Lateral Approach Sinus (LAS) and Crestal Approach Sinus (CAS): The Unravelled Paraphernalia for Maxillary Sinus Membrane Advancement

Dr. Rinisha Sinha; Dr. Pranave P; Dr. Aishwarya Sabharwal; Dr. Nidhi Saripalli; Dr. Shiksha Dhawan; Dr. Nishita Bhosale

Authors

Dr. Rinisha Sinha
Dr. Pranave P
Dr. Aishwarya Sabharwal
Dr. Nidhi Saripalli
Dr. Shiksha Dhawan
Dr. Nishita Bhosale

Keywords:

crestal approach sinus lift, hard tissue augmentation, lateral window approach sinus lift

Abstract

The permanent replacement of missing teeth in the maxillary posterior tooth region becomes a tedious task when it is confounded with bone atrophies. To overcome this problem and achieve successful rehabilitation, maxillary sinus membrane elevation procedures have been advocated as the most reliable means. The lateral window technique and the crestal approach are two of the most common approaches. These technologically developed procedures have reported high success rates in cases of deficient residual bone. Over time, there have been many advancements in these techniques that led to the development of user-friendly kits like the Lateral approach Sinus (LAS) kit and the Crestal approach Sinus (CAS) kit. In this case series, we have reported two cases, treated with either of these approaches and have compared the same.

Downloads

How to Cite

Lateral Approach Sinus (LAS) and Crestal Approach Sinus (CAS): The Unravelled Paraphernalia for Maxillary Sinus Membrane Advancement. (2023). Global Journal of Medical Research, 23(J1), 35-47. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/102300

Download Citation

References

S Bathla, R Fry, K Majumdar (2018) Maxillary sinus augmentation. 22, 468-473.

D Smiler (1997) Internal Sinus Lift Using the Crestal Window Technique. 9, 307-314.

Stephen Wallace, Dennis Tarnow, Stuart Froum, Sang-Choon Cho, Homayoun Zadeh, Janet Stoupel, Massimo Fabbro, Tiziano Testori (2012) Maxillary Sinus Elevation by Lateral Window Approach: Evolution of Technology and Technique. 12(3), 161-171.

P Boyne, R James (1980) Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. 38(8), 613-616.

H Tatum (1986) Jr Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. 30, 207-229.

R Summers (1994) A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. 15, 154-156.

Young-Kyun Kim, Yong-Seok Cho, Pil-Young Yun (2013) Assessment of dentists' subjective satisfaction with a newly developed device for maxillary sinus membrane elevation by the crestal approach. 43(6), 308.

Paul Fugazzotto (2002) Survival Rates of 8-mm or Shorter Tissue-Level Implants in Function for Up to 228 Months. 35(6), 1239-1247.

D Schwartz-Arad, R Herzberg, E Dolev (2004) The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. 75, 511-516.

S Balaji (2013) Direct v/s Indirect sinus lift in maxillary dental implants. 3, 148-153.

Frank Strietzel, Marcus Nowak, Ingeborg Küchler, Anton Friedmann (2002) Peri‐implant alveolar bone loss with respect to bone quality after use of the osteotome technique. 13(5), 508-513.

Shilpa Kolhatkar, Leyvee Cabanilla, Monish Bhola (2009) Inadequate Vertical Bone Dimension Managed by Bone-added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation (BAOSFE): A Literature Review and Case Report. 10(3), 81-88.

B Leblebicioglu, S Ersanli, C Karabuda, T Tosun, H Gokdeniz (2005) Radiographic Evaluation of Dental Implants Placed Using an Osteotome Technique. 76(3), 385-390.

Paul Fugazzotto, Sergio De Paoli (2002) Sinus Floor Augmentation on at the Time of Maxillary Molar Extraction: Success and Failure Rates of 137 Implants in Function for Up to 3 Years. 73(1), 39-44.

Nicola Zitzmann, Peter Schärer (1998) Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. 85(1), 8-17.

Dominik Emmerich, Wael Att, Christian Stappert (2005) Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osteotomes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. 76(8), 1237-1251.

Jan Tetsch, Peter Tetsch, Dominikus Lysek (2010) Long‐term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time period of 15 years. 21(5), 497-503.

Philip Jesch, Emanuel Bruckmoser, Andreas Bayerle, Klaus Eder, Michaela Bayerle-Eder, Franz Watzinger (2013) A pilot-study of a minimally invasive technique to elevate the sinus floor membrane and place graft for augmentation using high hydraulic pressure: 18-month follow-up of 20 cases. 116(3), 293-300.