in 2011.b) Study period ? Study was conducted from March 24, 2015 to May 24, 2015.drugs. ? The data regarding pattern of injection use in the AHMC is still lacking or scarce. This study is thus initiated to fill such information gaps byc) Study design ? A prospective cross sectional study was done to assess prescription pattern.determining the pattern of injection use in thed) Source population and Study populationhospital.i. Source population? This study will also provide a base line data for? All available prescriptionin the outpatientpolicy makers and also initiate other researchers onPharmacy department during the study period.this topic.ii. Study populationII. Objective a) General objective? All prescription containing injectable drugs during the study period.? To assess prescription pattern of injectable drugs inAHMC.b) Specific objective? To assess the percentage of injectable drugs perprescription f) Sampling size? A total of 500 encounters containing injectabledrugs were successfully evaluated during the studyperiod.g) Measurementsi. Dependent variables? Number of injectable drugs per prescription? Number of injectable drugs prescribed by genericname? Prescription pattern of injectable drugsii. Independent variables 1Prescriber related informationFrequencyPercentage (%)Name of the prescriber19038 %Qualification6513 %Signature48096 %c) Drug related informationcommonly prescribed therapeutic class was injectableSix hundred (600) injectable drugs wereantibiotics 154 (25%), anti pains 120 (20%) and diureticsprescribed during the study period and the most66 (11%) respectively (Table 2) 2S.NOClass of injectable drugsFrequencyPercentage (%)1Anti biotic15425 %2Anti pain12020 %3Diuretics6611 %4Corticosteroid549 %5Respiratory drugs549 %6Vitamins427 %7GIT3696%8Cardiovascular366 %9CNS244 %10Others142.3 %Total600100 % 3Prescribed injectionFrequencyPercentage (%)Cefriaxone5210.4 %Diclofenac448.8 %Insulin408 %Metronidazole418.2 %Gentamicin387.6 %Ampicilin346.8 %Cloxacilin285.6 %Furosemide265.2 %Penicillin G Benzanthin204 %Vitamin B complex183.6 %Total34168.2 % 4Class of drugDoseStrengthFrequencyDuration of treatmentOverUnderOptimumCorrectYesNoLongShortOptimumAnti pain--1201201182--120Corticosteroid13505454--153Vitamins--4242402-339GIT--363636---36Antibiotics10414o1541441022150Diuretics--666666---66Respir. Drugs31505454---54CVS-1353636---36CNS-12324222--24Others--1414122--14Total15(2.5)9(1.5)576(96)600(100)582(97)18(3)2(0.3)6(1)592(98.7)Class of drugsPrescribed by generic nameWritten in short (abbreviation)Written for proper diagnosisAnti pain120--Corticosteroids54--Vitamins42--GIT36--Antibiotics13420-Diuretics62--Respiratory drugs54--CVS36--CNS24--Others104-Total572(96)24(4)- AcronymsAHMC: Adama Hospital Medical CollegeARVT: Anti Retro viral Therapy PharmacyEDL: Essential Drug ListEP: Emergency PharmacyID: Inject able DrugsIP: Inpatient PharmacyOP: Outpatient PharmacyOPD: Out Patient DepartmentWHO: World Health Organization * Assessment of drug use pattern using WHO prescribing indicators at Hawassa University teaching and referral hospital ADesalegn East Med. Health 13 2013 * what are injection drugs.htm. Accessed date July13-201 * Pattern of drug prescription Dubai hospital 2011 United Arab Emirates * Evaluation of prescription writing quality in France University Hospital quality health care PFrancois EChirpaz LJBontemps JBassonsicalop Clin. Perform. Qual. Health 5 3 1997 * Guide lines for implementing drug utilization review programs in hospitals. Accessed date July7, 2011 * Status of prescription and drug usage in Tehran &Hakim ANikzad J prev med public health 45 2004 * Drug prescription based on WHO indicators: Tehran University of medical sciences facilities with pharmacy AMosleh SDarbooy SKhoshnevis Ansari MMohammadi Tehran University Medical Journal 65 14 2008 * A Retrospective Analysis of Prescribing Practice Based on WHO Prescribing Indicators at Four Selected Hospitals of West Ethiopia MBinu RSabbu KSurendra DHire East and Central African Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 16 2013 * Physicians medication prescribing in primary care in Riyadh City, Saud Arabia 2004 112 Literature review: variation in drug prescribing * Injection prescribing pattern in India MKermode VMuani Indian J Med Res 134 2003 * Injection practices in the formal & informal healthcare sectors in rural north India MKermode VMuani Indian J Med Res 124 2006 * Drug Prescription Pattern in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital Igbiks Tamunoand Joseph OFadare Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 11 1 2012 * A Study on the Factors Affecting the Prescription of Injection Medicines in Iran: A MohammadMeskarpour-Amiri NooredinDopeykar Policy Making Approach. Global Journal of Health Science 2015 Parisa Mehdizadeh Ali Ayoubian & Zahra Motaghed