Evaluation of Lumber Lordotic Angle in Patients with Inter Vertebral Disc Prolapse using Cobb's Method
Keywords:
cobb, inter vertebral disc, MRI
Abstract
This study was done to evaluate the lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) in patients with inter vertebral disc prolapse examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using Cobb's method. This study was conducted at Antalya Medical center and Elnilin Medical Center and extended from November 2012 up to March 2013. Total sample of 62 Sudanese subjects were included in the study, with ages ranging between (24-80 years), 50 of the total sample were 25 males and 25 females underwent MR lumbar scan and were diagnosed to have inter vertebral disc prolapse at different vertebral levels, the remaining 12 were diagnosed as normal lumbar spine and they were considered as control group. Measurement of (LLA) was done from the mid-sagittal slice of T 2 MRI lumbar spine using Cobb's method; by drawing a perpendicular line to a line drawn across the superior endplate of first lumbar vertebra and the superior endplate of first sacral vertebra; the angle formed by the intersection of the two perpendicular lines is the Cobb angle or lumbar lordotic angle. The Cobb angle and inter vertebral disc prolapse level were then correlated with Gender, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and jobs to demonstrate if there is any degree of association. The study concluded that Cobb angle and Disc prolapse levels have no significant relation with job, height, weight, age and BMI, no significant difference was detected between Cobb angle of the normal subjects and patients with prolapsed disc and the results did not differ among male and female patients. Using MRI in the detection of vertebral morphological changes and end plates degeneration is recommended since it involves no ionizing radiation and has excellent demarcation of disc prolapse. The dependence upon the Cobb angle in diagnoses of disc prolapse is of no significant value.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
F. Enzinger, S. Weiss (1995) General considerations. In: Enzinger FM, Weiss SW (eds) Soft tissue tumors, 3rd edn. CV Mosby, St. 1-16.
Curtis Mettlin, Roger Priore, Uma Rao, Delores Gamble, Warren Lane, Gerald Murphy (1982) Results of the national soft‐tissue sarcoma registry. 19(4), 224-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930190410
Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD (2000) Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses: A current perspective. 175, 575-587.
Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD (1997) The use of gadolinium in the MR evaluation of soft tissue tumors. 18, 251-268.
Anders Rydholm, Nils Berg (1983) Size, Site and Clinical Incidence of Lipoma:Factors in the Differential Diagnosis of Lipoma and Sarcoma. 54(6), 929-934. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678308992936
Murali Sundaram, Michael McGuire, David Herbold (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue masses: an evaluation of fiftythree histologically proven tumors. 6(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725x(88)90397-9
S. Sahrmann (2002) Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes.
Kuo Y, Tully EA, Galea MP (2009) Sagittal Spinal Posture After Pilates-Based Exercise in Healthy Older Adults. 34, 1046-1051.
Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG (2005) Muscles, Testing and Function with Posture and Pain.
O'Sullivan PB (2004) Clinical instability' of the lumbar spine: its pathological basis, diagnosis and conservative management.
Smith A, O'Sullivan P, Straker L (2008) Classification of Sagittal Thoraco-Lumbo-Pelvic Alignment of the Adolescent Spine in Standing and Its Relationship to Low Back Pain. 33, 2101-2107.
Sun Cheng X. G, Boonen al (1998) Measurements of vertebral shape by radiographic morphometry: sex differences and relationships with vertebral level and lumbar lordosis. 27(7), 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050402
Barbara Norton, Shirley Sahrmann, Linda Van Dillen (2004) Differences in Measurements of Lumbar Curvature Related to Gender and Low Back Pain. 34(9), 524-534. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2004.34.9.524
Damasceno (2006) Lumbar lordosis: a study of angle values and of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs role.
Deed Harrison (2001) Radiographic Analysis of Lumbar Lordosis: Centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison Posterior Tangent Methods. Journal of spine. 1 June. 26(11), 235-242.
Eslam Babai (2012) An Innovative Software Method for Measuring Lumbar Lordosis. 3(1), 204-213.
S. Ghassan, Skaf, M. Chakib, Nathalie Ayoub, Massud Domloj, Cherine Turbay, H. El-Zein, Hourani (2011) Effect of Age and Lordotic Angle on the Level of Lumbar Disc. 950576. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/950576
Khodadad Letafatkar Khodadad Letafatkar et al Effects of weight, gender and number of pregnancies on lumbar total and segmental lordosis and low back pain. 4(2).
Nourbakhsh MR (2001) Effects of lifestyle and work-related physical activity on the degree of lumbar lordosis and chronic low back pain in a Middle East population. Journal of spinal disorder. 14(4), 283-292.
Amonoo-Kuofi HS (1992) Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar Spine. During aging. 145, 373-377.
P. Guigui, N. Levassor, L. Rillardon, P. Wodecki, L. Cardine (2003) Valeur physiologiquedes paramètres pelviens et rachidiens de l'equilibre sagital du rachis - analyse d'une série de 250 voluntaries Rev Chir Orthop. 89, 496-506.
Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW (1995) An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers. 20, 1351-1358.
Published
2013-10-02
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.