Affordance-Based Assessment is Neither Subjective nor Objective Outcome Measure
Keywords:
gibson#xB4;s affordance; entrainment of touch and posture; affordance-based-assessment; knee synergy
Abstract
There is increasing awareness of the need to include patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in evaluatingthe measurement of clinical outcomes, withan increasing focus placed on the patients#x2019;perspective.Scientists have tried to link PROs with objective outcomes, providing unique information formanaging patient care. Traditionally, objective and patient-reportedoutcomes (such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis OutcomeScore (KOOS)) are considered two distinct constructs, which cannotserve as a direct proxy for each other. Gibson#xB4;s affordances are properties taken with reference to the patient. They are neither objective nor subjective.The present article develops a theoretical framework called entrainment of touch and posturethat advocates the vis viva (living force) as the proper gauge for the dynamical action of a force, and that could explain #x201C;possibilities for action or affordance#x201D; during outcome measurement.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
Published
2021-01-15
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.