Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes

Authors

  • Dr. Raline Solomon Amalakaran

  • Dr.Tamilarasi

  • Dr. Gitansha

  • Dr. D Ramamurthy

Keywords:

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of Barrett Versus 3 rd generation formulae for different intraocular lens (IOL) powers for Indian eyes with different axial lengths.

How to Cite

Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes. (2020). Global Journal of Medical Research, 20(F9), 41-45. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/2236

References

J Kane, A Van Heerden, A Atik, C Petsoglou (2016) Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulas. 42, 1490-1500.

P Aristodemou, Knox Cartwright, N Sparrow, J Johnston, R (2011) Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. 37, 63-71.

John Ladas, Aazim Siddiqui, Uday Devgan, Albert Jun (2015) A 3-D "Super Surface" Combining Modern Intraocular Lens Formulas to Generate a "Super Formula" and Maximize Accuracy. 133(12), 1431.

Graham Barrett (1993) An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. 19(6), 713-720.

(2013) 2a IBM SPSS Statistics Processes for PC. 22, 22-39.

Thomas Olsen (2007) Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. 85(5), 472-485.

Alexander Lee, Mujtaba Qazi, Jay Pepose (2008) Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. 19(1), 13-17.

Joseph Colin, Sohéla El Kebir, Emmanuelle Eydoux, Thanh Hoang-Xuan, Pascal Rozot, Marc Weiser (2010) Assessment of patient satisfaction with outcomes of and ophthalmic care for cataract surgery. 36(8), 1373-1379.

Anders Behndig, Per Montan, Ulf Stenevi, Maria Kugelberg, Mats Lundström (2011) One million cataract surgeries: Swedish National Cataract Register 1992-2009. 37(8), 1539-1545.

Wolfgang Haigis (2009) Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia. 35(5), 906-911.

Sheridan Lam (2013) Comparing optical low coherence reflectometry and immersion ultrasound in refractive outcome after cataract surgery. 39(2), 297-298.

G Carifi, F Aiello, V Zygoura, N Kopsachilis, V Maurino (2015) Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by multiple currently available intraocular lens power calculation formulas in small eyes. 159(3), 577-583.

Olga Reitblat, Ehud Assia, Guy Kleinmann, Adi Levy, Graham Barrett, Adi Abulafia (2015) Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas. 43(4), 328-334.

R Gale, M Saldana, R Johnston, B Zuberbuhler, M Mckibbin (2009) Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. 23(1), 149-152.

S Simon, Y Chee, R Haddadin, P Veldman, S Borboli-Gerogiannis, S Brauner, K Chang, S Chen, M Gardiner, S Greenstein, C Kloek, T Chen (2014) Achieving target refraction after cataract surgery. 121(2), 440-444.

R Sheard (2014) Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery. 28(2), 118-125.

D Zhou, Z Sun, G Deng (2019) Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia. 67, 484-489.

S Gökce, J Zeiter, M Weikert, D Koch, W Hill, L Wang (2017) Intraocular lens power calculations in short eyes using 7 formulas. 43(7), 892-897.

Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes

Published

2020-10-05

How to Cite

Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes. (2020). Global Journal of Medical Research, 20(F9), 41-45. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/2236