Comparison between Different Techniques for Determining Hematological Parameters in Dogs

Authors

  • Larissa Marchiori Sena

  • Theo Matos Arantes Morares

  • Lorena Silveira de Almeida

  • Ronaldo Eug#xEA;nio de Oliveira

  • Ana Paula Madureira

  • Graziela Barioni

  • Th#xE9;o Matos Arantes Morares

Keywords:

canine, hematological counter, hemogram

Abstract

The objective was to compare the hematological parameters obtained using automated, manual and estimated evaluation techniques, in order to verify whether these techniques can be used with confidence in dogs. Samples from 297 dogs were submitted to automated, manual and estimated blood count based on the hematocrit leveus and platelet estimation. Fisher's Exact Test, sensitivity, specificity calculations, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and kappa agreement coefficient (k) (p

How to Cite

Comparison between Different Techniques for Determining Hematological Parameters in Dogs. (2020). Global Journal of Medical Research, 20(G3), 11-17. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/2223

References

Lucas Canuto, Lorenzo Segabinazzi, Endrigo Araújo, Luis Silva, Sidnei Oliveira, Felipe Dalanezi, José Dell'aqua Junior, Frederico Papa, Eunice Oba (2015) Effect of quercetin or butylated hydroxytoluene on cooled or frozen-thawed ram sperm quality. 43(2), 841-854.

C Briggs, N Culp, B Davist, D 'onofrio, G Zini, G Machin, S (2014) ICSH guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting. 36, 613-627.

W Shalm, N Jain (1986) Shalm's veterinary hematology. 305.

P Turkson, E Ganyo (2015) Relationship between haemoglobin concentration and packed cell volume in cattle blood samples. 82(1), 863-868.

D Denicola (2011) Advances in hematology analyzers. 309(2), 52-61.

P Silva, H Alves, S Comar, R Henneberg, J Merlin, S Stinghen (2016) Hematologia laboratorial: teoria e procedimentos.

Natali Bauer, Andreas Moritz (2008) Evaluation of three methods for measurement of hemoglobin and calculated hemoglobin parameters with the ADVIA 2120 and ADVIA 120 in dogs, cats, and horses. 37(2), 173-179.

A Ungllaloro, Alder, Hl (1957) The correlation between packed cell volume and erthocyte number in canine bood. 18, 909-911.

R Cowell, R Tyler, J Meinkoth, D Denicola (2009) Diagnóstico Citológico e Hematologia de Cães e Gatos.

Mohamed-Rachid Boulassel, Raya Al-Farsi, Sulaiman Al-Hashmi, Hamad Al-Riyami, Hammad Khan, Salam Al-Kindi (2015) Accuracy of Platelet Counting by Optical and Impedance Methods in Patients with Thrombocytopaenia and Microcytosis. 15(4), 463-468.

K Cha, R Faris, E Brown, D Wilmore (1994) An electronic method for rapid measurement of haematocrit in blood samples. 15, 129-137.

D Zelmanovic, E Hetherington (1998) Automated analysis of feline platelets in whole blood, including platelet count, mean platelet volume and activation state. 27(2), 2-9.

W Coulter (1956) Commentary on and reprint of Coulter WH, High speed automatic blood cell counter and cell size analyzer, in Proceedings of the National Electronics Conference (1956) 12:1034-1044. 12, 911-921.

B Steele, Niou-Ching Wu, C Whitcomb (2001) White Blood Cell and Platelet Counting Performance by Hematology Analyzers: A Critical Evaluation. 331, 255-266.

M Zandecki, F Genevieve, J Gerard, A Godon (2007) Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part II: white blood cells, red blood cells, haemoglobin, red cell indices and reticulocytes. 29(1), 21-41.

S Tasker, P Cripps, A Mackin (2001) Evaluation of methods of platelet counting in the cat. 42(7), 326-332.

M Boulassel, Alr Farsi, Sal Hashmi, Als Kind (2015) Comparative analysis of four methods for enumeration of platelet counts in thrombocytopenic patients. 340(3), 119-124.

Comparison between Different Techniques for Determining Hematological Parameters in Dogs

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

Comparison between Different Techniques for Determining Hematological Parameters in Dogs. (2020). Global Journal of Medical Research, 20(G3), 11-17. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/2223