Methods for Assessing Human Embryos to Increase Reproductive Potential
Keywords:
assisted reproductive technologies, infertility, elective blastocyst transfer, time-lapse microscopy
Abstract
The embryological stage of ART programs is one of the most important, since the assessment of the quality of oocytes, their fertilization and in vitro cultivation to the stage of preimplantation embryos largely determines its success. Morphological evaluation of embryos is the main method of embryo selection. Time-lapse microscopy is one of the modern methods of selecting a high-quality embryo for transfer. In the analysis of many retrospective and prospective studies, they emphasize the advantage and lack of differences compared to traditional morphological assessment of the quality of embryos Almost all publications devoted to timelapse microscopy have focused on determining the timing of specific events of embryo division and then using this information to create algorithms that help to select embryo for transfer.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
O Ivanova, O Shurygina, D Rusakov, Yu, T Bykova, A Petrova, S Yukhimets, O Kulakova, S Yuldasheva (2019) Evaluation of the effectiveness of cryopreservation of human gametes and embryos in programs of assisted reproductive technologies. 27(3), 46-50.
O Ivanova, O Shurygina, D Rusakov, Ju, T Bykova, A Petrova, S Juhimec, O Kulakova, S Juldasheva (2019) Ocenka jeffektivnosti kriokonservacija gamet i jembrionov cheloveka v programmah vspomogatel'nyh reproduktivnyh tehnologij. 27(3), 46-50.
Sarah Armstrong, Priya Bhide, Vanessa Jordan, Allan Pacey, Jane Marjoribanks, Cindy Farquhar (2019) Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. 11320.
P Bortoletto, J Bakkensen, R Anchan (2018) Embryo transfer: timing and techniques. 43(1), 57-68.
D Brison, S Roberts, S Kimber (2013) How should we assess the safety of IVF technologies?. 27, 710-721.
G Coticchio, M Mignini Renzini, P Novara, M Lain, E De Ponti, D Turchi, R Fadini, M Dal Canto (2018) Focused time-lapse analysis reveals novel aspects of human fertilization and suggests new parameters of embryo viability. 33(1), 23-31.
Minghao Chen, Shiyou Wei, Junyan Hu, Jing Yuan, Fenghua Liu (2017) Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. 12(6), e0178720.
M De Los Santos, S Apter, G Coticchio, S Debrock, K Lundin, C Plancha, F Prados, L Rienzi, G Verheyen, B Woodward (2016) Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). 31(4), 685-686.
Joyce Harper, Emily Jackson, Karen Sermon, Robert Aitken, Stephen Harbottle, Edgar Mocanu, Thorir Hardarson, Raj Mathur, Stephane Viville, Andy Vail, Kersti Lundin (2017) Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for 'add-on' interventions?. 32(3), 485-491.
Mikkel Kragh, Henrik Karstoft (2021) Embryo selection with artificial intelligence: how to evaluate and compare methods?. 38(7), 1675-1689.
K Lasiene, V Gedrimas, A Vitkus, S Glinskyte, V Lasys, A Valanciute, W Sienkiewicz (2005) Evaluation of morphological criteria of sperm quality before in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. 16(4), 773-785.
N Murphy, T Samarasekera, L Macaskill, J Mullen, Ljf Rombauts (2020) Genome sequencing of human in vitro fertilisation embryos for pathogenic variation screening. 10(1), 3795.
T Nakahara, A Iwase, M Goto, T Harata, M Suzuki, M Ienaga, H Kobayashi, S Takikawa, S Manabe, F Kikkawa, H Ando (2010) Evaluation of the safety of timelapse observations for human embryos. 27(2-3), 93-96.
L Polanski, M Coelho Neto, C Nastri, P Navarro, R Ferriani, N Raine‐fenning, W Martins (2014) Time‐lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta‐analysis. 44(4), 394-401.
E Rocafort, M Enciso, A Leza, J Sarasa, J Aizpurua (2018) Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.
José Rocha, Felipe Passalia, Felipe Matos, Marc Maserati Júnior, Mayra Alves, Tamie Almeida, Bruna Cardoso, Andrea Basso, Marcelo Nogueira (2016) Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?. 20(3), 150-158.
A Reignier, J Lammers, P Barriere, T Freour (2018) Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review. 36, 380-387.
Charalambos Strouthopoulos, George Anifandis (2018) An automated blastomere identification method for the evaluation of day 2 embryos during IVF/ICSI treatments. 156, 53-59.
Tetsuya Takakuwa (2018) 3D Analysis of Human Embryos and Fetuses Using Digitized Datasets From the Kyoto Collection. 301(6), 960-969.
Nikica Zaninovic, Mohamad Irani, Marcos Meseguer (2017) Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy?. 108(5), 722-729.
Nikica Zaninovic, Zev Rosenwaks (2020) Artificial intelligence in human in vitro fertilization and embryology. 114(5), 914-920.
Published
2022-11-25
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.