Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup

Authors

  • Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen

  • Ismael Aunon-Martin

  • VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz

Keywords:

total hip arthroplasty, revision total hip arthroplasty, hip instability, hip dislocation, dual mobility cup, reinforcement cage device

Abstract

The current study evaluated the outcome of a retrospective series of 37 revision total hip arthroplasties with severe acetabular bone defects reconstruction using an antiprotrusio cage We aimed to compare the peri and postoperative complications and mid-term outcomes of two groups a reconstruction using a dual mobility cup DMC cemented into the cage n 14 or a cemented simple polyethylene cup SPEC n 23 at a mean follow-up of 5 years We found an inverse association between the use of DMCs and both dislocation rate p 0 05 and dislocation undergoing revision p 0 05 No aseptic loosening was found in the DMC-group and there were no differences in the rest of the complications between the DMC-group and the SPEC-group p 0 05 In conclusion DMCs demonstrated excellent results at mid-term follow-up in terms of prevention of instability and stable cemented fixation

How to Cite

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen, Ismael Aunon-Martin, & VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz. (2014). Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup. Global Journal of Medical Research, 14(H1), 31–36. Retrieved from https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/656

Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup

Published

2014-01-15