Microbiological Evaluation of Poultry Meat Obtained from Different Retail Markets in Khulna District
Keywords:
Abstract
The research work conducted to evaluate microbial load in poultry meat from different retail markets in the Khulna district (Nirala, Dumuria, and Fultola). The objective of the present study was to get quality poultry products from commercial farms and retail markets. A total of 48 samples collected and brought to Quality Feed Lab. for laboratory assay. Samples were propagating in nutrient agar followed by culture on selective media, Eosin Methylene Blue Agar, Mac-Conkey agar, Brilliant Green Agar, Salmonella-Shigella Agar. Total numbers of 48 samples examined, and 30 samples were found positive to E. coli, and the prevalence of E. coli in this study was 62.20 %. 37.50% of thigh meat samples were positive for E. coli within 24 tested samples whereas 87.50% of breast meat samples were positive within 24 tested samples for this bacteria. On the other hand, 23 samples were found positive for Salmonella spp, and the prevalence of Salmonella spp in this study was 49.91 %. 29.16% of thigh samples were positive for Salmonella spp within 24 tested samples whereas 66.66% of litter samples were positive within 24 tested samples for this bacteria. Total Viable Count (TVC), Total Coliform Count (TCC), Total Salmonella Count (TSC), and Total Campylobacter Count (CPC) in meat samples of different broiler markets like Nirala market at Khulna city corporation, Dumuria, and Fultola were determined.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
Abraham Adu-Gyamfi, Wellington Torgby-Tetteh, Victoria Appiah (2012) Microbiological Quality of Chicken Sold in Accra and Determination of D10-Value of E. coli. 03(05), 693-698.
Seemi Alam, Howard Mb, K Fatema, Kmf Haque (2015) Antibiogram Of Pre-Processed Raw Chicken Meat From Different Supershops Of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. 2(01 & 02), 45-52.
N Bhandari, Nepali Db, S Paudyal (2013) Assessment of bacterial load in broiler chicken meat from the retail meat shops in Chitwan, Nepal. 2(3), 99-104.
T Bintsis (2017) References Leuconostocgasicomitatum sp. nov. associated with spoiled raw tomato-marinated broiler meat strips packaged under modified atmosphere conditions. 3(3), 3764-3772.
Ladaporn Bodhidatta, Philip Mcdaniel, Siriporn Sornsakrin, Apichai Srijan, Oralak Serichantalergs, Carl Mason (2010) Case-Control Study of Diarrheal Disease Etiology in a Remote Rural Area in Western Thailand. 83(5), 1106-1109.
S Cowan (1985) Cowan and Steel's manual for identification of medical bacteria. 138-139.
S Das, S Chowdhury, M Khatun, M Nishibori, N Isobe, Y Yoshimura (2008) Poultry production profile.
S Datta, A Akter, I Shah, K Fatema, T Islam, A Bandyopadhyay, Zum Khan, D Biswas (2012) Microbiological quality assessment of raw meat and meat product and antibiotic susceptibility of isolated staphylococcus aureus. 2, 187-194.
Md. Faruque, Shahin Mahmud, Md. Munayem, Razia Sultana, Md. Molla, Md. Ali, Muhammad Wasim, Sourav Sarker, Fatematuz Evamoni (2019) Bacteriological Analysis and Public Health Impact of Broiler Meat: A Study on Nalitabari Paurosova, Sherpur, Bangladesh. 09(07), 581-601.
P Fratmico, A Bhunia, J Smith (2005) Foodborne Pathogens. 273.
K Gomez, Gomez (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research.
Gemma González‐ortiz, Roser Sala, Elisa Cánovas, Nourhène Abed, Ana Barroeta (2013) Consumption of Dietary n‐3 Fatty Acids Decreases Fat Deposition and Adipocyte Size, but Increases Oxidative Susceptibility in Broiler Chickens. 48(7), 705-717.
M Hasan, Sm Kabir, Nazmul Hoda, M Amin (2015) Assessment of microbial load in marketed broiler meat at Mymensingh district of Bangladesh and its public health implications. 2(1), 87-95.
Icmsf (1985) Microorganism in foods; samples for Microbiological Analysis: Principles and specific applications.
Iso (1995) International meeting of ISO/TC 43, ISO/TC 43/SC 1, and ISO/TC 108. 81(1), 202-202.
Pauliina Isohanni, Stephan Huehn, Tommi Aho, Thomas Alter, Ulrike Lyhs (2013) Heat stress adaptation induces cross-protection against lethal acid stress conditions in Arcobacter butzleri but not in Campylobacter jejuni. 34(2), 431-435.
A Javadi, S Safarmashaei (2011) Study of Enterobacteriacea contamination level in premises of poultry slaughterhouse with HACCP system. 10, 2163-2166.
F Khalafalla, Ali Fatma, Hm, A El-Fouley (2019) Microbiological evaluation of chicken meat products. 26(2), 151-163.
Gordana Kralik, Zlata Kralik, Manuela Grčević, Danica Hanžek (2017) Quality of Chicken Meat. 4.
Tahiru Mahami, Wellington Togby-Tetteh, Delali Kottoh, Leticia Amoakoah-Twum, Emmanuel Gasu, Sylvester Annan, Daniel Larbi, Isaac Adjei, Abraham Adu-Gyamfi (2019) Microbial Food Safety Risk to Humans Associated with Poultry Feed: The Role of Irradiation. 2019, 1-7.
Samita Maharjan, Binod Rayamajhee, Vijay Chhetri, Samendra Sherchan, Om Panta, Tika Karki (2019) Microbial quality of poultry meat in an ISO 22000:2005 certified poultry processing plant of Kathmandu valley. 6(1).
Franca Marangoni, Giovanni Corsello, Claudio Cricelli, Nicola Ferrara, Andrea Ghiselli, Lucio Lucchin, Andrea Poli (2015) Role of poultry meat in a balanced diet aimed at maintaining health and wellbeing: an Italian consensus document. 59(1), 27606.
G Mead (2004) Microbiological quality of poultry meat: a review. 6(3), 135-142.
S Shane (2000) Campylobacter infection of commercial poultry. 19(2), 376-395.
N Sultana, M Haque, M Rahman, M Akter, M Begum, M Fakhruzzaman, Y Akter, M Amin (2017) Microbiological quality of commercially available poultry feeds sold in Bangladesh. 3(1), 52-60.
K Yashoda, N Sachindra, P Sakhare, D Rao (2001) MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF BROILER CHICKEN CARCASSES PROCESSED HYGIENICALLY IN A SMALL SCALE POULTRY PROCESSING UNIT. 24(3), 249-259.
Published
2021-09-28
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.