Developing the First Validity of Shared Medical Decision-Making Questionnaire in Taiwan

Chi-Chang Chang

Authors

Chi-Chang Chang

Keywords:

shared medical decision-making, rasch test model, reliability, validity

Abstract

Due to a lack of valid Taiwanese instruments measuring Shared Medical Decision-making (SMDM) in Taiwan. The purpose of the study is to investigate the reliability and validity of the Shared Medical Decision-making process. Total 350 patients were randomly recruited from a medical centre in Taiwan. As a theoretical basis steps of the SMDM process were defined in an expert panel. Item formulation was then conducted according to the Delphi method and a pool of 16 items was constructed. In addition, the Winstep software was used to examine whether the data fit Rasch test model. Items with outfit or infit MNSQs (mean square errors) not in the range between 0.77 and 1.30 are usually deemed as potential misfits. Successive Rasch analyses were performed until a final set of items was obtained. After eliminating 1 item the remaining 15 form a unidimensional scale with an acceptable reliability for person measures 0.77 and very good reliability for item difficulties 0.97. Analysis of subgroups revealed a different use of items in different conditions. Taiwanese Shared Medical Decision-making Questionnaire (SMDMQ) is a 15 items normative instrument. In addition, a theory-driven instrument to measure the process of SMDM has been developed and validated by use of a rigorous method revealing first promising results. Yet the ceiling effects require the addition of more discriminating items, and the different use of items in different conditions demands an in depth analysis.

Downloads

How to Cite

Developing the First Validity of Shared Medical Decision-Making Questionnaire in Taiwan. (2014). Global Journal of Medical Research, 14(23), 9-15. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/

Download Citation

References

G. Elwyn, A. Edwards, P. Kinnersley (2000) Shared decision-making and the concept of equipoise: Defining the 'competences' of involving patients in health care choices. 50, 892-899.

G. Elwyn, A. Edwards, S. Mowle, M. Wensing, C. Wilkinson, P. Kinnersley (2001) Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. 43(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00149-x

Vikki Entwistle, Ian Watt (2006) Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual framework. 63(3), 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002

D. Kiesler, Auerbach SM (2006) Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: Evidence, models and interventions. 61, 319-341.

D. Simon, G. Schorr, M. Wirtz (2006) Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). 63, 319-27.

Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni, Tim Whelan (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). 44(5), 681-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3

(1982) Splicing Life: A Report on the Social and Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering with Human beings.

Barrie Cassileth, Danielle Volckmar, Robert Goodman (1980) The effect of experience on radiation therapy patients' desire for information. 6(4), 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(80)90065-6

William Strull, B. Lo, G. Charles (1984) Do Patients Want to Participate in Medical Decision Making?. 252(21), 2990. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1984.03350210038026

L. Pendleton, W. House (1984) Preferences for treatment approaches in medical care. College students versus diabetic outpatients. 22, 644-646.

Raisa Deber, N. Kraetschmer, J. Irvine (1996) What Role Do Patients Wish to Play in Treatment Decision Making?. 156(13), 1414. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440120070006

Dennis Mazur, David Hickam (1997) The Influence of Physician Explanations on Patient Preferences about Future Health-care States. 17(1), 56-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9701700106

Gilbert Churchill (1979) A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. 16(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110

R. Waugh, E. Chapman (2005) An analysis of dimensionality using factor analysis true-score theory) and Rasch measurement: what is the difference? Which method is better?. 6, 80-99.

J. Linacre (2011) WINSTEPS [computer program], Chicago, IL, 2011.

P. Holland, H. Wainer (1993) Differential Item Functioning.

B. Wright, M. Mok (2000) Understanding Rasch measurement: Rasch models overview. 1, 83-106.

E. Jr, Smith (2002) Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. 3, 205-231.

J. Linacre, B. Wright (2009) A User's Guide to WINSTEPS.

J. Keeves, S. Alagumalai (1999) New Approaches to Measurement'. In Masters, G. N., and J. P. Keeves (Eds), Advances in Measurement in Educational Research and Assessment. 23-48.

B. Wright, J. Linacre, J. Gustafson, P. Martin-Lof (1994) Reasonable mean-square fit values. 8, 370.

B. Wright, G. Masters (1982) Rating Scale Analysis.

G. Rasch (1961) On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. 321-334.

D. Andrich (2004) Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms?. 42, 1-16.

Ching-Lin Shih, Wen-Chung Wang (2009) Differential item functioning detection using the multiple indicators, multiple causes method with a pure short anchor. 33(3), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621608321758