Abstract

Some policy-makers believe a decentralized health system enhances service delivery by improving authority autonomy accountability and community participation at the local level Evidence on the extent to which these benefits have been realized and whether there are gaps in service delivery is essential for policy designs and system reinforcing strategies The study gathered data through 29 interviews with service providers and policy-makers and eight FGDs with residents and analyzed it for themes The results showed several benefits of the decentralization system program that includes increased autonomy over staff planning budgeting appointments increased participation in service boards in cash and kinds The findings also revealed several challenges that hinder the effective functioning of decentralization including lack of authority to recruit staff interference in the appointment transfer of cases procurement limited decision making power over local revenue resources lack of community responsibility in service planning and monitoring Although the designing of decentralized health program was appropriate in earnest critical elements for attaining adequate decentralization are still lacking The region has still played the biggest role in staff recruitment resource transfer planning programming These deficiencies have resulted in inadequate information nominal service monitoring and low quality of services outcomes Better quality of service delivery necessitates financial independence and significant service monitoring