Waveone and one Shape Files: Survival in Severely Curved Artificial Canals

Emilia Karova; Snezhanka Topalova-Pirinska

Authors

Emilia Karova
Snezhanka Topalova-Pirinska

Keywords:

nickel-titanium instruments, waveone, one shape, pathfiles, g-files, glide path, lifespan, cumm-ulative survival, continuous rotation, reciprocating m

Abstract

Nickel-titanium rotary instruments are preferred for their excellent flexibility, superelasticity and improved cutting efficiency but they can separate unexpectedly, especially in curved canals. Instrumentation with WaveOne and One Shape files was performed on 200 artificial canals divided in four equal groups. Glide path was created with PathFiles and G- files. Average lifespan and survival rate of the shaping files were tested, before and after a glide path creation. Average lifespan of WaveOne and One Shape files without a creation of a glide path was 10.25±2.50 canals and 4.1 (±1.37) canals, respectively and after the creation of a glide path - 17.50±2.12 canals and 4.6 (±1.30) canals. Average lifespan and cumulative survival of the tested files revealed significant difference. WaveOne files showed significantly higher resistance to fracture compared with One Shape files. Lifespan and survival rate of tested files increased after the creation of a glide path. Reciprocal motion increases significantly instruments life.

Downloads

How to Cite

Waveone and one Shape Files: Survival in Severely Curved Artificial Canals. (2014). Global Journal of Medical Research, 14(24), 1-7. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/

Download Citation

References

Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Iijima M, Clark WA, Kovarik L, Buie C (2009) Metallurgical Characterization of a New Nickel-Titanium Wire for Rotary Endodontic Instruments. 35(11), 1589-1593.

Hoen Arens FC, Steiman HR, Dietz Jr (2003) Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments J Endod. 29(10), 664-666.

Berruti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D (2004) Influence of Manual Preflaring and Torque on the Failure Rate of ProTaper Rotary Instruments. 30(4), 228-230.

Berruti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G (2012) Root Canal Anatomy Preservation of WaveOne Reciprocating Files with or without Glide Path. 38, 101-104.

Berutti E, Cantatore G (2006) Rotary instruments in Nickel Titanium. 1, 518-547.

E. Berutti, G. Chiandussi, I. Gaviglio, A. Ibba (2003) Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile. 29(1), 15-19.

Bonaccorso A, Cantatore G, Condorelli GG, Schafer E, Tripi TR (2009) Shaping Ability of Four Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Simulated S-Shaped Canals. 35, 883-886.

J. Chen, H. Messer (2002) A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique Aust Dent J 2002. 47(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00297.x

Cheung GS, Liu CS (2009) A Retrospective Study of Endodontic Treatment Outcome between Nickel-Titanium Rotary and Stainless Steel Hand Filing Techniques. 35, 938-943.

G. Cheung, B. Peng, Z. Bian, Y. Shen, B. Darvell (2005) Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination Int Endod J. 38(11), 802-809.

G. De‐deus, E. Moreira, H. Lopes, C. Elias (2010) Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement Int Endod J. 43(12), 1063-1068.

Di PM (2007) A dozen ways to prevent nickeltitanium rotary instrument fracture. 138, 196-201.

Franco V, Fabiani C, Taschieri S, Malentacca A, Bortolin M, Del M (2011) Investigation on the Shaping Ability of Nickel-Titanium Files When Used with a Reciprocating Motion. 37(10), 1398-1401.

Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De M (2008) Fatigue Resistance of Engine-driven Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments Produced by New Manufacturing Methods. 34(8), 1003-1005.

Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer P (2005) Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. 10(1), 30-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x

Hulsmann M, Schinkel I (1999) Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. 15(6), 252-258.

Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS (2006) A Retrospective Clinical Study of Incidence of Root Canal Instrument Separation in an Endodontics Graduate Program: A Penn Endo Database Study. 32, 1048-1052.

Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W (2012) Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Resistance of Two New Nickel-Titanium Instruments Used in Reciprocation Motion: Reciproc Versus WaveOne. 38(4), 541-544.

Kim HC, Yum J, Hur B, Cheung GS (2010) Cyclic Fatigue and Fracture Characteristics of Ground and Twisted Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files. 36, 147-152.

Gambarra-Soares Lopes HP, Elias CN, Inojosa Siqueira JF Jr, Lopes WS (2013) Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Rotary Instruments Made of Conventional Nickel-Titanium Wire, M-Wire, or Nickel-Titanium Alloy in R-Phase. 39(4), 516-520.

Martin B, Zelada G, Varela P (2003) Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. 36, 262-266.

Parahos P, Gordon I, Messer HH (2004) Factors Influencing Defects of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments After Clinical Use. 30, 722-725.

Parashos P, Messer HH (2006) Rotary NiTi Instrument Fracture and its Consequences. 32(11), 1031-1043.

Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E (2013) Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments J Enodod. 39(2), 258-261.

Peters OA, Peters CI (2010) Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system In: Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, eds Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp, 10th ed St. 2010, 283-348.

O. Peters (2004) Current Challenges and Concepts in the Preparation of Root Canal Systems: A Review. 30(8), 559-567.

Clement Pruett JP, Carnes Jr (1997) Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. 23, 77-85.

Andelin Roland DD, Hsu Browning DF, Torabinejad M (2002) The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments. 28(7), 543-545.

Ruddle CJ (2005) The ProTaper technique. 10, 187-190.

B. Sattapan, G. Nervo, J. Palamara, H. Messer (2000) Defects in Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files After Clinical Use. 26, 161-165.

Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G (2004) Comparison of Hand Stainless Steel and Nickel Titanium Rotary Instrumentation: A Clinical Study. 30(6), 432-435.

Schilder H (1974) Cleaning and shaping the root canal Dent Clin North Am. 18(2), 269-296.

Setzer FC, Bombe CP (2013) Influence of Combined Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Stress on the Fracture Point of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments. 39, 133-137.

Shen Y, Haapasalo M, Cheug GS, Peng B (2009) Defects in Nickel-Titanium Instruments after Clinical Use. Part 1: Relationship between Observed Imperfections and Factors Leading to Such Defects in a Cohort Study. 35, 129-132.

Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC (1997) A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. 23, 503-507.

D. Sonntag, A. Guntermann, S. Kim, V. Stachniss (2003) Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary NiTi files performed by students. 36(4), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00661.x

Tygesen YA, Steiman R, Ciavarro C (2001) Comparison of Distortion and Separation Utilizing Profile and Pow-R Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files. 27, 762-764.

P. Varela Patino, B. Biedma, C. Rodriguez, G. Cantatore, J. Bahillo (2005) The Influence of a Manual Glide Path on the Separation Rate of NiTi Rotary Instruments. 31(2), 114-116.

Varela P, Ibanez-Parraga A, Rivas-Mundina B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B (2010) Alternating versus Continuous Rotation: A Comparative Study of the Effect on Instrument Life. 36(1), 157-159.

P. Varela-Patino, B. Martin, N. Rodrigues (2008) Fracture rate of nickel-titanium instruments using continuous versus alternating rotation. 2, 193-197.

J. Webber, P. Machtou, W. Pertot, S. Kuttler, C. Ruddle, J. West (2011) The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system Roots. 1, 28-33.

Wu J, Lei G, Yan M, Yu Y, Yu J, Zhang G (2011) Instrument Separation Analysis of Multi-used ProTaper Universal Rotary System during Root Canal Therapy. 37(6), 758-763.

Yao JH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ (2006) Cyclic Fatigue of Three Types of Rotary Nickel-Titanium Files in a Dynamic Model. 32, 55-57.

G. Yared, F. Bou Dagher, P. Machtou (2001) Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator's proficiency on ProFile failures. 34(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00352.x

SY, K. Bae, S. Baek, K. Kum, W. Shon, Lee (2010) Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. 36(12).

M. Zarrabi, M. Javidi, M. Vatanpour, H. Esmaeili (2010) The influence of torque and manual glide path on the defect or separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments in root canal therapy. 21, 107-111.

Zelada G, Varela P, Martin B (2002) The Effect of Rotational Speed and the Curvature of Root Canals on the Breakage of Rotary Endodontic Instruments. 28, 540-542.

Zhang EW, Cheung GS, Zheng YF (2010) Influence of Cross-sectional Design and Dimension on Mechanical Behavior of Nickel-Titanium Instruments under Torsion and Bending: A Numerical Analysis. 36, 1394-1398.