Continuous Movement of Stems and Cement in both Polished and Rough Tapered Femoral Stems in A Biomechanical Model
Keywords:
Abstract
Polished tapered stems used in hip replacement subside into bone cement without loosening. However, subsidence of rough stems leads to loosening of the prosthesis. There have been no reports on continuous movement of cement and stem. We believed that the relation of stem subsidence to cement differed by stem surface finish. To determine whether this was the case, we compared the pattern of movement of stem and cement in both polished and rough stems in a biomechanical model. Methods Two sizes of polished stems and of roughprocessed stems (rough stems) were fixed into composite femurs with different cement thickness, and a 1-Hz dynamic load was applied for a total of 2 million cycles. An 8-hour no load period was set after every 16 hours of load. Continuous stem motion was measured by a digital displacement gauge, and continuous cement motion was recorded by a strain gauge on an aluminum plate inserted in the cement. All stems subsided downward during the load periods but rose during the no load periods in a 1-day cycle, and a great deal of subsidence were seen by 200,000 cycles– after loading. For polished stems, more than 85% of the total subsidence occurred by 1 million loading cycles, and subsidence rates converged after that. Stem subsidence was not accompanied with cement subsidence. For rough stems, however, subsidence progressed linearly and was accompanied by cement subsidence.The convergence of stem subsidence and lack of synchronization with cement subsidence in polished stems indicated taper slip into cement without loosening. Early subsidence in rough stems leads to progressive subsidence.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
J Alfaro-Adrián, H Gill, D Murray (1999) Cement migration after THR. 81-B(1), 130-134.
J Alfaro-Adrián, H Gill, D Murray (2001) Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. 16, 598-606.
J Arnold, N Venditti (2001) Effects of environment on the creep properties of a poly(ethylmethacrylate) based bone cement. 12(8), 707-717.
G Bergmann, F Graichen, A Rohlmann (1993) Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. 26, 969-990.
L Cristofolini, M Viceconti, A Cappello, Toni (1996) Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. 29, 525-535.
R Crowninshield, R Brand, R Johnston, J Milroy (1980) The Effect of Femoral Stem Cross-Sectional Geometry on Cement Stresses in Total Hip Reconstruction. 146, 71-77.
O Eden, A Lee, R Hooper (2002) Stress relaxation modelling ofpolymethylmethacrylate bone cement. 216, 195-199.
Anneliese Heiner, Thomas Brown (2001) Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. 34(6), 773-781.
D Howie, R Middleton, K Costi (1998) Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. 80-B(4), 573-576.
A Kaneuji, T Sugimori, T Ichiseki, K Fukui, K Yamada, T Matsumoto (2006) The relationship between stem subsidence and improvement in the radiolucency in polished tapered stems. 30, 387-390.
Ayumi Kaneuji, Kengo Yamada, Kenichi Hirosaki, Masahiro Takano, Tadami Matsumoto (2009) Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems. 80(3), 270-276.
A J C Lee (1990) The time-dependent properties of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement: the interaction of shape of femoral stems surface finish and bone cement. 11-19.
A Lee, R Ling, Sabina Gheduzzi, Jean-Pierre Simon, R Renfro (2002) Factors affecting the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement. 13(8), 723-733.
G Shen (1998) Femoral stem fixation. An engineering interpretation of the long-term outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. 80, 754-756.
Anna Stefánsdóttir, Herbert Franzén, Ragnar Johnsson, Ewald Ornstein, Martin Sundberg (2004) Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stemA radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years. 75(4), 408-414.
M Sundberg, J Besjakov, T Von Schewelow, Å Carlsson (2005) Movement patterns of the C-stem femoral component. 87-B(10), 1352-1356.
Nico Verdonschot, Rik Huiskes (1996) Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction. 29(12), 1569-1575.
Published
2013-06-24
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.