Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating between Local Tumor Recurrence and Benign Breast Changes after Breast Conservative Surgery
Keywords:
diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, breast lesions
Abstract
Objective: To assess the role of DWI and the ADC in differentiating between local tumor recurrence and benign breast changes after breast conservative surgery. Materials and Methods: 26 patients (age range, 25-68 years; mean age, 49 years) with breast conservation surgery were included in our study. MRI study was done using bilateral fat-suppressed T2- weighted fast spin-echo, axial STIR, axial T1- weighted fast spin-echo. DWI series were acquired using echo planar imaging pulse sequences incorporating with diffusion gradients and finally dynamic contrast enhancement study was done. Results: Among the twenty sex patients underwent MR imaging in our study, 7 patients were diagnosed at histopathology as local tumor recurrence at the site of surgery, and 11 patients had surgical scarring, 6 patients had seromas, one patient had hematoma and one patient had fat necrosis. Local tumor recurrence showed lower ADC values (mean ADC = 0.95 ± 0.37 x 10-3 mm2/s) than that of benign lesions (mean ADC = 1.69 ± 0.16 x 10-3 mm2/s). The sensitivity and specificity of DWI in the differentiating local tumor recurrence from benign breast lesions were 100 % and 94.7 %, respectively. Conclusion: DWI is easy to obtain in short scan time and easy to evaluate, and ADC values can differentiate between local tumor recurrence and benign breast changes after breast conservation surgery with high sensitivity & specificity.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
Jatoil, Proschan MA (2005) Randomized trials of breast‐conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. 28, 289‐294.
Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC (2003) Eighteen‐year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservaon therapy: the Naonal Cancer Instute randomized trial. 98, 697‐702.
Doyle T, Schultz DJ, Peters C (2001) Long‐term results of local recurrence aer breast conservaon treatment for invasive breast cancer. 51, 74‐80.
J. vanDongen, A. Voogd, I. Fenman (2000) Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Breast-Conserving Therapy With Mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 Trial. 92.
Fowble B, Schwaibold F (1991) Local-regional recurrence following definitive treatment for operable breast cancer. 373-402.
Preda L, Villa G, Rizzo S (2006) Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy. 8(5), R53.
P. Viehweg, A. Heinig, D. Lampe, J. Buchmann, S. Heywang-Köbrunner (1998) Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy. 7(3), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02591331
Frei KA, Kinkel K, Bonel HM, Lu Y, Esserman LJ, Hylton NM (2000) MR imaging of the breast in patients with positive margins after lumpectomy: influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging. 175(6), 1577-1584.
Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW (1998) Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. 5(3), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02303784
Linda Nunes, Mitchell Schnall, Susan Orel (2001) Update of Breast MR Imaging Architectural Interpretation Model. 219(2), 484-494. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma44484
Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA (2006) Diagnostic Architectural and Dynamic Features at Breast MR Imaging: Multicenter Study. 238(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381042117
American Radiology (2008) ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. 2.
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W (2007) American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography. 57(2), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75
Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ (2000) Dynamic high-spatial resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability.
David Bluemke, C. Gatsonis, M. Chen (2004) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy. 292(22), 2735. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.22.2735
Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging. 16(2), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10140
Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H (2008) Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of Breast Tumors: Clinical Application. 7(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.7.23
C. Marini, C. Iacconi, M. Giannelli, A. Cilotti, M. Moretti, C. Bartolozzi (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. 17(10), 2646-2655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0621-2
Erika Rubesova, Anne‐sophie Grell, Viviane De Maertelaer, Thierry Metens, Shih‐li Chao, Marc Lemort (2006) Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: A clinical prospective study. 24(2), 319-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20643
Shantanu Sinha, Flora Lucas‐quesada, Usha Sinha, Nanette DeBruhl, Lawrence Bassett (2002) In vivo diffusion‐weighted MRI of the breast: Potential for lesion characterization. 15(6), 693-704. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10116
Geppert Wenkel E, Schulz-Wendtland R (2007) Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. 14, 1077-1083.
Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S (2005) ADC Mapping of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors. 4(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.4.35
Heidi Lyng, Olav Haraldseth, Einar Rofstad (2000) Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. 43(6), 828-836. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200006)43:6
Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T (2008) Enhanced mass on contrast‐enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted MR images. 28(5), 1157-1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21570
Susan Orel, Mitchell Schnall (2001) MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer. 220(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113
Debra Ikeda, Douglas Baker, Bruce Daniel (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer: Clinical indications and breast MRI reporting system. 12(6), 975-983. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6
Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bluemke DA, Maranto C, Arnold C, Herskovits EH (2003) Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: Diagnosis with Multiparametric MR Imaging. 229(1), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2291020333
J. Mi, Eun, Bong (2007) The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values for Breast Tumors. 8, 390-396.
Gonzales A, CASTAÑON I, BALTAR N (2012) Diffusion weighted MR Imaging assessment after breast conservative treatment. C-1065.
Şahin C, Arıbal E (2013) The role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions in diffusion-weighted MRI. 19, 457-462.
P. Ranildi, M. Giulaini, B. Belli (2010) DWI in breast MRI: Role of ADC value to determine diagnosis of tumor between tumor recurrence and surgical scar in operated patients. e114-e123.
Tsushima et (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5‐T. 30, 249-255.
F. Kelcz, K. Hain (2010) Kelcz F, and Hain K.S.: Post Lumpectomy MRI: using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) to distinguish benign from malignant tissues. Mag. Reson. 18, 4535.
Dhillon GS, Bell N, Ginat DT (2011) Breast MR Imaging: White the Radiologist Needs to Know. 1, 48. https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.85655
Gombos Drukteinis JS, Raza S (2012) MR Imaging Assessment of the Breast after Breast Conservation Therapy: Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Lesions. 32, 219-234.
Kuroki Y, Nasu K, Kuroki S (2004) Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer with the Sensitivity Encoding Technique: Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value. 3(2), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.3.79
Published
2014-02-12
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.