Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen; Ismael Aunon-Martin; VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz

Authors

Ainhoa Toro-Ibarguen
Ismael Aunon-Martin
VerAnica Jimenez-DAaz

Keywords:

total hip arthroplasty, revision total hip arthroplasty, hip instability, hip dislocation, dual mobility cup, reinforcement cage device

Abstract

The current study evaluated the outcome of a retrospective series of 37 revision total hip arthroplasties with severe acetabular bone defects reconstruction using an antiprotrusio cage. We aimed to compare the peri and postoperative complications and mid-term outcomes of two groups, a reconstruction using a dual mobility cup (DMC) cemented into the cage (n=14) or a cemented simple polyethylene cup (SPEC) (n=23) at a mean follow-up of 5 years. We found an inverse association between the use of DMCs and both dislocation rate (p

Downloads

How to Cite

Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup. (2014). Global Journal of Medical Research, 14(H1), 31-36. https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/656

Download Citation

References

Julien Wegrzyn, Andrew Thoreson, Olivier Guyen, David Lewallen, Kai‐nan An (2013) Cementation of a dual‐mobility acetabular component into a well‐fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: A biomechanical validation. 31(6), 991-997.

Wayne Paprosky, Paul Perona, Jeffrey Lawrence (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. 9(1), 33-44.

R Merle D'aubigné (1970) Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 56, 481-486.

De Lee, J Charnley, J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. 121, 20-32.

C Ranawat, L Dorr, A Inglis (1980) Total hip arthroplasty in protrusion acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. 62, 1059-1065.

R Conn, Lfa Paterson, R Stauffer (1985) Long-Term Results of Acetabular Reconstruction Using Impaction Bone Grafting and a Cemented Cup. 9, 306-325.

Neil Sheth, Charles Nelson, Bryan Springer, Thomas Fehring, Wayne Paprosky (2013) Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management. 21(3), 128-139.

Antonio Coscujuela-Mañá, Francesc Angles, Carles Tramunt, Xavier Casanova (2010) Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. 20(Suppl. 7), 112-118.

O Guyen, V Pibarot, G Vaz (2009) Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability. 467, 465.

O Guyen, D Lewallen, M Cabanela (2008) Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants. 90, 1553-1560.

R Philippot, F Farizon, J Camilleri (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. 94, 23-e27.

Moussa Hamadouche, David Biau, Denis Huten, Thierry Musset, François Gaucher (2010) The Use of a Cemented Dual Mobility Socket to Treat Recurrent Dislocation. 468(12), 3248-3254.

F Langlais, M Ropars, F Gaucher (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. 466, 389-395.

L Schneider, R Phillipot, B Boyer, F Farizon (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstrcuction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. 97, 807-813.