Affordance-Based Assessment is Neither Subjective nor Objective Outcome Measure

Authors

  • Wangdo Kim

Keywords:

gibson#xB4;s affordance; entrainment of touch and posture; affordance-based-assessment; knee synergy

Abstract

There is increasing awareness of the need to include patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in evaluatingthe measurement of clinical outcomes, withan increasing focus placed on the patients#x2019;perspective.Scientists have tried to link PROs with objective outcomes, providing unique information formanaging patient care. Traditionally, objective and patient-reportedoutcomes (such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis OutcomeScore (KOOS)) are considered two distinct constructs, which cannotserve as a direct proxy for each other. Gibson#xB4;s affordances are properties taken with reference to the patient. They are neither objective nor subjective.The present article develops a theoretical framework called entrainment of touch and posturethat advocates the vis viva (living force) as the proper gauge for the dynamical action of a force, and that could explain #x201C;possibilities for action or affordance#x201D; during outcome measurement.

How to Cite

Wangdo Kim. (2021). Affordance-Based Assessment is Neither Subjective nor Objective Outcome Measure. Global Journal of Medical Research, 21(H1), 13–17. Retrieved from https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/2407

Affordance-Based Assessment is Neither Subjective nor Objective Outcome Measure

Published

2021-01-15