Resident Participation and Directed Electronic Medical Record Programming Can Decrease Peri-Operative Complications and Improve Surgical Quality, NSQIP Quality Metrics
Keywords:
NSQIP; quality improvement; reimbursement; medicare
Abstract
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) is a data collection system used to track hospital and surgical performance and to compare hospital and surgical quality. Improvement in quality metrics, both over time in the same institution and against peer hospitals, is rewarded by financial incentives with improved Medicare payments. As such physicians may be interested in the quality metrics of their specific practice and performance improvement not only because of the possibility of improved care provision but also because reimbursement may become dependent on such data. We hypothesized that involvement of general surgery residents would be a useful modality to improve NSQIP data and possibly improve patient care. The residents were incorporated into our hospital performance committee and directly assisted with the overhaul of surgical quality assurance over an eight-month period. Data from the antecedent eight-month period was compared to data from the eight months after general surgery resident oversight was initiated. Statistically significant improvement in hospital performance was demonstrated in five of the eight measured categories. We believe that this finding could be reproducible in other institutions; additional studies are necessary to determine this.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
Katherine Rowell, Florence Turrentine, Matthew Hutter, Shukri Khuri, William Henderson (2007) Use of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data as a Catalyst for Quality Improvement. 204(6), 1293-1300.
S Khuri, J Daley, W Henderson, G Barbour, P Lowry, G Irvin, J Gibbs, F Grover, K Hammermeister, J Stremple (1995) The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: Risk Adjustment for the Comparative Assessment of the Quality of Surgical Care. 180(5), 519-531.
S Khuri, J Daley, Henderson (1999) The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: The First National, Validated, Outcome-Based, Risk-Adjusted, and Peer-Controlled Program for the Measurement and Enhancement of the Quality of Surgical Care. 228, 491-507.
R Werner, J Kolstad, E Stuart, D Polsky (2011) The Effect of Pay-For-Performance in Hospitals: Lessons for Quality Improvement. 30(4), 690-698.
W Borden, J Blustein (2012) Valuing Improvement in Value-Based Purchasing. 5(2), 163-170.
Meredith Rosenthal, Rushika Fernandopulle, Hyunsook Song, Bruce Landon (2004) Paying For Quality: Providers' Incentives For Quality Improvement. 23(2), 127-141.
Marko Bukur, Matthew Singer, Rex Chung, Eric Ley, Darren Malinoski, Daniel Margulies, Ali Salim (2012) Influence of Resident Involvement on Trauma Care Outcomes. 147(9), 856.
R Kiran, Ahmed Ali, U Coffey, J Vogel, J Pokala, N Fazio, V (2012) Impact of Resident Participation in Surgical Operations on Postoperative Outcomes: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. 256(3), 469-475.
Sumanas Jordan, L Mioton, J Smetona, A Aggarwal, E Wang, G Dumanian, J Kim (2012) Abstract 2. 131, 12.
Published
2017-10-13
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.