Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen; Ismael Aunon-Martin; VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz; edelgado hdoc; j morenobeamud

Authors

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen
Ismael Aunon-Martin
VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz
edelgado hdoc
j morenobeamud

Keywords:

total hip arthroplasty, revision total hip arthroplasty, hip instability, hip dislocation, dual mobility cup, reinforcement cage device

Abstract

The current study evaluated the outcome of a retrospective series of 37 revision total hip arthroplasties with severe acetabular bone defects reconstruction using an antiprotrusio cage. We aimed to compare the peri and postoperative complications and mid-term outcomes of two groups, a reconstruction using a dual mobility cup (DMC) cemented into the cage (n=14) or a cemented simple polyethylene cup (SPEC) (n=23) at a mean follow-up of 5 years. We found an inverse association between the use of DMCs and both dislocation rate (p

Downloads

How to Cite

Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup. (2014). Global Journal of Medical Research, 14(13), 31-36. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/

Download Citation

References

Wegrzyn J, Thoreson AR, Guyen O (2013) Cementation of a dual‐mobility acetabular component into a well‐fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical validation. 31(6), 991-997. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22314

Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M (2009) Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. 95, 407-413.

Wegrzyn J, Pibarot V, Jacquel A, Carret JP (2014) Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull Cross-Plate, Structural Allograft and Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup in Revision THA at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. 29, 432-437.

Wayne Paprosky, Paul Perona, Jeffrey Lawrence (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: A 6-year follow-up evaluation. 9(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-x

Merle, '. Aubigné, R. (1970) Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 56, 481-486.

De Lee, J. Charnley, J. (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. 121, 20-32.

C. Ranawat, L. Dorr, A. Inglis (1980) Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. 62, 1059-1065.

R. Conn, Lfa Paterson, R. Stauffer (1985) Management of acetabular deficiency: long-term results of bone grafting the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. 9, 451.

Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Fehring TK, Paprosky WG (2013) Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management. 21, 128-139.

Coscujuela-Mañá A, Angles F, Tramunt C, Casanova X (2010) Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. 20(S7), 112-118.

Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G (2009) Use of a Dual Mobility Socket to Manage Total Hip Arthroplasty Instability. 467(2), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0476-0

Guyen O, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME (2008) Modes of Failure of Osteonics Constrained Tripolar Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of Forty-three Failed Implants. 90, 1553-1560.

Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri JP (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. 94(8), e23-e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.013

Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D (2010) The Use of a Cemented Dual Mobility Socket to Treat Recurrent Dislocation. 468, 3248-3254.

Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F (2008) Dual Mobility Cemented Cups Have Low Dislocation Rates in THA Revisions. 466, 389-395.

Schneider L, Phillipot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. 97, 807-813.