A Prospective Single-Centre Randomised Controlled Study to Compare the Time to Healing of Partial Thickness Burn Wounds Treated with Versajet, Biobrane and Acticoat to Conventional Therapy
Keywords:
Abstract
Background: Burns in South Africa account for significant morbidity, mortality cost. Treatment options that could ease this burden require exploration. Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the time to healing of partial thickness burn wounds treated with Versajet, Biobrane and Acticoat to conventional therapy. Methods: A randomised, controlled, prospective study was undertaken. Results: One hundred and twenty one patients were randomised, and 96 were analysed. Median time to healing was slightly shorter for Biobrane-treated patients in the pediatric sub-group (21.7 [±9.0] versus 23.7 [±9.4], p=0.5361), and slightly longer in the adult sub-group (19 [12- 25] versus 18.5 [12-27], p=09695). Healing rates were higher for Biobrane-treated patients in the paediatric sub-group (84.6% versus 68.4%, p=0.197), and lower in the adult subgroup (78.3% versus 85.7%, p=0.487). . The absolute risk reduction (ARR) for Biobrane-treated patients in the paediatric sub-group was 0.16 (16%), yielding a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 6. The median number of dressing changes was significantly lower for Biobrane group in the adult and paediatric population (6.2 [±3.6], p=0.0003; and 7.6 [±4.8] versus 10.7 [=4.8], p=0.039). The mean cost per healed burn for Biobrane group was lower in the paediatric population (R111, 385 versus R143,917), and higher in the adult population (R54, 290 versus R90.175). Conclusion: Biobrane and Acticoat did not lead to a significant decrease in the time to healing, we believe the associated reduction in dressing changes to be important. Together with the obsereved cost reduction to heal partial thickness burns in children, we recommend this regime therapy in a paediatric setting, and have adapted our Standard of Care accordingly. We have identified a subgroup of adult patients who will benefit of the application of skin substitutes.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
Violence MRC/UNISA Crime (2009) MRC/UNISA Crime, Violence and Injury Lead Programme. http://www.mrc.ac.za/crime/nimss2008.pdf.crime/nimss200
H. Herbert, et al (2012) J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012. 73(1), 168-174.
S. Burrows, A (2010) van Niekerk, and L Laflamme, Fatal injuries among urban children in South Africa: risk distribution and potential for reduction. 88(4), 267-272.
C. Ahn, P (2012) K Maitz, The true cost of burn. 38(7), 967-974.
S. Cox, H. Cullingworth, Rode (2011) G., L Cullingworth, and H Rode, Treatment of paediatric burns with a nanocrystalline silver dressing compared with standard wound care in a burns unit: a cost analysis. 101(10), 728-731.
R. Varas (2005) A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Acticoat Versus Silver Sulfadiazine in the Treatment of Partial-Thickness Burns: Which Method Is Less Painful?. 26(4), 344-347.
F. W Wood (2012) A prospective randomized clinical pilot study to compare the effectiveness of Biobrane (R) synthetic wound dressing, with or without autologous cell suspension, to the local standard treatment regime in paediatric scald injuries. 38(6), 830-9.
I. Whitaker, et al (2007) The use of Biobrane® by burn units in the United Kingdom: A national study. 33(8), 1015-1020.
S. Lal, et al (2000) BIOBRANE® IMPROVES WOUND HEALING IN BURNED CHILDREN WITHOUT INCREASED RISK OF INFECTION. 14(3), 314-318.
L. Ou, et al (1998) Use of Biobrane in pediatric scald burns - experience in 106 children. 24(1), 49-53.
Christopher Hankins, Xiao Tang, Alan Phipps (2006) Hot beverage burns: An 11-year experience of the Yorkshire Regional Burns Centre. 32(1), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.08.001
H. Rennekampff, et al (2006) Debridement of burn wounds with a water jet surgical tool. 32(1), 64-9.
(2007) Treatment of deeppartial thickness and indeterminate depth facial burn wounds with water- jet debridement and a biosynthetic dressing. 38(Suppl 5), 39-45.
L. Cuttle, et al (2007) A retrospective cohort study of Acticoat™ versus Silvazine™ in a paediatric population. 33(6), 701-707.
(2011) Biobrane: a retrospective analysis of outcomes at a specialist adult burns centre. 37(4), 594-600.
Published
2014-11-04
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.