Evaluation of Lumber Lordotic Angle in Patients with Inter Vertebral Disc Prolapse using Cobbs Method

Authors

  • Caroline Edward Ayad

Keywords:

cobb, inter vertebral disc, MRI

Abstract

This study was done to evaluate the lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) in patients with inter vertebral disc prolapse examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using Cobb’s method. This study was conducted at Antalya Medical center and Elnilin Medical Center and extended from November 2012 up to March 2013. Total sample of 62 Sudanese subjects were included in the study, with ages ranging between (24-80 years), 50 of the total sample were 25 males and 25 females underwent MR lumbar scan and were diagnosed to have inter vertebral disc prolapse at different vertebral levels, the remaining 12 were diagnosed as normal lumbar spine and they were considered as control group. Measurement of (LLA) was done from the mid-sagittal slice of T2 MRI lumbar spine using Cobb’s method; by drawing a perpendicular line to a line drawn across the superior endplate of first lumbar vertebra and the superior endplate of first sacral vertebra; the angle formed by the intersection of the two perpendicular lines is the Cobb angle or lumbar lordotic angle. The Cobb angle and inter vertebral disc prolapse level were then correlated with Gender, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and jobs to demonstrate if there is any degree of association. The study concluded that Cobb angle and Disc prolapse levels have no significant relation with job, height, weight, age and BMI, no significant difference was detected between Cobb angle of the normal subjects and patients with prolapsed disc and the results did not differ among male and female patients. Using MRI in the detection of vertebral morphological changes and end plates degeneration is recommended since it involves no ionizing radiation and has excellent demarcation of disc prolapse. The dependence upon the Cobb angle in diagnoses of disc prolapse is of no significant value.

How to Cite

Evaluation of Lumber Lordotic Angle in Patients with Inter Vertebral Disc Prolapse using Cobbs Method. (2014). Global Journal of Medical Research, 13(K7), 1-6. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/507

References

F Enzinger, S Weiss (1995) General considerations. 1-16.

Curtis Mettlin, Roger Priore, Uma Rao, Delores Gamble, Warren Lane, Gerald Murphy (1982) Results of the national soft‐tissue sarcoma registry. 19(4), 224-227.

M Kransdorf, M Murphey (2000) Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses: A current perspective. 175, 575-587.

M Kransdorf, M Murphey (1997) The use of gadolinium in the MR evaluation of soft tissue tumors. 18, 251-268.

A Rydholm, N Berg (1983) Size, site and clinical incidence of lipoma. Factors in the differential diagnosis of lipoma and sarcoma. 54, 929-934.

Murali Sundaram, Michael Mcguire, David Herbold (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue masses: An evaluation of fifty-three histologically proven tumors. 6(3), 237-248.

S Sahrmann (2002) Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes.

Y Kuo, E Tully, M Galea (2009) Sagittal spinal posture after pilatesbased exercise in healthy older adults. 34, 1046-1051.

Florence Kendall, Elizabeth Mccreary, Patricia Provance (2005) Muscles, Testing and Function. 26(8), 1070.

P O'sullivan Clinical instability' of the lumbar spine: its pathological basis, diagnosis and conservative management.

J Boyling, G Jull, Eds (2004) Grieve's Modern Manual Therapy.

A Smith, O 'sullivan, P Straker, L (2008) Classification of sagittal thoracolumbo pelvic alignment of the adolescent spine in standing and its relationship to low back pain. 33, 2101-2107.

X Cheng, Y Sun, S Boonen (1998) Measurements of vertebral shape by radiographic morphometry: sex differences and relationships with vertebral level and lumbar lordosis. 27(7), 380-384.

Barbara Norton, Shirley Sahrmann, Linda Van Dillen (2004) Differences in Measurements of Lumbar Curvature Related to Gender and Low Back Pain. 34(9), 524-534.

Damasceno (2006) Lumbar lordosis: a study of angle values and of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs role. 14(4).

Eslam Babai (2012) An Innovative Software Method for Measuring Lumbar Lordosis. 3(1), 204-213.

S Ghassan, Skaf, M Chakib, Nathalie Ayoub, Massud Domloj, Cherine Turbay, H El-Zein, Hourani (2011) Effect of Age and Lordotic Angle on the Level of Lumbar Disc Herniation Advances in Orthopedics. 6.

Khodadad Letafatkar (1387) Effects of weight, gender and number of pregnancies on lumbar total and segmental lordosis and low back pain. 4(2).

M Nourbakhsh (2001) Effects of lifestyle and work-related physical activity on the degree of lumbar lordosis and chronic low back pain in a Middle East population. 14(4), 283-292.

Amonoo-Kuofi Hs (1992) Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar Spine. During aging. 145, 373-377.

P Guigui, N Levassor, L Rillardon, P Wodecki, L Cardine (2003) Valeur physiologiquedes paramètres pelviens et rachidiens de l'equilibre sagital du rachis -analyse d'une série de 250 voluntaries. 89, 496-506.

Daniel Gelb, Lawrence Lenke, Keith Bridwell, Kathy Blanke, Kevin Mcenery (1995) An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers. 20(12), 1351-1358.

Evaluation of Lumber Lordotic Angle in Patients with Inter Vertebral Disc Prolapse using Cobbs Method

Published

2014-02-20

How to Cite

Evaluation of Lumber Lordotic Angle in Patients with Inter Vertebral Disc Prolapse using Cobbs Method. (2014). Global Journal of Medical Research, 13(K7), 1-6. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/507