Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Acetabular Reconstruction using an Antiprotrusio Cage and a Cemented Dual Mobility Cup or Simple Polyethylene Cup
Keywords:
total hip arthroplasty, revision total hip arthroplasty, hip instability, hip dislocation, dual mobility cup, reinforcement cage device
Abstract
The current study evaluated the outcome of a retrospective series of 37 revision total hip arthroplasties with severe acetabular bone defects reconstruction using an antiprotrusio cage We aimed to compare the peri and postoperative complications and mid-term outcomes of two groups a reconstruction using a dual mobility cup DMC cemented into the cage n 14 or a cemented simple polyethylene cup SPEC n 23 at a mean follow-up of 5 years We found an inverse association between the use of DMCs and both dislocation rate p 0 05 and dislocation undergoing revision p 0 05 No aseptic loosening was found in the DMC-group and there were no differences in the rest of the complications between the DMC-group and the SPEC-group p 0 05 In conclusion DMCs demonstrated excellent results at mid-term follow-up in terms of prevention of instability and stable cemented fixation
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
Published
2014-01-15
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.