Outcome of Distal Hypospadias Repair in Pediatric Surgery Department at Alribat Teaching Hospital

Yassir Hassan Ahmed

Authors

Yassir Hassan Ahmed

Keywords:

distal hypospadias, urethra

Abstract

Background: Hypospadias is a common congenital anomaly affecting the penis in which the opening of the urethra is on the ventral surface of the penis, usually associated with ventral curvature of penis (chordae). Treating hypospadias is a challenging mission for the surgeons. Many techniques have been descried in the literature for the repair of hypospadias with variable results. Objectives: To evaluate the surgical and cosmetic outcome of distal hypospadias repair including different procedures used to repair distal hypospadias and to identify complications and suggest solutions.

Downloads

How to Cite

Outcome of Distal Hypospadias Repair in Pediatric Surgery Department at Alribat Teaching Hospital. (2014). Global Journal of Medical Research, 13(I5), 1-4. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/492

Download Citation

References

M Zaontz, M Packer (1997) Abnormalities of external genitalia. 44, 1267-1297.

John Duckett, Howard Snyder (1991) The MAGPI Hypospadias Repair in 1111 Patients. 213(6), 620-626.

Y Hayashi, Y Kojima (2008) Current concepts in hypospadias surgery. 15, 651-664.

H Hisham, A Ashraf (2010) Repair of Distal Hypospadias with Foreskin Reconstruction. 11(1).

Basharatak, A Muhamad, B Faras (2009) Comparative Study of Inverting Suturing Versus Overand Over Continues Suturing in Hypospadias Repair. 21(4).

Snodgrass Warren (2004) Hypospadias. 25, 63-67.

Ahmed Hadidi (2004) Hypospadias Surgery. 79-81.

F Churi, B Hardy, B Churchill (1981) Urologic anomaliesassociated with hypospadias. 8, 565-571.

A Belman, Evan Kass (1982) Hypospadias Repair in Children Less than 1 Year Old. 128(6), 1273-1274.

T Hensle (2002) Hypospadias Repair. When should it be done? A.

I Ulman, V Erikçi, A Avanoğlu, A Gökdemir (1997) The effect of suturing technique and qamaterial on complication rate following hypospadias repair. 3, 156-157.

Ahmed El-Mahrouky, James Mcelhaney, Francis Bartone, Lowell King (1987) In Vitro Comparison of the Properties of Polydioxanone, Polyglycolic Acid and Catgut Sutures in Sterile and Infected Urine. 138(4 Part 1), 913-915.

John Duckett (1996) Editorial Comment. 834-835.

J Barcat (1973) Current concepts of treatment. 249-263.

J Spence, A Permutter (1990) Sleeve advancement indistal hypospadias repair. 144, 523-525.

Murat Çakan, Fatih Yalçınkaya, Fuat Demirel, Mustafa Aldemir, Uğur Altuğ (2005) The midterm success rates of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in reoperative patients with distal or midpenile hypospadias. 21(12), 973-976.

A Holland, G Smith, D Cass (2000) Clinical Review Of The 'Snodgrass' Hypospadias Repair. 70(8), 597-600.

M Uygur, Dursun Ünal, M Özgür Tan *,, Demokan Erol (2002) Factors affecting outcome of one-stage anterior hypospadias repair: analysis of 422 cases. 18(2-3), 142-146.

John Duckett, Howard Snyder (1992) Meatal Advancement And Glanuloplasty Hypospadias Repair After 1,000 Cases: Avoidance of Meatal Stenosis And Regression. 147(3 Part 1), 665-669.

A Elbakry (1999) Tubularized-incised urethral plate urethroplasty: Is regular dilatation necessary for success. 84, 683-688.

Warren Snodgrass (1999) DOES TUBULARIZED INCISED PLATE HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR CREATE NEOURETHRAL STRICTURES?. 162(3 Part 2), 1159-1161.