Electronic Fetal Monitoring of Low Risk Patients

Authors

  • Dr. Poonam Singh

  • Dr. Lata Agrawal

  • Dr. Shobha Mukherjee

  • Dr. Kumari Aparajeeta

  • Dr. Parru Singh

Keywords:

Abstract

Introduction-Minimizing fetal morbidity during labor is one of the principal aims of intrapartum care. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM) and intermittent auscultation are the known modalities of intrapartum fetal surveillance. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is routinely used at admission-the so-called Fetal Admission Test. If no fetal heart rate abnormalities are detected, continuous electronic monitoring is replaced by intermittent assessment for the remaining labor. The Admission test may help to identify those cases at risk in labor at the same time doing away with continuous monitoring. EFM at high risk is understandable, but at low-risk, does its advantages balance out the cost and increased incidence of operative delivery? This study is aimed at studying electronic fetal monitoring of low-risk patients in labor and its relation to perinatal outcome.

How to Cite

Electronic Fetal Monitoring of Low Risk Patients. (2020). Global Journal of Medical Research, 20(E4), 41-45. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/2137

References

A Vintzileos, D Nochimson, A Antsaklis, I Varvarigos, E Guzman, R Knuppel (1995) Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth. 173(4), 1021-1024.

Richa Lohana, Meena Khatri, Chella Hariharan (2016) Correlation of non stress test with fetal outcome in term pregnancy (37-42 Weeks). 2(4), 639.

V Nikita, B Kumare (2016) Labour Admission Test (LAT) as a Predictor of Intrapartum Fetal Distress. 6(1), 26-30.

Geeta Gurung, Ashma Rana, Kanti Giri (2006) Detection of intrapartum fetal hypoxia using admission test (AT). 1(2), 10-13.

N Patel, G Kadikar, B Kalathiya, P Bajaj (2015) A prospective study of admission test during labour and feto-maternal outcome. 5(3), 40-43.

Jitesh Shah, N Mehta Meghna (2015) A Kognathi Satyanarayan. 3(2), 3-5.

V Gaikwad, M Puri, P Pandey (2015) Labour admission test: An assessment of the test's value as screening for foetal distress in labour. 1(13), 653-655.

Gyaneswhor Shrestha, Ashim Gurung, Gopal Sedhain, Swmaya Bajpai, Aliza Hamal, Rupesh Verma, Bibhav Bashyal, Aakriti Shrestha, Bishal Dhakal, Aayushi Shrestha, Roshan Acharya, Ashish Neupane, Shiva Bhandari (2015) Prediction of the outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage by blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: a prospective observational study. 86(11), 6472-6476.

Swati Patel, Ajesh Desai, Dirgha Pamnani, Komal Modi (2015) Analysis of Mullerian developmental defects in a tertiary care hospital: a four year experience. 2(2), 570-574.

Devi Rama, B Madhavi, G, L Pranathi Reddy, P Anusha Rao (2015) Use of Cardiotocogram (CTG) as an Admission Test as predictor of fetal outcome in labour in low risk group. 10(2), 97-101.

Electronic Fetal Monitoring of Low Risk Patients

Published

2020-07-20

How to Cite

Electronic Fetal Monitoring of Low Risk Patients. (2020). Global Journal of Medical Research, 20(E4), 41-45. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/2137